User talk:Lmbuga/Discusións anteriores 17

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016. Pico do Areeiro. Madeira. Portugal '06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:47, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016. Pico do Areeiro. Madeira. Portugal '04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:05, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016. Pico do Areeiro. Madeira. Portugal '05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:45, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016. Camiño de Pico do Areeiro. Madeira. Portugal '02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Peulle 11:55, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016. Pico das Torres. Madeira. Portugal '13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:49, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016. Pico das Torres. Madeira. Portugal '15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:49, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016. Pico do Cedro. Madeira. Portugal '11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:49, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016. Pico do Cidrão. Madeira. Portugal '08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:49, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016. Pico do Gato. Madeira. Portugal '12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:49, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Check this image

Could you look at this image for me, and tell me what is wrong with it. File:Liberty Service Station, Birmingham Gardens.jpg --Adamdaley 03:48, 21 March 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamdaley (talk • contribs) 03:48, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

• Hellow @Adamdaley: (poor English): It has the same issues. In this case, the lack of clarity is greater and difficult to correct. The vertical line of the left is right, but the vertical line of the right is tilted: It needs perspective correction.

I don't know why the lack of sharpness. You have e good camera. The pictures are less moved if you take it by the viewfinder and you support the camera firmly on the head.

To fix the perspective distortion it's necessary Lightroom, or GIMP (free), or photoshop (too expensive)... --Lmbuga (talk) 10:06, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

@@Lmbuga: I understand. With the above file, I was able to do it more front on than the 7-Eleven prices you edited. My knowledge of Photoshop is basic and I cannot do the corrective correction. --Adamdaley 00:45, 22 March 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamdaley (talk • contribs) 00:45, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

• @Adamdaley: I do not have photoshop now. After Easter, yes (computer of a friend). I think it's a filter. Menu "filters". I am sorry. There are help on the internet.--Lmbuga (talk) 08:46, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

@Adamdaley: https://www.creativebloq.com/adobe/3-ways-fix-perspective-errors-photoshop-71412122--Lmbuga (talk) 08:48, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016. Pico do Cedro. Madeira. Portugal '13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:39, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016. Pico do Cidrão. Madeira. Portugal '10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:03, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016. Pico Ruivo. Madeira. Portugal '16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:39, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nubes desde o Pico do Areeiro Madeira Portugal-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nubes desde o Pico do Areeiro Madeira Portugal-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Escudo de Santana Madeira Portugal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Olivier LPB 14:18, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Faial Santana Madeira Portugal-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Somewhat more description would be useful. --Smial 16:26, 19 March 2018 (UTC)  Done Thanks--Lmbuga 00:42, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Faial Santana Madeira Portugal-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 15:01, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Serro do Guindastre Faial Santana Madeira Portugal-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 15:03, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Vista da costa desde a Ponta do Rosto ate a Ponta do Castelo. Ponta de São Lourenço. Madeira. Portugal-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:23, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Vista da costa desde a Ponta do Rosto ate a Ponta do Castelo. Ponta de São Lourenço. Madeira. Portugal-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:23, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Vista de Madeira desde a Ponta de São Lourenço. Portugal-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:20, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Corte do terreo en Pico do Areeiro Madeira. Portugal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:36, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Vista da costa desde a Ponta do Rosto até a Ponta do Castelo. Ponta de San Lourenzo. Madeira. Portugal-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:27, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pomone. Francois Barois París P08'.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PJDespa 12:06, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Busto de bronce de Andre le Notre deseñador e arquitecto paisaxista de xardines Tuilieries, París P06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:06, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Annibal by François Girardon París P10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:06, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Annibal by François Girardon París P11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:06, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Xulio (Jules) César por Nicolás Coustou París P07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PJDespa 12:06, 24 March 2018 (UTC) The face of the statue is too dark and the leg is too bright. Good quality? -- Spurzem 19:01, 24 March 2018 (UTC) Good quality IMO, the statue is like that because of the weather, the leg is still white but the head is darker, it is due to actual patina of the time. A post treatment would be unuseful IMO --PJDespa 12:49, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Paisaxe dede o Pico do Areeiro Madeira. Portugal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:42, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Vista da costa desde a Ponta do Rosto até a Ponta do Castelo. Ponta de San Lourenzo. Madeira. Portugal-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:49, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Vista da costa desde a Ponta do Rosto até a Ponta do Castelo. Ponta de San Lourenzo. Madeira. Portugal-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:42, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Vista da costa desde a Ponta do Rosto até a Ponta do Castelo. Ponta de San Lourenzo. Madeira. Portugal-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 13:27, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Vista da costa desde a Ponta do Rosto até a Ponta do Castelo. Ponta de São Lourenço. Madeira. Portugal-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Reasonably successful effort in not the best lighting --Daniel Case 04:34, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Vista de Madeira desde a Ponta de San Lourenzo. Portugal-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Reasonably sharp all around, save lower corners --Daniel Case 04:34, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 L'Hiver (Winter) by Girardon Château de Versailles P26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:57, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Cour de Marbre du Château de Versailles P22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A beautiful composition a Q1+, but not a FP. Left part is a bit shadowed and the colour of the sky is a bit too white --Michielverbeek 20:59, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Cour de Marbre du Château de Versailles P23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:01, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:2017 L'Air by le Hongre Grande Commande 1684 Versailles P26.jpg

Copyright status: File:2017 L'Air by le Hongre Grande Commande 1684 Versailles P26.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2017 L'Air by le Hongre Grande Commande 1684 Versailles P26.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:23, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

• @Magog the Ogre: . Thank you and sorry. {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} added. I don't have deleted the tag "no license". Yours sincerely also--Lmbuga (talk) 11:58, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

• Tag deleted--Lmbuga (talk) 13:19, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Hercule det aussi Vertumne. Rome. d'après Nicolas Poussin Versailles P28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 10:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Embarcación turística Alexandre III París P03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 12:28, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Embarcación turística París P17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 13:31, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 L'Air by le Hongre Grande Commande 1684 Versailles P26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:47, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pomone. Nicolas Poussin Versailles P29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd prefare to have more of it's socket on there, but its ok. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 03:12, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Elefante. Éléphant. Emmanuel Fremiet. Exposition Universelle 1878. París P31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:47, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 L'Amerique du Sud. Aimé Millet. Exposition Universelle 1878. Paris P32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:51, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 L'Amerique du Sud. Aimé Millet. Exposition Universelle 1878. Paris P33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:51, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 L'Océanie. Mathurin Moreau-Vauthier. Exposition Universelle 1878. Paris P34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:51, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 L'Amérique du Nord. Ernest Hiolle. Exposition Universelle 1878. Paris P35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:51, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Escultura no Palacio de Versalles París P21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:51, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 L'Amérique du Nord. Ernest Hiolle. Exposition Universelle 1878. Paris P36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 L'Afrique. Eugène Delaplanche. Exposition Universelle 1878. Paris P37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 L'Asie. Alexandre Falguière. Exposition Universelle 1878. Paris P38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 L'Europe. Alexandre Schoenewerk. Exposition Universelle 1878. Paris P39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Cheval à la herse by Pierre Louis Rouillard. Paris P40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 12:12, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Cour de Marbre du Château de Versailles P24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Esculturas na fachada de Notre-Dame P43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gets abit blurry on the right side but still ok. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 21:20, 5 April 2018 (UTC)  Comment Thanks. You're right ToMar. I'm not sure: Maybe it should not be QI. It's on the limit. I had not noticed. I would not have proposed it if I had noticed. Thank you very much--Lmbuga 23:02, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Esculturas na fachada de Notre-Dame P44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 21:20, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Rosetón de Notre-Dame P45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 21:20, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Tour Saint-Jacques P42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, BUT this is not Notre-Dame de Paris! It is Tour Saint Jacques. --Uoaei1 13:10, 4 April 2018 (UTC)  Done: Photo tagged to rename. Thank you very much--Lmbuga 07:32, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Notre-Dame de Paris P51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:29, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Notre-Dame de Paris P53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:29, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Notre-Dame de Paris P54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:29, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Portail de la Vierge. Notre-Dame de París P59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:03, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Tympanum of the Portail de la Vierge. Notre-Dame de Paris P58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 19:53, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Tympanum of the Portail de la Vierge. Notre-Dame de Paris P57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:03, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Portail de la Vierge. Notre-Dame de Paris P56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shame about the right shade. But good picture quality.--Famberhorst 15:46, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Portail de la Vierge. Notre-Dame de Paris P55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:03, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Notre-Dame de Paris P52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:14, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Notre-Dame de Paris P49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 14:08, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Portail du Jugement Dernier of Notre-Dame de Paris P62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 12:08, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Spire of Notre-Dame de Paris P46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:04, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Parteluz. Portail du Jugement Dernier of Notre-Dame de Paris P63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:03, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Portail du Jugement Dernier of Notre-Dame de Paris P64.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:11, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sotavento 01 - IESMGB 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 22:45, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Motor JT9D Boeing 747 -4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:17, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 MUNCIP. Motor JT9D Boeing 747.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:17, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sotavento 04 - Maquinaria aeroxenerador 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 05:02, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Faro. MUNCIP. A Coruña. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PJDespa 12:01, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018. Sotavento. Planta de xeración de hidróxeno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:12, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018. Sotavento. Planta de transformación de hidróxeno en enerxía eléctrica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:12, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Female Misumena vatia near Botevgrad, Bulgaria 02.jpg

@Exonie: and @Charlesjsharp: (poor English, sorry)

First of all, to say that it is impossible for me to make a macro as good as this one. However, I know what it is to be sitting on the floor for half an hour and seeing the behavior of a spider.

Second, understand that I am simply an amateur photographer. My opinions are not law.

The photo is great, but I wonder what it would be like if the photographer tried something different. Something like what I did in these pictures, although they are worse photos, because they do not have that depth of field: (Think that F8 is the maximum that that camera allows, Canon PowerShot G10) File:Ficheiro-Araña alimentándose de Auchenorrhyncha. Bastavales, Brión, 090905.jpg. Other: File:Araña. A Estrada, Galiza. 02.jpg. Other: File:Araña. Ordes- 09-04-12 D.jpg.

Maybe I should not make that comment. I am sorry. Anyway, thank you for asking for clarifications--Lmbuga (talk) 15:46, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

• Thanks for your reply. Yes, probably is best not to make a suggestion on technical choices unless you're pretty sure! Your FPs are nice shots. Taking images with a macro lens is a real challenge because of the small depth of field and, being so close, lighting is a nightmare. That's why my default is ISO 800 and around 1/500 sec to avoid camera shake - as you know, we cannot hold the camera securely when chasing insects and spiders. Charles (talk) 16:17, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

• @Charlesjsharp: You're right with ISO 800 and around 1/500 sec, but controlling the flash (previous photos were taken with external flash), you can try to go further in the depth of field. Thank you for your words of encouragement --Lmbuga (talk) 16:41, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

On sunny days i can 'afford' ISO 400 but experimentally in the general case i get better shots with ISO 800. I trade some noise for better contours, it's not the best macro lens i have :-) I don't like flash but i use it sometimes in order to decrease aperture and get better depth of field, i should buy some LED ring i guess. I'm amateur photographer so any tips are welcomed. I'll be uploading more insects and spiders soon. --Exonie (talk) 17:49, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018. Sotavento. Steam turbine rotor. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The car is a bit disturbing. Good quality. Basotxerri Mon, 30 Apr 2018 15:59:52 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018. Sotavento. Steam turbine rotor 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Basotxerri Mon, 30 Apr 2018 15:59:52 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 MUNCYT Boeing 747 -7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:53, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Escultura. Palacio de Versalles P41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:18, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017. Escultura. La Victoire sur l'Empire. Palacio de Versailles V03. Francia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 12:33, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017. Versalles. Francia V07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:18, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017. Fonte. Versalles. Francia V05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:18, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017. Sculpture. Parc de Versailles, parterre de Latone. Francia V04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:11, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016. Pico do Areeiro. Madeira. Portugal '07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --The Photographer 00:26, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017. Embarcación "Imperiale". París.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 20:14, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017. Bacchus d'après Poussin V13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:02, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017. Detalle do Pórtico do Xuízo Final. Notre-Dame 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017. Detalle do Pórtico do Xuízo Final. Notre-Dame 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017. Detalle do Pórtico do Xuízo Derradeiro. Notre-Dame.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:24, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017. Detalle do Pórtico do Xuízo Final. Notre-Dame 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017. Detalle do Pórtico do Xuízo Final. Notre-Dame 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017. Notre-Dame de Paris from the south'.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I find the tree disturbing. But the photo has a good quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:57, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017. Portail Sainte Anne of Notre-Dame de Paris'1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:02, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017. Portail Sainte Anne of Notre-Dame de Paris'2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:02, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017. Portail du Jugement Dernier of Notre-Dame de Paris'.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:02, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017. Detalle do Pórtico de Santa Ana. Notre-Dame 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:02, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

File:FdMontes.jpg

File:FdMontes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Estevoaei (talk) 01:23, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017. Pierre Granier - Ino et Mélicerte-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 11:14, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017. Pierre Granier - Ino et Mélicerte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 11:14, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017. Simon Mazière - Pan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 20:21, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 -Detalle de Notre-Dame de París. 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:22, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 -Detalle de Notre-Dame de París. 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Olivier LPB 08:46, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 -Detalle de Notre-Dame de París. 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:22, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 -Detalle de Notre-Dame de París. 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:22, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017. Bacchante dite aussi Pomone- Pierre Laviron V14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:24, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017. Torre de Notre-Dame de París-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 11:29, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017. Torre de Notre-Dame de París-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:36, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 -Detalle de Notre-Dame de París. 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:14, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 -Detalle de Notre-Dame de París. 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:14, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 -Detalle de Notre-Dame de París. 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:14, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 -Detalle de Notre-Dame de París. 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:14, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017. Facultade de dereito. Universidade de París.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:30, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 -Le palais du Luxembourg, dans le jardin du Luxembourg, Paris-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:59, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 -Le palais du Luxembourg, dans le jardin du Luxembourg, Paris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:11, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018. Combarro, Poio. Galiza-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:54, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018. Combarro, Poio. Galiza-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:33, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018. Combarro, Poio. Galiza-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:33, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018. Combarro, Poio. Galiza-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Atamari 11:26, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018. Combarro, Poio. Galiza-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tsungam 11:38, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018. Combarro, Poio. Galiza-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 15:26, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018. Combarro, Poio. Galiza-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 12:18, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018. Combarro, Poio. Galiza-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 15:26, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018. G. Torrente Ballester. A Armenteira-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:12, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018. G. Torrente Ballester. A Armenteira-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:40, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018. Mosteiro da Armenteira. 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 17:55, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018. Alexandre Bóveda. Pontevedra. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:11, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018. G. Torrente Ballester. A Armenteira-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good. --Rbrechko 13:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Vista da costa norte desde o lateral sur da praia de Pantín. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 13:17, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Praia de Pantín. Galiza-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 12:46, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Praia de Pantín. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 13:17, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

QI

Hi, you added some image notations on my images that is helpful. And it will be more helpful if I could better learn to understand QI, also how to resolve problems. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 20:04, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Español: Gracias por su comentario, pero no entiendo lo que usted desea

Maybe it's better for you, @Moheen Reeyad: , to talk to a user who can easily express in English, and not with the google translator--Lmbuga (talk) 20:14, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Praia de Pantín. Galiza-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:14, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Praia de Santa Comba e Praia dos Ponzos desde Cabo Prior. Ferrol. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:05, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Castelo da Palma. Mugardos. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:17, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Castelo da Palma. Mugardos. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:05, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Detalle do Castelo de San Felipe. Ferrol. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:08, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018. Ruínas de Santo Domingo. XIV-XV. Pontevedra. 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:55, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pozo no Castelo de San Felipe. Ferrol. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:23, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Detalle do Castelo de San Felipe. Ferrol. Galicia-Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:56, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Entrada do Castelo de San Felipe. Ferrol. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:57, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pozo no Castelo de San Felipe. Ferrol. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --TwoWings 06:20, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018. Loro parque. Tenerife-279.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:17, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018. Loro parque. Tenerife-234.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 15:36, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Chelonoidis nigra. Loro parque. Tenerife-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:44, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Alligator mississippiensis. Loro parque. Tenerife.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:44, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Chelonoidis nigra. Loro parque. Tenerife-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:04, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2019! ;-)

			* Happy Holidays 2019, Lmbuga! *
			Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:09, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cruceiro en Combarro - 276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:59, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Praia de Pantín. Galiza-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:44, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A cara do mar. Praia de Pantín - 160.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:48, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017. Versalles. Francia V06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 23:05, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020!

		* Happy Holidays 2020, Lmbuga! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:58, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Hola Miguel, mis mejores deseos también para estas fiestas, espero que las disfrutes con tus queridos, un fuerte abrazo! Poco a poco (talk) 11:45, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Qué alegría recibir tu felicitación. Te deseo también una Feliz Navidad y un dichoso 2020. Un abrazo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 20:00, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Gato BarraNa files

File:Gato enervado pola presencia dun can.jpg File:OtAG.JPG File:Gato BarraNa Galicia 3 - retouched.jpg File:Gato BarraNa Galicia 3-2.jpg File:Gato BarraNa Galicia 3.jpg File:Gato Barraña Galicia 2.jpg

I wanted to delete your files that are about Gato BarraNa because they bug me out, but they’re also scary and creepy as hell because it’s an issue for people like me since any picture that's on Flickr for so long should be deleted and/or lost for archivals as well.Jack Carlin (talk) 20:47, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

• @Jack Carlin: (pour English) I'm not agree. The problem is yours. The attitude of the cat is before a dog. I do not see the problem. Do what you want. I do not care. I have only tried to contribute the attitude of a cat in extreme circumstances. I can not understand, according to the criteria of Commons that these photos, made by me, could be deleted--Lmbuga (talk) 23:50, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
• @Jack Carlin: I am the author of all of them. I can also publish them on Flickr, on the page of my teaching institute. Commons is desperate. You always think the worst--Lmbuga (talk) 00:02, 28 January 2020 (UTC).
• Please, see the date of the pictures--Lmbuga (talk) 00:18, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
  • I'm so tired that the question doesn't interest me anymore--Lmbuga (talk) 00:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

The licensing of File:OtAG.JPG is fake. It must be cc-by-sa-3.0 or (flickr) cc-by-sa-2.0. Everyone does what they want. I have the original file, and not in jpg, perhaps in RAW--Lmbuga (talk) 00:54, 28 January 2020 (UTC)   I can prove that the NIKON model E8800 camera was mine. See File:Vilanova de Arousa.Galicia.20.jpg, File:A Illa de Arousa.Galicia.20.jpg...--Lmbuga (talk) 01:07, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

• @Lmbuga: I’m sorry, but I’m currently in a situation regarding these users named Vergerus and Actormusicus because they have been constantly harassing and blocking me on the Italian Wikipedia because they think that I’m wrong about voice actor replacements but truly I’m right because I go on the Il mondo dei doppiatori website, which is about Italian dubbing voice actors and their roles, but those users just won’t accept my edits due to their disruptive behavior, and the one thing that should be included for Italian voice actor-related articles are live-action characters in parentheses next to the film/show titles instead of just the original voice actor anyways. So how about you just tell those users to just accept my edits and respect me for once because as an enthusiast on dubbing and voice actors, I hope they might die or get sick from the recent Wuhan coronavirus outbreak that's spreading worldwide.Jack Carlin (talk) 01:32, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

• @Jack Carlin: Sorry Jack. I need someone to translate what you say. I'm already looking for someone. I don't understand very well what you say. Wait a few days, please.--Lmbuga (talk) 13:29, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

• @Jack Carlin: I'm not interested in the question you raise. I dont understand her. I do not work on those projects. I'm sorry--Lmbuga (talk) 17:57, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Verbo regular gl morfemas.jpg

A sexta persoa do futuro do indicativo leva tilde: andarán, collerán, partirán. As formas sen tilde son do antepretérito. --82.207.237.6 18:45, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

@82.207.237.6: Gracias cariño. En gallego también se acentúan. No escribo muy bien a máquina (la causa es esa), pero me encanta que leas todo lo que escribo, que me sigas y me digas palabras amorosas como esas, y sabiendo que soy licenciado en filología, con especialidad en lengua gallega--Lmbuga (talk) 16:03, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Amor, lo que sí te agradecería sería que editases registrado para poder escribir en tu página de discusión estas palabras --Lmbuga (talk) 16:07, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Non teño o arquivo orixinal. Se ti o fas mellor, pisa o meu, súbeo por enriba.--Lmbuga (talk) 16:41, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

A miña resposta sería diferente se me dixeses que cometín un erro e que esquecín acentuar esas palabras e solicitas que o mellore. Moi posiblemente me puxese a buscar o artigo e encontraríao, pero así, non. Unha lisca de respecto non está de máis--Lmbuga (talk) 16:45, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Son moi imperfecto e moi despistado, desculpa. Eu só pretendía colaborar--Lmbuga (talk) 16:49, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

• Feito: Non fun capaz de facelo en jpg. Fíxeno en PDF, síntoo, Ademais o nome dos tempos non é igual: File:Verbo-flexión verbal regular-desinencias-orixinal.pdf--Lmbuga (talk) 17:25, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Se es capaz de facer mellor o outro, borra o que fixen eu e que está mal, en caso contrario, ponlle os acentos a man.--Lmbuga (talk) 17:31, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Re:Hola Anna

Hola Miguel, sabes que aquí solo se borran archivos si incumplan alguna política, y afortunadamente los caprichos personales ni siquiera son un motivo a tener en cuenta en una propuesta de borrado. Así que nadie va a borrar tus fotos, ni tienes que defenderlas por ninguna wiki. Y mucho menos preocuparte por la cháchara irrelevante de un usuario con problemas que nada tienen que ver contigo (ni con nadie de este proyecto, lo que pase en las wikis se soluciona en ellas). Ya le he dejado un aviso al usuario. Otro admin ya le había advertido de la improcedencia de la propuesta de borrado.
En cuanto a las fotos, en esta: File:OtAG.JPG he puesto un aviso con el enlace a la original, la falsa atribución y la licencia errónea. En mi opinión hasta se podría borrar, es un duplicado exacto, pero como es muy antigua podría estar en uso en algún otro sitio que no aparezca en la lista de la imagen.
En la foto original: File:Gato enervado pola presencia dun can.jpg el enlace está roto. Lo he buscado en tu cuenta de Flickr, pero no lo encuentro. Si puedes actualízalo, sino tampoco tiene mucha importancia.
Esta: File:Gato BarraNa Galicia 3-2.jpg está bien atribuida y relicenciada, y el resto de las que se queja el usuario no tienen ningún problema. Si no le gustan que no las mire :-) Un abrazo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 05:01, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

• Muchas gracias. --Lmbuga (talk) 15:59, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

¿Diferencias? Debo estar haciéndome vieja, no recuerdo nada. Gracias por tus cálidas palabras, siempre has podido y podrás contar conmigo para lo que necesites. Y no dudes que si vuelvo algún día a tu preciosa tierra te avisaré para compartir un abrazo y un trocito de esa empanada que no sabe igual hecha fuera de allí.

Por cierto, el usuario ha revertido esto y esto porque dice que en la imagen no aparece el gato —lo cual es cierto—, así que de momento no vuelvo a revertir, igual tiene razón en eso. Un abrazo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 05:11, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Igrexa Matalobos.jpg

File:Igrexa Matalobos.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Estevoaei (talk) 16:41, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Location?

Hi Lmbuga - do you have any location information for File:Coturnix coturnix (Lmbuga).jpg, please? Was it captive, or a wild bird? If captive, it may actually be Coturnix japonica, as that species is more commonly used in poultry farms. It appears to be in very un-natural habitat for a wild bird. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 11:25, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

@MPF: Location: Teaño, Cuntis, Galicia, Spain. Captive bird. I don't know more. Perhaps japonica. See Coturnix coturnix --Lmbuga (talk) 21:48, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Many thanks! - MPF (talk) 23:17, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Uso de fotos

Hola amigo. Mi nombre es Sandro, soy de Brasil y estoy escribiendo un libro sobre suculentas. Me gustaría usar una de tus fotos para ilustrar el libro. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2010-06-06_insectos-31.jpg ¿Puedo usarla, y como seria la licencia?

localización imaxes

Ola, Lmbuga! Como vai?

Quería pedirche axuda para xeolocalizar dúas imaxes túas, File:Portomouro-Río Tambre 2003GDFL 010.jpg e File:Portomouro-Río Tambre 2003GDFL 008.jpg. O Tambre por Portomouro leva máis auga, como se pode ver en File:Tambre.Portomouro.Val do Dubra.jpg, Sería quizais o río Dubra, que desauga no Tambre á altura de Portomouro? Pero tampouco atopo esa construción.

Moitas grazas. Un saúdo! --Estevoaei (talk) 11:13, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020/2021!

		* Happy Holidays 2020/2021, Lmbuga! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:14, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

File:2016. Campanario da igrexa do Barco de Valdeorras. Galiza 3.jpg

Hola, que tal. ¿Me podrías decir a que iglesia corresponde este campanario?. Gracias y un saludo.--Aitorembe (talk) 10:42, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:2014 Baroña. Castro de Baroña. Porto do Son-2.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Nicolao de Portomarín eue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:30, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Pedro de Portomarín eue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rúa e igrexa de San Pedro de Portomarín eue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:39, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Igrexa de San Pedro de Portomarín eue 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 19:42, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa en Palas de Rei 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castelo de Pambre eue 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:41, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portal da igrexa de San Pedro de Portomarín eue 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some more categories are necessary. --Ermell 20:26, 2 May 2021 (UTC)  Done Thanks--Lmbuga 14:44, 3 May 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Thanks. --Ermell 12:47, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre das campás. Sé vella de Salamanca. España eue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:57, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Convento de Santo Estevo. Salamanca. España eue 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:58, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Convento de Santo Estevo. Salamanca. España eue 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 04:24, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tractor no Leboreiro. Melide. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality (assuming that the tractor is standing on a slight gradient). --MB-one 10:45, 8 May 2021 (UTC)  Comment Thanks. It was standing on a slight gradient--Lmbuga 22:38, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portal da igrexa de San Pedro de Portomarín eue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments chromatic aberration should be removed. --F. Riedelio 07:36, 5 May 2021 (UTC)  Done Thanks--Lmbuga 14:18, 7 May 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 06:20, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Convento de Santo Estevo. Salamanca. España eue 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The verticals are a bit wiggly (perhaps lens correction would benefit it?), but good enough for QI. --Nefronus 11:55, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura en Salamanca 2 eue 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:59, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Averroes. Córdoba. España eue-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:43, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Averroes. Córdoba. España eue-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 20:19, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P. Francisco de Vitoria. Salamanca. España eue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 16:36, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salamanca - Horto de Calixto e Melibea, monumento a -La Celestina-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 19:49, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ben Maimónides. Córdoba, España-eue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:30, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita de San Telmo. Puerto de la Cruz. Tenerife. Illas Canarias. eue-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita de San Telmo. Puerto de la Cruz. Tenerife. Illas Canarias. eue-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agustín de Betancourt y Molina. Puerto de la Cruz. Tenerife. Illas Canarias-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 21:30, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teatro romano de Mérida. España-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:07, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La ciudad de Puerto de la Cruz a la areonáutica española. Tenerife. Illas Canarias. eue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:47, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita de San Telmo. Puerto de la Cruz. Tenerife. Illas Canarias. eue-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:41, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita de San Telmo. Puerto de la Cruz. Tenerife. Islas Canarias. eue-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:36, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz. Tenerife. Illas Canarias. eue454.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good enough IMO. --Tournasol7 20:56, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 19 May 2021 (UTC)