Map request edit

Hanno - I will definitely be able to provide you with what you need. Are you looking for a map, or do you need the actual data? Are you wanting something you can take and customize, or something you wish to detail for my creation? :) Rarelibra 20:46, 18 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hei Rarelibra, that's good news! Thanks a lot for your helpfulness. My goal is to produce a map of the (historical) distribution of the Walser language. I have a list of the municipalities/valleys, but don't have a suitable map and am not familiar with producing maps from cartographic data. So what I thought I would need is a raw map, preferably in png format, which shows the area I mentioned (45.5–47.5°N, 6.5–11°E) with national, regional (e.g. canton in Switzerland) plus the lowest-possible level borders. Different colours and/or strengths for different borders would of course make it a bit easier for me. I would not need any more details in the map (such as locations of cities or any names). I then intended to identify the Walser municipalities, give them a different background colour, remove the lowest-level borders, and label some of the areas.
Do you think you could provide such a raw map? That would be great, indeed. Please let me know if you need more details. I am not familiar with drawing maps (although I will manage to manipulate them once they are created...), so I might have forgotten some specifications.
Best wishes, Hanno 11:09, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
PS: I don't need any details on German borders, even though a bit of Germany will be on the map. There haven't been any Walser settlements in Germany, however.
Let me see what I can create for you, and we'll go from there... :) Rarelibra 12:47, 26 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fehler in Karte Zimbern.png edit

Hallo Hanno.

In Deiner Karte Zimbrisch.png (in der deutschen Wikipedia im Artikel Zimbern) scheinen mir die Sieben Gemeinden mit den Dreizehn Gemeinden vertauscht zu sein. Vielleicht magst Du das mal ändern, wenn Du Zeit hast. --84.151.246.176 21:51, 10 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Au wei. Das muss ich mir mal anschauen. Danke fuer den Hinweis! Hanno 10:39, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Hanno, die Sieben Gemeinden und die Dreizehn Gemeinden sind tatsächlich vertauscht. Es wäre schön, wenn Du dies ändern könntest. Ich finde die Karte sehr anschaulich, besonders für Leser, die sich einen Überblick verschaffen wollen. Herzlichen Dank für die Erstellung.

hara1603 8:20, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Ist nunmehr erledigt. Was dauerte, war nicht herauszufinden, dass ich tatsaechlich die Beschriftungen vertauscht hatte, sondern die Zeit fuer die Aenderung der Abbildung zu finden. Danke fuers Lob. Ich bin allerdings ueberhapt kein Fachmann, was das Zimbrische angeht, sondern habe einfach die Information des deutschen WikipediaArtikels visualisiert. Hanno 20:03, 20 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


File:Karte Lage Kanton Basel-Landschaft.png edit

 
File:Karte Lage Kanton Basel-Landschaft.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--MGA73 (talk) 19:38, 12 August 2009 (UTC)Reply


File source is not properly indicated: File:Lazio-Stemma.png edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lazio-Stemma.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Lazio-Stemma.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:52, 20 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:CO2-Temp.png edit

Hallo Hanno,

ich bin gerade über diese Löschdiskussion gestolpert: Commons:Deletion requests/File:CO2-Temp.png. Hast du eine Meinung dazu? Mit diesem Bild hast du ja hohe Wellen ausgelöst :-)

Beste Grüße --Uncopy (talk) 10:14, 6 November 2009 (UTC) ps: ach, und danke übrigens für File:CO2-417k.png!Reply

Hei Uncopy. Meine Meinung dazu tut nichts zur Sache. Gibt es einen gültigen Grund, die Datei zu löschen, sollte sie gelöscht werden; gibt es keinen, sollte sie nicht gelöscht werden. Ich glaube, es ist besser, wenn ich mich als Urheber nicht in diese Entscheidung einmische. (Und was die Wellen angeht, sagt deren Höhe mehr über die DebattantInnen als über das Bild aus.) Hanno (talk) 12:44, 15 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Pseudoscorpion.jpg edit

 
File:Pseudoscorpion.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Images containing permission grants only to the Wikimedia Commons, Wikipedia, or Wikimedia are considered non-free. --Kaldari (talk) 22:04, 8 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for lateness.. regarding question of question "Breast with large areolas.jpg." edit

I was 19 or 20 when that was taken. Ill add that to description thank you.

File:RomanCatholicismInEurope.png edit

 
File:RomanCatholicismInEurope.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Grsd (talk) 11:13, 20 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Xor.png edit

 
File:Xor.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kopiersperre (talk) 21:31, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:CO2-Temp.png edit

Hy Hanno,

I'm a primary school teacher in Switzerland and I would like to use this picture in a lesson about global warming. I also would like to share this lesson with my colleagues in a share file accessible only for official teachers in my part of Switzerland (canton de Neuchâtel). May I ask you for the conditions ? Best wishes Brigitte Hofmann 157.26.2.22 09:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply