Most Curious
Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Image deletion warning | Image:Neues_Museum_(ehem._Landesmuseum).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Soxred93 (talk) 04:56, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Schlosspark_Tiefurt_(Musentempel).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Soxred93 (talk) 04:56, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Museum_Schloss_Tiefurt_(Weimar).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Warum ist diese Kat "Ueberfluessig"? TomAlt (talk) 14:10, 1 December 2008 (UTC) Ich habe sie in "Kunstgewerbeschulbau (Van-de-Velde-Bau)" umbenannt, da die Kunstgewerbeschule nur bis 1915 bestand und danach eher als Van-de-Velde-Bau bekannt ist (steht so auch auf der Kennzeichnungstafel an der Fassade).--Most Curious (talk) 16:53, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Das hatte ich nicht gesehen, ein "badname" baustein hätte geholfen. Egal. Wenn Van-de-Velde-Bau der gängige Name ist (die Uniseite benutzt ihn zumindest) dann könnten wir die kat doch einfachheitshalber Category:Van-de-Velde-Bau nennen und fertig ist, oder? Ich denke entweder-oder, beides ist zu sperrig. TomAlt (talk) 22:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Hallo TomAlt, den "badname" Baustein hatte ich vorhin bereits auf die alte Seite gepackt. Ich finde allerdings, dass in diesem Fall beide Bezeichnungen in der Kategorie stehen sollten, damit beim Einsortieren der Fotos sofort klar ist was gemeint ist und nicht unnötig neue Kategorien angelegt werden. In älterer Literatur ist meist nur von Kunstgewerbeschulbau (nicht zu verwechseln mit dem Kunstschulbau) die Rede, zur Bauhauszeit wird das Gebäude sogar als "Werkstattgebäude des Staatlichen Bauhauses" bezeichnet und ist in späteren Jahren nur noch als Van-de-Velde-Bau bekannt. Wer ein Foto aus älterer Zeit hat wird dann mit Van-de-Velde-Bau nichts anfangen können und genauso andersrum. Aus diesem Grund sollte man hier auf den zweiten Namen in der Kategorie nicht verzichten. Gruß --Most Curious (talk) 22:32, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Schillers Wohnhaus has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Weimar in the National Socialism has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |