User talk:Malchen53/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A bowl of strawberries for you!
ich wollte das mal ausprobieren AlterWolf49 (talk) 21:07, 30 January 2012 (UTC) |
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 23:36, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
A beer for you!
Gute Fotos AlterWolf49 (talk) 00:26, 28 May 2012 (UTC) |
Katholische Kirche Kühlungsborn
Hallo Malchen53, auf vielen (z.B. hier) Fotos sind Werke von Künstlern zu sehen, die dem Urheberrecht unterliegen und in der Kirche gilt leider die Panoramafreiheit nicht. Gibt es eine Möglichkeit, eine Freigabe für die Fotos zu bekommen? Gruß. --Schiwago (talk) 07:10, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- Hallo Schiwago, vielen Dank für Deinen Hinweis. Ich werde versuchen mich in den nächsten Tagen mit den entsprechenden Stellen in Verbindung zu setzen und eine Freigabe für die Bilder zu bekommen. Mit bestem Gruß --Malchen53 (talk) 16:43, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Denkmalvorlage für Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
Hallo Malchen53,
Du hattest mich wegen der Vorlage Template:Baudenkmal (Nordrhein-Westfalen) angesprochen. Für Denkmale in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern gibt es vergleichbares wohl nicht. In dieser Kategorie finden sich eine Reihe von Vorlagen. Eine allgemeine zur Kennzeichnung von Kulturdenkmälern in Deutschland findest Du hier mit Beschreibung. Es gibt auch ein Commons:WikiProjekt Vorlagen, das soeben von mir entdeckt wurde. Vielleicht kann dort jemand helfen. Lieber Gruß und weiterhin viel Erfolg --Asio 20:55, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:50, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Propsteikirche Brilon, Andachtsraum, Mondsichelmadonna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alme, St. Ludgerus, Pietà auf dem Seitenaltar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Autopatrol given
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you.--Steinsplitter (talk) 14:34, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- Tipp: Ich empfehle keine Textabschnitte von der Diskussionsseite zu entfernen, am besten du legst ein Archiv an. Viele Grüße--Steinsplitter (talk) 15:09, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hallo Steinsplitter, ich habe Deine Einträge leider erst gerade mitbekommen, sorry. Ich werde mir ein Archiv anlagen. Leider fehlt mir manchmal noch die Erfahrung. Gruß--Malchen53 (talk) 15:48, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- Joa, das ist kein problem. Ich kans dir nicht verbieten abschnitte zu entferen, in der regel werden solche Archiviert. Viele Grüße--Steinsplitter (talk) 15:54, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- Kannst Du mir einen Link geben wie ich mir ein Archiv anlege? --Malchen53 (talk) 16:11, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- User:MiszaBot/usertalksetup LG--Steinsplitter (talk) 16:25, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- Danke!! LG--Malchen53 (talk) 16:47, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- User:MiszaBot/usertalksetup LG--Steinsplitter (talk) 16:25, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- Kannst Du mir einen Link geben wie ich mir ein Archiv anlege? --Malchen53 (talk) 16:11, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- Joa, das ist kein problem. Ich kans dir nicht verbieten abschnitte zu entferen, in der regel werden solche Archiviert. Viele Grüße--Steinsplitter (talk) 15:54, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hallo Steinsplitter, ich habe Deine Einträge leider erst gerade mitbekommen, sorry. Ich werde mir ein Archiv anlagen. Leider fehlt mir manchmal noch die Erfahrung. Gruß--Malchen53 (talk) 15:48, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kottmannshausen, Gartenbahn Huserland 9.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grömitz, der Hafen 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cumulonimbus praecipitatio, Kühlungsborn, Ostsee.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pyrus 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brilon, Kurpark, Mahonia aquifolium 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mahonia aquifolium 1, Kurpark, Brilon, Germany.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brilon, Kurpark, Limonit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Quarz, Brilon, Kurpark, Germany.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brilon, Hoppecke, St. Mariä-Heimsuchung, Alte Kirche, Jesusfigur.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brilon, Hoppecke, St. Mariä-Heimsuchung, Blick von der Empore auf den Altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brilon, Hoppecke, St. Mariä-Heimsuchung, Blick von der Empore auf den Altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kühlungsborn, Strandstraße mit Bäder Express.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kühlungsborn, Wellen am Strand, (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.Dear Malchen53, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Möhnesee-Körbecke, St.Pankratiuskirche, Tanchelinus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!Dear Malchen53, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Werl, denkmalgeschützte Propsteikirche, Pietà von Gerhard Gröninger, aus der Zeit um 1600.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Werl, denkmalgeschütztes Haus mit Freitreppe, Melsterstraße 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Probleme mit deinen Bildern
Hallo Malchen53, leider gibt es Probleme mit einigen deiner Bilder aus Werl. Konkret geht es um deine Aufnahmen des Hauses Kämperstraße 42, die du irrtümlich als Krämergasse 2 bezeichnet hast. Krämergasse 2 ist jedoch dieses Haus. Vielleicht kannst du die betreffenden Bilder umbenennen lassen, Text und Kategorisierung habe ich bereits korrigiert. Gruß aus dem Tecklenburger Land --J.-H. Janßen (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- Entschuldigung, da ist mir ein schlimmer Fehler unterlaufen. Danke für Deine Hilfe. Die Bilder habe ich natürlich sofort umbenennen lassen. Liebe Grüße aus Brilon --Malchen53 (talk) 13:02, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dortmund, DASA, Eingangsbereich.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brilon, St. Nikolai Kirche, Srahlenkranzmadonna (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brilon, St. Nikolai Kirche, Kreuzigungsgruppe.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brilon, St. Nikolai Kirche, Heiliger mit Zweig.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Werl, denkmalgeschütztes Haus, ehemaliger jüdischer Betraum, Steinerstraße 28. Inschrift über dem Eingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brilon, St. Nikolai Kirche, Heiliger mit blühendem Zweig.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Werl, Skulptur von Joseph Wäscher, der Schweinehirt (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brilon, Briloner Hochfläche, 7 Jahre nach Kyrill (5).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Werl, denkmalgeschützte Propsteikirche, Pietà an der Außenwand 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kühlungsborn, Denkmal, Vater und Sohn (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Soest, Rathaus, Über dem mittleren Torbogen das Stadtwappen von Soest.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Soest, Wiesenkirche, Westfälisches Abendmahl.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Soest, Rathaus, Westansicht.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brilon, St. Nikolai Kirche, Heiliger mit Buch und Schlüssel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Soest, Rathaus, Mittelteil des Westflügels; im Giebel der Stadtpatron St. Patroklus, darunter ein doppelköpfiger Adler, über dem mittleren Bogen das Soester Stadtwappen..JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Soest, Rathaus, Figur des Gerhard Glotz.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Soest, Rathaus, im Giebel St. Patroklus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rüthen Eselgruppe vor dem neuen Rathaus 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
ArchiveBot
Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:46, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brilon, NSG Drübel, HSK-003 (14).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brilon, NSG Drübel, HSK-003 (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brilon, NSG Ammertenbühl, HSK-505 (11).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brilon, Blick auf die Stadt von Süden.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brilon, Blick auf die Stadt von Süden (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kühlungsborn Düne mit Ginster.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:Bad Doberan, Münster, Darstellung einer Wilgefortis.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Herzliches Dankeschön für Deine Fotos zum Jahreswechsel
Hallo Malchen53,
Danke für Deinen Beitrag zum Weihnachts-Fotowettbewerb zum Thema Weinachtszeit, Winterzeit, Wendezeit''!
Mit Deiner Hilfe wurden commons um über 1500 Bilder zu Winter- & Weihnachtsthemen bereichert - mit einer großen Motivvielfalt, die von Weihnachtsmärkten und -dekorationen über Weihnachtsmänner, verschneite Landschaften und Schlössern zu typischen Speisen und Getränken reicht.
Wie Du vielleicht unserem Bericht im Kurier schon entnommen hast, haben wir die Community nun zu Abstimmungen in der Endrunde aufgerufen. Zur Wahl stehen die 14 eingereichten Artikel und 100 Bilder, die bis zum 20. Januar durch die Vorrunde und die Einbindung in Artikel ausgewählt wurden. Für die Gewinner, die bis zum 31. Jänner/Januar mit Eurer Hilfe ermittelt werden, stehen durch Unterstützung seitens von WMDE und WMAT insgesamt 12 Bild- und 4 Artikelpreise zur Verfügung. Da in jeder Kategorie – Bild oder Artikel – nur maximal ein Preis pro Teilnehmer möglich ist, sind die Preischancen groß.
Wir freuen uns, wenn Du Zeit findest, dich an der Wahl zu beteiligen. Du hast beliebig viele gereihte Stimmen, wobei erste Stimmen mehr zählen als nachfolgende (zur Reihung setzt Du einfach eine Zahl vor deine Unterschrift).
Um eine genüssliche Betrachtung der Bilder zu ermöglichen, sind die Finalisten nicht nur auf der Abstimmungsseite, sondern auch in einer Galerie zu finden.
Liebe Grüße und viel Spaß beim Bilder und Artikel bewerten!
Anna reg, Dr. Bernd Gross (talk) 08:38, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Werl, Wohnhaus von Wäscher.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
2003:63:AF4A:985C:7822:49EE:F36C:349A 09:41, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bad Hermannsborn, der Park (12).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Burg, Oberburg, Blick auf Schloss Burg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Wiki Loves Earth 2016
Hallo Malchen53,
Du erhältst diese Nachricht als Teilnehmer von Wiki Loves Earth 2014 oder 2015. Dieses Jahr wird sich Deutschland wieder am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth beteiligen. Wir würden uns über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Der Zeitraum für das Hochladen der Naturbilder ist vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2016.
Für die Weitergabe an den internationalen Wettbewerb ist ab diesem Jahr eine Mindestauflösung von 2 Megapixeln erforderlich. Bitte gib an, in welchem Schutzgebiet oder an welchem Schutzobjekt (z.B. Naturdenkmal, Geotop) die Fotos gemacht wurden. Wenn Bilder gar nicht zugeordnet werden können, gelangen sie nicht in die Wertung. In die Bilder eingefügte Zusätze wie der Name des Fotografen, Datum, Beschreibung oder ein Rahmen sind unerwünscht.
Seit der letzten Runde sind unter anderem Listen aller FFH-Gebiete und EU-Vogelschutzgebiete in Deutschland erstellt worden, die nun ebenfalls auf Bilder warten.
Dieses Jahr wird eine Vorjury die Vorauswahl der Bilder nach den Wettbewerbsregeln übernehmen. Als Teilnehmer aus den Vorjahren kannst Du Dich daran beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, ein Zugangscode kommt per E-Mail.
Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
(Sorry to write in Engilsh)
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:56, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche Ambo und Altar.JPG
- File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche Blick von der Orgel auf den Altar 1.JPG
- File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche der Altar.JPG
- File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche Mutter Gottes im Turm 1.JPG
- File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche Mutter Gottes im Turm 2.JPG
- File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche Tabernakel 1.JPG
- File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche Tabernakel 2.JPG
- File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche Taufkapelle hinter dem Altar 1.JPG
- File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche Taufkapelle hinter dem Altar 2.JPG
- File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche Wandreliefs 1.JPG
- File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche Wandreliefs 3.JPG
- File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche Wandreliefs 4.JPG
- File:Gudenhagen- Petersborn Sankt Michael Kirche Ölgemälde neben der Altarwand 2.JPG
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 19:40, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Mariä Heimsuchung (Werl), Rosenfenster über der Orgel.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Altarkreuz 3.JPG
- File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Altarkreuz 4.JPG
- File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Altarraum.JPG
- File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Ambo 1.JPG
- File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Blick durch das Kirchenschiff vom Altar aus (2).JPG
- File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, das Zeltdach innen 1.JPG
- File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, das Zeltdach innen 2.JPG
- File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Harmonium auf der Empore 1.JPG
- File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Kirchenfenster 1.JPG
- File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Kirchenfenster 2.JPG
- File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Kirchenfenster 3.JPG
- File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Kirchenfenster 4.JPG
- File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Kirchenfenster 5.JPG
- File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Kirchenfenster 6.JPG
- File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Kirchenfenster 7.JPG
- File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Kirchenfenster 8.JPG
- File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Kirchenfenster 9.JPG
- File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Kreuzgang 1.JPG
- File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Kreuzgang 2.JPG
- File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Kreuzgang 3.JPG
- File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Kreuzgang 4.JPG
- File:Kühlungsborn, Kath. Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Verstärker auf der Empore 2.JPG
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 10:58, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
File:Bad Doberan, Münster, zwei Figuren auf Sockel.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |