Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Fuji kyosuke!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 08:23, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Image without licenseEdit

File:ピッチパイプ (円形).jpegEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 12:05, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:ピッチパイプ (円形).jpgEdit

Català | Deutsch | English | فارسی | 日本語 | Русский | Slovenščina | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:ピッチパイプ (円形).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:59, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Ronhjones, Pitch pipe isn't a derivative work. It is a utility goods. Fuji kyosuke (talk) 11:40, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

You did not make the object, so it's a derivative Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:05, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Ronhjones, so, you say it's not a utility goods? --Fuji kyosuke (talk) 23:26, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works#Isn't every product copyrighted by someone? What about cars? Or kitchen chairs? My computer case? says "ordinary alarm clocks, dinner plates, gaming consoles— as well as actual, full-scale planes— are not generally copyrightable...." I think pitch pipes are same as these utilitarian objects. Even though you're an admin, please make a satisfactory explanation. --Fuji kyosuke (talk) 03:43, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
I will not be the closing admin. I have my opinion, the closing admin may see it differently. We are in different counties so our opinion of COM:TOO will be different - it's just the degree of originality in the object. Ronhjones  (Talk) 14:07, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Fuji kyosuke".