Rarely on Commons, please text on my Italian talk!


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ombra!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:33, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Marcio Zanchetta 2016.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 16:16, 12 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

@JuTa: It's under the same OTRS ticket I properly used for the others files since 2014. What's up? (Be kind, reply on my Italian talk cause I'm in wikipause and here, I wouldnt read your message for weeks). Cheers, --Ombra (talk) 09:44, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
Yes, but even with OTRS release it needs a valid license template of the copyright holders choice. For a long list of such templates see Commons:Copyright tags. regards. --JuTa 10:11, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
@JuTa: Is it ok? --Ombra (talk) 10:19, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
Looks good now. --JuTa 11:17, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Rogerio Rocha 2016.png

edit

Hello,

The OTRS template - on Commons at least - can only be added by agents to prove that the permission is valid and also covers the file in question.

Unfortunately, the correspondance is in Italian. I ping Delfort to see if he can help me with it and tell me if the file is covered by the permission.

Best regards,

--AntonierCH (d) 20:49, 24 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Delfort: Could you please create a very precise template like Template:Shootzurich that indicates which files are covered or not? Then the users can add them directly without needing an OTRS review. Please update it:Wikipedia:Autorizzazioni_ottenute/DivisioneC5/2014 accordingly as well.   Br, --AntonierCH (d) 20:51, 24 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Hey @AntonierCH: I think I did the same of the last time... But many years have gone by. Maybe Delfort can help us and/or refresh my rusty memory --Ombra (talk) 21:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
I'm not a OTRS user anymore :( --Delfort (talk) 07:45, 25 August 2017 (UTC)Reply


Please do not overwrite files

edit

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  Nederlands (informeel)‎  polski  português  sicilianu  slovenčina  svenska  Türkçe  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  മലയാളം  日本語  中文  עברית  فارسی  +/−


 
I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:Massimo De Luca LC Martina.JPG. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.
  • Hello Ombra, I do not speak Italian but hope you'll see that message. If the image is available under a free license please upload it as a separate file, and provide actual source and license information for the new image. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 07:58, 24 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Divisione Calcio a 5

edit

Ciao, ho creato questo bel template {{Divisionecalcioa5}} da usare al posto della licenza abituale e sopratutto dell'OTRS. quando carichi un file dal sito di Divisione Calcio a 5, nella scelta delle licenze, scegli quella personalizzata (nessuna di quelle indicate qui sopra) e metti questo template. Fai qualche prova e, magari, aggiungilo ai tuoi caricamenti precedenti (alcuni li ho già smistati). Pinga anche gli altri utenti interessati. --Ruthven (msg) 12:31, 21 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

PS: appena carichi il logo, fammi un cenno, che lo aggiungo nel template. --Ruthven (msg) 12:32, 21 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Grazie @Ruthven: , nei prossimi giorni faccio qualche test. Pingo @Beric Dondarrion and Hugo Bibone: per presa visione :) --Ombra (talk) 12:43, 21 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Marcelo Padilha Gonçalves 2019.png

edit
 
File:Marcelo Padilha Gonçalves 2019.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:23, 18 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Ruthven: arrieccoci... Ogni volta la stessa menata --Ombra (talk) 05:25, 19 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Logo AF Firenze C5.svg

edit
 
File:Logo AF Firenze C5.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: NOT a simple logo. Still under copyrights by its rightful owner.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Glorious 93 (talk) 23:54, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Blackcat: si accettano suggerimenti :/ --Ombra (talk) 06:00, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
edit

Copyright status: File:Luca Bergamini 2021.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Luca Bergamini 2021.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:05, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply