More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.
Eulenburg deleted fileEdit
Re: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Philipp-Fuerst-von-Eulenburg_%281847-1921%29.jpg We have the same problem (unknown authorship) also for these pictures from the same scandal and the same years:
Philipp zu Eulenburg-Hertefeld.jpg
Moltke, Kuno von (1847-1923) sett 1900 a Costantinopoli - Atelier Walsleben Breslau.jpg
Kuno von Moltke.jpg
- Thanks for the notice. While this is by no means "official" policy, i wouldn't press the first one for example: with a creation date of 1882 it would be unlikely enough (for my preferences), that the author died 70+ years ago (adding 50 years should make this safe enough for all images created before 1893). Also for some pictures it may be possible to claim "PD-anonymous" for Germany. Two facts must be shown: the file has to be published 70+ years ago and there must be some evidence/proof, that the author's name wasn't disclosed in the publication (or they used a pseudonym for an unknown real author). Hope that info helps a bit, but i am not going to nominate those images myself. GermanJoe (talk) 13:21, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- Please remind to always answer on the discussion page of the writer, not on yours, otherwise the writer could now know you answered.
- I know the rules very well, and they apply both on the image you nominated and on those I called your attention upon. Since you don't want to nominate them (why?) I made myself a page with several cases similar to the one you nominated, please cast your vote for their deletion. Thank you.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Unknown_authors_around_1900 --User:G.dallorto (talk) 10:34, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!Edit
|The Original Barnstar|
|Thank you for your rapid and helpful response to my question at the Village Pump. Pleasantville1972 (talk) 03:33, 23 October 2014 (UTC)|
Your VFC installation method is deprecatedEdit
Hello GermanJoe, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Pandit Raghunath Murmu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requestsEdit
This photo is available freely in public domain and I have added this to the Commons for using it in the wiki page titled "Pandit Raghunath Murmu"(the public figure). Just because you found this image at one particular website doesn't mean it is a copyrighted material. This photo is the most popular and the most widely available image of Pandit Raghuram Murmu.
- Hello @Sameerhansda:, as just explained on en-Wiki, modern creative works are copyrighted by default unless their author grants an explicit free license. I am sorry, but you are mixing up "publicly available" and "public domain" (not copyrighted) - these terms are not synonymous. If you need further clarification from other uninvolved editors, I recommend you ask for additional advice at Commons:Village Pump/Copyright. GermanJoe (talk) 06:40, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hello @GermanJoe:, the picture we are talking about is the only photo of Raghuram Murmu available. This is the photo that is used in all websites,seminars, articles, presentations, functions, youtube videos and what not. What can be done to validate this photo?? SameerHansda
- Hello @Sameerhansda:, that's very difficult when images don't have complete information about their author and previous publications. Some necessary details would be: Who created the initial image? The copyright entirely depends on the original creative author (the original photographer or painter) and the first publication, not on any later re-publications by others. Also important: when and where was this image first published? When was it created? As you seem knowledgeable in this topic area, maybe you can provide this required information? Unfortunately all websites I checked lack these basic details. India has a copyright protection between 50 and 60 years after the copyright owner's death or first publication. As Raghunath Murmu died in 1982, it is very likely that the image is still under copyright protection and cannot be used at all. One more important aspect: if the copyright situation cannot be sufficiently clarified, images have to be deleted by default. Commons does not host images with unclear copyright. GermanJoe (talk) 19:16, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Re: Please do not overwrite filesEdit
Hey GermanJoe thank you for the message. I must confess, I thaught nobody would regret the older file. The license is the same for both, I overwrited the older file because its quality is lower than the new one. I am sorry for the mistake, I will stop to upload new files here. Commons rules became too complicated for me, I'll make do with it.wiki. Cheers, --Ombra (talk) 17:42, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hello @Ombra:, overwriting an existing file can be easily fixed. Such minor mistakes happen occasionally, but are really not a big deal - and your contributions are appreciated of course. If you find or create freely licensed images, it would be great if you'd reconsider and continue to upload them here, so they are available for all Wikipedia projects and other re-users. I do hope the previous standard message didn't come across as unintentionally discouraging. In case some Commons rules or copyright cases are unclear, I'd be glad to help with any future questions. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 18:02, 28 December 2017 (UTC)