User talk:Milseburg/Archiv 2018 - 2022

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 360°-Panorama vom Tour de Moron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --Ermell 21:12, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour de Moron 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 12:36, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Any suggestions?

Per this edit, what repair brush (in Photoshop) would you suggest? Daniel Case (talk) 18:27, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello Daniel, I use Photoshop too for retouching. But my "newest" version is Photo Shop Elements 9.0.3. I have also in use Photoshop CS2 9.0. Old, but still good and now free. I begann retouching the oldest version of your image with the "Bereichsreparaturpinsel" in Photo Shop Elements 9.0. I think in English it is the "Part Healing Brush". All spots have the same size, so you can conveniently keep the brush size of about 30 pixels. Then you have to click on every spot. This is a bit painstaking as there are many spots. I had to do that too sometimes, because many mosquitoes came into the picture. I wish you a merry christmas. I will be offline a few days from tomorrow. --Milseburg (talk) 11:12, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

That's the spot healing brush in English, and yes, it's what I use to clean up dust spots too. Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leit- und Quermarkenfeuer Norddorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fitindia 16:50, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dünenweg bei Norddorf auf Amrum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a happy 2019! ;-)

			* Happy Christmas time and all the best for 2019, Milseburg! *
			Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Joyeux Noël et bonne année! Frohe Weihnachten und ein frohes Neues Jahr! Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku! Счастливого Рождества и c Новым годом! Щасливого Різдва i З Новим роком! ... :) -- Poco2 13:51, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:360°-Panorama vom Tour de Moron.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:360°-Panorama vom Tour de Moron.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heidelstein von Südosten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:18, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnsberg-Panorama Herbst 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good. --Aristeas 18:38, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Häuselhörner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:43, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Großes Häuselhorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 20:26, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mathesberg von Nordosten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stepro 15:45, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wildkarspitze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:38, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reichenspitzgruppe von Norden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Good annotations. --Milan Bališin 16:51, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Großvenediger vom Kröndlhorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Paris Orlando 11:50, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberer Wildalmsee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:33, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiesbüttsee im März.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Hmmmm very pleasant. I'd support this on FPC. If you decide to nominate, I'd remove CA on the branch on the right top --Podzemnik 15:48, 4 February 2019 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint. I'm not sure if it's good enough to succeed on FPC. --Milseburg 17:39, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herbst über dem Hennesee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Milan Bališin 18:06, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herbst am Hennesee 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Milan Bališin 18:06, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herbst am Hennesee 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Milan Bališin 18:08, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reichenspitzgruppe vom Salzachgeier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Sharpness could be better, but IMO OK. --XRay 16:19, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tümpel auf Amrum nahe Nebel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:49, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dünensee auf Amrum bei Wittdün.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:49, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dünensee auf Amrum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 18:50, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strucklahnungshörn 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Special.--Famberhorst 18:03, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staustufe Krotzenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:34, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staustufe Krotzenburg Schleuse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:04, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staustufe Krotzenburg (Teilansicht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality, especially the shape of water. --PtrQs 18:53, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staustufe Krotzenburg Oberwasser.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:54, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fähre Seligenstadt 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:18, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2019

Hallo Milseburg,

vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2019 kannst Du wieder beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland (WLE 2019) teilnehmen. Gesucht sind selbst aufgenommene Landschafts- und Naturfotos aus Schutzgebieten in Deutschland.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg kann diese Übersichtsseite dienen.

WLE 2019 kann nur durchgeführt werden, wenn weitere Mitarbeiter und Mitarbeiterinnen unser Team verstärken. Es geht unter anderem um die Organisation in der Wikipedia und das Sortieren der Bilder auf Commons. Über Art und Umfang der Beteiligung entscheidest Du selbst.

Wie in den Vorjahren übernimmt eine Vorjury ab Anfang Mai die Vorauswahl der Bilder. Auch daran kannst Du Dich gern beteiligen. Bei Interesse trage Dich bitte unter WLE-Vorjury ein, das Passwort kommt per E-Mail.

Besonders engagierte Freiwillige werden für die Jury benötigt. Wenn Du vom 12. bis 14. Juli in Fulda die besten Bilder küren willst, melde Dich auf der Jury-Seite.

Wir wünschen viel Freude beim Fotografieren,

--GPSLeo (talk) (im Auftrag des Organisationsteams) 17:01, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpenhaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:11, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saalhausen im Lennetal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Arabsalam 10:58, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vordünen auf dem Kniepsand (Amrum).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 03:07, 4 May 2019 (UTC) )

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kniepsand (Amrum).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:40, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Primärdünen auf Amrum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Arabsalam 18:10, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amrum - Weg durch die Dünen zum Strand bei Nebel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:00, 4 May 2019 (UTC)  Support Amazing shot --MB-one 12:01, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amrum - Vordünen auf dem Kniepsand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:24, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amrum - Kniepsand bei Norddorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qua;tiy --Michielverbeek 17:23, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amrum - Kniepsandpanorama bei Norddorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think, you had to decide between a bent stairs with a straight horizon or a bent horizon and a straigt stairs. You chose the right. --Llez 04:24, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amrum - Kniepsand bei Wittdün.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 20:29, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Steilufer bei Stohl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:47, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steilufer bei Stohl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:33, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Küstenlandschaft auf dem Dänischen Wohld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:31, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steilufer bei Dänisch-Nienhof (Blick von oben).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:29, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steilufer bei Dänisch-Nienhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:27, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steilufer Schönhagen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 14:20, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helgoland - Blick vom Lummenfelsen zur Langen Anna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 17:43, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helgoland - Blick vom Bread Hörn nach Südosten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:43, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Istenberg mit Bruchhauser Steinen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:33, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldstein (Bruchhauser Steine) von Osten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 16:22, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochkaltergebirge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Epic --Podzemnik 23:25, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptgipfel der Reiter Alm 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:47, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schottmalhorn von Südwesten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:47, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schottmalhorn von Nordosten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:47, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadelhorn vom Wagendrischelhorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support So good! --Podzemnik 23:25, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick vom Feldstein auf Elleringhausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The DOF at f/2.8 is surprising. --Aristeas 08:02, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gipfel Feldstein (Bruchhauser Steine).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Contrast is a bit high (shadows are very dark), but that’s a matter of taste. The DOF at f/2.8 is surprising. --Aristeas 08:01, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick vom Feldstein nach Nordosten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not your best pic but I think it's a QI. Shadows are quite dark, yes, but not too much. They're also not distracting much that they'd annoy me :) --Podzemnik 23:28, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter in der Langen Rhön.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:57, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lange Rhön - Auf der Hohen Dalle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:15, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heidelstein von der Hohen Dalle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:25, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter auf der Milseburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice. Good qualty. --Milan Bališin 16:08, 22 May 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Stoxastikos 17:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter auf der Abtsrodaer Kuppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good qualty. --Milan Bališin 16:08, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter auf dem Schafstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:35, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter auf dem Schafstein (Östliche Blockhalde).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:35, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schafstein von Westen am Abend.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:34, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama von Noahs Segel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 10:50, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama von der Stoffelskuppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:34, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basstölpel an Helgolands Westküste.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:25, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ausblick vom Großen Nallenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 14:11, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Härdler von Norden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:04, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Härdler von Westen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:04, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Härdler nach Osten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:37, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ausblick vom Härdler nach Nordwesten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:01, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Helgoland - Blick vom Lummenfelsen zur Langen Anna.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Helgoland - Blick vom Lummenfelsen zur Langen Anna.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klippen von Helgoland mit Langer Anna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:53, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auf der Reiter Alm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 14:21, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blockhalde auf der Milseburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:09, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Basstölpel an Helgolands Westküste.jpg

Hallo Milseburg, ich fände es gut, wenn du die Bildmanipulationen an der Datei per Template:Retouched picture nachvollziehbar machen würdest. Ich frage mich auch unabhängig von dem mit Überlichtgeschwindigkeit umgedrehten Vogel, ob so ein Foto mit Basstölpeln rechts an dieser Stelle überhaupt möglich wäre. Gruß, --Sitacuisses (talk) 05:27, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

 Done Danke für den Tipp und das genaue Hinsehen. Die Vorlage sollte häufiger verwendet werden. Viele nehmen die Bilder nicht so, wie sie aus der Kamera kommen. Die Vögel waren durchaus da. Ich fand es für die Bildwirkung aber besser, wenn der eine ins Bild hineinschaut statt heraus und der andere nicht so am Rand sitzt. --Milseburg (talk) 12:26, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Nun ja, jetzt sitzen sie beide so, dass das Licht aus der falschen Richtung kommt. Die Sonne bzw. Wolkenlücke ist schließlich rechts. Bei der allgemeinen Fotoknipserei mache ich auch mal solche Spielchen, aber hier auf Commons und insbesondere bei der Artikeleinbindung in Wikipedia finde ich strengere Maßstäbe angebracht. --Sitacuisses (talk) 00:53, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Denen wird File:Helgoland - Blick vom Bread Hörn nach Südosten.jpg wahrscheinlich eher gerecht. Bei dem anderen schien die Sonne nicht. Es war diffuses Licht, sonst hätte ich die Eingriffe nicht machen können. Ich sehe dadurch keinen bedeutsamen Originalitätsverlust und nahm mir deshalb die Freiheit, es in dieser Weise zu optimieren. --Milseburg (talk) 08:07, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dünnekenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 12:28, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussichtsplattform Biggeblick.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:45, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Hahnenkamm (Spessart).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 17:46, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

QIC The Baar - View from Fürstenberg

Hallo, danke für die wertvollen Hinweise, ich muss blind gewesen sein, soviele Fehler zu übersehen. Habe das Panorama nochmals über ein anderes Programm erstellt, dieses Mal hoffentlich ohne Fehler (zumindest habe ich keine mehr gefunden). Könntest Du bitte nochmals einen Blick darauf werfen, es ist inzwischen im Consensual Review. Viele Grüße --Llez (talk) 06:30, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Habe mich über die vielen Fehler sehr gewundert, da deine Panoramen sonst viel besser sind. Über Famberhorst auch, dass der das so angenickt hat. Jetzt ist das Stitching viel besser, allerdings fiel mir auf, dass die Schärfe nicht mehr ganz so gut ist wie vorher. Im dunklen Bereich ganz rechts sehe ich jetzt auch waagerechte Streifen, die da vorher nicht waren. Ist aber nicht so schlimm wie die Nähfehler vorher. lG --Milseburg (talk) 10:06, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Habel und Habelberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:00, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melibokus von Westen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:01, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Amrum - Weg durch die Dünen zum Strand bei Nebel.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Amrum - Weg durch die Dünen zum Strand bei Nebel.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Großer Feldberg von Norden 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:10, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Winter auf der Abtsrodaer Kuppe.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Winter auf der Abtsrodaer Kuppe.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019

Hallo Milseburg,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Winter auf der Milseburg.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Winter auf der Milseburg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Marcellinus und Petrus (Seligenstadt).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leuchtturm Neuwerk (Herrengarten).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:47, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leuchtturm Neuwerk 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:47, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phare de Calais 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:29, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Bourgeois de Calais devant l'hôtel de ville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, perspective optimal --PantheraLeo1359531 20:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour du Guet (Calais).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:28, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame de Boulogne (Beffroi).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 16:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburger Leuchtturm in Cuxhaven.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:06, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Notre-Dame de Calais.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beffroi de Boulogne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:43, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasserturm Heide.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 15:24, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Mahon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 14:33, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Mahon 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments in the right corner you have a small problem, can you fix it?--Armenak Margarian 14:33, 18 September 2019 (UTC)  Done Oh dear, you've been right. I don´t know how I could miss that. It should have been fixed now. Thank you for your review. --Milseburg 14:54, 18 September 2019 (UTC) Good quality, thank you! --Armenak Margarian 16:12, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Mahon 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 14:23, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Johannes Nepomuk (Biebergemünd).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 17:43, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Martin (Bad Orb).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:33, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Ronneburg von Süden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 17:04, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hirschberger Tor (Arnsberg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:08, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Liebenstein von Burg Sterrenberg 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Nice --DerFussi 11:16, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Liebenstein und Rhein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. I like it --DerFussi 11:10, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sterrenberg und Liebenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:30, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Ronneburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Milan Bališin 17:46, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heidelberg-Altstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but three birds on the left side above the horizon look like dust spots, and on the bottom middle-right side it is possible to remove a piece of paper. --Moahim 10:23, 30 September 2019 (UTC) @Moahim:  Done I picked up the paper and shot down the birds. Thanks for the review.--Milseburg 11:13, 30 September 2019 (UTC) Ok. --Moahim 14:54, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenkrähen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:53, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mägdeburg und Hohenkrähen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:53, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mägdeburg von Südosten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:54, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohentwiel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:54, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzbergkapelle (Arnsberg) 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI but the size is inflated for a 42 MP image --Poco a poco 16:44, 27 September 2019 (UTC) A higher compression is possible, but for the quality it's rather detrimental I´m afraid. What limits are there? --Milseburg 18:10, 27 September 2019 (UTC) My experience says, you could limit the size of the file to 10 or max 12 MB (still highest quality) and get the same result, you may try it out --Poco a poco 20:54, 30 September 2019 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Volume reduced by higher compression as advised. Please check the quality, if it was worth it. --Milseburg 19:59, 1 October 2019 (UTC)  Support Definitely, do you perceive any difference? --Poco a poco 21:42, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Ehrenfels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 12:14, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Großer Weitschartenkopf von Osten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:06, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gipfelkreuz Großer Weitschartenkopf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:05, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Aperture

Hi Milseburg. I reviewed two of your candidates on QIC, one unfortunately insufficient imo and the other, a panorama, which I like a lot. Now my question is why do you use in both cases an aperture f/2.8 when there is sufficient light, they are static photos and you have a shutter speed of 1/1800 or even 1/2000. I understand that with smaller apertures you get a much better DOF and even resolution while you don't need such a high shutter speed with static objects. Cheers and Gut Licht! --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Wolfgang, auf meiner Benutzerseite kannst du ruhig deutsch reden. Danke für dein Feedback. Das Pano ist mir das wichtigere meiner beiden aktuellen Kandidaten auf QIC und ich freue mich, dass es endlich jemand zu würdigen wusste. Ich fortografiere fast ausschließlich freihand auf Wander- oder Radtouren im Automatikmodus. 2.8 ist da die Standardblende. Bei dem Erntebild finde ich die Schärfe für ein QI akzeptabel, zumal man die dänischen Inseln am Horizont in Originalauflösung klar erkennen kann. Aber da können wir ja noch andere Meinungen einholen. Dir auch gutes Licht! --Milseburg (talk) 14:43, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Böllat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:39, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erntezeit auf dem Dänischen Wohld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Venedigergruppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 14:48, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
360 panoramic views from Kaiser-Wilhelm-Turm (Schläferskopf).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Patroller!

---

Counter Vandalism Unit

Hi Milseburg,

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use your help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons.

-- ~riley (talk) 21:35, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Views from Böllat.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebersberg (Rhön) von Nordwesten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 12:56, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohe Tauern von Nordwest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice. --Milan Bališin 19:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:36, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gipfelkreuz Großer Weitschartenkopf.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gipfelkreuz Großer Weitschartenkopf.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hohe Tauern von Nordwest.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hohe Tauern von Nordwest.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear Milseburg,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ausblick von der Platzer Kuppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Platzer Kuppe Gipfel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:33, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2019 - October - Harvesting/Winners

	Photo Challenge – Second Place
	Congratulations! Your picture Erntezeit auf dem Dänischen Wohld.jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Harvesting, in October 2019. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Georg-Viktor-Turm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gut, technisch sauber --PantheraLeo1359531 15:19, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

My FP-Nomination "Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Quéribus"

Thanks for your vote. I offered an alternative according to the comments of the opponents. Could you please have a look on the nomination again? --Llez (talk) 22:47, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

 Done --Milseburg (talk) 11:11, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cap Gris-Nez Westseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:51, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escalles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful image and good quality -- Spurzem 15:37, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear Milseburg,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick vom Cap Blanc-Nez nach Südwesten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grtek 23:23, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020!

		* Happy Holidays 2020, Milseburg! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:50, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebersberg von Südwesten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhön und Ebersburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vue d'Étretat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 16:45, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlossbergturm (Freiburg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 17:16, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussicht vom Witthoh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, atmospheric and good quality -- Spurzem 09:02, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Vue d'Étretat.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vue d'Étretat.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vue du Cap Blanc-Nez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Slight tilt, but still ok --Poco a poco 18:34, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpenblick vom Napoleonseck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:25, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Aussicht vom Witthoh.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aussicht vom Witthoh.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wisenberg von der Belchenflue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:42, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cap Blanc-Nez vu du Mont d´Hubert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:41, 18 January 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Shizhao 08:41, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hesselberg von Südwesten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Horst J. Meuter 18:26, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hursch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 18:30, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La chapelle Notre-Dame-de-la-Garde et les falaises d'Etretat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 16:36, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wartturm (Bad Orb).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:39, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wintersberg (Bad Orb) 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:24, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:La chapelle Notre-Dame-de-la-Garde et les falaises d'Etretat.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:La chapelle Notre-Dame-de-la-Garde et les falaises d'Etretat.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/EatchaBot (talk) 14:35, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria, Hilfe der Christen (Hillenberg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and very nice. --Tournasol7 17:55, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussichtsturm Rother Kuppe 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:04, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rother Kuppe von Westen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:21, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rother Kuppe von Südosten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:40, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehrenberg (Wasserkuppenrhön).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:01, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vier Fichten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Aristeas 17:24, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stellberg Westseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:15, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phonolithfelsen Teufelstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sonya7iv 11:31, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Orb - Haus des Gastes und Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:12, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Orb - Museum und Haus des Gastes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:53, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Michaelskirche (Bad Orb).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 12:47, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Molkenberg (Bad Orb) 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sonya7iv 11:00, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2020

Hallo Milseburg,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 30. Juni 2020 findet zum achten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist zum siebten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2019
• 
  Hessigheimer Felsengärten
• 
  Silberteich im Harz
• 
  Nationalpark Jasmund

Dieses Jahr ist es aufgrund der Ausgangsbeschränkungen schwieriger aktuelle Fotos zu machen, deshalb läuft der Wettbwerb dieses Mal zwei Monate. Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen. Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du hier und vor allem unter dieser Anleitung. Falls du im Moment nicht wie sonst in die Natur fahren kannst, findest du vielleicht in den Tiefen deiner Festplatte oder auf dem Smartphone noch interessante Fotos.

Du möchtest am Wettbewerb teilnehmen, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die deiner Meinung nach angeschafft werden sollte, freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 31. Juli 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im August tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 08:31, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Côte d'Albâtre - Roc Vaudieu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 11:48, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Orb vom Ehrenkreuz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:50, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Rathaus (Bad Orb).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 20:17, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Côte d'Albâtre à l´Aiguille de Belval.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- --Fischer.H 16:45, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte d'Amont (Étretat).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:20, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Côte d'Albâtre à Cap Fagnet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 15:45, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pisseuses de Valaine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 13:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)  Comment - Really peaceful and nice. -- Ikan Kekek 04:35, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manneporte en soir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not very sharp but sharp enough, impressive that everything is in focus, the bird isn't blurry, and the view is very pretty --Trougnouf 20:54, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niedermooser See und Horst.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 23:58, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raureif in der Hessischen Rhön.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Good use of rule of third. --Peulle 21:00, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick vom Aussichtsturm ins Rote Moor 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:27, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick vom Aussichtsturm ins Rote Moor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carschten 10:41, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moorweiher im Roten Moor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. WB a bit too cold IMO. --Ermell 12:26, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick vom Lummenfelsen zur Langen Anna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 21:14, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akka massif seen along the Padjelantaleden in Stora Sjöfallet National Park (DSCF0983).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit pity that not all snowy peaks are in the sun, but overall good quality. --Milseburg 10:41, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niedermooser See.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:29, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:58, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotes Moor - Moorteich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and very beautiful --Aristeas 06:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotes Moor im April.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:20, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussichtsturm Rotes Moor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:53, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Côte d'Albâtre à l´Aiguille de Belval.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Côte d'Albâtre à l´Aiguille de Belval.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falaises d'Amont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and very nice. --Aristeas 13:59, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sommer auf dem Simmelsberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality. --Fischer.H 17:01, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturschutzgebiet Schleimündung von Süden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:41, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasserfall Eisgraben.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 20:04, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blockhalde Stellberg 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:57, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ausblick vom Stellberg nach Westen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auf dem Simmelsberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Very nice and peaceful atmosphere. --Domob 10:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ausblick von der Hindenburghöhe ins Rheintal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:10, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abendlicher Blick vom Lummenfelsen zur Langen Anna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Fischer.H 16:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blockhalde Stellberg 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you remove the shadows at the bottom? --Poco a poco 16:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)  Done @Poco a poco: Thanks for the review --Milseburg 20:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:10, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Falaises d'Amont.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Falaises d'Amont.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duchtlingen im Hegau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:33, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hegau - Hohenstoffeln, Mägdeberg, Hohenhewen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 14:44, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolken über dem Hegau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not a wow feeling, but IMO a beautiful photo --Michielverbeek 15:19, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick vom Wachtküppel zur Wasserkuppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:15, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick vom Wachtküppel nach Nordosten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:07, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madstein (Bad Orb).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice and good quality. --ArildV 10:50, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madstein (Bad Orb) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:11, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Breitenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 01:19, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick vom Wachtküppel nach Norden und Nordosten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:38, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teufelstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality -- Spurzem 08:38, 21 May 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Carschten 08:38, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Raureif in der Hessischen Rhön.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Raureif in der Hessischen Rhön.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:07, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussichtsturm Spitzenstein 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carschten 19:30, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old observation tower on Spitzenstein.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:33, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manneporte (sud-ouest).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 11:08, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Manneporte en soir.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Manneporte en soir.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Vue d'Étretat.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Blockhalde am Mathesberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality IMO --PJDespa 16:11, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hutebuche auf dem Mathesberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --S.Hinakawa 17:09, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwarzes Moor (Bohlenweg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:25, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwarzes Moor (Moorteich).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:26, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blockhalde am Mathesberg 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:38, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blockhalde am Mathesberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carschten 11:20, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Felsen auf dem Spitzenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:36, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loreleyblick Maria Ruh 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:58, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Schomberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting image, good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 16:02, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jeust.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:50, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wüstegarten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wagendrischelhorn von Nordosten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:17, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Wagendrischelhorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 21:14, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020

Hallo Milseburg,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Panorama vom Wagendrischelhorn.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Wagendrischelhorn.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kassianspitze (Ritzlar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit overshaprned to my taste but OK --Podzemnik 04:21, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Königsangerspitze mit Radlsee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:01, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Radlseehütte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Regardant par la Manneporte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:09, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Johannisburg (Aschaffenburg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 14:16, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Latzfonser Kreuz mit Dolomiten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:11, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fliegerdenkmal auf der Wasserkuppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:19, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Regardant par la Manneporte.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Regardant par la Manneporte.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtschloss Fulda (Südwestansicht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 10:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtmauer Bad Orb (2020).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:30, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle am Latzfonser Kreuz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 13:54, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Latzfonser Kreuz mit Dolomiten.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Latzfonser Kreuz mit Dolomiten.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhein bei Kaub und Oberwesel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Schönes Bild und gute Qualität -- Spurzem 13:13, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Johannisberg (Aschaffenburg) II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:05, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Windeck im Herbst.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:24, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Lorchhausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, very beautiful. --Aristeas 08:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Sankt Goarshausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I would suggest cropping a bit at the left or lower border to get rid of the small rock in the lower left corner, but the image already has good quality. Spike 14:41, 25 September 2020 (UTC) @Spike: Thank you for the review. I removed the little rock. --Milseburg 13:25, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernsicht von der Belchenflue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality. --Fischer.H 17:16, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernsicht vom Thanner Hubel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, something very special --Michielverbeek 10:55, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernsicht zu den Alpen vom Tour de Moron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fantastic image --ReneeWrites 18:21, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernsicht von der Hasenmatt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, from compact camera. --PetarM 12:09, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
360 Panoramics from Hasenmatt.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:33, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:53, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hasenmatt 360°.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tesla 18:22, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernsicht auf Gleichberge und Fichtelgebirge 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernsicht auf Gleichberge und Fichtelgebirge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Milseburg,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fliegerdenkmal auf der Wasserkuppe.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fliegerdenkmal auf der Wasserkuppe.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Orb von Norden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Famberhorst (talk • contribs) 16:44 21 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Taking panorams/photos

Hello Milseburg,

I really like your photos. Particularly the one you took from Burg Windeck. If it's not too much to ask, do you have some advice for starting photography? I have an old DSC-HX50, never used it much, could I take photos like yours with that?

Best Regards ZeR0101MiNt (talk) 00:09, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I think you don't need new and expensive equipment to take good photos. I got into photography by taking panoramas. This is perhaps not the easiest way, because several images have to be made at once, which are then stiched together. Panoramastudio is an easy-to-use program that also enables beginners to quickly experience success. Greetings --Milseburg (talk) 15:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panoramics from Wartturm over Bad Orb.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:58, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:58, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Johannisberg III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 16:39, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stadtschloss Fulda (Südwestansicht).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stadtschloss Fulda (Südwestansicht).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020/2021!

		* Happy Holidays 2020/2021, Milseburg! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:35, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New year 2021

		* Happy New year 2021" Milseburg! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! --Pierre André (talk) 11:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Schloss Johannisberg (Aschaffenburg) II.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss Johannisberg (Aschaffenburg) II.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Hirschkopf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:17, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zierenberg mit Brocken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Kallerna 22:46, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Bad Karlshafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:35, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter in der Rhön 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ausblick von der Porta-Kanzel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:47, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wasserfall Eisgraben.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wasserfall Eisgraben.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jakobsberg (Porta Westfalica).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:03, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter in der Südlichen Hochrhön.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and very impressive! --Aristeas 16:58, 15 January 2021 (UTC)  Comment IMHO this is a possible FP; maybe a bit more denoising in the sky could be advantageous. --Aristeas 17:00, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Winter in der Südlichen Hochrhön.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Winter in der Südlichen Hochrhön.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalter Winterabend in der Rhön.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter in der Langen Rhön 2020-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bildgröße grenzwertig klein. Hast Du vielleicht eine kompressionsärmere Variante? Wenn ja, wäre das super! --PantheraLeo1359531 19:16, 23 January 2021 (UTC) @PantheraLeo1359531: Yes, compression increased from 87 to 100%. I would really be interested if someone sees a difference. --Milseburg 19:32, 23 January 2021 (UTC) Yes, I see the difference :). Apart from that, less compression gives better edit options. Thanks --PantheraLeo1359531 12:21, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fichtelgebirge seen from Himmeldunkberg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment look at the modifications to the syntax of the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernsicht vom Himmeldunkberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Indeed, nice view! IMO the picture could be sharper. I suggest a smaller aperture, lower shutter speed? But regard this as QI, also because that color contrast btw fg and bg. --Etaped 13:05, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgholzhausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:46, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzberg (Nordseite).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, an interesting foreground --Michielverbeek 21:49, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter auf dem Kreuzberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful --Michielverbeek 20:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himmeldunkberg vom Arnsberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panoramics from Eschkopfturm.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnsberg (Bayerische Rhön), Südansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 11:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gersfeld vom Nallenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Pudelek 17:40, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mosbach (Gersfeld).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 20:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Simmelsberg Winter 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 14:45, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Simmelsberg Winter 2021.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Simmelsberg Winter 2021.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzberg (Rhön), Südwestansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:21, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfaffenhausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, nice place. --LexKurochkin 13:51, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2021

Hallo Milseburg,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2021 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist zum achten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2020
• 
  Südliche Mosaikjungfer (Aeshna affinis) am Westufer des Gülper Sees
• 
  Bienenfresser im FFH-Gebiet Kaiserstuhl
• 
  Röhrling mit Fliege im Bruderwald in Bamberg
• 
  Strand im Nationalpark Boddenlandschaft
• 
  Neuntöter im Geo-Naturpark Bergstraße-Odenwald

Wie du bei den Top 5 des vergangenen Jahres siehst, sind vor allem Tiere unter den Siegerbildern. Aus diesem Grund setzen wir den Fokus dieses Jahr stärker auf Landschaftsaufnahmen. Aber natürlich haben auch Tierbilder eine Chance zu gewinnen.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen. Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2021 - Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung. Falls du im Moment nicht wie sonst in die Natur fahren kannst, findest du vielleicht in den Tiefen deiner Festplatte oder auf dem Smartphone noch interessante Fotos.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 11:31, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanzelblick auf Waldeck II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Views from Soestwarte.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 23:54, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanzelblick auf Waldeck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but I would have prefer more sky and less bottom --Michielverbeek 19:23, 20 April 2021 (UTC)  Question Thanks for vote and hint. With regard to the Golden ratio, a horizon in the middle would not be desirable. But an image with 2/3 sky? --Milseburg 19:50, 20 April 2021 (UTC) In this case 2/3 sky would have been more desirable because I like the sky very much --Michielverbeek 05:30, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jesberg-Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The errors at the right side should be fixed. --Ermell 19:52, 21 April 2021 (UTC)  Done @Ermell: Thanks for the hint. --Milseburg 20:29, 21 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:14, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohe Dalle im Winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 14:46, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter auf dem Melpertser Rasenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and beautiful. --Aristeas 14:43, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter auf dem Kreuzberg II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice and good--Lmbuga 19:45, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter auf dem Kreuzberg III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:16, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhönwinter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:07, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter in der Rhön.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality IMO --Lmbuga 13:39, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rothsee (Bauersberg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 15:36, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herbst auf der Abtsrodaer Kuppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bilstein-Gipfel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:57, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herbstlicher Ausblick vom Pferdskopf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 15:45, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter auf dem Himmeldunkberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think there is a lens flare on the right side of the picture. --Imehling 16:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)  Done @Imehling: I eliminated the flare. Thanks for the hint.--Milseburg 21:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC) --Imehling 06:04, 19 May 2021 (UTC) Good quality. --Imehling 06:04, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kreuzberg seen from the southwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support The key point for VIC is that this photo is in better light and sharper at review size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:19, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Kreuzberg (Rhön).jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope)
2. Kreuzberg (Rhön), Südwestansicht.jpg: +1 <--

=>
File:Kreuzberg (Rhön).jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former.
File:Kreuzberg (Rhön), Südwestansicht.jpg: Promoted. <--

--A1Cafel (talk) 02:16, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mont Blanc seen from Lemberg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:33, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wüstegarten von Osten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:26, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021

Hallo Milseburg,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2021 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit über zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Im Herzen Deutschlands in Thüringen und in Niedersachsen sind neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die auf Fotos warten. Übrigens in der Hauptstadt Thüringens in Erfurt findet dieses Jahr die WikiCon vom 1. bis 3. Oktober statt. Dies könnte man mit einem Foto-Kurzurlaub vor der WikiCon in Thüringen verbinden …

Vor dem Hintergrund der Flutkatastrophe 2021 haben wir auch drei Sonderpreise ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die Kulturdenkmale zeigen, die zerstört wurden. Das Foto kann das Objekt vor oder nach der Zerstörung zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 18:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Winter auf dem Himmeldunkberg.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Winter auf dem Himmeldunkberg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021

Quest’anno partecipi al concorso Wiki Loves Monuments?

Da domani sarà possibile caricare di nuovo le foto, fino al 30 settembre!

Come ogni anno, e questo è il decimo anniversario, torna Wiki Loves Monuments, il concorso fotografico più grande al mondo che negli anni ha coinvolto quasi 50 nazioni e più di 15.000 persone e hanno prodotto un database di oltre 360.000 immagini di monumenti, patrimonio culturale dell’umanità intera a disposizione di tutti su Wikimedia Commons.

Con la tua partecipazione hai sostenuto lo sviluppo turistico del nostro Paese perché rende disponibili a tutti le sue bellezze. L’obiettivo è la valorizzazione dell’immenso patrimonio culturale italiano sul web. Le fotografie dei monumenti vengono condivise su Wikimedia Commons, il grande database di immagini di Wikipedia, con licenza libera CC-BY-SA. Wiki Loves Monuments contribuisce infatti a diffondere la filosofia di Wikimedia Italia e di tutti i progetti wiki, che si basano sulla libera condivisione della cultura.

L’Italia nelle sue prime 9 edizioni (dal 2012 al 2020) conta 145.000 immagini 15.000 monumenti, 2.000 fotografi, 2.000 enti. Uno dei 2.000 fotografi sei tu e quindi anche quest’anno non puoi mancare, partecipa!!!

Ti aspettiamo. Questo messaggio ti è stato consegnato perché hai partecipato al concorso italiano nel 2020

Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 12:46, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine

Привіт!

З 1 по 30 вересня вже традиційно пройде українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! В Україні цей конкурс пройде вже вдесяте. На конкурс можна подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше можна прочитати за посиланням.

Радимо ознайомитися із детальними правилами, а також із відповідями на часті питання. Як і того року — у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» можна отримати 21 бал за фотографії об'єктів, якщо світлин цієї пам'ятки раніше не було завантажено.

Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.

Цього року вперше будуть окремо виділені фото з повітря (дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо) — у спеціальній номінації «Аерофото». Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі.

Також вперше проводиться спеціальна номінація «Пам'ятки Подесення», знову пройдуть спецномінації «Відео», «Єврейська спадщина», «Млини», «Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» та «Via Regia Ukraine». Для участі світлин у цих спецномінаціях не потрібно обирати нічого у Завантажувачі — світлини зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.

Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Приєднуйтеся!

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Важливо! Цього року відбулася адміністративно-територіальна реформа. Однак, ми проводимо конкурс ще за попереднім адміністративно-територіальним устроєм. Ми почали роботу над створенням списків з новим поділом, але вона ще не є завершена. Ви можете користуватися тими новими списками, що вже є, якщо потрібно відшукати пам'ятку за новим поділом (деякі ОДА вже почали присилати у такому форматі), але пам'ятайте, що нові списки ще не є повними.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки».17:32, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Überlauf Edertalsperre vom Uhrenkopf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 19:47, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Überlauf Edertalsperre 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice image, good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 16:31, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Überlauf Edertalsperre 2021 II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 17:33, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Überlauf Edertalsperre IV.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:51, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Überlauf Edertalsperre III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:09, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reichstagsgebäude von Westen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Alexander-93 14:12, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reichstagsgebäude (Westfassade).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:50, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche Ihlow (Oberbarnim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:39, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dammtor Barth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 14:58, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Winter auf dem Melpertser Rasenberg.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Winter auf dem Melpertser Rasenberg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні триває до 30 вересня / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine is on till September 30

Автор фото Aeou, інфографіка AnastasiaPetrova (WMUA), CC BY-SA 4.0

Переможці спеціальної номінації «Відео» 2020. Автори роликів: Ігор Мартинів, Кирило Венцеславський; Музика: Erik Satie: Gymnopedie No 2 by Kevin MacLeod. Монтаж: Atoly. Ліцензія CC BY-SA 4.0

Привіт!

Нагадуємо, що до 30 вересня включно можна вантажити світлини та відео культурної спадщини України до національного етапу міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»!

Зараз Україна посідає 3-є місце за кількістю завантажених світлин, поступаючись Російській Федерації та Німеччині. За першу половину місяця було завантажено світлини пам'яток із усіх регіонів України, але частина із них є дуже погано представлена. Севастополь зараз представлений тільки однією пам'яткою і одним фото, Крим — 12 пам'яток і 51 фото. Детальніше — у таблиці:

Проміжна статистика

Регіон	К-ть пам'яток	К-ть фото
Севастополь	1	1
АР Крим	12	51
Закарпаття	26	96
Миколаївщина	29	81
Рівненщина	36	186
Херсонщина	36	83
Житомирщина	55	324
Донеччина	57	153
Тернопільщина	62	234
Буковина	75	220
Луганщина	82	90
Львівщина	82	351
Кіровоградщина	88	181
Волинь	98	270
Одещина	115	383
Сумщина	129	414
Дніпропетровщина	139	278
Київ	159	248
Хмельниччина	166	538
Полтавщина	171	594
Харківщина	175	625
Київщина	181	651
Черкащина	186	455
Прикарпаття	240	305
Вінничина	242	775
Запоріжжя	253	317
Чернігівщина	305	519

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Цього року у конкурсі є вісім спеціальних номінацій:

• «Аерофото» — для фото з повітря (зроблені дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо). Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі;
• «Відео» — для відеосюжетів з пам'ятками;
• «Єврейська спадщина» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
• «Млини» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
• «Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
• «Пам'ятки Подесення» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
• «Via Regia Ukraine» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом 15 населених пунктів, що за цим маршрутом є.

Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Приєднуйтеся!

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 18:58, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falaises d’Aval - Chambre des Demoiselles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:15, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Oberweißenbrunn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:51, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Reichstagsgebäude von Westen.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Reichstagsgebäude von Westen.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aiguille et Porte d´Aval.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 13:16, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Syberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Herbstlicher Ausblick vom Pferdskopf.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Herbstlicher Ausblick vom Pferdskopf.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Falaises d’Aval - Chambre des Demoiselles.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Falaises d’Aval - Chambre des Demoiselles.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohes Brett vom Jenner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality! --Radomianin 20:02, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:06, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jenner von Königssee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:31, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Winter in der Rhön.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Winter in der Rhön.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Göll im Herbst.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:14, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:08, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Müllerfelsen Luftbild

Hallo Milseburg, danke für die Beurteilung meines Bildes vom Müllerfelsen bei Streitberg. Ob man da fliegen darf hast du gefragt. Die Antwort ist ja auch wenn das so schutzbedürftig aussieht. Man darf nicht direkt über Naturschutzgebiete fliegen und sonst auch noch einiges nicht aber dort ist noch nicht mal Landschaftsschutz. Beste Grüße aus Bamberg von Reinhold Möller--Ermell (talk) 21:41, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte d'Aval (Vue depuis la Manneporte).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fischer.H 18:08, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte d'Aval en soir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 20:11, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Aiguille et Porte d´Aval.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aiguille et Porte d´Aval.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ramsau Kirche mit Wagendrischelhorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:05, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brocken, seen from Milseburg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:44, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Überlauf Edertalsperre vom Uhrenkopf.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Überlauf Edertalsperre vom Uhrenkopf.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winterpanorama von der Milseburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Very good image. Please carefully check for dust spots! I marked all I could see. --Augustgeyler 00:33, 11 December 2021 (UTC) @Augustgeyler: Many thanks for looking carefully and taking the trouble to mark the spots. I hope I've got all them now. --Milseburg 11:12, 11 December 2021 (UTC)  Comment Four spots in the left part of the sky did remain. I marked them separately. --Augustgeyler 23:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)@Augustgeyler: You're right again. I missed many spots. Where did I have my eyes? I did another cleaning. Please look again. Thank you. --Milseburg 14:31, 13 December 2021 (UTC)  Support Very good panorama. --Augustgeyler 15:18, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edelweißlahner von Osten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schottmalhorn von Osten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Frohe Weihnachten!

	✴ Happy Holidays, Milseburg ✴
	Merry Christmas and a happy new year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr! Желаю вам счастливого Рождества и Нового года! --Aristeas (talk) 18:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2021/2022!

		* Happy Holidays 2021/2022, Milseburg! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:11, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ramsau Kirche mit Wagendrischelhorn 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ramsau Kirche mit Wagendrischelhorn 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vendersheim 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:St. Michael (Bad Orb) with tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Best and only in scope, very useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 20:35, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:14, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin-Panorama vom Fernsehturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, very nice image --PantheraLeo1359531 13:36, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nahe bei Oberhausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:14, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katzenbuckel von Osten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 13:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Großer Hermannsberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:18, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Unklar 1991-05.jpg

Kannst Du mal das Bild (Kapelle? auf einer Bergkuppe) anschauen und eventuell geographisch zuordnen. Ich vermute mal Rhöner Gegend und da kennst Du dich ja ganz gut aus.-79.214er (talk) 16:09, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Danke für die Anfrage. Antwort dort. --Milseburg (talk) 17:41, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Katzenbuckel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 10:28, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Heimbergturm 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ...but good. --Imehling 08:51, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Katz und Loreley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality. --Fischer.H 16:08, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hörnum Odde seen from the Hörnum Lighthouse in 2011.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Useful, as you say, but I think it would be better to name the lighthouse in your scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
  •  Done There is only one lighthouse. A smaller leading light was dismantled in 2013 as it was in danger of falling victim to ongoing erosion. --Milseburg (talk) 13:58, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

•  Support, useful. I think it's still useful to give the name of the lighthouse, because even though there is now only one lighthouse on the island, there are lots of lighthouses in the world. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:35, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Burg Katz und Loreley.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Burg Katz und Loreley.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussichtsturm Windkraft 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality but you may want to remove several dust specks on the left --Virtual-Pano 16:01, 9 March 2022 (UTC)  Done --Milseburg 16:19, 9 March 2022 (UTC) Dust specks gone but sorry to be the bearer but there are several stitching flaws ( e.g. tension rods at tree top level) ; CA of tree in the background; horizontal stitching artefact (right hand upper part of spiral staircase) --Virtual-Pano 17:26, 9 March 2022 (UTC)  Done You're right. The subject is more stubborn than expected. I made some improvements and a new upload. --Milseburg 17:59, 9 March 2022 (UTC)  Support Well done --Virtual-Pano 19:21, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Schindlenbühl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 22:55, 9 March 2022 (UTC)  Comment @Milseburg: It will be helpful to indicate the angle of coverage -- is it 360°? I'm not sure what is the use of an extremely wide panorama that is barely visible in review size. --Tagooty 02:55, 10 March 2022 (UTC) @Tagooty: As it is categorized, this is 360°. I've now added it to the description as well. The review size is full resolution. You can also use the ZoomViewer offered on the files page under the preview. The image shows the entire panorama from said observation tower. It makes sense to use de:Schindlenbühl, de:Mittlerer Schwarzwald, de:Oberrheinebene, other language Wikis or Wikivoyage. --Milseburg 15:16, 10 March 2022 (UTC)  Thank you. --Tagooty 15:41, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ronneburger Hügelland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 14:08, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peterskopf vom Flaggenturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality Lmbuga 13:46, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bismarckturm (Kallstadt).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality -- --Matutinho 16:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Porte d'Aval (Vue depuis la Manneporte).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porte d'Aval (Vue depuis la Manneporte).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vorfrühling am Bodensee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:29, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Berlin-Panorama vom Fernsehturm.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berlin-Panorama vom Fernsehturm.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herbstein (Nordwestansicht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 16:28, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2022 - Deutschland

Hallo Milseburg,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2022 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist bereits zum neunten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2021 – Landschaft
• 
  Halde Jägersfreude
• 
  Naturschutzgebiet Wacholderhänge bei Wallersberg
• 
  Landschaftsschutzgebiet Heseler Wald und Umgebung

• Sieger WLE 2021 – Detail
• 
  Schneebedeckte Pappel-Schüpplinge im FFH-Gebiet Regnitz, Stocksee und Sandgebiete von Neuses bis Hallstadt
• 
  Blüten des Gamander-Ehrenpreis im Naturpark Taunus
• 
  Striegeliger Schichtpilz im Bruderwald in Bamberg

Seit dem vergangenen Jahr ist der Wettbewerb zweigeteilt, das heißt wir unterscheiden zwischen den beiden Bereichen Landschaft und Detail/Makro. Zu Landschaft zählen auch geschützte Einzelbäume. Im Bereich Detail/Makro werden Pflanzen, Tiere und Pilze bewertet.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen - zum Beispiel in Bayern Liste der Naturdenkmäler im Landkreis Würzburg oder in Sachsen Liste der Naturdenkmale in Stollberg/Erzgeb.

Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2022 – Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung.

In diesem Jahr feiert die FFH-Richtlinie ihren 30. Geburtstag. Aus diesem Grund vergeben wir fünf Sonderpreise für die Fotografen, die die meisten FFH-Gebiete fotografieren.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2022 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 12:03, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Panorama-Kommentar

Hallo Milseburg! Ich sehe anhand der hier eingezeichneten 0°-Linie wirklich keine Begründung mein QIC abzulehnen, s. https://postimg.cc/YvBtvv8w An der betroffenen Bildstelle geht es nun mal runter, das kann ich nicht ändern, s. Einzelbild: https://postimg.cc/18BbyXjB --Tuxyso (talk) 21:57, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Mein Kommentar bezog sich auf das Panorama in Originalauflösung. Bei Bildern dieses Formats hat ein Betrachten nur in voller Auflösung Sinn. Ich bin da vielleicht etwas kleinlich. Der Horizont ist zu Beginn leicht schief. Etwa 2000 Pixel rechts vom linken Rand liegt der Horizont knapp 30 Pixel niedriger als am Anfang. Das erste Bild müsste eventuell gerade gerückt werden. Der Horizont ganz rechts liegt knapp 60 Pixel unter dem des Meeres am liken Rand. Wir erwähnt liegen die Niederlande zwar teilweise unter dem Meeresspiegel. Aber es sind nur wenige Meter. Die Bäume am Horizont rechts dürften auf keinen Fall unter dem Niveau des Meeres im linken Teil des Panoramas liegen. Du machst sehr gute Bilder und arbeitest auf hohem Niveau. Da nimmst du mir kleinliche Kritik hoffentlich nicht übel. Sonst gibt es halt nichts auszusetzen. --Milseburg (talk) 23:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Darß 2021 - Weststrand 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 18:37, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Darß 2021 - Weststrand 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 17:51, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Darß 2021 - Weststrand 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 17:53, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Darß 2021 - Weststrand 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 17:54, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Darß 2021 - Weststrand am Abend 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 09:29, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Darß 2021 - Weststrand am Abend 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 09:29, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schärtenspitze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:00, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Watzmann von Norden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:55, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Watzmann und Hochkalter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reiter Alm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Darß 2021 - Weststrand am Abend 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Lovely scene! --Domob 16:11, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohes Ufer zwischen Ahrenshoop und Wustrow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:19, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Watzmann (Westseite).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 15:40, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Jenner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Vwe< good quality. --Steindy 15:35, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick vom Knopfmacherfelsen nach Osten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Watzmann mit Schönfeldspitze.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Watzmann mit Schönfeldspitze.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochkalter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:18, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Knopfmacherfelsen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Well done, how about a FP nomination? --Virtual-Pano 19:56, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Watzmann (Ostseite).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:20, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ausblick Hohe Düne (Pramort).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:25, 30 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:35, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herbst in den Berchtesgadener Alpen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 16:29, 28 May 2022 (UTC) @Spurzem: Thanks for your support. I subsequently changed the color coordination slightly (the spruces seemed too yellow to me) and I want to make sure that this did not conflict with your vote.--Milseburg 14:39, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Watzmann von Südwesten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:38, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

--Pi bot (talk) 07:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiegelesfels-Oberes Donautal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 17:05, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 21:05, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter auf dem Arnsberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:21, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochkaltergebirge von Süden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:29, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schneibstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --Steindy 17:25, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostseeküste bei Ahrenshoop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:15, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuchskaute von Westen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek 21:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick auf Frankfurt vom Dettweiler Tempel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:26, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuchskaute von Westen 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Blurred Foreground, too little contrast in the middle ground, fixable? --F. Riedelio 06:47, 9 July 2022 (UTC) @F. Riedelio: Many thanks for the review.  New version I've uploaded a new version. Please habe another look. --Milseburg 16:14, 9 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 10:39, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Großer Hundstod.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:12, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick beim Abstieg vom Seehorn nach Westen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Milseburg 13:25, 15 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:13, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leoganger Steinberge von Nordosten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 15:31, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seehorn (Westseite).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wikibusters 14:44, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glocknergruppe von Norden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not really convinced by the bottom crop with that chunks of rocks, but overall QI to me --Poco a poco 15:06, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Großvenediger von Nordosten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 12:41, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seehornsee im Herbst.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 11:11, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinernes Meer vom Seehorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Excellent quality. This is a possible candidate for FP --George Chernilevsky 10:36, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glocknergruppe von Norden 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:18, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Panorama vom Knopfmacherfelsen.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Knopfmacherfelsen.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Hahnenkamm (Spessart) 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting image, well done and good overall quality! --PantheraLeo1359531 18:07, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Panorama vom Jenner.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Jenner.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022

Hallo Milseburg,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2022 findet zum zwölften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Sieger 2021 – Schloss Langenburg

Vergangenes Jahr hat Matthias Süßen mit einer Drohnenaufnahme von Schloss Langenburg im Morgennebel gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf wird dieses Jahr sein Nachfolger?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Cloppenburg oder in Oldenburg.

Wir haben dieses Jahr unter dem Motto „Klein aber Oho“ drei Sonderpreise für Kleindenkmale ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die die unterschätzten Kleindenkmale wie Grenzsteine oder Bildstöcke zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2022 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 06:10, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Buchbergturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wow a lot of work to review such a large pano. So: no stitching errors, no blurry parts, nothing overexposed -> QI for me. Personnally I would have used Photoshop de-haze to reduce the hazing effect on the faraway parts of the landscape but it's not at all mandatory. --D4m1en 09:27, 26 August 2022 (UTC) @D4m1en: Thank you for your effort and your constructive criticism. Unfortunately, my software is not up to date and does not have this feature.--Milseburg 22:51, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Göll (Westseite).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Göll (Westseite).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Desenberg (Nordansicht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:53, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Desenberg (Westansicht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:34, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auferstehungskirche (Arnsberg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:05, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Propsteikirche (Arnsberg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 10:08, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks !

Hello, yesterday (06/09/2021) you opposed to some nominated quality images:

Image_1 this edit

Image_2 this edit

Image_3 this edit

Because the sky posterization...

Thanks to your contribute, I found out a mistake (it was my fault) in a single step of my Darktable photo workflow software, a semi automatic post process photo software. That's why several images were recently affected by the same issue.

Obviously, I replaced and I am going to fix all the uploaded files affected by (un-justified) postprocess posterization.

Just a question about SW: I noticed you used Photoshop CS2 9.0 some years ago... Do you think is it still good nowadays?

THX again, Gio Terra Terragio67 06:02, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Well done! I still occasionally use Photoshop CS2 9.0 for very large images. The big advantage is that it costs nothing. It can still keep up well with modern software, which is also free. The photo software that has recently been offered as a subscription is too expensive for me in the long run. --Milseburg (talk) 13:00, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hirschberger Tor (Nordseite).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 15:25, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernsicht vom Herzogenhorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. IMO OK for QI. --XRay 14:40, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche St. Sebastian (Ramsau).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 16:07, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Sigmaringen 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 09:30, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hintersee - Hochkalter.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hintersee - Hochkalter.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kloster Seligenstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 20:07, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glockenturm (Arnsberg) NW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 13:01, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alte Saline (Reichenhall).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Palauenc05 07:16, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Watzmann (Westseite).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Watzmann (Westseite).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glauberg 360.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 12:58, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glauberg Hügel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 11:07, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Ronneburg von Südosten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:31, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Optimum resolution for panorama

2022-09-10 Ferry Terminal at Caribou, NS Canada

Hello Milseburg:

Thank you for bringing the panorama resolution issue to my attention. I made a mistake in creating the panorama export bot for my new camera.

Here is how I determine the optimum resolution for a panorama.

The native resolution of the full frame sensor in my Nikon Z6II is 6048 x 4024-pixels for a total of 24.5 megapixels resulting in a 9.21 MB size in JPG file format.

In a panorama, the long-side-dimension is variable and dependent on the number of frames stitched; the percentage of overlap and the degree of cropping. So, the long side can't be used to determine final image size.

To maintain the native resolution of original Nikon Z6II images used in the panorama, without upsampling or downsampling, is dependent on the short-side-resolution of the panorama which should be at most 4024-pixels with no cropping and < 4024-pixels if cropped.

A panorama of 7 full-frame images taken here on my Nikon Z6II with approximately 20% overlap and some cropping results in a 15,454 x 3,444-pixel panorama image when stitched in Lightroom. If exported with the short-side-resolution <= 4024-pixels (3,444-pixels in this case) and long side proportional results in a 26.2 MB JPG file at the native resolution of the camera.

I am having difficulty uploading this large file today, but will do so in the next day or so.

Best,

Gordon GRDN711 (talk) 18:53, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello Gordon,

yes, the length of the panorama image depends on the number of images used. You could also stitch pictures together at height, but I usually only create single-row panoramas. The scope can be expanded further up and down if you take images in upright format. Due to the shift of the images, something is always lost at the top and bottom. Best, Milseburg (talk) 20:19, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neustädter Rathaus (Hanau) 2022 I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:43, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neustädter Rathaus (Hanau) 2022 II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 20:04, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neustädter Rathaus (Hanau) 2022 III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Terragio67 13:27, 25 September 2022 (UTC) Note: The image is really sharp and your body is visible, because reflected on the upper glass of the main door (5495 - 6820). --Terragio67 13:45, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marienkirche Gelnhausen 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice photo, good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:32, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama über Gelnhausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:58, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Herbst in den Berchtesgadener Alpen.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Herbst in den Berchtesgadener Alpen.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldberg vom Herzogenhorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:00, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

File:WeinheimWachenburgNebelHirschkopfturmWaldnerturmSonne2020-11-28-15-12-43.jpg

File:WeinheimWachenburgNebelHirschkopfturmWaldnerturmSonne2020-11-28-15-12-43.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

@Mdaniels5757: you don't really want to start a regular delete discussion because the original image title contained an factual error? The error has been corrected. The old title is just an unused redirect that should be deleted. Why the effort? Milseburg (talk) 15:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Although you're right that the redirect is now unused due to global replacement, the file was used under that name, so deleting the redirect could cause problems with mirror sites and any external links to the page. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:24, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Should these problems be solved in the discussion? Milseburg (talk) 15:32, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldberg vom Schauinsland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Steinernes Meer vom Seehorn.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Steinernes Meer vom Seehorn.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hofsgrund und Schweizer Alpen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:20, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frankfurt Skyline 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 13:39, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frankfurt Skyline 2022 bei Nacht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:09, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freienohl 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support What a .... Good quality. --Terragio67 17:29, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Main zwischen Skytower und Main Plaza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:12, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Schloss Sigmaringen 2022.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss Sigmaringen 2022.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Rothaus-Zäpfle-Turm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 06:26, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berchtesgadener Hochthron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:41, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wartstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:37, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Speyer - Altstadt - Altpörtel - Blick auf Gedächtniskirche und St. Joseph mit Sonnenuntergang.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Speyer - Altstadt - Altpörtel - Blick auf Gedächtniskirche und St. Joseph mit Sonnenuntergang.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wartstein (Ramsau).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 17:40, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuhausen am Rheinfall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:54, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

WikiDaheim: Gratulation

Hallo Jörg Braukmann,
danke für deine Beiträge zu WikiDaheim und Gratulation! Du hast damit einige Platzierungen erreicht und wir gratulieren also

• zum 4. Platz in der Sonderkategorie Natur/Landschaft mit File:Seehornsee im Herbst.jpg sowie
• zum 5. Platz in der Sonderkategorie Natur/Landschaft mit File:Großer Hundstod.jpg

Du erhältst in Kürze von uns noch eine Mail mit den genaueren Infos zu den Preisen. Die Galerie aller Gewinnerbilder in den verschiedenen Kategorien ist hier zu finden.

Herzliche Grüße, –Annemarie Buchmann (WMAT) (talk) Annemarie Buchmann (WMAT) (talk) 11:42, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hohes Ufer zwischen Ahrenshoop und Wustrow.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hohes Ufer zwischen Ahrenshoop und Wustrow.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2022/2023!

		* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Milseburg! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:12, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Holidays 2022/2023!

✴ Happy Holidays, Milseburg ✴ Merry Christmas and a happy new year! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo! Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr! --Aristeas (talk) 11:10, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kloster Seligenstadt.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kloster Seligenstadt.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 29 December 2022 (UTC)