Open main menu
Welcome to the Commons, Edoderoo!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | تۆرکجه | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | भोजपुरी | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | català | нохчийн | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | euskara | estremeñu | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | galego | עברית | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk | occitan | Ирон | polski | português | português do Brasil | rumantsch | română | русский | sicilianu | Scots | سنڌي | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | українська | اردو | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Hi edoderoo. This is Bengt Nyman talking about nominations for deletion of some of my images: Why Edoderoo ?? Other People have been uploading my images from my Flickr site (>250) to Wikimedia Commons for years. Why should my own uploading require a different license ?? Please explain yourself. ALSO: Please do not send me messages from an email address that do not accept answers !! Bengt Nyman

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines



Contents

File:Michael van peel-1481045120.jpgEdit

Hi, this file lacks an OTRS ticket number.    FDMS  4    13:41, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Fixed, this happens every once in a twenty images we process, most info is passed over automatically, but the ticket number. Thanks for letting me know! Edoderoo (talk) 14:10, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Two more:

Thanks,    FDMS  4    21:29, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Fixed, thanks for letting me know! Edoderoo (talk) 06:24, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Nasrdin-dchar-1360145485.jpgEdit

 
File:Nasrdin-dchar-1360145485.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Natuur12 (talk) 20:31, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

ticket:2016122510005646Edit

Hi Edoderoo... you apparently treated this ticket, but it is not in a Permissions queue - could you please move it as appropriate? Thank you, Storkk (talk) 09:14, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

The ticket is in the info-nl::wikiportret queue, where we handle (and usually keep) all our wikiportet-related images. In which queue would you prefer it, and for what reason? Edoderoo (talk) 09:23, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Commons OTRS agents have to be able to check the OTRS tickets for media on Commons regardless of which external queues they have permissions for, so it is my understanding that best practice involves moving tickets to Permissions-commons after they have been dealt with. For this specific image, could you please confirm that it was explicitly declared to be a self-portrait? Thanks, Storkk (talk) 09:35, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
We have thousands of images in this wikiportret-queue, and even if I move them to permissions-nl I'm afraid you still can not see the ticket(s). So if you believe this is an issue, you better have that discussion at a higher level in the hierarchie, as I do not believe we are going to manually move every ticket once it has been dealt with by the Dutch agents.
About the selfie. Yes, the user declared undoubedly that it is a selfie, altough it didn't look like one at first sight. It might be that the user is not telling us the truth, because the user wanted this image to be uploaded in order to replace another image he didn't like. But we didn't know this yet, when the image was uploaded, that turned out later on in the process. Right now the article has no image at all, because the same user kept deleting the image on the article "based on portrait right", although there ain't no portret right as such in The Netherlands that can prevent Wikipedia from displaying a decent photo. Edoderoo (talk) 09:59, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
This is now tangential, but any idea why they uploaded the photo in the first place, then? And why nlwiki is allowing a user to repeatedly remove an image from an article? Very strange.
At first they wanted another image, but their uploaded image was reverted because the other one was better according to the community. Now we have two images under a free license, and none of them are shown right now. But anyone can place them back, and at some moment that will be done, I expect. Edoderoo (talk) 12:38, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
With regards to the ultimate location of tickets for permissions of Commons-hosted media, this has been discussed many times in the past with regards to different queues. I don't want to step on your collective toes, though, and if it relates to thousands of tickets, this should indeed probably be discussed at a higher level, perhaps moving wikiportret from an info-nl subqueue to a permissions subqueue. I will start a discussion on OTRSwiki and ping you there. Storkk (talk) 12:32, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Good idea, thanks! Edoderoo (talk) 12:38, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

OTRS licenties, CC-BY-SA-4.0?Edit

Beste Edo,

Alles kits? Dat hoop ik. Vraagje: Commons:OTRS/nl verwijst in de modelverklaring voor de auteursrechten naar Commons:Choosing_a_license/nl#Bekende_vrije_licenties. Daar staat CC-BY-SA-4.0 niet bij, foutje? (Heb zaterdag een donatie opgeladen, waarvan ik de donor heb gevraagd die verklaring, dan maar voor CC-BY-SA-3.0, op te sturen naar OTRS.) Bedankt en vriendelijke groet, Hansmuller (talk) 10:11, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

"Volgens mij is die pagina sinds 2012 niet meer bijgewerkt, en was 3.0 destijds de laatste versie. Je kunt jouw contact prima adviseren om versie 4.0 te gebruiken, maar versie 3.0 kan ook. Er zijn wel verschillen tussen al die versies, maar volgens mij is dat voor komma-n**k*rs en/of juristen, voor meer pragmatisch ingestelde mensen werkt het allemaal even goed. Edoderoo (talk) 11:42, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Ik adviseer altijd CC-BY-SA-4.0 - dat is het punt niet - volgens die officiële pagina mag dat dus NIET. Het ging me om het bijwerken, kun jij dat doen? (dank, ik dacht dat ik dat niet mocht doen), 4.0 staat er nu nog steeds niet bij. Hansmuller (talk) 08:55, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

OTRS-goedkeuring op Category:Aerial photographs from Nederlands Instituut voor Militaire Historie uploaded in 2017?Edit

Nu ik je toch schrijf, de meeste NIMH-luchtfoto's hebben je OTRS-goedkeuring niet gekregen, misschien omdat ik gelijktijdig met jouw bewerking toevallig ook VisualFileChange op dezelfde categorie losliet... (Ik kopieerde vroeger zelf de goedkeuring op de bestanden nadat een voorbeeldfile was goedgekeurd, maar dat mag niet meer begreep ik.) Kun je het nog eens proberen? Dank!, Hansmuller (talk) 08:55, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Ik zie het. Het zal niet alleen komen door jouw ge-edit, ik zie nu dat ik wat betere zoek-en-vervang's in VisualFileChange moet maken. Het kost me nu alleen al heel veel tijd om iedere keer na een reload alle afbeeldingen in het scherm te krijgen (door een volle minuut naar beneden te blijven scrollen). Maar goed, er krijgen er nu steeds meer een toestemmingssjabloon. Edoderoo (talk) 10:02, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Volgens mij laatste telling hebben er 0 het sjabloon OTRS pending en hebben ze alle 1144 mijn naam. Dan is het volgens mij nu compleet! Edoderoo (talk) 10:46, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Foto Joke Buis door Michael TerlouwEdit

Er is inmiddels toestemming gegeven dat loopt via de lijn, alleen nu staat er plots bestand kan worden verwijderd.. vind dit vrij apart omdat het pas na 7 dagen kan (aangegeven). dag 28september status, de status botst dus een beetje in mijn hoofd.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Massair (talk • contribs) 09:33, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
De afbeelding is gemaakt door Michael Terlouw, dat staat ook elders op het internet. Maar de afbeelding is geupload door iemand anders (Massair), en het is a) onduidelijk onder welke licentie het bestand valt (licentie ja is geen licentie, en die wordt niet ondersteund door Wikimedia) en b) is niet duidelijk waar/hoe/waarvoor toestemming is gegeven en aan wie. Wikimedia heeft eenduidig toestemming van de fotograaf nodig om de licentie onder een ccbysa-licentie te mogen verspreiden. Dat "Massair" ja antwoord op de opmerking permission is daarvoor niet voldoende. U geeft aan dat toestemming is gegeven via de lijn, maar dat is niet iets wat ik begrijp. Edoderoo (talk) 09:57, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Foto Jolien JanzingEdit

Dit is al de tweede maal dat deze foto werd verwijderd. Jolien Janzing zelf heeft bevestigd dat ik de toelating had om deze foto te publiceren. Dit is een paar jaar geleden gebeurd. Moet ik nu nog eens die bevestiging vragen? —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.211.139.112 (talk) 14:01, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Janzing heeft helemaal niets te vertellen over de auteursrechten van de foto, dus die hoef je ook niets te vragen. Die toestemming moet je aan de fotograaf vragen. Maar *jij* hebt die afbeelding geupload als eigen werk, daarmee heb je duidelijk ook niet de waarheid verteld. Ik zou voorstellen deze foto nu lekker te vergeten, en inderdaad zelf met een camera op pad te gaan om een foto van Jolien Janzing te gaan maken. Je geeft aan met haar contact te hebben, dan kan het zo moeilijk ook niet zijn. Edoderoo (talk) 15:41, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Artworks by Maxim SukharevEdit

Could you handle the OTRS ticket:2018031210013951?

It is for the following files:

Also see the previous discussion.

The author has sent his permission to upload them on 13 May. I can't understand why the case has not yet been processed while others, more recent ones, are quickly processed.--Eckhardt Etheling (talk) 12:37, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

If you can, please also handle the ticket:2018042710011656. Thank you.--Eckhardt Etheling (talk) 12:42, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

PS: I asked the same intervention to user 0x010C. See here.--Eckhardt Etheling (talk) 15:30, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

It seems that the permission at OTRS is sufficient, but you need a sysop to restore the files, and I'm not a sysop at OTRS (the two times I applied for this it was denied, because the other sysops believed I was too inactive?). I can not handle this for you, so you'll need to get in touch with a user that is a sysop as well. Edoderoo (talk) 15:35, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Ok, thank you, I will ask an OTRS volunteer & sysop to restore the files. Could you check ticket:2018042710011656 and ticket:2018042710011549? These are already uploaded and do not need to be restored.--Eckhardt Etheling (talk) 17:15, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
The first one is missing some important past in the declaration: that the website is the holder of the full copyright, and/or photographer/creator of the images. Now it is not sure if the website just has a license to use the images, or if they made the pictures themselves, but for the release of the images this is always important. The best way to get a good declaration is to use the template on Commons:OTRS#Declaration_of_consent_for_all_enquiries, so we are also sure that the person releasing the rights on the images clearly understands what they are actually releasing. This will avoid discussions afterwards, when people 'suddenly' do not want others to edit the photo's, or that they are used in a commercial setting. The text in the link will make that all clear. The second ticket I read as I am the owner, although the text is actually multi-interpretable. For those few images I have put the ticket number to the images. Edoderoo (talk) 17:34, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
I think that the website (i.e., ССО СРВ) is the holder of the full copyright, not just of the license, as the entire website's content is under the copyright "ССО СРВ ©1997-2018 При использовании материала ссылка на сайт обязательна", trans. "When using the material, a link to the site is required"), and in any case the material author is a constituent member of ССО СРВ. In the original message I linked both the website on which the images would have been uploaded (Wikimedia Commons) and the license content (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/) which is quite explicit. In any case, I will ask Anastasia (the website's administrator) to send a corroboration herself.--Eckhardt Etheling (talk) 19:24, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Veerle dobbelaere-1450102584.jpgEdit

 
File:Veerle dobbelaere-1450102584.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

2A02:A03F:4895:2C00:223:6CFF:FE8A:3971 11:42, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Ola-Calippo-IMG 20180723 122547859.jpgEdit

 
File:Ola-Calippo-IMG 20180723 122547859.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yours sincerely, Ies (talk) 13:31, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Myra koomen-1523781286.jpgEdit

Hi, apparently the OTRS ticket # got lost somewhere for File:Myra koomen-1523781286.jpg.    FDMS  4    19:38, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Fixed, thanks for letting me know. Every once in a while I forget to copy/paste this info, and it doesn't help that it is usually just outside sight one line below the visible area of the edit window. But it's fairly easy (for me) to find back the right ticket and fill it in. Edoderoo (talk) 20:07, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

File:ContraPoints.jpgEdit

Hi! How can you add permission template without answering to the ticket on the OTRS platform? I have added OTRS received template instead. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:24, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Well, you didn't answer the OTRS-ticket either. As you overruled me, I assume you will take care of it now? Edoderoo (talk) 11:39, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

License reviewEdit

Kan je misschien naar deze foto's kijken? File:Fake flash USB drives flash memory side.jpg, File:Fake flash USB drives controller side.jpg en File:182365-c.jpg. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:47, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Als jij de maker van de foto's bent, lijkt het me geen enkel probleem. Maar vraag het beter aan een actieveling op Commons, zoals Natuur12. Ik deed alleen voor OTRS dingen op Commons, maar ik ben weg bij OTRS. Edoderoo (talk) 11:00, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Je bent dus geen license reviewer meer? Volgens Special:UserRights/Edoderoo nog wel. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:04, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Ik heb het iig aan Ellywa gevraagd (ik val Natuur12 al best vaak lastig dus ik vraag iemand anders  ). Als je geen license reviews meer doet is het misschien een idee om te verzoeken uit die groep te worden gehaald. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:15, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Ik denk dat dat bitjes zijn, die je krijgt omdat je vanuit de gemeenschap een bepaald vertrouwen geniet, en/of dat geautomatiseerd kan worden controleerd of je wel/niet aan licenties-velden "mag prutsen". Niet zozeer dat ik heb aangegeven heb dat het mijn hobby is ;-) Edoderoo (talk) 11:18, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Zeker niet. Je moet er echt om vragen. Ik zie dit:
"12:29, 15 February 2014 Jcb (talk | contribs) changed group membership for Edoderoo from OTRS-member to OTRS-member, rollbacker, confirmed user, file mover and image reviewer (Trusted user, sitting right in front of me at the moment) (thank)"
Nu was je al OTRS-member, maar toch, de vaardigheden die je nodig hebt voor license review zijn net ietsje anders (al overlapt het ook wel). Ik ga het navragen. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:46, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Delete request onterechtEdit

Je hebt voor drie van de bestanden die ik heb ge-upload een delete request gestuurd omdat de licentie niet zou kloppen. Er zou geen bewijs zijn dat de bron toestemming geeft. Alle bestanden die ik upload komen van www.zuiderzeecollectie.nl en als je bij de objecten even wat beter kijkt bij de detailpagina zie je dat de objecten zijn vrijgegeven onder licentie cc by sa 4.0. De fotograaf maakt alleen een reproductie en kan daaraan dus geen rechten ontlenen, maar ook met hem zijn afspraken gemaakt waardoor de werken op de zuiderzeecollectie onder die licentie beschikbaar zijn.

Mijn nadrukkelijke verzoek is dat je de delete-requests ongedaan maakt en in de toekomst geen delete requests meer op mijn uploads vanuit zuiderzeecollectie.nl plaatst. Er zijn wikipedianen die met deze afbeeldingen aan de slag gaan in artikelen, dit is zeer storend. Bij voorbaat dank.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by SuyderSee (talk • contribs) 08:50, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
De fotograaf heeft wel degelijk rechten, dus blijkbaar heb je van licenties geen kaas gegeten. Discussie over de nominaties kun je daarom beter bij de nominatie doen, in plaats van bij mij. Edoderoo (talk) 09:05, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Zie https://www.auteursrecht.nl/ik-ben-maker/Fotograaf en dit is zo met de fotograaf afgesproken anders mag het Zuiderzeemuseum het nooit zo publiceren. informeer voortaan anders even bij het museum voordat je een foto van wikimedia delete. Je kunt er namelijk nog veel meer vinden op commons als je zoekt want ze zijn gewoon over CC-BY licentie beschikbaar. Ik kan nu niets meer doen aan het deleten van de afbeeldingen maar val mij voortaan alsjeblieft niet meer lastig met delete requests voordat je goed je onderzoek hebt gedaan!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by SuyderSee (talk • contribs) 16:00, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Jouw link vertelt helemaal niets over het museum. Bij de foto's die jij hebt geupload staat niet (of niet duidelijk) vermeldt waarom de foto vrij van rechten is. Dat jij allerhande websites hebt gevonden die, als je die vrij interpreteert, alle foto's in de wereld als "goed voor Wikipedia" bestempeld, is iets dat je met de commons-sysops mag bediscussieren. Edoderoo (talk) 16:13, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Vopo's Friggin in the Riggin 2017.jpgEdit

This media has been deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | hrvatski | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Tiếng Việt | +/−


 
A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Vopo's Friggin in the Riggin 2017.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial ( ), No derivative works ( ), or All Rights Reserved ( ), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as   (CC BY),     (CC BY-SA) or   (CC0) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

E-mailadres voor het uploaden van foto'sEdit

Beste Edo, Ik heb weer eens een fotograaf gevonden die bereid is om wat foto's aan Wikipedia af te staan. Wat is tegenwoordig het e-mailadres waarnaar hij zijn foto's kan opsturen? Graag je reactie, waarvoor op voorhand mijn dank. Groet, Piet.Wijker (talk) 19:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Een mogelijkheid is dat via www.wikiportret.nl te doen, ook als het geen portretten zijn. Maar zelf uploaden op Commons mag ook, en een verklaring van nl:Wikipedia:OTRS/Standaardmail naar info-nl@wikimedia.org of permissions-nl@wikimedia.org opsturen samen met de foto's kan ook. Edoderoo (talk) 19:35, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Oké, dank je wel. Ik weet genoeg. Groet, Piet.Wijker (talk) 14:33, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Foto's Yvonne van DorpEdit

Beste Edo, zojuist heb ik 2 foto's van Yvonne van Dorp toegevoegd, die op 3 febr. jl. door de maker ervan, Conno du Fossé, per e-mail zijn aangeboden voor publicatie op Wikipedia. Kun jij er de noodzakelijke OTRS-goedkeuringstickets aan toevoegen? Bij voorbaat mijn hartelijke dank. Groet, Piet.Wijker (talk) 20:01, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

@Jcb, And: @Ellywa, Too: - Kunnen jullie voor mij de OTRS-templates toevoegen? Piet, ik ben sinds een paar maanden geen OTRS-er meer. Wellicht over een paar maanden weer wel ;-) Edoderoo (talk) 06:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  Done. Bijzonder mooie foto's! Elly (talk) 09:47, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!Edit

Dear Edoderoo,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Maureen-vanherberghen-1419647808.jpgEdit

 
File:Maureen-vanherberghen-1419647808.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

2A02:1811:2D1C:2600:2863:47E0:C380:4A21 23:07, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Edoderoo".