Frohlinde von Berg
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:39, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:1925, Haus Dr. Zapf,Köln.jpg
editThis media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:1925, Haus Dr. Zapf,Köln.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:1931, Herstatt-Haus, kompr.jpg
- File:Domter.1949, Technischer Schnitt, mini.JPG
- File:Domterrassen0079, mini.JPG
- File:Haus Zapf, Köln,Grundriss.jpg
- File:Häuser Hültzstr., kompr.jpg
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 02:15, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Ich habe die Dateien "Haus Dr. Zapf" und "Haus Zapf, Grundriss", "Domterrassen 1949" und "Domterrassen ,Techn. Schnitt" bearbeitet und gespeichert. Bei den Häusern Hültzstr. und Herstatt-Haus muss ich noch nach dem Fotografen forschen. Die mögen also erstmal gelöscht werden.--Frohlinde von Berg (talk) 14:31, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted content
edit
File:1925, Haus Dr. Zapf,Köln.jpg
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.And also:
- File:1931, Herstatt-Haus, kompr.jpg
- File:Domter.1949, Technischer Schnitt, mini.JPG
- File:Domterrassen0079, mini.JPG
- File:Haus Zapf, Köln,Grundriss.jpg
- File:Häuser Hültzstr., kompr.jpg
Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:56, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Besatzungs(Offiziers)Haus, Marienburg, Auf dem Römerberg 4.tif
editThis media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Besatzungs(Offiziers)Haus, Marienburg, Auf dem Römerberg 4.tif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Genre building right.jpg
- File:Mevissenhaus, BreitestraßeGertrudenstraße, 1949.tif
- File:Rhein-Radio, Habsburger Ring 28, 1950.tif
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:52, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted content
edit
File:Besatzungs(Offiziers)Haus, Marienburg, Auf dem Römerberg 4.tif
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.And also:
- File:Genre building right.jpg
- File:Mevissenhaus, BreitestraßeGertrudenstraße, 1949.tif
- File:Rhein-Radio, Habsburger Ring 28, 1950.tif
Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:54, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:1946, Domterrassen, 2 Schnitte (2), 50p.c.tif
editThis media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:1946, Domterrassen, 2 Schnitte (2), 50p.c.tif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
Yours sincerely, Scoopfinder(d) 10:00, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
- Hallo Scoopfinder, mit Email vom 23.09.2015 an permissions-de@wikimedia.org habe ich schriftliche Nachweise über meine Erbenstellung als Tochter des Architekten Hermann von Berg, Urhebers der Grafiken zur Domplanung in Köln, vorgelegt. Ich denke, damit ist der verlangte Nachweis erbracht, und zwar sowohl für die beiden Schnitte wie auch für die Vogelschau-Zeichnung. Kann nun der Hinweis auf der Wikipedia-Seite oben links in Rot nicht gelöscht werden? Ich schaffe das nicht. FvB 16:26, 16 December 2021 (UTC)