Ritarisk
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Solicitud de no borrado
editBuen día Ritarisk: Usted me ha solicitado el borrado de la siguiente imagen https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Almagesto_Introduccióan_VIRGO.png la cuál he "recategorizado" con "Virgo Symbols". Por favor, no la borre dado que tiene bastantes links con el Almagesto que he subido a Wikisource. Muchas gracias por tu atención. Fernando T. de Gorocica 10:11, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
used rights of artworks from Katerina Belkina
editDear user Ritarisk. my name is Katerina Belkina. I am an visual artist and uploaded here on wikimedia on 5th April 2016 fife artworks in a small resolution. I am the author of this artworks. First of all I need to explain that this are digital artworks and not photos of some paintings. Now I found out that you exchanged my uploaded artworks to high resolution pictures. The problem is now that I provided the Creative-Commons license not for this size. Even when you think they have now a better quality. Also important is that the pictures that you uploaded are not photos made by you they are exactly my artworks that you was taken from my website. For this you need to have first of all the right. The Creative-Commons license give you a right to use this from me uploaded pictures or to modify them. So it means in other words you can open them with a photo program like Adobe Photoshop and resize them. But you used a complete other source. This isn't correct. I kindly ask you to delete your high resolution pictures from the database. If you see this different please write me your argumentation.
1. File: Katerina Belkina "Metro".jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Katerina_Belkina_%22Metro%22.jpg - I upload on 5. Apr. 2016 in a size 525 × 400 (160 KB) - User Ritarisk uploaded on 30. Apr. 2016 a picture in the size 1.200 × 915 (571 KB) I disagree with this, because the user not explained from where he took the picture. For this high size never gave the Creative-Commons license.
2. File: Katerina Belkina "For Lempicka".jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Katerina_Belkina_%22For_Lempicka%22.jpg - I upload on 5. Apr. 2016 in den Maßen 578 × 400 (171 KB) - User Ritarisk uploaded on 30. Apr. 2016 a picture in the size 1.445 × 1000 (717 KB) I disagree with this, because the user not explained from where he took the picture. For this high size never gave the Creative-Commons license.
3. File:Katerina Belkina "The Flight. Poezd".jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Katerina_Belkina_%22The_Flight._Poezd%22.jpg - I upload on 5. Apr. 2016 in den Maßen 561 × 400 (158 KB) - User Ritarisk uploaded on 30. Apr. 2016 a picture in the size 1.200 × 856 (537 KB) I disagree with this, because the user not explained from where he took the picture. For this high size never gave the Creative-Commons license.
4. File:Katerina Belkina "The Sinner".jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Katerina_Belkina_%22The_Sinner%22.jpg - I upload on 5. Apr. 2016 in den Maßen 575 × 400 (49 KB) - User Ritarisk uploaded on 30. Apr. 2016 a picture in the size 1.200 × 835 (101 KB) I disagree with this, because the user not explained from where he took the picture. For this high size never gave the Creative-Commons license.
5. File:Katerina Belkina "Red Moscow".jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Katerina_Belkina_%22Red_Moscow%22.jpg - I upload on 5. Apr. 2016 in den Maßen 554 × 400 (193 KB) - User Ritarisk uploaded on 30. Apr. 2016 a picture in the size 1.200 × 866 (630 KB) I disagree with this, because the user not explained from where he took the picture. For this high size never gave the Creative-Commons license.
--Katerina Belkina (talk) 12:36, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Dear user Ritarisk. Maybe you recognised here is today a hot discussion about your uploaded pictures of Katerina Belkina running. And different people are changing always between the small resolution pictures from the author (me) and your high resolution pictures. To say the truth I am as an author have absolute a problem with the fact that you uploaded the high resolution files. Is it possible to delete your high resolution files totally from the wikimedia database? Please let me know about this soon. Kind regards Katerina Belkina --Katerina Belkina (talk) 15:23, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
deletion request
I as the autor of the following artworks announce with this lines here a deletion request for the pictures that the Wikipedia user Ritarisk uploaded in the high resolution
1. File: Katerina Belkina "Metro".jpg in the size 1.200 × 915 (571 KB)
2. File: Katerina Belkina "For Lempicka".jpg in the size 1.445 × 1000 (717 KB)
3. File:Katerina Belkina "The Flight. Poezd".jpg in the size 1.200 × 856 (537 KB)
4. File:Katerina Belkina "The Sinner".jpg in the size 1.200 × 835 (101 KB)
5. File:Katerina Belkina "Red Moscow".jpg in the size 1.200 × 866 (630 KB)
Because he just uploaded it with his note that its in a better resolution but no further informations about the used rights, permission, download source (website or camera) that he used and where. --Katerina Belkina (talk) 23:31, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
editHello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
edit(Sorry to write in Engilsh)
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Entrega de su itulo profesional.jpg
editThis file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Entrega de su itulo profesional.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
File:Ecuacion.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |