Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Paulparadis!

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Paulparadis!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burning Daylight.pp.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 16:03, 25 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lys Blanc 1.pp.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 22:38, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Summer Wine.pp.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Yes, now it's described better, merci. Good quality, Tournasol7 16:25, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 7 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavot0998.pp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 17:59, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
*   Comment It looks like the flower is floating above the stem.--Famberhorst 18:23, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paysage 0192.pp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:07, 30 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 2 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pivoine0066.pp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:06, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 08:19, 3 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Foin1618.pp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- Spurzem 16:02, 28 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hemerocalle1441.pp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 22:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hémérocalle 0117.pp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality --Jakubhal 17:17, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavot1889.pp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 19:28, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ancolie1884.pp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paysage0328.pp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment good image but overcategorized and undercategorized. --MB-one 20:12, 7 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
  Question I made an attempt to fix it. Is this sufficient? Oui, merci pour le suivi Salut bien PP --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:14, 7 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality --Palauenc05 07:19, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lys1731.pp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please add a proper description. --Hillopo2018 11:30, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Please do not move to CR without at least a positive or negative vote. Please discuss here. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:03, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality IMO. --Satdeep Gill 14:41, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paysage1646.pp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:51, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lys0176.pp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:24, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crocus0511.pp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality and very cute with this little bee, but can you please also add an English description? --FlocciNivis 16:03, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lys1966.pp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Drow male 07:33, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hémérocalle1060.pp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dahlia0571.pp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:59, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply