Panther

Archive

Access rights

Hereby I confirm the request to remove my sysop access rights. --Panther (talk) 06:44, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for all your good work. —Giggy 10:41, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. :) Канопус Киля (talk) 19:13, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

_____________________

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image_talk:Image:JSU-152.jpg

Я являюсь представителем компании Fireglow Games и создателем игры Sudden Strike 3: Arms for Victory из которой и сделан этот скриншот.

Буду благодарен за помощь если вы мне объясните что я должен сделать чтобы эта картинка не была удалена и осталась в соотвествующих статьях. Peter Porai-Koshits (talk) 17:41, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Flag of Penza oblast proposed (2006).png

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Flag of Penza oblast proposed (2006).png has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

proposed CoAs not protected by PD-RU-exempt therefore the image is a vector-images.com copyvio. /Lokal_Profil 02:45, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Same for Image:Flag of Obninsk (Kaluga oblast) proposal.png, Image:Flag of North Medvedkovo (municipality in Moscow) proposal (2003).png, Image:Flag of Khimki (Moscow oblast) proposal.png, Image:Flag of Kamchatka oblast proposal (2001).png, Image:Flag of Schukino (municipality in Moscow) proposal (2003).png, Image:Flag of Shadrinsk rayon (Kurgan oblast) proposal.png /Lokal_Profil 02:59, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

OK. --Panther (talk) 10:09, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Герб Приморской области

Здравствуйте, Panther! Не могли бы вы прокомментировать ситуацию здесь? Премного благодарен.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:19, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Illustrations with numbers

There is a new category:Illustrations with numbers. You have already contributed to it. Thanks! Keep up the good work! --LA2 (talk) 22:38, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Coat_of_Arms_of_Beloyarsky_(Khanty-Mansia)_proposal.png

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Coat_of_Arms_of_Beloyarsky_(Khanty-Mansia)_proposal.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Coat_of_Arms_of_Beloyarsky_(Khanty-Mansia)_proposal.png]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Lokal_Profil 23:56, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Steam engine in action.gif

I have used this gif on English Wikipedia- Cotton Mill. It is a wonderful animation. Thank you. I want to do more work on Stationary steam engines in English Cotton Mills, and could use any extra diagrams. As you have already drawn many of the elements needed- I am sure that you would do a better job than me.

• Mc Naught 1845 Compound beam engine.
• Horizontal cross compounds
• Corliss valve gear

I find this an interesting web site for details on which types of engines were used in English Mills.

• Arthur Robert's Engine List

Best wishes --ClemRutter (talk) 21:15, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

• • ОК, I'll try. --Panther (talk) 08:43, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Рис.3.3..jpg и др.

• Вы уверены, что эти файлы не проходят под PD? На каком основании?--Agent001 (talk) 12:52, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Уверен. Уже тыщу раз обсуждалось. --Panther (talk) 18:32, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
    • Хм. Не видел ни одного из этой тыщи. Можно ссылочку?--Agent001 (talk) 00:11, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
      • Я сейчас навскидку не нашел, где бы это было прямо написано. Пока только это. Т.е. даже если доказать, что эти картинки были сделаны по служебному заданию Ростехнадзора именно для этого документа (что крайне сомнительно), то Ростехнадзор может их только использовать, но не передавать в общественное достояние в составе своей работы. Надо спросить у Alex Spade, он когда-то занимался этим вопросом и публиковал детальное исследование. --Panther (talk) 11:08, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

      Вопрос с PD я изучал отдельно и тщательно. Если государственные док-ты объявлены PD, значит все его элементы служащие неотъемлемой частью всего документа в целом (как-то: картинки, шрифты) тоже объявляются PD. Разумеется если нет противоречия, допустим если в документе заведомо (незаконно) использованы элементы защищенные АП. Но можете быть уверены, в аппарате кабмина или Президента существуют целые отделы людей следящих что-бы этого не произошло. Аналогичная ситуация с марками СССР: они все PD независимо от того кто автор рисунков, репродукций и фотографий, поскольку де-факто известно, что художник заключал договор с издательством, где передавал все права соответствующему ведомству, грубо говоря правительству вообще. --Agent001 (talk) 12:05, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

      Неправильно. В PD только документы законодательного и судебного характера + государственная символика и марки, упомянутые отдельно. Заключение Ростехнадзора не имеет ни законодательного ни судебного характера, следовательно в ОД не находится. Целиком. --Panther (talk) 15:22, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

      Ну я не знаю, что и сказать. Вот цитата из текста шаблона PD "официальные документы государственных органов и органов местного самоуправления муниципальных образований, в том числе законы, другие нормативные акты, судебные решения, иные материалы законодательного, административного и судебного характера, официальные документы международных организаций, а также их официальные переводы". Неужели документ опубликованный федеральной службой РФ, не может считаться "государственным органом" опубликовавшим "нормативный документ"?--Agent001 (talk) 00:33, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

      в том числе ... иные материалы законодательного, административного и судебного характера — вот ключевая фраза. --Panther (talk) 11:16, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Уточняю

Пожалуйста, помогите мне понять некоторые детали. Судя по вашим словам (Author has personal copyright, and in Russian laws is no matter what was the task), у музеев в России не было и нет ни одной собственной фотографии? Насколько я вас понял, все фотографии остаются в собственности авторов? А значит, все музеи находятся по угрозой судебного преследования со стороны авторских наследников? В случае, если вы специализируетесь на таких деталях, хочется задать и ещё один вопрос. Есть картина, написанная по заказу музея, оплаченная музеем и полученная музеем по акту, опубликованная музеем сразу после получения. Кому принадлежали права на эту картину? Спасибо.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:17, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Права можно приобрести только по письменному возмездному договору передачи авторских прав. При этом неимущественные права (например, право на авторство) неотчуждаемы и остаются у автора. Если указанного договора нет, то и никаких прав музей не имеет. Относительно картины это тоже справедливо - музей будет обладать имущественными правами только в том случае, если их передача явно указана в договоре. Иначе он приобретает только экземпляр произведения, и не может им распоряжаться по своему усмотрению. --Panther (talk) 15:15, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Спасибо. Половина вопроса мне ясна. Получается, что у многих российских музеев нет права на большую часть их "творческих экспонатов", которые были переданы им в давние двадцатые годы.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:20, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

А как поступать в нашем случае, когда автор определил свою позицию по фотографиям и заявил её в нескольких газетных статьях и выступлениях по радио? Он пишет, что 1) отправился в экспедицию музея, 2) действовал по указанию директора музея, 3) фотографировал для музея, 4) передал негативы и отпечатки музею, 5) с гордостью заявляет, что работы для музея выполнены им хорошо.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:20, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Если нет письменного договора о передаче прав, то юридически он их музею не передавал, а слова «к делу не пришьешь»... --Panther (talk) 15:26, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Что касается музеев вообще, то при отсутствии договора, по идее, они имеют права только владеть экземпляром произведения, но при этом публичная демонстрация или воспроизведение копий могут быть оспорены законными наследниками автора. --Panther (talk) 15:30, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Еще уточнение - публикация под свободной лицензией (или передача в общественное достояние) тоже относится к таким правам, как право на воспроизведение, и не может быть выполнена без правильно выполненной процедуры передачи этих прав. --Panther (talk) 15:34, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Сейчас есть прецедент - библиотеки попросили право оцифровывать все входящие книги без уведомления авторов - тут же поднялся такой вой, что уши вянут. Т.е. покупая книгу библиотека приобретает экземпляр произведения, может даже давать его читать читателям, но скопировать книгу она уже не может. --Panther (talk) 15:38, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Спасибо за пояснения. Это не простые "слова", это статьи, опубликованные автором в разных газетах. Он пишет: "Поездка была организована дирекцией". Автор "охотно" принял это предложение, то есть загодя знал, что работает на музей. По словам автора, "отпечатки снимков и сами негативы я передал музею" (то есть не в музей на хранение, а музею как владельцу). А вот слова из радиопередачи: "Негативы и позитивы я передал (имя директора) в музей по его, так сказать, заявке. Выполнил его распоряжение. Копии себе оговорил, что копии отпечатков я оставил себе".--PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:50, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Аналогии с библиотечным вопросом нет, потому что речь идёт о произведении, которое принадлежало организации и права на которое закончились в силу именно того, что оно принадлежало организации.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:50, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Coat_of_Arms_of_Olekminsk_(Yakutia)_(1790).png

File:Coat_of_Arms_of_Olekminsk_(Yakutia)_(1790).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

78.1.190.151 13:36, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Taras_Shevchenko_in_Kharkov.jpg

File:Taras_Shevchenko_in_Kharkov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Упорная загрузка под поддельными лицензиями

[1] --Pessimist2006 (talk) 06:48, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token a360f715a74e687d152c991e26754536

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Coat_of_Arms_of_Zhukovsky_(Moscow_oblast).png

File:Coat_of_Arms_of_Zhukovsky_(Moscow_oblast).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Serjio-pt (talk) 15:27, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Flag_of_Zhukovsky_(Moscow_oblast).png

File:Flag_of_Zhukovsky_(Moscow_oblast).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Serjio-pt (talk) 15:31, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Drawing

Your illustration is very nice. Do you happen to have the labels for the parts 1 through 6?

Thanks!

Photohound (talk) 00:59, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

 Done. --Panther (talk) 06:03, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Gorgeous illustration of steam locomotion!

Hi Panther - it's one beautiful piece, and I've nominated it for both quality and valued images. I think it's feature picture worthy too! Jon C (talk) 06:31, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Oh, and in the excitement, I forgot why I was writing you at first place. I came across it via the "illustrations that should be SVG" context. Seeing you created the piece with CorelDraw, I'm wondering if you still have the source and can upload it as a vector file? Jon C (talk)

I still have sources, but there are several Corel Draw specific fills which cannot be easily represented in the SVG format... --Panther (talk) 21:31, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Commons talk:Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 in Russia#Визуализация

Михаил, не могли бы Вы прокомментировать вопросы, поднятые в этом разделе? Дело срочное, а никакой уверенности, что существует понимание, и что в августе не вылезут легко просчитываемые проблемы, у меня нет. Заранее спасибо.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:03, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

WLM

Подскажи, так как глянуть базу объектов по региону, например Самарской области? Чтобы хоть оценить заранее возможности, связываться с проектом или заранее признать, что времени не хватит. ShinePhantom (talk) 06:19, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

• Памятники архитектуры (возможно, с ошибками) выгружены тут: [2]. Вся база здесь: [3] (надо в поиске выбрать Самарскую область и посмотреть). Всё обсуждение тут: Commons talk:Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 in Russia (особенно нижние темы). Работы много, но не смертельно много.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:33, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

  Спасибо. Подумаю пока как местных фотографов заинтересовать. ShinePhantom (talk) 06:59, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Я еще не загружал актуальные данные, пока делаю редактор. Данные мне нужны будут в таком формате. По конкретному региону можно посмотреть так (код региона по ОКАТО). --Panther (talk) 08:20, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

The Wrong Man

Здравствуйте коллега, уважаемый участник the Wrong Man» явно не вандал, он ответственный участник руВикипедии. Я не оспариваю Ваше мнение, но блокировки он не заслужил. Данное событие освещается на ВП:ЗКА русском разделе Википедии. Прошу Вас пересмотреть решение, с надеждой Martsabus (talk) 18:54, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

• Там технически что-то не в порядке, так как блокировка 2006 года, до узурпации, а правки он делал в 2008. Сейчас попробую спросить на форуме.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

  Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#The Wrong Man--Ymblanter (talk) 19:27, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

  Разблокировали, можно работать--Ymblanter (talk) 07:31, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Массовое удаление

Пожалуйста, поспособствуйте в решении возникших проблем. С массовым удалением репродукций я постараюсь сам разобраться: получу соответствующие документы в Союзе художников, в крайности -- обращусь через МОСХ к наследникам (отправлю в OTRS). Но мне непонятно поведение участника Dinamik, начиная с указанного файла, и кончая фото Лукирского, в первом случае -- мой снимок, что и было в описании файла, а остальные -- 1930-х годов. Но он, получив от меня вразумительные ответы, невозмутимо состриг вполне законные картинки. Помогите, пожалуйста, разобраться -- в чём дело? --Serge Lachinov (talk) 01:04, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Я бегло посмотрет претензии к вашим изображениям. К сожалению, по правилам проекта любое сомнение в возможности получения разрешения от автора трактуется не в пользу изображения. Ничего не сделаешь, по поводу авторских прав тут общая паранойя, и претензии вполне законны. --Panther (talk) 08:44, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Как же так: первая работа (М. Шульц с К. Кондратьевым) моя, а остальные сделаны в 1930-х -- больше 70-ти лет! Но если и это не аргументы, я готов написать по поводу первой в OTRS -- этим я как раз и буду отстаивать свои авторские права (получается, что Dinamik, не имея ничего к обоснованию -- не зная ни меня, ни моего возраста, находит возможным руководствоваться своими субъективными соображениями), что касается остальных -- вообще ничего не понимаю, зачем же тогда этот шаблон, о 70-тилетнем сроке? --Serge Lachinov (talk) 02:35, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Насчет первой согласен, но нужно решить теперь это через OTRS. Что касается остального, то 70 лет установлено с даты смерти автора. Если автор неизвестен, либо его разрешение получить невозможно, изображение, к сожалению, подлежит удалению. --Panther (talk) 05:54, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Notification

Hello, there is a de-flag proposal at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag which affects your bot. Regards --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:38, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Bot de-flagging notification

Hi Panther, I'm writing to you because your bot BotCat (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) (assign permissions) is about to be de-flagged as a result of inactivity. If you'd like to keep that account flagged as a bot, please speak up at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag#Discussion; otherwise, I'll remove the bot flag from that account in a week from now (20 February 2014). Thanks for your understanding, odder (talk) 22:46, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Nikolay Gogol monument in Moscow shot 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Nikolay Gogol monument in Moscow shot 02.jpg

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 22:25, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Coat of Arms of Karpinsk (Sverdlovsk oblast) (1973).png

File:Coat of Arms of Karpinsk (Sverdlovsk oblast) (1973).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alexandronikos (talk) 05:48, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Coat of Arms of North Ossetia-Alania.png

File:Coat of Arms of North Ossetia-Alania.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Производные произведения

Commons:Производные произведения has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

37.105.145.148 13:09, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Coat of Arms of Karpinsk (Sverdlovsk oblast).png

File:Coat of Arms of Karpinsk (Sverdlovsk oblast).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alexandronikos (talk) 12:41, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Coat of Arms of Karpinsk (Sverdlovsk oblast) (1973).png

File:Coat of Arms of Karpinsk (Sverdlovsk oblast) (1973).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alexandronikos (talk) 11:44, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Coat of Arms of Belgorod (1893).png

File:Coat of Arms of Belgorod (1893).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

109.238.80.85 16:39, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Coat of Arms of Vladimir oblast.png

File:Coat of Arms of Vladimir oblast.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

109.238.80.85 18:04, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Правила удаления

Commons:Правила удаления has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tomahawk 88 (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Правила удаления

Commons:Правила удаления has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tomahawk 88 (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Coat of Arms of Kislovodsk (Stvropol kray) (soviet).png

File:Coat of Arms of Kislovodsk (Stvropol kray) (soviet).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Александр Танчугин (talk) 09:47, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Flag of Volokolamsk (Moscow oblast).png

File:Flag of Volokolamsk (Moscow oblast).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

83.220.239.43 12:08, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Coat of Arms of Partizansk (Primorsky kray) proposal (2003).png

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Coat of Arms of Partizansk (Primorsky kray) proposal (2003).png. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

--Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:50, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Coat of Arms of Magnitogorsk (Chelyabinsk oblast) (1969).png

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Coat of Arms of Magnitogorsk (Chelyabinsk oblast) (1969).png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Coat of Arms of Magnitogorsk (Chelyabinsk oblast) (1969).png]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:47, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Boiling nuclear reactor.png

Hi Panther, I appreciate your drawing ”Boiling nuclear reactor.png”, but could you add the reference unit of the relevant nuclear boiling reactor? Usually control rods of boiling water reactors are introduced from the bottom of the reactor vessel. As in your drawing, the control rods are introduced from the top, it will be great to inform wikipedia of the reference boiling water reactor where the control rods are introduced from the top of the reactor vessel. Thanks. Rgds. --Thepat (talk) 08:26, 9 November 2020 (UTC)