User talk:Nightflyer/Archive 2

Admin?

Sag mal, wäre es nicht mal an der Zeit, daß du noch etwas mehr Verantwortung übernimmst und auf Commons Admin wirst? ;) Marcus Cyron (talk) 22:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Nööööö... Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 12:04, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Genauer:

1. Commons ist english. Mein Schulenglisch liegt 40 Jahre zurück. Wenn ich hier mitlese, stütze ich mich meist auf Google-Translate ab.
2. Und ehrlich: Es reicht mir, wenn ich als filemover manchmal eigene oder fremde Dateien mal richtigstellen kann.

Schuster, bleib bei deinen Leisten Auf DE hab ich es ja mal ein Jahr Admin probiert, war aber nicht wirklich glücklich damit... Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 21:17, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Ist nicht wirklich vergleichbar. Ist hier meist sehr viel gechillter. Und man könnte das hier fast ohne Englischkenntnisse machen ;). Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:41, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Marcus, nett gemeint. Aber ich erinnere mich an eine Diskussion über die Sperrung von Bernd Gross. Da wurde der Sperrer ganz direkt böse angegangen. Das gab einige Seiten an Diskussionen (find ich leider nicht mehr). Erst als ich auf deutsch meinen Kommentar schrieb, und jemand den ins englische übersetzte, kam Ruhe auf, der Überbringer der Nachricht wurde nicht mehr angegiftet. Also nicht böse sein, danke für dein Angebot, aber ich will einfach nicht. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 22:25, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Dann muß ich dich versuchen anders zu quälen ;) Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Ach, ich bin beratungsresistent . Aber ich muss hier aufräumen, die Signaturen funktionieren nicht mehr. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 19:45, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Image without license

File:Konvertierung.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:03, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Wewelsfleth, Peters Werft und Peking NIK 9172.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 15:14, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Würzburg, Residenzplatz 2 20170422 003 bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1984, MiNr 712.jpg

And also:

• File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1984, MiNr 713.jpg
• File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1984, MiNr 714.jpg
• File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1984, MiNr 715.jpg

Yours sincerely, --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:04, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Karl V. Unterschrift

Hallo Nightflyer! Ich hoffe Du bist damit [1] einverstanden.--Koppchen (talk) 18:22, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Ja sicher. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 18:35, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Kreis Rendsburg-Eckernförde, Wildes Moor NIK 1497.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I'm not sure this needs so much empty sky, though --Daniel Case 05:46, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Jörl, Naturschutzgebiet Düne am Rimmelsberg NIK 1892.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:40, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Jörl, Naturschutzgebiet Düne am Rimmelsberg NIK 1871.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:18, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Jörl, Naturschutzgebiet Düne am Rimmelsberg NIK 1876.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:18, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Jörl, Naturschutzgebiet Düne am Rimmelsberg NIK 1874.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:07, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Jörl, Naturschutzgebiet Düne am Rimmelsberg NIK 1862.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:31, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Süderlügum, Naturschutzgebiet Süderlügumer Binnendünen NIK 2069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:11, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Süderlügum, Naturschutzgebiet Süderlügumer Binnendünen NIK 2062.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:11, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Süderlügum, Naturschutzgebiet Süderberge bei Süderlügum NIK 2043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:40, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:CHT China Shanghai.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:CHT China Shanghai.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:CHT China Shanghai.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Zaccarias (talk) 07:12, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Nordhastedt, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Mühlenteich NIK 2471.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:10, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Delve, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Südermoor bei Schwienhusen NIK 2567.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:10, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Brammer, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Sandergebiet westlich von Brammerau NIK 1344.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you add an English description? Good quality otherwise. --Trougnouf 12:30, 14 May 2018 (UTC)  DoneMy english is very poor, but I have it tried... maybe wrong... --Nightflyer 21:18, 16 May 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality, thank you! --Trougnouf 13:57, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Delve, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Südermoor bei Schwienhusen NIK 2557.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:16, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Krumstedt, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Landschaftliches Hochmoor NIK 2415.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 23:24, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Schülp b. Rendsburg, Rüsterbarg NIK 2165.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:55, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Code issues in User:Nightflyer/common.js

Hi Nightflyer, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:Nightflyer/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 3 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ISSUE: line 16 character 6: Label 'User' on The statement. - Evidence: User:The Photographer/QICvote.js
2. ISSUE: line 16 character 9: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: User:The Photographer/QICvote.js
3. ISSUE: line 16 character 33: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: User:The Photographer/QICvote.js

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 08:24, 24 May 2018 (UTC).

Code issues in User:Nightflyer/common.js

Hi Nightflyer, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:Nightflyer/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ERROR: Cannot parse line 16 column 10: Unexpected identifier

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 08:24, 24 May 2018 (UTC).

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Gieselautal NIK 2905.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 20:57, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Gieselautal NIK 2900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 20:57, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Gieselautal NIK 2809.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tsungam 06:29, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Gieselautal NIK 2853.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tsungam 06:29, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Hennstedt, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Hennstedter Moor NIK 2690.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:08, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Delve, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Südermoor bei Schwienhusen NIK 2557.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice natural scene --Daniel Case 05:53, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Nordhastedt, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Mühlenteich NIK 2436.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Some of the sunny spots blown, but they're so small as not to detract from the overall wish-I-could-walk-into-it quality of the image --Daniel Case 05:53, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 May 2018 (UTC)