Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, MrKDunleavy!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 23:43, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Percy Liza edit

 
Category:Percy Liza has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

In addition, I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than using the automatic Nominate for deletion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests), please remember to follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:30, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Deletion request problems edit

Don't edit your comments after other people have responded to them. This confuses the conversation, and the people you're talking to may miss the fact that you've made that change.

Don't delete other people's votes because you believe that they're bots, or not "moderators". This is extremely inappropriate. Deletion requests discussions are open to all users. --Lord Belbury (talk) 08:07, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Not sure what you meant by editing this section heading from "Deletion request problems" to "Warning", but sure, consider it a warning if you like.
Could you answer the outstanding questions at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Khaby Lame 2021.jpg some time? Thanks. --Lord Belbury (talk) 09:21, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
What you said to me looks more like a warning instead. I thought the owner who create this picture was a guy from Peru aka Agustin03072005 who usually create this picture. MrKDunleavy (talk) 09:46, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:TimWalbergHeadshot.jpg edit

Copyright status: File:TimWalbergHeadshot.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:TimWalbergHeadshot.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:05, 12 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please do not remove deletion requests edit

Bahasa Indonesia  বাংলা  Deutsch  English  español  français  magyar  Nederlands  Nederlands (informeel)‎  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  svenska  Türkçe  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−


 
Please do not remove deletion request tags from images before an administrator has closed the debate. If you do not agree that the image should be deleted, you can express your opinion on the deletion request page. You can find this page via a link in the deletion request tag or at Commons:Deletion requests. Thank you.

If you've changed your mind about Commons:Deletion requests/File:Khaby Lame 2021.jpg and want to retract the nomination, you should say so in the discussion so that it can be closed, rather than removing the deletion template and leaving the discussion open.--Lord Belbury (talk) 17:02, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply