Archive edit

Generalissmus Suvorov byl v listopadu 1800 již půl roku po smrti.

No a? Pravděpodobně míříte na tento obrázek. Římské číslice Vám něco říkají? --Daniel Baránek (talk) 21:14, 26 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Protestant - Svídnice edit

Dobrý den, smím-li, užiji dnes na 'cs.wiki' na hesle 'Svídnice' nějaká Vaše fota, ano? Žádné zde ve fotogalerii zatím nemáme, tak bych tam nějaké dnes dal, vložil. Líbí se mi 'Rynek'. Máte-li nějaké jiné, můžete nám na tamějším hesle 'pomoci'. Jste vítán. S pozdravem --Protestant (talk) 14:24, 13 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Josef Bertl edit

Ahoj, díky moc za nahrání portrétů Josefa Bertla. Dovolím si osobní názor: 1. myslím, že není nutno překlápět z Langhansova archivu všechny varianty. 2. pokud je na Commons méně kvalitní verze souboru, pak bych se přimlouval za to, aby se méně kvalitní soubor nahradil kvalitnějším a nikoliv pro to, aby se to dublovalo. Proto jsem File:Josef Bertl.jpg navrhl na smazání. Zdraví --Gampe (talk) 10:31, 23 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Fotografie edit

Dobrý den, Vaši fotku jsme použili zde, moc děkujeme.

B. Žemličková

http://www.praha.cz/zpravy-z-prahy/praha-6-je-proti-vystavbe-na-dzbanu-v-sarce-vedeni-radnice-zaslalo-dopis-primatorce

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2015 в Україні. Увага! Опитування / Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Ukraine. Survey edit

 

Вітаємо!

8 липня 2015 року вийшов закон №122-ЗРК/2015 «Про внесення змін до Закону Республіки Крим ”Про об'єкти культурного спадку в Республіці Крим”», яким об'єкти культурної спадщини Криму було визнано такими, що підлягають державній охороні Російської Федерації. Спираючись на це, НП «Вікімедіа РУ» та спільнота російських учасників вікіпроектів цього року проводить щорічний фотоконкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки» в Росії уже із Кримом у своїх конкурсних списках. Просимо висловитися щодо того, якою, на Вашу думку, має бути українська частина. Також Ви можете висловити Ваші ідеї щодо поліпшення конкурсу.Опитування за лінком / Survey is here.

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» / сторінка на Вікісховищі. 20:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Věková struktura České hinduistické náboženské společnosti v České republice roku 2011 edit

Dobrý den,rád bych použil vaši statistiku hinduistického náboženství k tvorbě vzdělávací prezentace.Děkuji předem. Pokud míníte prezentaci vidět,rád vám jí pošlu mailem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomáš Laštuvička (talk • contribs) 19:55, 31 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

fotografie Tesák sjezdovka edit

Dobrý večer pane Baránku,

jelikož jste na Wikipedii žádal o zprávu v případě půjčení Vaší fotografie, splňuji toto přání. Tím bych Vám chtěla napsat, že si vaši fotografii půjčuji pro článek, který bude uveřejněn na stránkách Generace 21 (www.generace21.cz).

S přáním pěkného večera,

Nela Rájová

fotografie Hostýn edit

Dobrý večer,

stejně jako jinou fotografii (psala jsem Vám) si půjčuji pro stejný článek i tuto fotografii.

Děkuji moc,

N.R

Určitě, nechť vám slouží. Děkuji za zprávu. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 07:49, 25 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Category:Kingdom_of_Bohemia_(1848-1918) edit

 

Kingdom of Bohemia (1848-1918) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Zoupan (talk) 00:42, 17 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

Subdivisions of the Czechoslovak Republic (1918–1938) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Zoupan (talk) 01:02, 2 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Category:Richard Crane (diplomat) edit

Ahoj, navrhl jsem kategorii na smaz, protože je prázdná. Předpokládám, že jsi ji založil s nějakým obsahem, který byl zřejmě smazán. Zdraví.--Kacir (talk) 01:32, 17 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Jasně. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 05:47, 17 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
 
File:Čortkiv, chrám.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mykola Vasylechko 12:14, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey edit

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey edit

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open! edit

 

Dear Daniel Baránek,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Leningrad Codex edit

Hello, one question, please. Since the Leningrad Codex is a complete Hebrew Bible manuscript, in handwriting on parchment, why would Wikimedia Commons delete the category "Hebrew manuscripts" on an image showing one page taken from this manuscript? Is there something that I should know, and, thereby, avoid making future mistakes by using the same category?Davidbena (talk) 18:40, 29 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks for asking. Did You read Commons:Overcat? File:LeningradCodex text.jpg is in Category:Codex Leningradensis > Category:Hebrew Bible manuscripts. The file should be only in the most specific category, otherwise the Category:Hebrew Bible manuscripts would be full of content and it would be very hard to find there something. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 05:37, 30 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Community Insights Survey edit

RMaung (WMF) 01:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey edit

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey edit

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Jews in the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Buidhe (talk) 06:13, 28 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Frydek synagoga po vyhoreni.jpg edit

 
File:Frydek synagoga po vyhoreni.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Buidhe (talk) 22:23, 29 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Antonín Bořek-Dohalský.jpg edit

 
File:Antonín Bořek-Dohalský.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Buidhe (talk) 10:48, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Austrian Silesia edit

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_Silesia#/media/File:%C3%96sterreichisch-Schlesien_1746_en.svg

Hi, I wanted to ask you if you know about logic that motivated Austrians to keep Austrian Silesia and its actual borders. Do you know why they kept exactly that parts?

Cautious (talk) 15:58, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Ancient_latin_scripts edit

 

Ancient latin scripts has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:01, 25 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Přihlaste své fotky do Czech Wiki Photo 2020! edit

 
Czech Wiki Photo

Milí fotografové a editoři projektů Wikimedia,

každý rok společně nahrajete na Commons tisíce svobodných fotografií. Chceme vám všem poděkovat a také vás ocenit. Vyberte ty nejlepší z vašich fotek a přihlaste je do 30. 10. 2020 do soutěže Czech Wiki Photo 2020! Soutěž je otevřená i úplným nováčkům. Autoři tří nejlepších fotek si odnesou vouchery do Foto Škoda a speciální wiki-odznaky. Přihlášené fotky bude hodnotit i Honza Rybář, držitel Czech Press Photo.

Baví vás focení pro Commons i mimo soutěže? Staňte se fotografem Wikimedie, půjčujeme fototechniku a proplácíme cesty - více na Fotíme Česko.

Těšíme se na vaše snímky!
Za spolek Wikimedia Česká republika
Jakub Holzer
jakub.holzer@wikimedia.cz -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Jewish_Medieval_history edit

 

Jewish Medieval history has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 19:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:History_of_Prague_(1848-1918) edit

 

History of Prague (1848-1918) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Josh (talk) 19:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open! edit

 
2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open! edit

 

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:28, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Deletion policy edit

Hi, I've deleted File:Zatisi kniha lebeda.jpg as a copyright violation as you requested, but please:

Thanks! Jaqen (talk) 07:27, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Kamjanec Podilskij, katedrála, zahrada.jpg edit

 
File:Kamjanec Podilskij, katedrála, zahrada.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:12, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Smazání fotek z Hartmanické synagogy edit

Ano, máte pravdu, vámi označené fotky zřejmě porušují (C), takže souhlasím s jejich smazáním. Jirka Dl (talk) 19:19, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Intergovernmental_relations edit

 

Intergovernmental relations has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribs) 13:24, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply