Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Dbalinov!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Question

edit

Hi, I have seen you create {{Government.bg}}. Could you point out where can you find the CC license on the website? A1Cafel (talk) 10:38, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, you can find it described here: https://www.government.bg/bg/administratsia/pomoshtna-informatsia . This link is also part of the uppre box of the template government.bg Dbalinov (talk) 05:33, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your opinion about OpenRefine and its Wikimedia Commons features: two (!) surveys

edit

Hi! You have recently tried/used Wikimedia Commons features in OpenRefine (uploading files, or editing existing files). I'm curious to hear how this has gone, also if you only briefly tried these features.

To help the OpenRefine team with future improvements, it would be immensely helpful if you would be willing to spend a bit of time filling in two surveys. (Yes, two! Each of them uses a different method and (open source) platform). Both will run until approximately end October 2023.

  1. A first, classical, survey (fully anonymous) where you can tell us how you use the Commons features in OpenRefine, and how you (want to) learn to use them better;
  2. A second, more experimental survey (also fully anonymous) in which you prioritize the features that matter most to you. This second survey is a bit strange in that you can 'just keep clicking'. Feel free to use it as long or as briefly as you want; you can stop any time. Please also add your own suggestions!

Many thanks! With kind regards, SFauconnier (talk) 18:34, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Template:Parliament.bg

edit
 
Template:Parliament.bg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 11:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Masur I appreciate your concerns regarding the licensing status of the content on the Bulgarian Parliament's website.
However, after carefully considering the information provided in the "Terms and conditions", I completely agree with the answer of Pelajanela.
The clarification from the copyright information page of the National Assembly clearly indicates:
  • The National Assembly of Bulgaria keeps the rights only for the software.
  • that the content on the website (text, pictures, video and other visual elements in the portal) can be used freely, with citation required.
Therefore, I believe that marking the files as Creative Commons licensed is indeed appropriate, as it aligns with the stated terms of use on the website.
Thank you for raising this issue and allowing for further clarification. Dbalinov (talk) 13:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Bogdan Bogdanov.jpg

edit
 
File:Bogdan Bogdanov.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--Masur (talk) 16:20, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Masur The image you deleted actually has the correct copyrights rules. I am really strict when uploading images.
You can see the actual page with wayback machine link . The copyright rules are in the following page of the same web site. As it's stated:
"The content of the website of the Ministry of Economy and Industry can be used freely, unless it is explicitly stated that it is subject to protection under the current Law on copyright and related rights. - Therefore, the use of textual content, photos, video materials and other visual elements found on the page is public and requires only citation."
The copyright mark in the footer is for the software itself
- "The software providing the functionality of this website and its design are subject to copyright."
Can you please consider reverting back the deleted image? Dbalinov (talk) 16:34, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply