User talk:Poco a poco/2017-07

Archives 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Desierto de Lut, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 44-49 HDR PAN.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Desierto de Lut, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 44-49 HDR PAN.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sillustani, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 93.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. There is probably some motion blur but the pic is great enough. You could cut of a bit of sky according to the rule of thirds. --Moroder 22:04, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario de Fátima bint Musa, Qom, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good, not just a picture of beautiful architecture but a slice of life. -- Ikan Kekek 00:08, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta Baja, Daroca, Zaragoza, España, 2014-01-08, DD 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Very interesting game with perspective lines. --MirandaAdramin 20:48, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Islas flotantes de los Uros, Lago Titicaca, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 46.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Beautiful colors ! --MirandaAdramin 20:46, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa de la Punta Roja, Marsella, Francia, 2016-06-22, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruta de las Caras, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:36, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de fuego, Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 24-27 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Point of the tower could have been sharper, but good for me.--Famberhorst 17:50, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Garni, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Atamari 19:19, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Río Bistrica en Prizren, Kosovo, 2014-04-16, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de Paracas, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Natural da Arrábida, Setúbal, Portugal, 2012-05-11, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 03:08, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piquero patiazul (Sula nebouxii), Punta Pitt, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 36.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality - sharp where it's most important. -- Ikan Kekek 06:08, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario de El Quinche, El Quinche, Ecuador, 2015-07-21, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joobo 13:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Carretera al monasterio Noravank, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 55-59 PAN.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Carretera al monasterio Noravank, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 55-59 PAN.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario de Las Lajas, Ipiales, Colombia, 2015-07-21, DD 36-37 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 10:38, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rua de São Filipe de Nery, Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:08, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Región de Búðahraun, Vesturland, Islandia, 2014-08-14, DD 039.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 12:59, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rabelos en el río Duero, Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:07, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario de Las Lajas, Ipiales, Colombia, 2015-07-21, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:49, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sinfonía de las Piedras, valle de Garni, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are overexposed areas, could you try to get that better? --Basotxerri 15:36, 29 June 2017 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 18:43, 30 June 2017 (UTC) Thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:25, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruta de las Caras, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good at full screen, but at only a slightly larger size, I start to notice that the sky is glary and a lot of the vegetation is blurry. Since the file is so big, it's probably a QI, but would it be worth processing the photo a bit more? There just might be dark blue CA on the branches; I'm not sure, but if there is, I'm sure you'll see it. The top of the rock on the right side appears to have a border, but that would seem to be a natural product of light hitting it. -- Ikan Kekek 00:18, 29 June 2017 (UTC)  New version ~~~~  Support - Looks better, but why did you downsize the file? -- Ikan Kekek 18:38, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stafnes, Suðurnes, Islandia, 2014-08-13, DD 020.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:45, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teotihuacán, México, 2013-10-13, DD 38.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:28, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:45, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tepe Sialk, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:28, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tepe Sialk, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:45, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Palacio CEC, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 91-93 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palacio CEC, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 91-93 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de Vestmannaeyjar, Heimaey, Islas Vestman, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 087.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roca de la Ley, Parque Nacional de Þingvellir, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-16, DD 016.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:34, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rua de Trinta e Um de Janeiro, Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:20, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Garni, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 17:15, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reynisfjara, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 158-160 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Río Isar, Múnich, Alemania4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are some dust spots in the sky, some compression artifacts around the golden statue and I think the image needs a bit more clarity and contrast. Could you fix that, please? --Basotxerri 19:51, 2 July 2017 (UTC)  New development Poco a poco 17:21, 3 July 2017 (UTC) ¡Enhorabuena, muchas gracias! This is much, much but way much better! Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:04, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salina de la Playa, Sástago, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-23, DD 22-26 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:53, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Río Saigón, Ciudad Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, 2013-08-14, DD 28.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de Paracas, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente de Mes, Mes, Albania, 2014-04-18, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:52, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre del Oro, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 73.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. It's possible there's a very slight CW tilt - please correct if you agree. --Peulle 21:10, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teotihuacán, México, 2013-10-13, DD 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 20:48, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Mayor, México D.F., México, 2013-10-16, DD 111.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:25, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de la Muela, Ágreda, España, 2012-08-27, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 20:48, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salinas Huito, Arequipa, Perú, 2015-08-02, DD 49.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Shadows a little bit dark. --XRay 04:38, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Iglesia Nova Gracanica, Trebinje, Bosnia y Herzegovina, 2014-04-14, DD 14-16 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia Nova Gracanica, Trebinje, Bosnia y Herzegovina, 2014-04-14, DD 14-16 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Mall, Londres, Inglaterra, 2014-08-07, DD 009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 12:19, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teatro Nacional y Museo de Lucha Macedonia, Skopie, Macedonia, 2014-04-16, DD 89.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 15:49, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de San Blas, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 64.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 15:51, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre Latinoamericana, Ciudad de México, México, 2015-07-18, DD 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:41, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torrehermosa, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-28, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:15, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre del silencio, Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 73.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:38, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de Hércules, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-24, DD 12-15 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:43, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre del silencio, Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 15:52, 6 July 2017 (UTC)  Comment I don't know the spot, but nonetheless I think it's not "Tower of Silence" on the photo. --A.Savin 21:41, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de Paracas, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:50, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shish Badgiri, Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:17, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de la iglesia de Santa Catalina, Valencia, España, 2014-06-30, DD 142.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:16, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mausoleo de Emir Ali, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:09, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Risan, Bahía de Kotor, Montenegro, 2014-04-19, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Peulle 12:14, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Casa histórica de Abbasi, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 75.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Casa histórica de Abbasi, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 75.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urnas funerarias, Sillustani, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 86.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good perspective and good quality -- Spurzem 11:08, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vicuñas (Vicugna vicugna), Laguna de Salinas, Arequipa, Perú, 2015-08-02, DD 46.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 11:09, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viru Bog, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 56.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:38, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Alicante, España, 2014-07-04, DD 57.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:38, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villanueva del Jalón, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-05, DD 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality - in advance. Please remove the spot in the sky (and please add the geo location). --XRay 11:59, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torremocha de Jadraque, Guadalajara, España, 2015-12-28, DD 155.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok now --Ezarate 16:22, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Saludos

Saludos Hola Diego, soy un admirador de tu trabajo, te escribo para agradecerte por las miles de horas de trabajo de alta calidad que le has regalado al mundo a través de commons, este tu trabajo es ya parte del precioso acervo mundial y tu nombre jamás será borrado.

Entiendo tus frustraciones, te pido que consideres que vivimos en un mundo imperfecto donde no tenemos el poder de cambiar a otros, pero si tenemos la capacidad de cambiarnos a nosotros mismos y perdonar a los que son menos maduros, a los fanáticos, a los que tienen hambre de destacar a cualquier precio, a los indiferentes, etc.

Si peleamos con las personas directamente obtendremos frustración, toda lucha en contra de personas trae desgaste, dolor y a la larga el fracaso.

Se que algunas de mis palabras parecen de loco, pero te las comparto porque esta forma de ver la vida me ha resultado gratificante en diversos ambitos. Mi lucha no es contra personas si no contra: - La injusticia, intento ser justo aun si estoy en un ambiente injusto - La ignorancia, me esfuerzo en aprender y enseñar, aunque otros no compartan su conocimiento - La maldad, intento hacer el bien aun si otros me hacen el mal - La corrupción, intentando ser honorable aun cuando otros no lo son conmigo La frustración viene de esperar de los demás algo: reconocimiento, apoyo, respeto, justicia, amor, etc. Y es que todo el mundo está enfermo o herido o perdido, todos estamos en un proceso de curación, pero a diferente velocidad con diferentes tratamientos y con diferentes patologías.

Cuando amas a alguien o amas algo uno se entrega sin esperar nada a cambio y se es muy feliz. Espero que el amor llene tu corazón y tu vida y que este sustituya toda frustración y tristeza. --Cvmontuy (talk) 13:27, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Gracias por tu mensaje. Un saludo, Poco² 17:43, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tren de la FCA en el trayecto Ollagüe-Uyuni, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 92.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sástago, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-23, DD 39.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:12, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teatro Nacional, Skopie, Macedonia, 2014-04-16, DD 53.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. It's normal in Skopje the cars parked on the walking passage? :) Tournasol7 17:30, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torreón Malladeta, Villajoyosa, España, 2014-07-03, DD 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Tournasol7 17:32, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 77.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:01, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 16-19 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:43, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Ismailiyya, Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-26, DD 193.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:01, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Ich kann

deinen Zorn und - wahrscheinlich - auch deine Enttäuschung sehr gut verstehen. Ich lade bereits seit neun Monaten keine Bilder mehr hoch. Ich hatte auch einen Diskussionsbeitrag darüber im Wikipedia-Kurier. Es war widerlich, wie sich Leute, die noch nichts zustandegebracht haben, sich äußerten. --Hubertl 05:29, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

So nebenbei: Auch Uwe und noch einige andere sind ziemlich sauer, so auch auf WMAT, die dortigen Angestellten inkl. Claudia können nur Eines, das aber gut: Die Leistungen der Fotografen als die Ihre, als die Eigene nach San Francisco zu verkaufen. Das geht ganz gut, wenn man von denen bezahlt wird, denen man dann in Folge die Leistung streitig macht. --Hubertl 05:32, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oficinas salitreras de Humberstone y Santa Laura, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 68.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:27, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salineras de Maras, Maras, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:06, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salinas de Peralta de la Sal, Huesca, España, 2015-12-23, DD 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 18:03, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de observación, Parque Estatal Brown County, Indiana, Estados Unidos, 2012-10-14, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:29, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sinfonía de las Piedras, valle de Garni, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me. Tournasol7 07:50, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Benidorm, España, 2014-07-02, DD 48.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good composition and good quality -- Spurzem 19:17, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Gibraltar, 2015-12-09, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:19, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urnas funerarias, Sillustani, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 113.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and very good quality -- Spurzem 19:16, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rua de São João, Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting lighting and good quality -- Spurzem 19:21, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tambomachay, Cuzco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 92.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:22, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Embalse de Kechut, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 60-63 PAN.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Embalse de Kechut, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 60-63 PAN.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Borgarnes, Vesturland, Islandia, 2014-08-14, DD 023.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:25, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Engolasters, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:26, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 102.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:28, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Artajona, Navarra, España, 2015-01-06, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:29, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de la Bahía de Kotor, Montenegro, 2014-04-19, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 23:12, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Museo de la Catedral de Quito, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 91-93 HDR.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Museo de la Catedral de Quito, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 91-93 HDR.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Río Moraca, norte de Podgorica, Montenegro, 2014-04-14, DD 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 10:45, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Alicante, España, 2014-07-04, DD 53.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:28, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urna funeraria, Sillustani, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 101.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Atamari 11:27, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Andechs, Alemania 2012-05-01, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:28, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de Margarita la Gorda, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. for me (have added German description) --J. Lunau 17:29, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teatro municipal, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preparación del boczek, Gniezno, Polonia, 2012-04-06, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I don't like a boczek, but good quality IMO. Tournasol7 08:01, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sede de Unasur, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:25, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario de Fátima bint Musa, Qom, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 15:46, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salto del Angel-Canaima-Venezuela18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:52, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Alcalá de Moncayo, España, 2012-08-27, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:31, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Mónaco, 2016-06-23, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 20:33, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tortuga de orejas amarillas (Trachemys scripta scripta), Tierpark Hellabrunn, Múnich, Alemania, 2012-06-17, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:04, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sinfonía de las Piedras, valle de Garni, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:35, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torres de Cuart, Valencia, España, 2014-06-30, DD 106.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:36, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerros Pintados, Pampa del Tamarugal, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:28, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paloma bravía (Columba livia), Rynek, Gniezno, Polonia, 2012-04-02, DD 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:40, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:33, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pasargadae, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mezquita de Agha Bozorg, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 85.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mezquita de Agha Bozorg, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 85.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mausoleo de Saadi, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 15:53, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita de Emamzadeh Abu Lolo, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 15:53, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mansión Masoudieh, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:01, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita Seyyed, Isfahan, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:05, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 17:19, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Arequipa, Perú, 2015-08-02, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:06, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Nuévalos, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-09, DD 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:06, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viru Bog, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 58.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:06, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Quito desde El Panecillo, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 41.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:06, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-26, DD 108-114 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mezquita Shah, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 49-51 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mezquita Shah, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 49-51 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Madinat Jumeirah-Dubai3303.JPG

Yours sincerely, Guanaco (talk) 07:36, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

New Uploads Protest

Your protest, where you are not uploading new material since March 2017, does not appear to be achieving any change or discussion. I guess you may informally talk about it at Wikimania, which I'm not attending. Here are some of my thoughts/experiences:

Wikipedia

I have not generally found a bad experience adding new photos I have taken to Wikipedia. I can't recall any edit wars or reverts. I know that over time, an image may be replaced and often with a poorer one taken by the person replacing it! I guess this is just human nature -- the thrill of getting your photo on a Wikipedia page. I don't monitor my Wikipedia image-usage very closely. There is of course a danger of self-promotion and a danger that the few people who are watching a given page are stupid. I have found that if an image is "Featured" then people on wiki respect that more. I have never received any criticism on Commons about my images not being used/useful. I don't see a big solution to this as Wikipedia is so random as to the quality of individuals you may interact with on any given page. -- Colin (talk) 11:00, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

See also my comment. --A.Savin 17:51, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi Colin, A.Savin, as I've mentioned before my experience hasn't been so good. I do track the usage of my pictures in Wikipedia as that's the main reason why I upload them to Commons. And I've uploaded quite a lot, sometimes dozens of pictures of a motif showing it in different ways, from different angles and so on. I mean that my pictures do not have always the purpose to be the great one and only that will definitely be used at the end of the day. On the other side I can guarantee quality. In my opinion the FP and HQ content should be highlighted at the other side (the WP projects), so that its usage is facilitated. Many people in the movement don't even now that there is something like QI and judge the pictures by personal preference (and usually at thumbnail size).

Alexander, I haven't surely thrown in the sponge due to this particular topic, but the sum-up of all of them. Poco² 19:22, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Deletion

Wrt appreciation/respect, I don't think the quality of one's photography, the cost of one's kit, or the amount of time taken to achieve the image, are relevant in a deletion discussion. There are problems with process on deletion and in particular speedy delete was highly inappropriate here. A factor that may be relevant is time-spent on Commons and/or various user-privilege settings on one's account, which would indicate the user is more trusted and less likely to make stupid copyright mistakes. Perhaps the speedy delete process can be amended to discourage use for regular user's works. Wrt the regular deletion, I really don't know whether this image was legal wrt-copyright or not, or whether the precautionary principle was taken too far. There are a few folk on Commons I regard as knowledgeable wrt copyright issues, but most are not and many of them are either admins or participate/nominate deletion discussions. Such is the flaw of an amateur/volunteer project and perhaps the vast majority of deletions are OK and so really hard to get right all the time. You upload a lot of content so are more likely to get stuff deleted than those that upload less or in specialised topics like bugs. -- Colin (talk) 11:00, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

This topic should be seen considering the "Image abuse" topic below. We are extremely strict with our own contributors "to avoid problems with the outside world", but the outside world does care a shit about our licenses, as they mostly use them as if all material would be in public domain. Even serious newspapers just ignore the obvious after pointing out the problem. I don't believe that this situation is really balanced and we are letting punish ourselves for no good reason. Poco² 19:22, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Review hassle

We know there are a few users who engage in revenge votes, or who just get grumpy enough to be disinclined to look favourably on one's work. I don't know a solution for that. It is hard to prove revenge voting, and even the most blatant examples (I can think of one) does not result in a permanent ban. I think there is too much focus on technical achievement at pixel level, and hard to achieve perfection at this level, so that always leaves the opportunity for someone to find a fault if so inclined. This may be either because they are ignorant (yet) about what makes a great photo, or because of personal motive. I would like to see the image guidelines page for FP scrapped and replaced with something short and less focused on minor technical flaws. QI I have given up on as it seems that pixel peeping is the main concern there. I don't know how to fix human nature -- when you criticise other's works, they will occasionally get upset. -- Colin (talk) 11:00, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

This topic has indeed no easy solution but is indeed a problem, people sometimes (some of them much more than others) get hurt with a decline and do not AGF. At this point I've to say Colin, that your effort to "educate" the reviewers who e.g. review a 5 MPx at 100% equally as the do with a 50 MPx is the best contribution I can think of in this area. I thank you and appreciate you for that. Poco² 19:22, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Image abuse

This problem is not restricted to Commons or users releasing work with CC. It seems that in the US, if you register your work with the Copyright Office, and hire some big lawyers, you can get very good income from suing people -- provided they have money to begin with. Elsewhere it does not seem so profitable to sue, or even possible to recover costs. The nature of Commons, and Flickr, and Facebook and all other sites with user-generated/uploaded content is that the hosting company does not get involved. They have no budget to either. Unless you keep your work "all rights reserved" and licence on a royalty basis with Getty (i.e. not microstock), then good luck finding an image agency who can be bothered to fight either. For my own images I treat any credit as a bonus and something I'd expect a respectful and clued-up person to do. But I don't seek out abuse or lose any sleep over it. I'm not aiming to make money from my images, and don't care if others do. The only times I complain are when some photography blogs/sites make mistakes like crediting "Wikipedia" or use a Commons image without credit at all. I expect those sites to get it right and show a good example. -- Colin (talk) 11:00, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

For what I can see you are not being consistent here and with the topic before. This topic, as you practise in the other one, does need a lot of education, too. CC licenses are there to show that things are not black or white, but they are barely known. I don't aim to make money with my images, I never did, and I donate the little income I get to the Spanish WM chapter.

I don't think that we can compare Flickr and the WMF when it comes to licensing. For Flickr licenses are just a variable more in the system, for the WMF it should be crucial as CC licenses are the vehicle to advance in the free knowledge movement. In the German community there is a lot of discussion about this topic, some users are indeed (not only in the US) asking for lots of money without prior warning to companies or individuals who just believe that if something is in Wikipedia, it can just be used. I support this people in terms of fighting for the fulfilment of the license terms, but surely not if they just use our movement to deploy traps to make money. I sometimes don't even persuade national newspapers to respect the license I use, eventually I just give up (totally furstrated). I do indeed expect some help from the WMF to fight for our licenses. Poco² 19:22, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Conclusion

Essentially, I don't see easy fixes for your complaints. Some process changes to deletion may help. Setting a good example, as you do, will help. I don't know what positive effect your protest would have. Are you selling your images instead? If not, then all that happens is that nobody sees them or uses them. I see you are uploading to Flickr with a big watermark and an -NC licence. Your images are getting ~30 views, which is almost nothing. My Flickr isn't any better. Diliff and Code both get ~1000 views but just a handful of Faves which is hard to explain given the quality of their work. Really this shows that Flickr is about social-engineering -- tit-for-tat votes and building up a list of followers to achieve "explore" exposure. In my mind, that's a far worse system than Commons FP where the quality of the image is a fairly good factor in deciding the result, not just the popularity of the photographer. Perhaps Commons needs some new forum to give you the necessary satisfaction. Like when I created Photo Challenge, it shows that new forums can be created if there's will. -- Colin (talk) 11:00, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi Colin, please, allow me a few days to answer, I am pretty busy in my real life right now Poco² 19:34, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

I agree with your appreation about Flickr and other platforms, social-engineering is a key factor. If you invest time and effort in your community, you will get your reward. That is, indeed, something I've never done. No, I'm not selling anything anywhere. I upload my work in Flickr as I am not doing it here, as I do feel the need to show it.

I was really ready to tackle these problems, and Wikimania could have been a good platform for that, but, again, the WMF shows that their priorities don't seem to overlap those of users like me. A really pity. I may still talk about this topic in Montreal, but the coverage will be likely moderate. We'll see. Poco² 19:22, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Universidad de Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The calling woman could better go away. But good quality.--Famberhorst 17:32, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viru Bog, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 53.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pelícano pardo de las Galápagos (Pelecanus occidentalis urinator), Cerro Brujo, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 160.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image but seems like it has a slight overall blue cast?--Shankar Raman 13:56, 19 July 2017 (UTC) Looks good to me --Alandmanson 10:35, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa de la Punta Roja, Marsella, Francia, 2016-06-22, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:50, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piquero patiazul (Sula nebouxii), Las Bachas, isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-23, DD 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:26, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:30, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa de Sangenjo, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 39.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:31, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sinfonía de las Piedras, valle de Garni, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments You could relly wish for some focus stacking here, at least two photos here, but I guess it wasn't possible at the time. Ok for QI though. --W.carter 10:16, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Madinat Jumeirah-Dubai3303.JPG

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 12:52, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

IDs

Hola Diego. Revisando imágenes de Egipto en la categoría Cultural heritage monuments in Egypt with known IDs, observo que muchas IDs son incorrectas. He visto una imagen tuya con el link {{Cultural Heritage Egypt|EG-GZ-09}} This is a photo of a monument in Egypt identified by the ID EG-GZ-09. Por favor ¿podrías indicarme donde encontrar una lista con IDs correctas de Egipto? Gracias. Un abrazo, --JMCC1 (talk) 17:53, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Hola JMCC1, me temo que no voy a ser de gran ayuda. No recuerdo que yo haya consultado listados de monumentos de Egipto para incluir el código. Creo que nunca he participado en WLM en Egipto, lo que suele ser un aliciente para hacerlo. Posiblement en el caso que viste fue otro editor con lo añadió. Vía WLM he llegado a este enlace. No sé cómo vas con el árabe, yo ná de ná...Un abrazo, Poco² 19:33, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Gracias por el enlace. Seguiré investigando. Un abrazo, --JMCC1 (talk) 21:28, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Pd: Te felicito por tus magnificas imágenes. --JMCC1 (talk) 21:31, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulipa Viridiflora 'Flaming Springgreen', Jardín Botánico de Múnich, Alemania, 2013-05-04, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful, good quality, Tournasol7 13:14, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villanueva del Jalón, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-05, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:11, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tradescantia sillamontana, jardín botánico de Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-13, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Shankar Raman 16:42, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre del silencio, Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 60-64 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice panorama! QI. --Lewis Hulbert 13:55, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oficinas salitreras de Humberstone y Santa Laura, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 08:27, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de la Muela, Ágreda, España, 2012-08-27, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tlatelolco e iglesia de Santiago Tlatelolco, México D.F., México, 2013-10-16, DD 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario Shah Nematollah Vali, Mahan, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruta de las Caras, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 82.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tuna (Opuntia phaeacantha), Conservatorio botánico, Fort Wayne, Indiana, Estados Unidos, 2012-11-12, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Túnel natural, Hartelholz, Múnich, Alemania, 2016-04-03, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments As the main subject is the dog, the sharpness is adequate for me. You could add some dog-related category. Good quality. --Basotxerri 12:07, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trasmoz, Zaragoza, España, 2016-01-03, DD 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:50, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Alicante, España, 2014-07-04, DD 84.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:50, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Túnel natural, Hartelholz, Múnich, Alemania, 2016-04-03, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:15, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Variotram, Helsinki, Finlandia, 2012-08-14, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Small cw tilt, could you also please add some more information about the location. --ArildV 08:27, 23 July 2017 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 18:12, 24 July 2017 (UTC)  Support thank you. --ArildV 07:18, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Carandolet, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 188.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:25, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Excención aquí en Commons

Hola Diego. El usuario Aldotron está pidiendo ayuda para editar en Commons pero se encuentra afectado bajo un bloqueo de IP local que no le deja solicitar el permiso, ni ha podido editar durante estos momentos. ¿Podrías otorgárselo, por favor?. Está excento globalmente (globalblock-excempt) ya que también le afectó un bloqueo global, pero no tiene el permiso ip-blockexcempt (localmente aquí) que evita que se encuentre afectado por bloqueos automáticos. Desde ya, gracias. --サンティ ^[talk] 20:25, 28 July 2017 (UTC).

Veo que ya está hecho. Poco² 08:30, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Reikiavik desde Perlan, Distrito de la Capital, Islandia, 2014-08-13, DD 146-148 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:50, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Quito desde El Panecillo, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 43.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:52, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de las cuevas-bodegas, Torrijo de la Cañada, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-29, DD 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:55, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 100.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:53, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Medinaceli, Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 108.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:42, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Universidad de Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 17:15, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Río Saigón, Ciudad Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, 2013-08-14, DD 30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 17:17, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urbina, Villa y Zapata en Palacio, Museo de la Ciudad de México, México D.F., México, 2013-10-16, DD 138.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments What a wild bunch! Good quality. --W.carter 20:33, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torres de Cuart, Valencia, España, 2014-06-30, DD 105.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Río Támesis, Londres, Inglaterra, 2014-08-11, DD 127.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments What on the dark side maybe, but good picture quality for me.--Famberhorst 04:51, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista aérea del suroeste de Islandia, 2014-08-13, DD 008.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 19:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Using your Nazca pictures in Wikidata, and geolocating them.

Hello Diego, and many thanks for your work.

I have recently finished a session on indexing and geolocating the main Nazca geoglyphs, both on OpenStreetMap and on Wikidata. You can see a visualisation example of a WD query here.

As you can see, I used many of your Nazca pictures as a main image on these WD items (P18 property), as they are of very good quality comparing to other available material on Commons. If you agree, I can add object location metadata on these pictures, based on the OSM/Wikidata location.

I have one more question : among all your Nazca pictures, I have been unable to locate the following two : File:Líneas de Nazca, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 51.JPG (splitted spiral?) and File:Líneas de Nazca, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 58.JPG (open-winged bird). Would you have you any clue of their location?.

Note that I can give you some more details on my work if you're interested. Best Regards, GAllegre (talk) 13:13, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello GAllegre, thank you for your words and for using these pictures. What you call open-winged bird seems to be a pelican (you can check it here) and the spiral is (my guess according to the uncropped file) the one on the top in this view. Regards, Poco² 14:02, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Baños de Vakil, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 36-38 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Baños de Vakil, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 36-38 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oficinas salitreras de Humberstone y Santa Laura, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 67.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (Geo location?) --XRay 04:33, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio CEC, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. BRight sky, IMO acceptable. --XRay 04:33, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vicuñas (Vicugna vicugna), Laguna de Salinas, Arequipa, Perú, 2015-08-02, DD 40.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:06, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sillustani, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 95-98 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A lot to see --Ermell 21:29, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza del ayuntamiento, Setúbal, Portugal, 2012-05-11, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:09, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 July 2017 (UTC)