Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, PJ Geest!

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

edit
 

Dear PJ Geest,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Anuna De Wever.jpg

edit
 
File:Anuna De Wever.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 23:01, 13 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrol given

edit
 

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. ~riley (talk) 05:14, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ok, super! Bedankt! --PJ Geest (talk) 09:27, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Fridays for future participants map

edit

Dear PJ Geest:) I just created an account because I wanted to ask you a question regarding the map of Fridays for Future you created/edited. I hope this is the right place to rise the question:) Is there any possibility to see/get the total numbers, which had been used for the countries (I'm especially interested in UK, Germany, the US and Australia). I'm in the process of writing my bachelor thesis and I need to calculate an approximate number of participants per inhabitants. Best wishes, Kati — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kati124 (talk • contribs) 00:04, 28 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Here you can see the sources of the numbers: File:Maximum_school_strikers_per_country.svg#Summary, so have a look at the article en:List_of_school_climate_strikes. Good luck! --PJ Geest (talk) 15:02, 28 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

YT License review

edit

Hi,

Zou je video's die je onder andere van YouTube overzet willen taggen met {{LicenseReview}}? Ik wil ze allemaal wel even voor je nalopen, om te voorkomen dat als in de tussentijd de beschrijving op YT verandert, wij hem hier weer moeten verwijderen. Ciell (talk) 14:23, 19 September 2021 (UTC) Ok, doe ik. --PJ Geest (talk) 15:22, 16 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Renewable energy in the Netherlands

edit

Kun je de eerste grafiek op https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renewable_energy_in_the_Netherlands misschien updaten? Er zijn nieuwe gegevens: https://ember-climate.org/data/data-tools/data-explorer/ KarlFrei (talk) 15:00, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ok, done --PJ Geest (talk) 08:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Art 19

edit

Hallo PJ Geest, in een poging om de afbeeldingen samen onder te brengen, alsook op vraag van Enhancing999 --> User talk:Lotje#uncategorized categories, kan jij misschien een korte samenvatting geven over het specifieke onderwerp? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 04:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please give your uploads proper file titles

edit

Hello, please name your uploaded files in reasonable manners and not e.g. "Famines-by-continent-and-ME-01 1839.png". You can use spaces and such numbers at the end are not useful and look like year names. Thanks. Prototyperspective (talk) 21:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, it was with good intentions. I kept the filename like Our World in Data gives the filename. This with the intention that if an automatic bot imports Our World in Data images again, images are not on Commons twice. But don't know if this will happen in the future again. It would certainly be a good idea. I think the numbers are the resolution of the image, but indeed can be confused with years. In the future I will just keep the sensical description of the name Our World in Data and remove the numbers, like "Famines-by-continent.png". Thanks for the great work of categorizing all the images of Our World in Data by the way. --PJ Geest (talk) 08:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for explaining, it makes sense. However, if bots (or people without searching first) import images, other measures should prevent duplicate uploads. Moreover, bots may change the title from the original, people can also upload files that are already here and to them finding these images would be more difficult, and when I download images from OWID their file-titles are different.
When it comes to other measures, and probably a new discussion should be started about it somewhere, there is some work on that with there now being the Imagehash search and I requested that a check for the same files is added at upload at phab:T167947#9985347.
Yes, please give it proper names, even if that leads to some duplicate uploads that is far less problematic than filetitles that are that suboptimal and while not important I also recommend not including hashes in the filetitle which makes it harder to read and is just for convenience of stored files but not relevant to which titles files have here. Nice to see some recognition for the time spent on categorizing OWID files, thanks. It's also useful for seeing which outdated OWID charts are used that could/should be updated with a new version using e.g. the GLAMorgan tool. Prototyperspective (talk) 14:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply