User talk:Johann Jaritz/Archive/2016

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg 5 Parkhotel 25122015 9843.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 05:08, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Werzerpromenade 8 Hotel Werzer West-Ansicht 25122015 9835.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, the white is not reflecting-good focus-good persepctive --Michielverbeek 06:00, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Werzerpromenade 8 Hotel Werzer Fenster und Fensterlaeden 25122015 9836.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:57, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 25122015 9840.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Badehuetten und Hotel Astoria 25122015 9839.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:32, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade mit Parkhotel 29122015 9888.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 04:56, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Gaisrueckenstrasse Apartementwohnanlage Court 26122015 9845.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:05, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Goritschach Filialkirche hl Oswald 26122015 9848.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:49, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Goritschach Filialkirche hl Oswald Opferstocknische 26122015 9857.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:05, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Park 25122015 9844.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Purple CAs at left and right (see notes) --Christian Ferrer 07:08, 30 December 2015 (UTC)  Done Thanks, Christian, for your review. I reduced the CAs the best possible way and charged this improved version.--Johann Jaritz 08:44, 30 December 2015 (UTC) Support ok, good quality --Christian Ferrer 17:36, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 29122015 9896.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:06, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Classical, but still... thank you for your work on Commons! Yann (talk) 13:36, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, the same to you and many successful and prosperous moments in your life for this New Year! Kind Regards to you from Austria. Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:11, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

The traditional greeting

	Dear friend
	Happy New Year and best wishes!! Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:06, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup, mon cher ami! I would like to thank you as well for all your assessments, reviews and helpful comments throughout the whole last year. A prosperous Happy New Year to you! -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:16, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 29122015 9895 9887.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:54, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Parkbaeume 29122015 9871.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:59, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Pier und Landspitz-Pavillion 29122015 9877.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Bootslandesteg 29122015 9885.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:54, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

QI Tunisia training

As part of the project Quality images training in Tunisia, the Wikimedia TN user group is looking for a Wikimedia commons User able to organize a training about Quality images, featured pictures, Valued images and Graphic Lab/Photography in Tunisia from February 18th to 22th, 2016. To participate please fill this form --Touzrimounir (talk) 19:55, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg Park Blick auf den Woerther See 29122015 9870.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:03, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade mit Parkhotel 29122015 9893.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:03, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Ernst Wahliss-Bueste 14122015 2514.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Code 06:28, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Parkbaeume 29122015 9873.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:03, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 29122015 9897.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Code 06:28, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villach Pfarrkirche hl Jakob N-Aussenwand Epitaph 03082015 6482.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villach Pfarrkirche hl Jakob N-Aussenwand Epitaph 03082015 6484.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:33, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villach Pfarrkirche hl Jakob N-Aussenwand Epitaph 03082015 6485.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:00, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villach Pfarrkirche hl Jakob SO-Aussenwand Epitaph 07082015 6553.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:33, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villach Pfarrkirche hl Jakob Turmvorhalle Wand Epitaph 03082015 6468.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 09:29, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Ich bin mir sicher,

dass dieser sinnlose Kobel, dessen Funktion niemand je verstehen wird - geschweige denn verstanden wurde - im Sinne der Förderung des Tourismus in Pörtschach aufgestellt wurde. Was aber noch erschreckender ist, ist die Qualität der Graffitis, an der man erkennt, dass sich seit 50 Jahren geistig nichts weiterentwickelt hat. Eigentlich beschämend. Hast du schon je auf einem Holzsteg ein Graffiti gesehen - außer natürlich reingeschnitzte Herzerl mit zwei Namen? --Hubertl 14:12, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Wahrlich, wahrlich! Du sprichst weise! So wie der André Heller, den ich über die Maßen schätze. LG. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:28, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Gloriette-Blick auf Woerther See und Blumeninsel 19112015 9209.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:06, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! R1-203 Strmec na Predelu Jalovec 10032015 0515.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:50, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malborghetto Valbruna Saisera Montasch 30032015 1227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, but it might have been a bit sharper --Michielverbeek 08:08, 3 January 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks, Michiel, for your promotion and constructive proposal. Next time I will take more care. --Johann Jaritz 09:52, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cinque Punte Blick von Rosstratte 13022015 9789.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:48, 3 January 2016 (UTC) *  Comment wie wär´s mit etwas weniger Blau? --Hubertl 08:55, 3 January 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks, Hubertl, for your proposal. I reduced the blue parts and charged this new version. --Johann Jaritz 09:41, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosental mit Karawanken Sinacher und Matschacher Gupf Kosiak und Vertatscha 28022015 0198.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:48, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Radovljica Linhartov trg drei Blechblasinstrumente 19032015 0925.jpg

File:Radovljica Linhartov trg drei Blechblasinstrumente 19032015 0925.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 08:38, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

You're welcome!

Thanks for the barnstar, the first one I've ever gotten over here at Commons. And, "you're welcome"/bitte for the thanks in general. I thought it was too important to just thank you for the edit via Echo. Daniel Case (talk) 18:33, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Langhaar getigerte Katze Carlo 17122015 2542.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 05:59, 4 January 2016 (UTC) *  Comment F/32 ??? --Hubertl 09:14, 4 January 2016 (UTC) For the price of ISO 3200? Better not! --Johann Jaritz 09:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC) *  Comment I meant the cat´s eye, not the lens, Hans! Oh my goodness! I was slow on the uptake. --Johann Jaritz 16:26, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Goritschach Filialkirche hl Oswald 26122015 9851.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support It’s better. I’m not quite sure, though... The third opinion is welcome. Dmitry Ivanov 12:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC).

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villach Maria Gail Kriegerdenkmal 13022015 9881.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:27, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steindorf Tiffen Pfarrkirche drei roem Grabbaureliefs 07032015 0371.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:36, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Radenthein Sankt Peter alter Friedhof und gotischer Bau 17092015 7509.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tweng is a nice place where I went through in 2011, goood composition but unfortunately it needs a small perspective correction --Michielverbeek 06:42, 4 January 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks, Michiel, for your review. I improved the perspective the best way I could and uploaded this new version. --Johann Jaritz 07:09, 4 January 2016 (UTC) Support --Jacek Halicki 09:53, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Setla

Servus!
Mir ist gerade

untergekommen.
Gewaltig!
Gruß, Ciciban (talk) 08:53, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Vielen Dank, Ciciban! Es ist schon achteinhalb Jahre her, dass ich das Foto geschossen habe. Ich konnte mich gar nicht mehr daran erinnern. Im Laufe der Jahre verliert man den Überblick und die Erinnerung verblasst. Dein Artikel über die Glanfurt ist sehr kompetent und aussagekräftig wie informativ. Danke Dir für diese Arbeit im Namen der WIKI-Community. LG. Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:14, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Park im Landschaftsschutzgebiet 03012016 9927.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Schaut nach mehr aus! --Hubertl 03:59, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Park-Laterne 03012016 9931.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:59, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Uferzone mit Schilf 03012016 9932.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:59, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Park mit Weide und Erlen 03012016 9934.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:15, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Maria Woerth-Blick 03012016 9937.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:15, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz und Kapuzinerinsel 03012016 9942.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:56, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 03012016 9959.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality.--Famberhorst 06:12, 5 January 2016 (UTC) *  Comment A document of horror. See the left yellow thing whatever it is. --Hubertl 08:20, 5 January 2016 (UTC) That`s the reason why I had to place the slide tower in my previous photographs close to the left margin, in order to keep that hideous yellow object outside frame. --Johann Jaritz 13:12, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 03012016 9950.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 05:44, 5 January 2016 (UTC)*  Comment A document of horror. See the left yellow thing whatever it is. --Hubertl 08:20, 5 January 2016 (UTC) That`s the reason why I had to place the slide tower in my previous photographs close to the left margin, in order to keep that hideous yellow object outside frame. --Johann Jaritz 13:12, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 29122015 9896.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 29122015 9896.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Park im Landschaftsschutzgebiet 03012016 9930.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 04:59, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Park mit Erlen und Schilfguertel 03012016 9933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Ostbucht mit Schilfbank 03012016 9935.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:47, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Park mit Weide und Bank 03012016 9936.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:47, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Parkbaenke unter Weiden und Erlen 03012016 9939.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:43, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Erle am Ufer 03012016 9926.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:37, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Picknick-Platz mit Maria Woerth-Blick 03012016 9925.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Steindorf Tiffen Pfarrkirche roem Grabbaurelief tanzende Maenade 07032015 0373.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Steindorf Tiffen Pfarrkirche roem Grabbaurelief tanzende Maenade 07032015 0373.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg 5 Villa Woerth Ausschnitt vom Einfahrtstor 03012016 9921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:43, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg 5 Villa Woerth Einfahrtstor Ausschnitt rechter Fluegel 03012016 9919.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg winterlicher Park am Seeufer 03012016 9922.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:59, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Erlen am Seeufer Maria Woerth-Blick 03012016 9924.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Osen 08:26, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz mit Maria Woerth-Blick 03012016 9943.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg 5 Villa Woerth Einfahrtstor Ausschnitt linker Fluegel 03012016 9920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:59, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Erle am Seeufer 03012016 9948.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:27, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz mit Blick zur Kapuzinerinsel 03012016 9944.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:59, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Peter Alexander-Steg 03012016 9947.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:59, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Park mit Fichten und Promenadenbad 03012016 9928.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:04, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

signature

Hello Johann, are you using the ~~~~ when you sign? I ask because I see you often delete [1] your name because it is written two time. You can go in your Preferences and write it in the way you want, but don't forget a link to the talk page. Regards, Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 10:55, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, Christian, for your help and advice. I followed your instruction to have a better workflow now. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 16:19, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuhaus Pfarrkirche und Schloss 08012016 9989.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:58, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuhaus Motschula bewaldeter Bergruecken 08012016 9977.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:58, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuhaus Museum Liaunig Metallplastik Raumentfaltung fuer H L 08012015 9978.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. I maybe would have added some more space at the top. --Code 06:24, 10 January 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks, Ansgar, for your review. I reworked the image pursuant to your suggestion and charged this alternative version. --Johann Jaritz 06:52, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuhaus Museum Liaunig Walnussbaum 08012015 9979.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Nice!--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuhaus Museum Liaunig Eingangsbereich mit Kunstguss Sarkophag 08012015 9981.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:32, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuhaus Museum Liaunig Eingangsbereich Kunstguss Sarkophag 08012015 9983.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments thank you, QI now. --Hubertl 11:41, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuhaus Museum Liaunig Eingangsbereich Kunstguss Sarkophag 08012015 9987.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think it is a Q1photo but I guess it needs a little perspective improvement in Lr..., standard lens correction without automatic upright + manual rotation -0,1 --Michielverbeek 07:45, 10 January 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks, Michiel, for your promotion. I acted on your advice and charged this improved version. --Johann Jaritz 12:03, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuhaus Museum Liaunig Metallplastik Raumentfaltung fuer H L 08012015 9976.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:49, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuhaus Museum Liaunig Eingangsbereich mit Kunstguss Sarkophag 08012015 9980.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:29, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuhaus Museum Liaunig Eingangsbereich Kunstguss Sarkophag 08012015 9988.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:06, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hochosterwitz 01 Faehnrichtor und 02 Waechtertor 01062015 4237.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 04:50, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolfsberg Thuern 1 Schloss Thuern mit Weinberg 08012016 2621.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:33, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuhaus Museum Liaunig Parkplatz Tafel 08012015 9968.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 07:13, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuhaus Museum Liaunig Eingangsbereich mit Plastiken 08012015 9967.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuhaus Museum Liaunig Eingangsbereich Kunstguss Sarkophag 08012016 9982.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:51, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuhaus Museum Liaunig Eingangsbereich Kunstguss Sarkophag 08012015 9986.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuhaus Museum Liaunig Eingangsbereich Kunstguss Sarkophag Ausschnitt 08012015 9984.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Urban Retschitz-Simonhoehe Winterlandschaft 12012016 9994.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:44, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Urban Zirkitz Blick auf das Klagenfurter Becken 12012016 0001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:44, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Urban Hoch Sankt Paul Winterwald 12012016 0003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:44, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hochosterwitz 01 Faehnrichtor Detail 1575 01062015 1061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:14, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hochosterwitz 01 Faehnrichtor Detail 1575 01062015 1062.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:08, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Veit St Donat Pfarrkirche roem Reliefstein Pferdeknechtdarstellung 18102015 8119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:14, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebenfels Zojach Winterwald 12012016 0013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 04:30, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebenfels Zojach Winterlandschaft 12012016 0020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 04:41, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Urban Zirkitz Strasse nach Sankt Paul Winterwald 12012016 9995.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:10, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Urban Hoch Sankt Paul Strasse im Winterwald 12012016 0006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:10, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Urban Hoch Sankt Paul Winterwald 12012016 0002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:16, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Urban Hoch Sankt Paul Strasse im Winterwald 12012016 0005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:10, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebenfels Zojach Winterlandschaft 12012016 0014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse Edelweiß-Bad Halbinsel-Blick 13012016 0061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:33, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 158 Geschaeftshaus Morokutti 12012016 0023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:49, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg 2 Villa Tilly Veranda und Eingang 13012016 0067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:33, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Annastrasse Kastanienallee 12012016 0026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:31, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Werzerpromenade 8 Werzers Hotel Resort 12012016 0029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality now. --Ermell 14:40, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse Edelweiß-Bad Woerther See 13012016 0053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:58, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse Edelweiß-Bad Woerther See 13012016 0065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:22, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Werzerpromenade Werzers Bootshaus 12012016 0030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 13012016 0082.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:58, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade 10 Hausboot 12012016 0036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:58, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Poertschach Hauptstrasse Edelweissbad Badesteg 18112015 9078.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Poertschach Hauptstrasse Edelweissbad Badesteg 18112015 9078.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Werzer Esplanade Schiffsanlegestelle 15012016 0107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:01, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Werzer Promenade Strandcasino Werzer und Bootshaus 15012016 0104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:02, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade 10 Hausboot 15012016 0114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:10, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Badehuetten und Hotel Astoria 13012016 0087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:10, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 13012016 0083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:53, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Moosburg Pfarrkirche Epitaph Ulrich von Ernau II 05032015 0373.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moosburg Pfarrkirche Epitaph Ulrich von Ernau II 05032015 0373.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Leonstainer Weg 17012016 0137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Werzer Esplanade Schiffsanlegestelle 17012016 0138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:14, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade 10 Hausboot 17012016 0146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:14, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Lakes Hotel 17012016 0147.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:45, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg Park mit Maria Woerth-Blick 18012016 0181.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:03, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Johann Jaritz Loibltal 12072008 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Johann Jaritz Molo Audace Trieste 09022008 01.jpg
• File:Johann Jaritz self-portrait 24032008 44.jpg —LX (talk, contribs) 18:41, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Bootsanlegesteg 18012016 0189.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo, but not a very special one --Michielverbeek 08:35, 20 January 2016 (UTC)  Comment Yes. I know, Michiel. That`s why you wont find it in FPC. --Johann Jaritz 09:07, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Brueckenneubau 18012016 0190.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:51, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Maria Woerth-Blick 18012016 0184.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Maria Woerth-Blick 18012016 0185.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:51, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz-Pavillon mit Maria Woerth-Blick 18012016 0186.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:55, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krumpendorf Parkweg Kurpark Blick auf den Pyramidenkogel 18012016 0175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:27, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krumpendorf Parkweg Kurpark Blick auf Parkbad-Badehaus 18012016 0176.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:01, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krumpendorf Parkweg Kurpark Blick auf Parkbad-Badehaus 18012016 0179.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:10, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krumpendorf Pamperallee Parkbad Sprungturm 18012016 0180.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:10, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krumpendorf Parkweg Kurpark am See-Ufer 18012016 0171.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse Edelweiß-Bad Wolken ueber Ostbucht 13012016 0059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 05:24, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Strandbar Passion 13012016 0089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 05:24, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Werzer-Strand Koschat-Denkmal 06092015 7142.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Picture is tilted. --Jacek Halicki 13:19, 21 January 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks, Jacek, for your review. I corrected the detected issue and charged this new version. --Johann Jaritz 13:54, 21 January 2016 (UTC) Support --Jacek Halicki 16:15, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Promenadenbad mit Blumeninsel und Pyramidenkogel 22112015 9240.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:04, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Brahmsweg Nischenbild Taufe Jesu 19112015 9220.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Tarviser Strasse Eisenbahnstation Lend Schallschutzwand Graffiti 19012016 0210.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:38, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Tarviser Strasse Eisenbahnbrueckenpfeiler Graffiti 19012016 0233.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:53, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Tarviser Strasse Eisenbahnbrucke Totenkopf-Graffiti 19012016 0223.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Scares me, but good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:56, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Tarviser Strasse Eisenbahnbrucke Goldkopf-Graffiti 19012016 0226.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality.--Famberhorst 06:09, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Klagenfurt Tarviser Strasse Eisenbahnbrucke Homer Simpson-Graffiti 19012016 0231.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Tarviser Strasse Eisenbahnbrucke Homer Simpson-Graffiti 19012016 0231.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:54, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Mein Fehler?

Hallo Johann Jaritz, kommt mir grad so vor, als hätte ich seinerzeit, als ich dir bei Category:Images by Johann Jaritz behilflich war, 5 Bilder versehentlich zu QI gemacht. Es fehlt die vom Bot bei erfolgreicher Kandidatur vergebnene Kategorie Category:Quality images. Kannst du das bitte gegenprüfen und gegebenfalls die Bilder entweder für QI zu nominieren oder anderenfalls die Quality-Kategorien entfernen. Danke lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:38, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Herzi Pinki, vielen Dank für Deine Mitteilung. Ich habe die Quality-Kategorien bei den betroffenen fünf Bildern entfernt und somit hat alles wieder seine Rechtmäßigkeit. Danke für Deine Überwachung und die damit möglich gewordene "Flurbereinigung". Danke lg --Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:05, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 160 Oesterreichischer Hof 21012016 0243.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:47, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 161 Poertschacher Hof Swimming Pool 21012016 0244.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:55, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Blumeninsel Blick vom Landspitz 21012016 0288.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:49, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Pavillon 21012016 0273.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:54, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Kleinkirchheim St Oswald Kirchweg 7 Pfarrhof Ost-Teilansicht 17092015 7587.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:46, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bleiberg-Noetsch 2 ehem Gewerkenhaus Theresienhof West-Portal 29042015 2915.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirchen Hart Filialkirche hl Lambert Fresko hl Christophorus 16082015 6688.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:45, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gurk Dom suedl Fassade Fenster und Fries 10042015 0717.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:45, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Annastrasse 43 Hotel Astoria Loggia 14122015 2474.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:48, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg 5 Kinderspielplatz vor dem Parkhotel 21012016 0252.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:00, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 21012016 0295.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Maybe more than that? --Frank Schulenburg 03:50, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Promenadenbad Blumeninsel und Bruecke 21012016 0290.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:04, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Maria Woerth-Blick 21012016 0266.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good though maybe a bit blue --Christian Ferrer 05:34, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Seeblick nach Osten 21012016 0269.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:40, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Uferzone mit Salix caprea und Schilfrohr 21012016 0255.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:40, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Erle am Ufer 21012016 0253.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:49, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg 5 Parkhotel 21012016 0247.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:13, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Uferzone mit Schilfrohr 21012016 0254.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Pavillon 21012016 0274.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please see my note. --Cccefalon 05:12, 27 January 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks, Uwe, for your review and your help. I cropped the image and uploaded this improved version. --Johann Jaritz 05:44, 27 January 2016 (UTC) Looks much much better! --Cccefalon 05:58, 27 January 2016 (UTC)~

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Steinmauer 21012016 0278.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please resolve the redlink. --Cccefalon 05:10, 27 January 2016 (UTC)  Done Redlink resolved. --Johann Jaritz 05:46, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Strassburg Bischofsburg West-Ansicht 10042015 0755.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Strassburg Bischofsburg West-Ansicht 10042015 0755.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Ehrentaler Strasse 119 Schloss Ehrenthal Einfahrtstor 25012016 0315.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:44, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Ehrentaler Strasse 119 Schloss Ehrenthal Parklaterne 25012016 2650.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:46, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Ehrentaler Strasse 119 Schloss Ehrental 25012016 0313.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:59, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Ehrentaler Strasse 119 Schloss Ehrenthal Wappen der Familie Aichelburg 25012016 2632.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:06, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Ehrentaler Strasse 119 Schloss Ehrenthal Ziergiebel mit Uhr 25012016 2643.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:05, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Ehrentaler Strasse 119 Schloss Ehrenthal stuckierte Fensterbekroenung 25012016 2647.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:05, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg 5 Parkhotel 18112015 9110.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg 5 Parkhotel 18112015 9110.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:07, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Ehrentaler Strasse 119 Schloss Ehrenthal Einfahrtstor Detail 25012016 2652.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:05, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Ehrentaler Strasse 119 Schloss Ehrenthal Soldatenstatue 25012016 2631.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:05, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Ehrentaler Strasse 119 Schloss Ehrenthal Teilansicht 25012016 0312.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, however, the right side verticals should be improved (slightly leaning in) --Cccefalon 05:07, 29 January 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks, Uwe, for your anew review. I corrected the image`s issue on the right side and uploaded this improved version. --Johann Jaritz 05:33, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Suppanstrasse 69 Schloss Ehrenhausen 25022016 0301.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:06, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Suppanstrasse 69 Schloss Ehrenhausen 25022016 0302.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Onion-shaped church towers from close distance are always perspectively tricky, but I think, it is ok here. With "content base filling" in PS, I had cloned out the branches top right. Good enough for QI, Johann. --Cccefalon 09:48, 30 January 2016 (UTC)  Comment Thanks a lot, Uwe, for all your efforts, help and review. --Johann Jaritz 11:49, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Suppanstrasse 69 Schloss Ehrenhausen Einfahrtstor 25012016 0309.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:52, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Suppanstrasse 69 Schloss Ehrenhausen Skulptur "nous" 25012016 0308.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:51, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Suppanstrasse 69 Schloss Ehrenhausen Meierhof 25022016 0310.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Ehrentaler Strasse 119 Schloss Ehrental Teilansicht 25012016 0314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit overexposed, repairable --Michielverbeek 06:18, 28 January 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks, Michiel, for your review. I shaded the overexposed parts and uploaded this version. --Johann Jaritz 07:06, 28 January 2016 (UTC) It's now a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 07:22, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Ehrenbichlweg Tentschacher Strasse Wegkapelle 25012016 0318.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Ehrenbichlweg 31 Schloss Ehrenbichl 25012016 0320.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:58, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Ehrenbichlweg 31 Schloss Ehrenbichl 25012016 2666.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 04:15, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Pfarrkirche hll Michael und Georg Epitaph Georg von Ernau 26012016 0368.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Pfarrkirche hll Michael und Georg Epitaph Ulrich II von Ernau 26012016 0361.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:36, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Pfarrkirche hll Michael und Georg Wappengrabplatte 1662 Neuhaus und Gradisch 26012016 0365.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:15, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Pfarrkirche hll Michael und Georg Wappengrabplatte 1665 Georg Andre Khraneg 26012016 0367.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:36, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Pfarrkirche hll Michael und Georg Wappengrabplatte 1665 Josph von Stubenberg 26012016 0370.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:13, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Promenadenbad Bruecke zur Blumeninsel 28012016 0425.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 04:56, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Promenadenbad Bruecke zur Blumeninsel 28012016 0439.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:35, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Ehrenbichlweg kahle Baeume 25012016 0322.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Would the right tree cutting, but for me good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Ehrenbichlweg 31 Schloss Ehrenbichl 25012016 2654.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Promenadenbad Bruecke zur Blumeninsel 28012016 0434.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:48, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Promenadenbad Blumeninsel Pappeln 28012016 0442.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:15, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Schiffsanlegebruecke 28012016 0447.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 21012016 0295.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 21012016 0295.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Elisabethstrasse Personalhaus des Parkhotels 28012016 0417.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:39, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg 5 Parkhotel-Strandpavillon 28012016 0421.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:32, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Steinmauer 28012016 0422.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:59, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Pavillon 21012016 0281.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Marianne Casamance 05:42, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Promenadenbad Bruecke zur Blumeninsel 28012016 0424.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:16, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Promenadenbad Blumeninsel Pappeln 28012016 0438.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:53, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Pavillon 21012016 0283.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:28, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Pavillon 21012016 0275.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Promenadenbad Bruecke zur Blumeninsel 28012016 0436.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Uferzone mit Salix caprea und Schilfrohr 21012016 0256.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Q1quality, good focus to the main tree - but not a very interesting photo and you might remove branches in right top corner --Michielverbeek 06:51, 4 February 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks, Michiel, for your promotion. Your thoughts about that image do match 100% with mine. Anyway, I tried to improve the shot by cropping out some of the irrelevant parts. --Johann Jaritz 07:15, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Wahlissstrasse 19 Apartements und Infopoint 28012016 0419.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Klagenfurt Annaichl Waltendorfer Strasse Hochsitz im Morgendunst 04022016 2686.jpg

Hello Johann, what a nice mood! :) I think the image is a bit tilted on left, look at the ground and at the stand. And I really think you should crop 300px of the grass at bottom, I tried on my PC and the result is fantastic. See notes on the image. Regard, Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 10:30, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

• I love so the mood that I could not resist an udploaded an attempt of edition, please revert if you don't like it. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:47, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Merci beaucoup, Christian! You are the expert of photography and image editing. Thus I am grateful for your edition, even for the different mood it exhales now, I accept the outcome for 100 percent. Thank you very much for your generous effort. I find the result much better now. Many greetings from Autriche. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:58, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

I'm happy if you like it dear friend :) Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 12:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Je te souhaite un bon dimanche après-midi. Bon repos et beaucoup des epreuves jolies. Cordialement de la Carinthie. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade 24 Promenadenbad 28012016 0429.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Is a white spot left in the air, but good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 5 February 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks, Agnes, for your promotion. I cloned the white spot out and uploaded this improved version. --Johann Jaritz 16:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade 24 Promenadenbad 28012016 0430.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:32, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Buchenstamm mit Einritzungen 28012016 0420.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Aussichtspunkt 28012016 0423.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:29, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Promenadenbad Bruecke zur Blumeninsel 28012016 0444.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:20, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade 24 Promenadenbad 28012016 0433.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Could be rotated a tad cw. --Cccefalon 06:27, 6 February 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks, Uwe, for your promotion. I rotated the image cw a tad and uploaded a revised file. --Johann Jaritz 08:17, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Uferzone mit Schilfrohr 21012016 0260.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CAs in the branches at top (left and middle) --Christian Ferrer 05:58, 6 February 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks, Christian, for discovering that issue. I mended the CAs and uploaded this topped version. --Johann Jaritz 07:59, 6 February 2016 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 16:57, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Parkbank mit Seeblick 21012016 0264.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:00, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Maria Woerth-Blick 21012016 0267.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Ehrenbichlweg 31 Gut Ehrenbichl 25012016 0321.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Ehrenbichlweg 31 Schloss Ehrenbichl 25012016 2662.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Ehrenbichlweg 31 Gut Ehrenbichl Schlosskapelle 25012016 2655.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Ehrenbichlweg 31 Gut Ehrenbichl Wirtschaftsgebaeude 25012016 2667.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Waltendorfer Strasse Flur 04022016 2694.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:30, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Waltendorfer Strasse Flur mit Baumreihe 04022016 2689.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:30, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Waltendorfer Strasse Hochsitz im Morgendunst 04022016 2686.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality en nice.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:13, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Waltendorfer Strasse Waldrand 04022016 2699.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:53, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Waltendorfer Strasse Flur und Baeume 04022016 2677.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:27, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Ehrenbichlweg Tentschacher Strasse Wegkapelle und Gut Ehrenbichl 25012016 0316.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Brockweg Brennholz-Stapel 06022016 0534.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit on the dark side, but good quality.--Famberhorst 06:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks, Dominicus Johannes, for your promotion. I brightened up the image a tad and uploaded this file. --Johann Jaritz 08:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Gaisrueckenstrasse Streuobstwiese 06022016 0540.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 05:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Gaisrueckenstrasse Streuobstwiese Apfelbaum-Stamm 06022016 0541.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Gaisrueckenstrasse Streuobstwiese Mauswurfshuegel 06022016 0559.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and exceptional educational value --Hubertl 09:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)  Comment I really do appreciate your comments full of wit. --Johann Jaritz 09:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Brockweg Birnbaumallee 06022016 0531.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Brockweg Brockhof alte Schmiede 06022016 0563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krumpendorf Parkweg Kurpark Schilfrohr und Laterne 04022016 2712.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krumpendorf Parkweg Kurklinik 04022016 2713.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 05:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krumpendorf Parkweg Kurklinik Ostseite Doppelfenster 04022016 2717.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krumpendorf Parkweg Kurpark Parkbank 04022016 2715.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 05:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krumpendorf Parkbad Badehaus 04022016 2713 2714.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:13, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Brockweg Brockhof und vulgo Ostermann 06022016 0533.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Brockweg Teich mit Typha latifolia 06022016 0567.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Gaisrueckenstrasse Streuobstwiese Apfelbaum 06022016 0561.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Brockweg am Waldrand 06022016 0569.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krumpendorf Blick auf Reifnitz und Mittagskogel 04022016 2709.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Brockweg Brennholz-Stapel 06022016 0536.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Brockweg Brockhof Teich Typha latifolia 06022016 0568.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fluff a bit on the white side, but for me good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 12 February 2016 (UTC) Fixed Thanks, Agnes, for your promotion. I darkened the fluff a bit. --Johann Jaritz 06:03, 12 February 2016 (UTC) Note: better now. Thank you.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:33, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 203 Reliefstein mit Inschrift F W 1835 06022016 0517.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Waltendorfer Strasse Hochsitz im Morgendunst 04022016 2684.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Schloss 1 Schloss S-Flügel mit Schlosskapelle SW-Ansicht 26012015 9083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Schloss Supraporte Doppelwappen Kronegg Zinzendorff 26012016 2668.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:35, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Pfarrkirche hll Michael und Georg Hochaltar Oelbild hl Michael 26012016 0373.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Brauhausgasse 1 Evangelisches Germeindehaus 26012016 0377.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Brauhausgasse 1 Evangelisches Germeindehaus 26012016 0375.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bad Kleinkirchheim St Oswald Kirchweg 16 Pfarrkirche hl Oswald Tuerbeschlag 17092015 7572.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bad Kleinkirchheim St Oswald Kirchweg 16 Pfarrkirche hl Oswald Tuerbeschlag 17092015 7572.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Techelsberg Pernach 11 Bauernhof vulgo Petutschnig 28012016 0387.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:57, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Baerndorf Nussbaum-Stamm 28012016 0398.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Muehlteich Schloss Moosburg 31102015 1879.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Schloss Schlosskapelle und Portal SO-Ansicht 26012016 0355.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Pfarrkirche Hll Michael und Georg O-Teil Kirchturm 15092015 7421.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Pfarrkirche Heilige Michael und Georg Kanzel 26012016 0372.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Gaisrueckenstrasse 2 Pfarrhof 15092015 7419.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality, but the roof top right is a little bit disturbing. --XRay 06:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC) Fixed Thanks, Dietmar, for your promotion. I cloned the disturbing edge of the roof out. --Johann Jaritz 07:05, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Baerndorf Bruecke ueber Stallhofener Bach 28012016 0403.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 05:07, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Baerndorf Stallhofener Bach 28012016 0399.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pse see my annotations--Cccefalon 04:56, 15 February 2016 (UTC) Fixed Thanks, Uwe, for your constructive help. According to your suggestions I cloned the impossibly unsharp parts out. --Johann Jaritz 05:44, 15 February 2016 (UTC) Well done and Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Baerndorf Bruecke ueber Stallhofener Bach 28012016 0397.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Pfarrkirche Roemerstein Stelenoberteil Ehepaar 26012016 0356.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Pfarrkirche roemerzeitlicher Grabbau mit Taenzer auf Akanthusbluete 26012016 0358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Mitterteich-Halbinsel Unterholz 28012016 0407.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Mitterteich-Halbinsel Uferzone Schilfguertel 28012016 0411.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:13, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Mitterteich-Halbinsel Uferzone totes Holz 28012016 0412.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:12, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Mitterteich-Halbinsel Uferzone totes Holz 28012016 0414.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:55, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Mitterteich-Halbinsel Uferzone Schilfguertel 28012016 0415.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Stillleben Kraeutersalz und Kartoffeln 02022015 9410.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Schloss Schlosskapelle Ost-Portal 26012016 2674.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moosburg Pfarrkirche roem Grabbaurelief Perseus und Andromeda 26012016 0357.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Klagenfurt Annabichl Waltendorfer Strasse Hochsitz im Morgendunst 04022016 2686.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Klagenfurt Annabichl Waltendorfer Strasse Hochsitz im Morgendunst 04022016 2686.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villach Maria Gail Pfarrkirche S-Wand aussen Steinreliefs hl Georg und Prinzessin 16022016 2724.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:26, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villach Maria Gail Pfarrkirche Zu Unserer Lieben Frau S-Portal 16022016 2720.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:55, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villach Maria Gail Pfarrkirche Mittelschiff S-Wand aussen Statue Gottesmutter 16022016 2719.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:55, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villach Maria Gail Pfarrkirche Zu Unserer Lieben Frau S-Wand Masswerkfenster 16022016 2722.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:26, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villach Maria Gail Pfarrkirche S-Wand aussen Engel des Weltgerichts 16022016 2721.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:26, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Ranis, Ansicht von Süd-Ost, 151002, ako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:49, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villach Maria Gail Pfarrkirche Zu Unserer Lieben Frau S-Wand Masswerkfenster 16022016 2725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:13, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villach Maria Gail Pfarrkirche Zu Unserer Lieben Frau Chorschluss Masswerkfenster 16022016 2744.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:13, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villach Maria Gail Pfarrkirche Vorhalle Schlussstein Gewoelbescheitel 16022016 2730.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villach Maria Gail Pfarrkirche Zu Unserer Lieben Frau S-Wand Gitterfenster 16022016 2739.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:12, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villach Maria Gail Kriegerdenkmal Relief 16022016 2745.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:12, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Schiffanlegebruecke 05022016 0503.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade 24 Promenadenbad 05022016 0500.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade 24 Strandleben 05022016 0501.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:29, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Blumeninsel Blick vom Landspitz 05022016 0492.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinsel-Blick nach Maria Woerth 05022016 0495.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Millstatt Stiftgasse Plastik des Lorenzo da Ponte 20042015 2266.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Millstatt Pfarrkirche Christus Salvator West-Wand rom Relief Vogel mit 3 Jungen 20042015 2269.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Millstatt Benediktinerstift Kreuzgang Doppelarkade zum Innenhof 20042015 2373.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Millstatt Benediktinerstift Kreuzgang Ostfluegel Doppelsaeule Basis Maennchen 20042015 2348.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Bahnhofplatz Oesterreichischer Hof 13122015 9745.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But: A very tight crop at the top and bottom. And the car is a little bit disturbing (but acceptable). --XRay 07:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Goritschach Filialkirche hl Oswald Vorhalle 26122015 9854.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:11, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Gaisrueckenstrasse Am Kåte Bildstock 16112015 9045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade 24 Promenadenbad Gitterfenster 05022016 0498.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade 24 Promenadenbad 05022016 0472.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finkenstein Faak am See Kreisverkehr Rosental Strasse Bikermonument 20022016 0612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:30, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finkenstein Faak am See Kreisverkehr Rosental Strasse Bikermonument 20022016 0611.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:30, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Millstatt Benediktinerstift Kreuzgang SO-Ansicht Viererarkade 20042015 2318.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Might it be, that the perspective isn't correct yet? The windows are somewhat skewed ccw. Elsewhere good as usual, --Cccefalon 04:57, 22 February 2016 (UTC)  Comment The cloister was set up around 1200 A.D. and the windows aren`t rectilinear as we are used to nowadays standards. They are really skewed, especially the left one in the image. --Johann Jaritz 05:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC) I trust your statement. For old buildings it is sometimes better to ask the photographer before making a decision. Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:21, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finkenstein Faak am See Kreisverkehr Rosental Strasse Bikermonument 20022016 0596.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finkenstein Faak am See Kreisverkehr Rosental Strasse Bikermonument 20022016 0600.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:15, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finkenstein Faak am See Kreisverkehr Rosental Strasse Bikermonument 20022016 0607.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:16, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Finkenstein Faak am See Kreisverkehr Rosental Strasse Bikermonument 20022016 0601.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Finkenstein Faak am See Kreisverkehr Rosental Strasse Bikermonument 20022016 0601.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kappel am Krappfeld Duernfeld 13 Filialkirche hl Pankratius 12092015 7345.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Techelsberg Ebenfeld Filialkirche hl Vitus 20022016 0591.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Kleinkirchheim Sankt Oswald Kirchweg 16 Pfarrkirche hl Oswald 17092015 7549.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but left side leaning out slightly --Uoaei1 05:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC) Fixed Thanks, Uoaei1, for your assessment. I corrected the leaning out part and put it vertical. --Johann Jaritz 05:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)  Support now --Uoaei1 09:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosegg Pfarrkirche hl Michael SW-Ansicht 20022016 0615.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments One dustspot and right side leaning out. Elsewhere good. --Cccefalon 05:22, 24 February 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks, Uwe, for your review. I fixed both mentioned issues. --Johann Jaritz 05:58, 24 February 2016 (UTC) Good as usual. --Cccefalon 06:04, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finkenstein Faak am See Kreisverkehr Seeufer-Landesstrasse Wegkapelle 20022016 0613.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Zollfeld Virunum Prunnerkreuz 18102015 8148.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:42, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Zollfeld Prunnerkreuz Medaillongrabstele Buesten zweier Knaben 18102015 8149.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:42, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Gaisrueckenstrasse halbaufbereitetes Buchen-Brennholz 23022016 0652.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:24, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Gaisrueckenstrasse Am Kåte gefaellter Birnbaum 23022016 0663.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:24, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Gaisrueckenstrasse 70 vulgo Brock-Hof und vulgo Rumasch 23022016 0661.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Gaisrueckenstrasse 70 vulgo Brock-Hof und vulgo Ostermann 23022016 0662.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:01, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Brockweg Brennholzstapel und alte Schmiede 23022016 0665.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Kannst du dich noch

Wau!

an die Zeiten solcher Farbexplosionen erinnern Irgendwie muss das vor deiner Zeit gewesen sein.. --Hubertl 22:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Aus heutiger Sicht der Dinge kann ich diese Phase meiner "Farbexperimente" nur sehr schwer nachvollziehen. Ich selber kann mir diese Periode nur schwer erklären. Ja, ich schüttle sogar des öfteren den Kopf, wenn ich jene "Elaborate" aus der Zeitspanne von 2008 bis 2012 betrachte. Vermutlich hatte mich der Geist von Andy Warhol ergriffen gehabt oder von wem auch immer. Ich möchte es als meine "expressionistische Periode" bezeichnen. Froh bin ich ja nur über den wiedergefundenen Naturalismus, der mich gegenwärtig beflügelt. Ich kann mir nur schwer vorstellen, dass ich diesen Pfad jemals wieder verlasse. lg --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Zollfeld Prunnerkreuz Grabaltar fuer Sabina Aelius Tertius und Castus 18102015 8154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:06, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Zollfeld Prunnerkreuz Grabinschrift des C Pomponius Felix 18102015 8150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:06, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Zollfeld Prunnerkreuz Grabinschrift fuer Ti Claudius Tertius Pomponia Procula 18102015 8153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Klagenfurt Viktring Quellenstrasse Strom-Verbundnetz 13022010 1580.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Klagenfurt Viktring Quellenstrasse Strom-Verbundnetz 13022010 1580.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Bootsverleih Bruecken-Konstruktion 25022016 0685.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:12, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Werzer´s Boothaus 25022016 0687.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:34, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 151 ehemaliges Postamt Postillon-Plastik 25022016 0676.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:34, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Woerther See-Ufer Rohrkolben 25022016 0677.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Weiden und Parkbaenke 25022016 0679.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:18, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarvisio Rio del Lago Raibler See Cima Predil und Predil-Passstrasse 10032015 0510.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarvisio Rio del Lago Raibler See und Monte Canin 10032015 0511.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:53, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarvisio Rio del Lago Fort mit Haubitze 10032015 0492.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:47, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Lago Predil mit Haubitze 10032015 0477.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp photo, good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 05:14, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarvisio Rio del Lago Fort Interiore 10032015 0482.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:08, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarvisio Rio del Lago Raibler See Geschuetz 10032015 0493.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, sharp enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:14, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarvisio Rio del Lago Raibler See mit Fuenfspitz 10032015 0505.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarvisio Rio del Lago Fort mit Haubitze 10032015 0490.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:12, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarvisio Rio del Lago Fort Haubitzen-Detail 10032015 0486.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:12, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarvisio Rio del Lago Fort howitzer cranks 10032015 0485.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bovec Flitscher Klause Sued-Seite 10032015 0617.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:42, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flitsch oesterr-ungar Frontlinie Uebergangsgraben und Schneegloeckchen 10032015 0647.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:42, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bovec Koritnica oesterr-ungar Frontlinie Freilichtmuseum 10032015 0669.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flitsch oesterr-ungar Frontlinie Stacheldrahtverhau 10032015 0666.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:30, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flitsch oesterr-ungar Frontlinie Primeln und Schneegloeckchen 10032015 0656.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:21, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flitsch oesterr-ungar Frontlinie Lastaufzug Umlenkrolle 10032015 0661.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:21, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bovec Spodnja Trenta Soča-Bruecke 10032015 0682.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. FPC? --Uoaei1 05:30, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Hermann mit Mangart und Strmec 10032015 0545.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:29, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mangart 10032015 0513.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:29, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flitscher Klause 10032015 0601.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:29, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bovec Flitscher Klause West-Seite 10032015 0609.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:54, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bovec Flitscher Klause Sued-Seite Schießscharten 10032015 0620.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 05:35, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flitsch Soldatenfriedhof 10032015 0672.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flitsch oesterr-ungar Frontlinie Holzhuette an Seilbahn 10032015 0655.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bovec Flitscher Klause Nord-Seite 10032015 0607.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:10, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarvisio Rio del Lago Raibler See und Fuenfspitz 10032015 0500.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:23, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarvisio Rio del Lago W-O-Blickrichtung mit Mangart und Jalovec 10032015 0532.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarvisio Rio del Lago Blick zum Monte Canin 10032015 0491.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:22, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarvisio Rio del Lago Sella Nevea Kabinenbahn und Schipiste Monte Canin 10032015 0527.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:41, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarvisio Rio del Lago Sella Nevea Kabinenbahn zum Monte Canin 10032015 0522.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:20, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passo del Predil Gostilna Hermanov und Grenzstation 10032015 0542.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice depth of field --Daniel Case 04:06, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passo del Predil Gostilna Hermanov und Grenzstation 10032015 0540.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp detail --Daniel Case 04:06, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passo del Predil Blick auf Mangart und Jalovec 10032015 0541.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice view --Daniel Case 04:06, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bovec Strmec na Predelu Fort Hermann 10032015 0547.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Another good image from this set --Daniel Case 04:06, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bovec Strmec na Predelu Passo del Predil Strasse unter Fort Hermann 10032015 0553.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great winter scene; best of this set --Daniel Case 04:06, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarvisio Rio del Lago Ortsschild Sella Nevea 10032015 0530.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarvisio Rio del Lago Sella Nevea telecabina Canin funivia Prevala-Schild 10032015 0524.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:36, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarvisio Rio del Lago Sella Nevea Kabinenbahn zum Monte Canin 10032015 0526.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:41, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarvisio Sella Nevea mit Jôf di Montasio 10032015 0529.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 07:33, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarvisio Sella Nevea Gebaeude 10032015 0531.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:40, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Poertschach Werzerpromenade Schiffsanlegestelle Sonnenuntergang 17022015 7558.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Poertschach Werzerpromenade Schiffsanlegestelle Sonnenuntergang 17022015 7558.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Pfarrkirche St. Bartholomäus in Friesach

Hallo, ich war gerade auf dieser Seite, der Text muss aber falsch sein. (Maria Saal, copy+paste Fehler) Kannst du das korrigieren. lg --Hannes 24 (talk) 17:56, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Hannes, vielen Dank für Dein wachsames Auge! Was für ein peinlicher Fehler! Dürfte passiert sein, wie Du richtig mutmaßt, durch Einkopieren von einer anderen Seite, allerdings ohne anschließende Textkorrektur. Das ist nun richtig gestellt. Liebe Grüße --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:39, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

mir auch schon passiert ;-). lg --Hannes 24 (talk) 14:59, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bovec Strmec na Predelu Fort Hermann 10032015 0558.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:39, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passo del Predil Gostilna Hermanov und Grenzstation 10032015 0543.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bovec Strmec na Predelu Fort Hermann 10032015 0549.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:06, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bovec Strmec na Predelu Fort Hermann 10032015 0552.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bovec Strmec na Predelu Fort Hermann 10032015 0554.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:03, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bovec Strmec na Predelu Fort Hermann 10032015 0564.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:05, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bovec Strmec na Predelu Fort Hermann mit Strasse 10032015 0565.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:12, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bovec Strmec na Predelu Fort Hermann 10032015 0557.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bovec Strmec na Predelu Fort Hermann 10032015 0559.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:00, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bovec Strmec na Predelu Fort Hermann 10032015 0560.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:13, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Woerthersee-Ostbucht Villen-Ensemble 06032016 2853.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Erlenstaemme im Park 06032016 2844.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:05, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Herbecks Ruhe 06032016 2855.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:59, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Park Schilfrohr 06032016 2843.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:00, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade junger Hoeckerschwan 06032016 2858.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yndesai 05:37, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Log Pod Mangrtom und Rombon 10032015 0593.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Log Pod Mangrtom und Rombon 10032015 0593.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Drautalbahn II Stations-Bahnsteig 06032016 2813.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Wahlißstraße 1 Villa Gitterfenster 06032016 2834.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:16, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade junger Hoeckerschwan 06032016 2859.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:09, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Keutschach Pyramidenkogel Aussichtsturm in Wolken 06032016 2835.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:09, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Naturpark im Landschaftsschutzgebiet 06032016 2841.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:15, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Marienstrasse 4 Friseur ISI 06032016 2869.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 04:18, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 188 Cafe-Bar 06032016 2870.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 04:18, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Drautalbahn II Stations-Bahnsteig 06032016 2816.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:59, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Werzer Promenade Seehotel Werzer 06032016 2862.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:11, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Annastrasse 10 Appartement-Villa Balkon-Giebel 06032016 2832.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:12, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade 10 Hausboot 06032016 2867.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:08, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Laternen an Terrasse 06032016 2866.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 186 Hofgebaeude 06032016 2871.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 176 Hotel Dermuth Eingangsschild 06032016 2873.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:06, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 176 Hotel Dermuth Eingang Lichtpyramide 06032016 2872.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:06, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Keutschach Pyramidenkogel Aussichtsturm in Wolken 06032016 2835.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Keutschach Pyramidenkogel Aussichtsturm in Wolken 06032016 2835.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Blick von Hohe Gloriette 01032016 0726.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:10, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz und Pyramidenkogel 46032016 0864.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:10, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 46032016 0871.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:10, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg 5 Parkhotel-Strandpavillon 04032016 0852.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:00, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 160 Firmenschild Cecco Beppe-Bar 06032016 2876.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:39, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 181 Haus Dr Kellner Portalbereich 06032016 2874.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Funny to see that you have used the distortion of the window and the image is sharp enough to be a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 05:10, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Kinderspielplatz Federwipptier 06032016 2861.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:03, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Pavillon 06032016 2856.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. May be better with the whole roof. --XRay 06:28, 13 March 2016 (UTC)  Comment You are right. The problem on that day was, that I had the 70-200mm zoom-lens mounted and I could not step back any further. --Johann Jaritz 07:15, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Wahlißstraße 1 Villa Sued-Ansicht 06032016 2836.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:28, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Parkhotel vom Werzerstrand gesehen 10032016 0904.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 03:42, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 206 BKS und Mecs 10032016 0901.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad und Pyramidenkogel 10032016 0913.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:55, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Blick von Hohe Gloriette auf Pyramidenkogel 01032016 0716.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:55, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Blick vom Werzerstrand auf Pyramidenkogel 10032016 0903.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is beautiful to see that the lake works as a mirror for the landscape, a Q1photo but it might have been a bit brighter and-or warmer --Michielverbeek 06:15, 15 March 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks, Michiel, for your review. I brightened up the dark parts and gave it a tad more of a warm touch. --Johann Jaritz 07:32, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Strandbar Passion 10032016 0909.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:49, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Werzerpromenade Werzer-Bad 10032016 0902.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:23, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Werzerpromenade 10 Werzer-Strandcasino und Bootshaus 10032016 0905.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 03:30, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Werzer-Esplanade Schiffsanlegestelle 15032016 0945.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:19, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landschaftspark 10032016 0918.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:16, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landschaftspark Trauerweide 10032016 0917.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Badehuetten und Hotel Astoria 10032016 0908.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:16, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Uferzone mit Salix caprea und Schilfrohr 10032016 0920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:41, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Naturpark 14032016 0929.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Naturpark Krokusse 14032016 0924.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:41, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Naturpark 14032016 0925.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:55, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 136 Sunset-Appartements 15032016 0963.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:20, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Annastrasse 25 Seevilla Ambassador 17032016 0974.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:20, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Schilfrohr 15032016 0959.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:20, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Pavillon 14032016 0931.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:15, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Radfahr-Verbotsschild 14032016 0935.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:38, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Bootsanlegesteg und Rutschenturm 14032016 0936.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:42, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Veranstaltungspavillon 14032016 0937.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:38, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Ernst Wahliss-Bueste 15032016 0956.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:52, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 124 Seestuben Rainer 15032016 0964.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:42, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Wertzerpromenade 10 Werzer-Strandcasino Leuchtkasten 15032016 0942.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:11, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarvisio Coccau mit Mangart und Cinque Punte 18032016 0987.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:35, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarvisio Rio del Lago Fort mit Haubitze 18032016 2904.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:35, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarvisio Lago del Predil Haubitze Cinque Punte Cima Predil und Passstrasse 18032016 1008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:35, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarvisio Lago del Predil mit Serpentinen der Passstrasse 18032016 2901.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments speciaal.--Famberhorst 07:55, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarvisio Rio del Lago Cinque Punte 18032016 2896.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Gaisrueckenstrasse 19 Grenzstein Burgfried Moosburg 20032016 1023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:33, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Gaisrueckenstrasse 19 Grenzstein Burgfried Moosburg 20032016 1022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:39, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Brockweg Brockhof aufgelassene Schmiede 20032016 1029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Gaisrueckenstrasse Abzweigung Muehlweg Wegweiser 20032016 1024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp enough, good focus to main object but IMO not a very interesting composition --Michielverbeek 06:12, 21 March 2016 (UTC)  Comment Yes, Michiel, you are right. But this photograph serves more as a documentary. --Johann Jaritz 06:25, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Gaisrueckenstrasse 77 vulgo Rumasch Pferdestall 20032016 1043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stepro 06:00, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Brockweg Teich am Brockhof 20032016 1028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 04:17, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Brockweg Brockhof aufgelassene Schmiede S-Ansicht 20032016 1032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 03:56, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Brockweg vulgo Ostermann 20032016 1045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:03, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Quellweg 2003201 1047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition from which I probably forget to make a photo from, image is sharp while different focuses are necessary, but IMO sky has to be a bit darker to limit the noise --Michielverbeek 06:32, 22 March 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks, Michiel, for your constructive review. I darkened the sky a tad. --Johann Jaritz 07:24, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Naturpark Buchenhain 14032016 0934.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:21, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Bank am Landschaftspark 14032016 0933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:56, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Schiffsanlegestelle 14032016 0938.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:49, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Ratzendorf Gedenksaeule 25. Mai 1906 MvB 22032016 2934.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Rolf H. 04:51, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Brockhof Wirtschaftsgebaeude S-Ansicht 20032016 1027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:05, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Brockweg Streuobstwiese 20032016 1033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Poertschach Werzerpromenade 10 Woerther See Stockentenpaar 15032016 0943.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Poertschach Werzerpromenade 10 Woerther See Stockentenpaar 15032016 0943.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Schöne Ostern euch allen!

Das Wetter scheint ja einigermaßen mitzuspielen... --Hubertl 21:01, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Promenadenbad Bruecke zur Blumeninsel 23032016 1086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 04:26, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Template:QICpromoted/layout Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Geography_of_Gmünd-Millstatt

Template:Autotranslate Herzi Pinki ([[User talk:Herzi Pinki|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:55, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:40, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Danke für die Kategorisierung

ich habe diese mit einer versteckten Unterkategorie (2016) ergänzt und diese um die Bilder erweitert, welche du seit 15. April als Supported by definiert hast. Diese ist nun hier (im oberen Bereich) angeführt. Es ist damit (vor allem für WMAT) leichter, die Menge den jeweiligen Zeiträumen zuzuordnen. --Hubertl 06:49, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Auch Dir sei vielmals gedankt für die Visualisierung der Kategorisierungen. ;=) Ist allen Beteiligten gewiss eine riesengroße Hilfe. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:51, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Wann ma sich des so ånschaut..

dånn waas ma, des sand ånständige Leit und kaane Falottn und Stiazla! --Hubertl 06:43, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

dånn waas ma, dåss des 400 mm a klaasse Optik iss, å`g`wåndt von an Könna ohnegleich`n. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:58, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:40, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:40, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Invitation - Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2016 - Jury

Hello, based in the quality and level of your contributions, I would like to invite you to join the WLE Brasil Jury that will be responsible to evaluate the TOP500 pictures and elect the Brazilian winners that will be selected for the international phase of the contest.

Our contest will be running until June 30 and the filtering proccess and winners election will be after that date.

For sure your participation will improve our final quality and results. Best regards Rodrigo Padula ([[User talk:Rodrigo Padula|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:09, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Dear Rodrigo Padula, sorry for my delayed answer to your kind invitation of joining the WLE Brazil Jury in order to evaluate the TOP 500 pictures of WLE Brazil. I do say YES and I ask you to remind me in July to view all the 500 preselected images. Thank you for the honor of inviting me to your jury. Best regards --Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:07, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:39, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Kleine Reparatur

Hallo! Wahrscheinlich hast du es schon gesehen ... Dein Bild File:Villach_Voelkendorfer_Strasse_86_Schloss_Werthenau_23052016_2043.jpg hat oben links eine kleine weiße Ecke (vom Zuschnitt). Ich hab's schon als QI bewertet, da ich mir sicher bin, dass du die kleine Macke noch behebst. --XRay ^talk 04:44, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Schönen guten Morgen, Dietmar! Herzlichen Dank für Deine Bewertung, aber auch für die Aufdeckung der Macke in diesem Bild. Zwischenzeitlich habe ich dieses "Missgeschick" behoben. Ich habe leider wieder einmal geschludert. ;=) Schönes Wochenende und herzliche Grüße aus dem Süden Österreichs. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:21, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Danke an alle

Hallo. Warum drückst du eigentlich auf "sich bedanken" für jede Promotion deines Fotos als QI? Ich für meinen Teil finde es nur nervig, wenn die Dankesmeldungen ohne besonderen Anlass kommen. Du kannst dich am besten "bedanken", wenn du im Gegenzug andere Nominationen gewissenhaft reviewst (mit Betonung auf gewissenhaft), was du hoffentlich ohnehin tust. Grüße --A.Savin 12:16, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Ein freundliches "Hallo!" zurück! Besten Dank für Deine Anregung. Du hast vollkommen Recht mit Deiner Meinung, dass es nervig sei, wenn Dankesmeldungen ohne besonderen Anlass versendet werden. Ich dachte mir, ich tue es, um nette Umgangsformen mit den Members der Community zu pflegen. Fortan werde ich es unterlassen, da ja wirklich kein besonderer Anlass gegeben ist; mit Ausnahme der FP candidates, wo es auch um mehr geht. Zum Thema "Gewissenhaftigkeit bei Nominationen" in den Reviews von Fotos anderer Teilnehmer: Dein Mahnruf ist vollkommen berechtigt, da ich mich manchmal dabei ertappe, ein wenig zu oberflächlich hingesehen und den einen oder anderen Makel dadurch übersehen zu haben. Ich will auch hier mehr Akkuratesse künftighin an den Tag legen. Auf Deine Nominationen bezogen, kann ich nur resumierend feststellen, dass so gut wie alle tadellos sind. Deine Einreichungen aus Indien sind einsame Klasse und gefallen mir persönlich ausnehmend gut. (Bin schließlich ein Fan des Subkontinents.) Du hast ein sehr gutes Auge und nimmst auch die Nachbearbeitungen sehr gewissenhaft vor. Gratuliere! Herzliche Grüße aus dem Süden Österreichs. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:28, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Possible FP

Hello, Johann. I think this photo is of sufficiently high quality and interest, because of the shapes of the sculpture and the various poles, to be a good Featured Picture Candidate, though of course I couldn't predict with confidence how people would vote. I thought I'd ask your opinion of the photo, though.

Regards,

Ikan Kekek ([[User talk:Ikan Kekek|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:35, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Ikan. I have been looking for a Featured Picture Candidate among my photographs of the past period, but didn`t find any of them apted for a nomination. It is hard for me to judge which of them might work. To be honest, I didn`t find any of my images of value for a nomination. That`s why I left it. If you consider your suggested image might have a chance, feel free to nominate it. I am only afraid, the rest of the community won`t approve it. Or maybe yes? I don`t know. Anyway I thank you for your friendly hint.

Regards, --Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:57, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, Johann. If you're not sure you consider it featurable, I don't think I should nominate it.

Regards,

Ikan Kekek ([[User talk:Ikan Kekek|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:48, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Termin?

heute oder morgen? werde wahrscheinlich montags wieder fahren. --Hubertl 07:26, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

bei jedem Schritt kriege ich heute Schweißausbrüche. Bin maximal mit Badehose gekleidet. Bewege mich gerade zwischen Schatten, Dusche oder Wörther See-Freibad, um mich einigermaßen kühl zu halten. Bleibt nur morgen, der Sonntag. Schauen wir morgen in der Früh, was möglich wird. Angenehme Stunden in der Hängematte am Pimperlesee. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:26, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Paaaaßt, i liiieg aa untam Baaam.--Hubertl 11:31, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Bei so an Wetta konn i nit vül mochn. Lei a bissale umahängan und paaasst. Kennst mi eh! Bin holt lei a faula Tscheafl! Kennst eh die Käantna Devis`n: "Lei loß`n!" --Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:41, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:11, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Die Dreifaltigkeitssäule

Da ist dem Dehio-Mitarbeiter wohl die Fantasie durchgegangen. Die Katholen haben nie, werden nie und wenn, dann höchstens so als ob, auch nur den geringsten Hinweis darauf geben, dass irgendeine andere als die katholische Religion auch nur in der geringsten Form als neben-, geschweige denn gleichberechtigt neben ihnen stehen kann. Das ist der Zustand im 21. Jhdt. Was immer 1680 in den Gedanken der Erbauer drinnen war, nicht jedoch die Weltreligionen. Das Doppelkreuz ist das Patriarchenkreuz (Erzbischöflich), wäre es mit drei Balken, wäre es päpstlich, die liegende Mondsichel ist marianisch, die Weltkugel repräsentiert die Katholische Kirche als "die" weltumspannende, katholische (sic!) Religion. Und das ganze im Singular. Es gab keine Religionen!!! Ende. Traurig, dass damit der Dehio nur noch beschränkt Quelle sein kann. --Hubertl 05:39, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für Deinen fundierten Einwand und die daraus resultierende mehr als berechtigte Kritik. DEHIO macht meinen Beobachtungen zufolge doch einige grundlegende Fehler, die auf die eine oder andere Art und Weise aufs Tapet gebracht werden sollten. Klar, dass aufgrund der dichten Fülle an speziellen (zumeist historischen) Informationen der eine oder andere Flüchtigkeitsfehler passiert. Im vorliegenden Falle ist es aber eine gravierende Aussage, welche das Zeug dazu hat, die katholische Welt in ihren Grundfesten erschüttern zu vermögen. Du hast vollkommen Recht. Als ich die Konnotationen zum Bild von dieser Dreifaltigkeitssäule am Klagenfurter Alten Platz hineinstellte, hatte ich ein wenig Bauchweh, aber ich dachte mir, wenn die "Experten von DEHIO" das dermaßen ausformuliert haben, wird es wohl so seine "Richtigkeit" haben und somit schrieb ich es so hinein (eben mit der Rückendeckung des DEHIO). Aber Du mit Deinem wirklich profunden Wissen über die Grundfesten unseres mitteleuropäischen Kulturkreises hast das mit wachsamem Holzauge sofort richtig dargestellt. Als erste Konsequenz möchte ich Dich darum ersuchen, die Konnotationen dieses Bildes zu überarbeiten und zu korrigieren. So, dass kein größerer Schaden aus dem derzeitigen Ist-Zustand entstehen möge. Weil diese "fundamentale Aussage" zu dem Halbmond könnte doch von gewisser Tragweite sein, gerade in Zeiten wie diesen, in denen Religionen für grausame Machenschaften instrumentalisiert werden. Du weißt, was ich meine. Danke im Voraus!!! Merci vielmals! --Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:47, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:11, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

]

Hallo Johann, bei einigen deiner Uploads taucht an irgendeiner Stelle #x5D; (Decodiert: ]) auf, wie z.B hier und hier und [2]. Hast du eine Idee, wo das herkommt? Womit lädst du deine Bilder hoch? --Arnd ([[User talk:Aschroet|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:01, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Arnd, vielen Dank für Deinen Hinweis. Ich kenne dieses fallweise auftretende, von Dir angesprochene Problem. Dieses rührt daher, dass ich oft schlampig in die Vorlage einkopiere und somit eine eckige Klammer zuwenig da ist, wo zwei hingehören. Das Programm ergänzt die zweite eckige Klammer automatisch durch den von Dir beanstandeten String. Ich werde versuchen, künftig behutsamer zu sein. Ob es gelingt, ist eine andere Frage. Aber bei der Flut an Bildern, die täglich zu editieren und hochzuladen sind, passieren solche Flüchtigkeitsfehler nun mal. Template:Smiley Liebe Grüße aus dem Süden Österreichs. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:42, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Übrigens vielen Dank für das Entfernen des Strings an besagten drei Stellen. Template:Smiley --Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Danke für die schnelle Antwort. Ich werde noch etwas weiter aufräumen. Welchen Programm benutzt du? --Arnd ([[User talk:Aschroet|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:48, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Nochmals herzlichen Dank im Voraus für Deine wertvollen Service-Dienste. Template:Smiley Ich arbeite mit WORD vom Microsoft Office-Paket und mit Google Chrome als Browser. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:55, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Und wie lädst du die Dateien hoch? Einfach über die Webseite oder mit einem speziellen Programm? --Arnd ([[User talk:Aschroet|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:03, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Über diese "Hochladen-Seite" von Commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Hochladen --Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:38, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:04, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you!!

Thank you!! It was a big help for me! truly appreciate your time and effort --Vengolis ([[User talk:Vengolis|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:34, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Once again I apologize, that I did not ask you before, if you don`t mind my editing of your photos. Template:Smiley --Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:36, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:10, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Saligenwanderung Srecno Pec 23092006 07.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Rollroboter ([[User talk:Rollroboter|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:07, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Leider liegt kein Einverständnis der abgebildeten Personen vor. Da ich nicht weiß, wie und wo die Personen erreichbar sind, das Foto aber auch keine größere Bedeutung hat, kann es getrost gelöscht werden. Danke für die Aufmerksamkeit! Template:Smiley Liebe Grüße --Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:19, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:11, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Maria Himmelfahrt

Lieber Johann, zunächst Gratulation zu Deinen vielen tollen Bildern, und danke für Deine oftmalige Unterstützung von meinen Fotos! Mir ist allerdings die von Dir verwendete englischsprachige Bezeichnung des Patroziniums des Maria Saaler Domes aufgefallen. "Assumption Day" ist nur der Himmelfahrtstag. "Assumption of Mary" wäre korrekt. LG. Martin --Uoaei1 ([[User talk:Uoaei1|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:07, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Lieber Martin, besten Dank für Deine lobenden Worte. Ebenso für Deine Unterstützung. Meine Wertschätzung gilt Deinem fotografischen Gesamtwerk, welches aus der Menge strahlend hervorragt. Die Thematik Deiner Aufnahmen ist meinem Betätigungsfeld nicht unähnlich. Für Deine Richtigstellung des englischen Begriffes für "Mariä Himmelfahrt" bin ich Dir sehr dankbar; sowie ich dazukomme, werde ich dies bei den vielen "Himmelfahrts-Bildern" nach und nach ausbessern. :=) LG. Johann --Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:25, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:40, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Bam in 1980

Hallo Johann, du warst in Bam also in der Zeit? Ich war recht beeindruckt von dem Ort nach dem es größenteils wieder aufgebaut wurde. Ich war sehr gespannt wie es vor dem verheerenden Erdbeben in 2003 ausgesehen hatte. Ich habe halt nur tolle Bilder in Kerman und Umgebung gesehen. Überhaupt Iran in der Zeit von Jomeini und dem Krieg mit Irak war sicher spannend. Sicher wäre es für dich interessant nochmals dahin zu gehen, es hat sich viel geändert und in 5 Jahren sieht es wieder ganz anders aus. Viele Grüsse! Poco² 05:59, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Diego, zunächst meinen Glückwunsch zu Deinem hervorragenden Deutsch. Wirklich erstaunlich für einen Spanischsprachigen!
Ja, im Mai 1981 war ich auf einer Busreise von Neu-Delhi auf den "Spuren Alexanders des Großen" unterwegs zurück nach Mitteleuropa; dabei kamen wir auch nach Bam, von deren Zitadelle ich sehr beeindruckt war. Viel ist mittlerweile geschehen und es verändert sich ständig sehr viel (Erdbeben, Kriegswirren, Umgestaltungen, etc.). Damals war ich noch mit einer analogen Nikon F2 und Umkehrfilm unterwegs. Digitale Fotografie war damals noch ein Fremdwort. Ich sollte mich mal mit den damals gemachten Diapositiven auseinandersetzen. Aber es bleibt meistens keine Zeit, das Material durchzuarbeiten und zu digitalisieren; obwohl es schon historischen Wert besitzt. Vielleicht gelingt es mir eines Tages dennoch.
Ich war auch in Isfahan in diesen großartigen Moscheen, die Du so zauberhaft ins Bild gesetzt hast. Allein dafür gebührt Dir der "Nobelpreis für Fotografie", wenn es ihn nur gäbe. Muchos saludos! --Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:37, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Na ja, ich versuche immer mein bestens mit der Sprache :) Wow, eine Busreise von Neu-Delhi über Nahost bist Mitteleuropa. Das waren ja spannende Zeiten! :) Heute ist alles globalisiert, steht zig-mal im Internet und in Lonely Planet Büchern und lässt sich genau verplanen, so wie ich auch zuletzt gemacht hatte. Ja, auch ich habe mit Analogfotografie, 15 Jahre später! angefangen. Ich kann mir also vorstellen, dass Archiven mit Tonnen von Bildern über Jahrzehnten ein Mammutaufgabe wäre. Bzgl. Nobelpreis bin ich ganz anderer Meinung, aber was mir nicht vorwerfen kann, ist dass ich produktiv und vielfältig bin :) Un abrazo! Poco² 19:10, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Template:QICpromoted

Template:QICpromoted

Template:QICpromoted

Template:QICpromoted

Template:QICpromoted

Service, die QI-Definitionen für den Bezirk musst du noch reingeben... --Hubertl 07:14, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:45, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:38, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:38, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

wegen QI

Wie kommst du darauf, so etwas zu promoten [3] [4]? Guckst du dir die Fotos in 100% an? Das ist nie und nimmer QI-Bild.

In einem anderen Kommentar auf deiner Diskussion vor einiger Zeit, hatte ich gebeten, gewissenhaft (mit Betonung auf Gewissenhaft) zu reviewen und im Zweifel etwas weniger (ich brauche z.B. gar nicht, dass ich 5 Bilder einstelle und nach 10 Minuten 4 davon bereits von dir durchgewunken, ohne groß zu gucken). Haben wir dort auf QI dank Roletscheck & Co. nicht schon genug Klüngel und Mauschelei? Ich hatte allerhand Respekt vor deiner Arbeit als Reviewer, aber habe damit wohl eine Fehleinschätzung vorgenommen. --A.Savin 03:25, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Meine Gewichtung in der Beurteilung vieler Fotos liegt im Gegensatz zu Dir vielleicht zu sehr auf Bildaussage, Inhalt und Komposition. Mag schon sein, dass ich dabei das eine oder andere Pixel übersehe oder in der absoluten Bewertung der Bildschärfe manches Mal nicht so akkurat hingucke wie Du es zu tun pflegst. Auch muss ich zugeben, dass ich ab und an ein großzügiges Herz habe. Und eine gewisse Schwäche für Fotografen, die vom Subkontinent kommen. Ich mag Leute und Kultur aus Pakistan/Indien/Bangladesch nun mal.
Aber Deine konstruktive Kritik ist wie auch schon vor einigen Wochen auch diesmal gerechtfertigt. Sie soll ja schließlich dazu beitragen, das Qualitätsniveau auf hohem Level zu halten. Und damit trägst Du mit Deinem Ordnungsruf gewiss dazu bei. Ich werde mir das hinter meine Ohren schreiben und etwas weniger "durchwinken". Und vielleicht meine Emotionen etwas besser im Zaum halten.
Im Übrigen schätze ich Deine Nominierungen sehr hoch ein und bin immer überrascht über Deinen hohen Qualitäts-Level. Dafür sei Dir an dieser Stelle besonders gedankt. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:20, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

QIC

I think something went wrong in this edit [5]. Acroterion ([[User talk:Acroterion|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:48, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Oooops! I apologize for that mischief. I did not produce it intentionally. Now it is repaired. Thank you! --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:54, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, and I can assure you I've done much worse things than that on Wikipedia projects by accident. Acroterion ([[User talk:Acroterion|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:56, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your understanding. Best wishes. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:03, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the Tri-motor review. For a different cockpit picture see this of one of the two flyable B-29s File:N529B Fifi MD5.jpg. It's not a QI, I had to shoot in a hurry and the exposure and composition are not what I'd like, and the perspective is a little distorted, but it's a dramatic view. And here is another Tri-motor cockpit: File:Ford Tri-Motor NC8419 cockpit 1.jpg. Acroterion ([[User talk:Acroterion|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:20, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Two more Wow!-images for me who gets these cockpit views for the first time in his life. Stunning aircrafts you have in the U.S. I`ve always been an admirer of U.S. aircrafts. Technique and design are simply overwhelming to my eyes. Thank you for showing me these photographs! Regards from Austria. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:29, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

A couple of airports in the area get visits from aircraft preservation organizations every year and they give tours and flights. I can't afford a flight in the B-29, but I did fly in Tri-motor NC-8419, it was only $55, and it was like flying in a giant metal moth. The plane was built in 1926, the same year my father was born, and only 23 years after the Wright Brothers first flew under power. Acroterion ([[User talk:Acroterion|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:43, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Bild von dir auf kandidatenliste für feautured images

Hey Johann, kann sein dass du schon eine notification bekommen hast. ich habe dein Bild File:Nova Gorica 0720069 71.jpg mal mit in den wettbewerb gebracht, weil ich es sehr schön und auch passend finde. grüße. --Joobo ([[User talk:Joobo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:29, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Herbstfarben

Hallo Johann! Kann es sein, daß Du da die Farben zuviel entsättigt hast? Irgendwie wirkt vor allem das Rot recht blass auf mich, und Herbstfarben sind doch eigentlich eher kräftig. Evtl. ist auch ein bisserl zuviel Blau im Bild, den Eindruck hab ich bei den grünen Blättern (das kann aber auch durch die nächtliche Beleuchtung kommen, ich schau es mit Tageslicht noch einmal an). Und danke für Deine vielen Bewertungen und das Hinterherräumen (z.B.)! Liebe Grüße, --Häferl ([[User talk:Haeferl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:35, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Susi! Das ist durchaus möglich. Ich kann das Bild noch ein wenig nachsättigen und den Blau-Anteil ein wenig mehr in Richtung Gelb verschieben. Hoffentlich hat der Alexander Savin nichts dagegen. Aber nun ab in die Falle! Liebe Grüße, --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:41, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer

Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin ([[User talk:Colin|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:25, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:38, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:02, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:09, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:10, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Some holiday joy

Since 1959, it is a Swedish tradition to (at 3 pm) watch Donald Duck and other Disney cartoons on TV. The most appreciated part is about Donald as bird photographer in Clown of the Jungle. I think most users at FPC can relate to the frustrated Donald (especially the parrot scene), which is why I'm sharing it with you. Happy Holiday! Template:Smiley --cart-Talk 15:16, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2017! ;)

		* * * * * * * Happy Holidays 2017 ! * * * * * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:04, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:04, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:01, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 31 December 2016 (UTC)