User talk:Docu

  • For more talk, see page history.
  • For bot related questions, please use the bot's talk page.

Category:Portraits_with_2_personsEdit

Mjrmtg (talk) 13:16, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Category:Group_portraits_with_3_personsEdit

Mjrmtg (talk) 13:17, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Clocking inEdit

I've created Commons:Clock with your clock template. I hope that's alright; I wanted a shorthand URL to send people to since I mention it often. Regards, --SJ+ 23:04, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Farewell?Edit

Hi Docu, I notice you haven't been around recently. I hope everything is ok. Best wishes for whatever you have moved on to, and thank you for your huge contributions to Commons over the years. --99of9 (talk) 02:35, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Category:Orion_(ship)Edit

Motacilla (talk) 23:31, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Category:Rotorua_(ship)Edit

Motacilla (talk) 14:29, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Category:Cornwall_(ship)Edit

Motacilla (talk) 21:34, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Category:Arcadia_(ship)Edit

Motacilla (talk) 07:27, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Category:Kitala_(ship)Edit

Motacilla (talk) 09:14, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Category:Arahura_(ship)Edit

Motacilla (talk) 18:56, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Category:IMO_9387085Edit

47.64.48.246 18:47, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Category:Ships_with_pennant_number_0Edit

116.0.139.87 09:30, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Category:Ships_built_at_Carrington,_TomagoEdit

AussieLegend () 12:33, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

not even able to...Edit

Your assistance please...Edit

You created Category:Pearl Mist (ship, 2009). News reports seem to say she was launched in June 2014. Can you help me sort that out? Geo Swan (talk) 02:36, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Ah, never mind. It was the Inaugural voyage that was in 2014. Legal disputes kept the ship from sailing, for years. Mystery solved. Geo Swan (talk) 02:42, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Commons bot inactivityEdit

Hello! Your bot has been listed at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag 4 as being inactive for over two years. As a housekeeping measure we'd like to remove the bot flag from inactive bot accounts, unless you expect the bot will be operated again in the near future. If you consent to the removal of the bot flag (or do not reply on the deflag page) you can rerequest the bot flag at Commons:Bots/Requests should you need it again. Regards --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Category:Equestrian_statues_by_percentage_of_imageEdit

Achim (talk) 19:50, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Commons:IMO sourcesEdit

  Commons:IMO sources has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

2607:FB90:6C9D:49E2:9FE6:CA65:8894:E8B3 07:52, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Equestrian statueEdit

  Template:Equestrian statue has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Achim (talk) 16:24, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Docu".