Bnjour JLPC. Finalement j'ai réussi à prendre (au zoom) la face nord du château de Charmant. La photo sur la fiche Mérimée semble être la bonne, finalement... (mais prise du nord-est). Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 13:12, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Perspectives (left and right are leaning out a bit) --Christian Ferrer 18:09, 23 April 2014 (UTC) Right : Done ; tilts corrected, I think.--JLPC 12:56, 25 April 2014 (UTC) Support ok --Christian Ferrer 10:58, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 21:35, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Good but the shadows of the trees (especialy at right) are very dark, can you try to bright its a bit please? --Christian Ferrer 17:40, 9 May 2014 (UTC) Done : new file uploaded. --JLPC 10:20, 10 May 2014 (UTC) Support ok --Christian Ferrer 13:58, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
IMO, the caption is wrong, idem with the link, as Louis-Augustin Dubourg does not exist. I think, "Louis-Alexandre" should be better ! . BtW, off topic, the bust in the french article seems to belonging to another person (Louis XIV style...)--Jebulon (talk) 19:36, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Two more mistakes on this page for me, sorry. I corrected the link (I mixed up L.-A. Dubourg and Louis-Augustin Auguin). As for the the French caption it's right but I'll accept another suggestion/translation in English (if "wrong caption" is what you mean). -- Concerning the bust (uploader unknown), according to Google it's Colbert and it was made in 2007 (FOP problem). -- Thanks a lot ! --JLPC (talk) 21:22, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Hello, I'm sorry that I disturbe you (and sorry for my bad english too!): You wrote on "Quality images candidates/candidate list/May 30th" at my picture of the "Interior of the synagogue, Graz, Austria": "Good, once the CAs removed (fixable imo)." I'm very sorry, I do not know what that means, and even if I knew - I couldn't do that because I do not know how to work with Lightroom or software like this. So please could you do me a favour: would you be so kind and "remove the CAs" for me? Thank you very much if this is possible for you and best regards! --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 08:15, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi JLPC and thank you very much for your information at my discussion page and for your help! I'm very, very happy and thankful about it - there's no need for a reverse in my opinion! I can only hope that someone votes for my picture now and promotes it! Best regards --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 15:01, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Good quality. Yet tilted slightly ccw. --Cccefalon 16:05, 22 June 2014 (UTC) Done Slight door tilt corrected ; pavement tilt OK. --JLPC 20:58, 22 June 2014 (UTC) Good quality. The pavement was never challenged :) --Cccefalon 05:34, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Wonderful colours. Yet the right side is leaning inwards and needs correction. --Cccefalon 16:51, 25 June 2014 (UTC) You're right : Done.--JLPC 21:25, 25 June 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 22:00, 25 June 2014 (UTC)