User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive19

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Tomicach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:16, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Tomicach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:39, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Tomicach 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:16, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Tomicach 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:16, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Tomicach 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:39, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Tomicach 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:59, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Stolec, pierwsza oficyna 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:34, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Stolec, pierwsza oficyna 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:34, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Stolec, druga oficyna 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:34, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Stolec, druga oficyna 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:59, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Brzegowa 11 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:45, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Brzegowa 11 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:45, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Brzegowa 15 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:34, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Brzegowa 17b 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Stolec, druga oficyna 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:17, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Stolec, druga oficyna 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:54, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Stolec, trzecia oficyna 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:10, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Stolec, trzecia oficyna 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:54, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Brzegowa 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:42, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Brzegowa 15 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 06:10, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Brzegowa 17b 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:08, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Brzegowa 2 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:12, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Brzegowa 2 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support: some of the clouds are very bright and that cable crossing the image isn't very favourable. IMO enough for a QI, though. --Basotxerri 15:40, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Brzegowa 2 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:12, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Brzegowa 2 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:12, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Brzegowa 2 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:03, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Brzegowa 2 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:09, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Brzegowa 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for a Q1photo. Sharp and a good composition. --Michielverbeek 05:05, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Wodna 5 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:49, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Wodna 5 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:09, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Wodna 5 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:27, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Wodna 5 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:27, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Wodna 5 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:27, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Wodna 5 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but depressing -- Spurzem 08:10, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Wodna 5 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 10:25, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Świętego Floriana 14 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Świętego Floriana 14 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:42, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Świętego Floriana 14 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:40, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Świętego Floriana 14 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:40, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Strzelin, ul. Świętego Floriana 14 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:42, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:23, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:57, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:57, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:57, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:22, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kolejka turystyczna w Srebrnej Górze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, still not sure, though --Poco a poco 07:54, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:22, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:00, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:22, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:22, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:47, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim, kotłownia 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:01, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim, kotłownia 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:03, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim, kotłownia 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:01, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim, ogród 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It looks like there is some sort of distortion at the bottom of the image, I don't know if it's real or if the shadows+paving creates an illusion but IMO it looks better with a bit cropped off. See note. W.carter 20:01, 31 August 2016 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 20:11, 31 August 2016 (UTC) Perfect! :) Good quality. --W.carter 20:36, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim, ogród 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 07:48, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim, ogród 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:21, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim, ogród 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:21, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim, ogród 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim, ogród 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim, park 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:26, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim, park 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:25, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pensjonat Sokółka w Srebrnej Górze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:26, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Srebrna Góra, kościół ewangelicki 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:25, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Masyw Śnieżnika, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:26, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Srebrna Góra, kościół ewangelicki 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 09:06, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Srebrna Góra, most wiszący 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:56, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Srebrna Góra, most wiszący 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:56, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Srebrna Góra, ul. Letnia 30 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 09:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Czarna Góra, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Bialskie, top of Czernica.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Bialskie, Marianne Road.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment Not sure why we have a VI scope of a forest road. Charles (talk) 16:21, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

  @Charles This road is of historical importance, was built by Princess Marianne of the Netherlands. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:49, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

  •  Support Now a picture of her working on the road would be VI! Charles (talk) 21:34, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Violetta glass plant, office building.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:47, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Srebrna Góra, ul. Letnia 30 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:26, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Srebrna Góra, ul. Letnia 30 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:35, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Srebrna Góra, ul. Letnia 30 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:35, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Srebrna Góra, ul. Letnia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:26, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Srebrna Góra, wiadukt srebrnogórski 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:38, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Radochów, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 22:47, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trzebieszowice, John of Nepomuk statue.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Janowa Góra.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Bialskie, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:33, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

FPC/VIC/QIC

I'm sorry, but until March 2017 I can not vote for a six-month blockade that has been imposed on me in this discussion, so do not be offended is not out of malice. For the rest if I am a servant here. Greetings --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:56, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Srebrna Góra, wiadukt srebrnogórski 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:58, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Srebrna Góra, wiadukt srebrnogórski 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:47, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Srebrna Góra, wiadukt srebrnogórski 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:58, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, bastion Dolny 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:47, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, bastion Dolny 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:37, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Buildings in Stronie Śląskie, Oranje-Nassau coat of arms.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:42, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Masyw Śnieżnika, Janowiec, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:42, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jaskinia Radochowska, entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:43, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

Hallo Jacek Halicki!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter infowikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:46, 8 September 2016 (UTC))

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, bastion Dolny 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:58, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, bastion Dolny 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:58, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, bastion Dolny 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:02, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, bastion Dolny 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:10, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Łysiec, Gór Bialskie, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 08:11, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jaskinia Radochowska, exit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Onuphrius chapel in Stronie Śląskie, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady Queen of Poland and Saint Maternus church in Stronie Śląskie, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 09:02, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Barbara church in Droszków, exopsure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, bastion Dolny 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, bastion Dolny 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort główny (donżon) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:39, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort główny (donżon) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Bartholomew in Skrzynka, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Bialskie, Krzyżnik, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Bialskie, Krzyżnik, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:59, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Masyw Śnieżnika, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort główny (donżon) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:39, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort główny (donżon) 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:14, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort główny (donżon) 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:40, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort główny (donżon) 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:35, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort główny (donżon) 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 11:18, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, bastion Dolny 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:44, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Masyw Śnieżnika, buildings in Czarna Góra Ski Resort.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:01, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gothic Bridge in Lądek-Zdrój, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:46, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:01, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kletno, ropes course.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:01, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Folwark in Żelazno, smithy, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. The building needs a bit of TLC, I think. DeFacto (talk). 21:50, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 22:04, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Folwark in Żelazno, smithy, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:53, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 22:03, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort Ostróg 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:16, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort Ostróg 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 11:26, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort Ostróg 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:16, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort Ostróg 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 11:28, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort Wysoka Skała 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:16, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Bialskie, Dział Pass.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 21:53, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Złote, Droszkowska Pass.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 21:53, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Masyw Śnieżnika, former checkpoint building on the Płoszczyna Pass.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 21:55, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Bialskie, Sucha Pass.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:17, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 21:55, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort Wysoka Skała 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 08:33, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort Wysoka Skała 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 08:31, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort Wysoka Skała 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:38, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort Wysoka Skała 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:17, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort Wysoka Skała 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:42, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Lądek-Zdrój, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 22:38, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Masyw Śnieżnika, Rudka, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Skrzynka, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Skrzynka, fire station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:43, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Ambona w Górach Bialskich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:15, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Biurowiec huty szkła w Stroniu Śląskim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:15, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Budynek nadleśnictwa w Strachocinie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:43, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Budynek nadleśnictwa w Strachocinie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:56, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stronie Śląskie, Morawka district.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 23:59, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Bialskie, Wielkie Rozdroże.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 00:00, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Observation tower on Czernica.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:23, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 00:01, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Reservoir in Stara Morawa, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 00:01, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel of St. Ignatius in Kłodzko, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 01:52, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Chatka grillowa przy pensjonacie Chata Cyborga w Bielicach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:13, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Cieniak, Góry Złote, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 09:52, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Czarna Góra, Masyw Śnieżnika, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:13, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Czernica, Góry Bialskie, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:11, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dom w Droszkowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:13, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Litany plate

Your 'litany plate' is better described as a memorial plate 'Herr erbarme dich' = 'Lord have Mercy'. Charles (talk) 07:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel of St. Ignatius in Kłodzko, litany plate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment wrong scope IMO. No other inscription in this chapel ?

This is the only one. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:49, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

 Comment It is a plate with a litany (perhaps "litany plate" or something like that in the scope) --Llez (talk) 19:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Fixed --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:07, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:07, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 22:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stronie Śląskie, dam exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 22:41, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stronie Śląskie, dam, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 22:42, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dom w Janowej Górze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:55, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dom nr 17 w Nowej Morawie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:03, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dom w Skowronkach, Radochów.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 11:51, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Buildings in Stronie Śląskie, fire station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Masyw Śnieżnika, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:27, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Bialskie, Łysiec, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Domy w Janowej Górze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:10, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Droga Marianny, Góry Bialskie, Sudety 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:44, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dukt Nad Spławami, Góry Bialskie, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 09:40, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Radochowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:44, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old house in Nowa Morawa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Why should this house be VI? Charles (talk) 10:09, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

This is a log cottage built in the nineteenth century, well-preserved example of the typical architecture of the Sudeten. Such houses is very little now. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:05, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

•  Support all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Trzebieszowicach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Żelaźnie, gołębnik 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Żelaźnie, gołębnik 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Góry Bialskie, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 08:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Anny na Górze Świętej Anny 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 08:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kamienica, gmina Stronie Śląskie, Monte Neve hotel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in category. It's funny you have the same garbage cans in Poland as we have here in the US. A crop at right on this image to get rid of them might be a small improvement though. INeverCry 04:20, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cobblestone roads in Poland, Marianne Road in Bialskie Mountains.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment Not useful. Charles (talk) 12:32, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

The image is useful, showing how they looked expensive in the nineteenth century. In addition, the image is used in the two articles. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:40, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

If you change scope to be VI of a specified type of cobblestone road, then I am happy to withdraw oppose Charles (talk) 07:24, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

 Done. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:51, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

 Support OK now. Charles (talk) 16:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Masyw Śnieżnika, Młyńsko, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:39, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Masyw Śnieżnika, Młyńsko, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:40, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Hałdy w Kamieniołomie Biała Marianna w Stroniu Śląskim Wsi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:25, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Herb rodu Oranje-Nassau w Stroniu Śląskim 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:59, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Herb rodu Oranje-Nassau w Stroniu Śląskim 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:59, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Janowiec, Masyw Śnieżnika, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 09:14, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kaplica św. Onufrego w Stroniu Śląskim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:59, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Catherine of Alexandria church in Nowa Ruda, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of Sorrows Church in Nowa Ruda, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of Sorrows Church in Nowa Ruda, spire.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 05:39, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of Sorrows Church in Nowa Ruda, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 05:40, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kapliczka na Przełęczy Droszkowskiej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:45, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół w Stroniu Śląskim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Skrzynce 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 08:52, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Skrzynce 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:45, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Krzyżnik, Góry Bialskie, Sudety 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Droga Marianny, Góry Bialskie, Sudety 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:37, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Anne church in Nowa Ruda, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 22:08, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Anne church in Nowa Ruda, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 22:08, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Anne church in Nowa Ruda, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 22:10, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Observation tower on Góra Wszystkich Świętych, bas-relief of Helmut Karl Bernhard von Moltke.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 22:10, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dawna remiza strażacka w Pstrążnej 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 09:41, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dawna remiza strażacka w Pstrążnej 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:15, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół ewangelicko-reformowany w Pstrążnej 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 09:39, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół ewangelicko-reformowany w Pstrążnej 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:24, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół ewangelicko-reformowany w Pstrążnej 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:41, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Schronisko na Górze Świętej Anny 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 16:12, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Schronisko na Górze Świętej Anny 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:48, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, Rynek 3 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:17, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, Rynek 3 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:17, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, Rynek 3 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:18, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dom w Młynowcu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice picture, but please provide a geo tag and a bit more info in the description so that whoever sees the pic don't have to back down through the categories just to find out where the village is situated. W.carter 19:42, 13 September 2016 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 11:12, 19 September 2016 (UTC) Thank you very much. Good quality. --W.carter 14:37, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dom w Młynowcu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Same as the previous version. W.carter 19:42, 13 September 2016 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 11:12, 19 September 2016 (UTC) Thank you very much. Good quality. --W.carter 14:37, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Krzyżnik, Góry Bialskie, Sudety 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 09:11, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Leśniczówka w Kletnie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:45, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Kłodzka 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 09:09, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Most św. Jana w Lądku-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:45, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Reformed church in Pstrążna, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Reformed church in Pstrążna, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Reformed church in Pstrążna, entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pstrążna, former fire station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 17:48, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 23:05, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Most św. Jana w Lądku-Zdroju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 08:47, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Młyńsko, Masyw Śnieżnika, Sudety 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 19:30, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Młyńsko, Masyw Śnieżnika, Sudety 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 09:37, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Młyńsko, Masyw Śnieżnika, Sudety 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality too. --Milseburg 19:30, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Oznaczenie szlaku turystycznego na Czernicy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 09:37, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Krzyżnik, Góry Bialskie, Sudety 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:52, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Bialskie, Suszyca, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 22:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Złote, Sowia Kopa, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 22:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Złote, Sowia kopa, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 22:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Kłodzka Street in Lądek-Zdrój, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support: Good-quality image and best in scope. --DAJF (talk) 00:13, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 22:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Ośrodek Narciarski Czarna Góra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:33, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Ośrodek zdrowia w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:25, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pajęczyna 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:35, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Park linowy w Kletnie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 08:44, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Market Square in Nowa Ruda, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 21:12, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:49, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Market Square in Nowa Ruda, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:51, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Market Square in Nowa Ruda, arcades.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:51, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Market Square in Nowa Ruda, keystone.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:52, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Żelaźnie, kuźnia 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:04, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pensjonat Chata Cyborga w Bielicach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:04, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pensjonat Monte Neve w Kamienicy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 04:51, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pensjonat Monte Neve w Kamienicy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:04, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Park linowy w Kletnie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:31, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Park linowy w Kletnie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:31, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pasieka w Trzebieszowicach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:46, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pasieka w Trzebieszowicach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:46, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Żelaźnie, kuźnia 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:46, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Młyńsko, Masyw Śnieżnika, Sudety 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 15:05, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pensjonat Chata Cyborga w Bielicach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:54, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Market Square in Nowa Ruda, interior of the arcades.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in category. INeverCry 23:11, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
7 Market Square in Nowa Ruda, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. INeverCry 23:14, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hostel on Saint Anne Mountain, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. INeverCry 23:15, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Nadrzeczna Street in Nowa Ruda, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. INeverCry 23:16, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, Rynek 3 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:20, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Nadrzeczna 1 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:04, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Nadrzeczna 1 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:31, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Nadrzeczna 1 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:21, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Nadrzeczna 2 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:04, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Nadrzeczna Street in Nowa Ruda, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Nadrzeczna Street in Nowa Ruda, interior of the arcades.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:39, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Nadrzeczna Street in Nowa Ruda, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:51, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Nadrzeczna Street in Nowa Ruda, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:56, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Nadrzeczna 2 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Nadrzeczna 3 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Nadrzeczna 3 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:46, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Nadrzeczna 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:46, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Nadrzeczna 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 09:43, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Nadrzeczna Street in Nowa Ruda, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support: Good-quality image and best in scope. --DAJF (talk) 00:04, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Nadrzeczna Street in Nowa Ruda, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support: Good-quality image and best in scope. --DAJF (talk) 00:05, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Nadrzeczna Street in Nowa Ruda, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support: Good-quality image and best in scope. --DAJF (talk) 00:05, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
7 Nadrzeczna Street in Nowa Ruda, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support: Good-quality image and best in scope. --DAJF (talk) 00:08, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Nadrzeczna 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Biały pasek w lewym górnym rogu, powstały po korekcji perspektywy. Poza tym przydałoby się więcej światła, bo zdjęcie trochę zbyt ciemne, przez co mało wyraźne. --Halavar 10:02, 27 September 2016 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 15:59, 27 September 2016 (UTC)  Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 18:49, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Nadrzeczna 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:17, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Nadrzeczna 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 21:50, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Nadrzeczna 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 21:50, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Matki Boskiej Bolesnej na Kościelcu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:24, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, Rynek 3 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:42, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, Rynek 3 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, Rynek 3 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 09:07, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, Rynek 7 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tsungam 09:07, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, Rynek 7 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 09:07, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ul. Kościelna 11 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:27, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ul. Kościelna 11 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:46, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Żeromskiego 3 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 09:47, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Żeromskiego 3 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:47, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wieża widokowa na Górze Wszystkich Świętych 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tsungam 08:46, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wieża widokowa na Górze Wszystkich Świętych 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:12, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wieża widokowa na Górze Wszystkich Świętych 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:59, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Popków, Góry Bialskie, Sudety 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:12, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Popków, Góry Bialskie, Sudety 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:12, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Popków, Góry Bialskie, Sudety 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 09:37, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
11 Kościelna Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 16:56, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Popków, Góry Bialskie, Sudety 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 09:36, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Przełącz Dział, Góry Bialskie, Sudety 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:42, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Przełącz Dział, Góry Bialskie, Sudety 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:42, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Przełęcz Droszkowska, Góry Złote, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 09:36, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Przełęcz Płoszczyna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:42, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Przełęcz Sucha, Góry Bialskie, Sudety 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 14:25, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Remiza OSP w Skrzynce 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:42, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Remiza OSP w Skrzynce 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:34, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Remiza OSP w Stroniu Śląskim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:42, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Sowia Kopa, Góry Złote, Sudety 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 16:25, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Sowia Kopa, Góry Złote, Sudety 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Could you add some informative annotations about the mountain´s names? --Milseburg 13:50, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Gotwaldówka w Kątach Bystrzyckich 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 09:25, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Gotwaldówka w Kątach Bystrzyckich 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:41, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Przełęcz Sucha, Góry Bialskie, Sudety 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 16:07, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Stacja narciarska Kamienica, restauracja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:47, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Stacja narciarska Kamienica, wyciąg orczykowy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:47, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Stronie Śląskie Wieś.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 12:55, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Stronie Śląskie, dzielnica Morawka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:38, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Stronie Śląskie, ul. Kościuszki 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:09, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Stacja narciarska Kamienica, wyciąg orczykowy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:03, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Stronie Śląskie, ul. Kościuszki 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:03, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Stronie Śląskie, ul. Kościuszki 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:03, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Stronie Śląskie, ul. Kościuszki 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:36, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Sucha Droga, Góry Bialskie, Sudety 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:43, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Sucha Droga, Góry Bialskie, Sudety 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:08, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Suszyca, Góry Bialskie, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:08, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wielkie Rozdroże, Góry Bialskie, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:08, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wieża widokowa na Czernicy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:12, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wieża widokowa na Czernicy 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:12, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wieża widokowa na Czernicy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:57, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wieża widokowa na Czernicy 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Kroton 10:03, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Zalew w Starej Morawie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 10:15, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Zalew w Starej Morawie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Kroton 10:05, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Zapora zbiornika retencyjnego w Stroniu Śląskim 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Kroton 10:02, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Zapora zbiornika retencyjnego w Stroniu Śląskim 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:05, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Zawada, Masyw Śnieżnika, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:55, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Zrekultywowane wysypisko śmieci w Starej Morawie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:05, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Łysiec, Góry Bialskie, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:05, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Nowa Rudzie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:56, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Nowa Rudzie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:33, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Nowa Rudzie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 12:40, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Nowa Rudzie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:15, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Słupcu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 12:41, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Świętego Krzyża w Nowej Rudzie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:07, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nepomuk w Nowej Rudzie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:36, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nepomuk w Nowej Rudzie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 10:05, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nepomuk w Nowej Rudzie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good Quality. --Bijay chaurasia 10:05, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nepomuk w Nowej Rudzie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:36, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Assumption church in Nowa Ruda, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Assumption church in Nowa Ruda, porch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Cross church in Nowa Ruda, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
John of Nepomuk statue in Nowa Ruda (Cmentarna Street).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda ul. Piastów 1 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:19, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda ul. Piastów 1 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:19, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda ul. Piastów 19 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:11, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda ul. Piastów 19 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 10:20, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda ul. Piastów 19 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - Looks to be of sufficient quality to me. -- Ikan Kekek 11:53, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Czerwieńczyce, kościół św. Bartłomieja 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments With that light it's not an ideal pic but OK for me. Could you detail the description as it's not the church what we see in the image? --Basotxerri 13:19, 12 October 2016 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 21:27, 12 October 2016 (UTC) Thank you! OK now... --Basotxerri 15:26, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Sowia Kopa, Góry Złote, Sudety 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Tilted CW little bit. --Halavar 10:42, 5 October 2016 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 13:08, 5 October 2016 (UTC)  Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 10:41, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower of Saint Bartholomew church in Czermna, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 02:56, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
John of Nepomuk statue in Nowa Ruda (Cmentarna Street), chronogram.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 02:57, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Piastów Street in Nowa Ruda, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:50, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 02:58, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Piastów Street in Nowa Ruda, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 19:49, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 02:58, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 21 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 14:57, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 21 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 11:54, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 21 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 23 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 11:56, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 23 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 10:06, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
19 Piastów Street in Nowa Ruda, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope Olivier LPB (talk) 22:05, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 03:01, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
19 Piastów Street in Nowa Ruda, window and stuccos on the first floor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 13 October 2016 (UTC)  Comment VI proliferation gone mad. These type of nominations devalue the VI project. Are we going to support every window of every building of every so-called cultural monument? Charles (talk) 21:08, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 03:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:19 Piastów Street in Nowa Ruda, window and stuccos on the second floor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support--Mathieu MD (talk) 10:00, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment VI proliferation gone mad. These type of nominations devalue the VI project. Are we going to support every window of every building of every so-called cultural monument? Charles (talk) 21:08, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
  • I asked myself the same question. I was undecided at first. But why not, after all? Actually, I don't find them important; but I know that I know little, and who am I to tell what is important or not? Jacek believed these windows deserved dedicated photos. And as such photos, I find them valuable enough. --Mathieu MD (talk) 21:34, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
  • These images may be very interesting to architects, architecture students, and architecture historians. In any case, their value or lack thereof in general as images on Commons would be a topic for the VI talkpage, not individual nominations. lNeverCry 03:07, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 03:07, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
21 Piastów Street in Nowa Ruda, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 03:08, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Duszniki-Zdrój, Rynek 6 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Duszniki-Zdrój, Rynek 6 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 25 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Kroton 06:31, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 25 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Kroton 06:30, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 25 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Kroton 06:29, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
21 Piastów Street in Nowa Ruda, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Piastów Street in Nowa Ruda, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Piastów Street in Nowa Ruda, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
27 Piastów Street in Nowa Ruda, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 15:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 25 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:06, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 25 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:05, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 25 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:05, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 25 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:06, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 25 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:06, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
27 Piastów Street in Nowa Ruda, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
27 Piastów Street in Nowa Ruda, gable.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Piastów Street in Nowa Ruda, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Piastów Street in Nowa Ruda, bay.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:39, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 27 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 27 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 09:57, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 27 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:51, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 5 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:44, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 5 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:51, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Żeromskiego Street in Nowa Ruda, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 23:23, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Włodzica in Nowa Ruda.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:47, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 23:24, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Observation tower on Góra Wszystkich Świętych, spiral stairs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 23:24, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Joseph Wittig Museum in Nowa Ruda, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 08:54, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 5 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good. --Rbrechko 09:58, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 5 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:20, 18 October 2016 (UTC) Can you please add more specific categories? Poco a poco 10:21, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 5 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:20, 18 October 2016 (UTC) Can you please add more specific categories? Poco a poco 10:21, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 5 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 09:17, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 7, 7a 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:20, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Koszyn, roadside cross.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 03:16, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Joseph Wittig Museum in Nowa Ruda, plaque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 03:17, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Nicholas church in Nowa Ruda, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Cross church in Nowa Ruda, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piastów 7, 7a 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality now! You know, I love these close up's. --Hubertl 11:13, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rzeka Włodzica w Nowej Rudzie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:01, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Matki Boskiej Nieustającej Pomocy w Koszynie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rbrechko 08:52, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Matki Boskiej Nieustającej Pomocy w Koszynie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:47, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Matki Boskiej Nieustającej Pomocy w Koszynie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:48, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Krzyż przydrożny w Koszynie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:24, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Krzyż przydrożny w Koszynie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Muzeum Josepha Wittiga w Nowej Rudzie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:17, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Muzeum Josepha Wittiga w Nowej Rudzie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Muzeum Josepha Wittiga w Nowej Rudzie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 October 2016 (UTC)