Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Stahlecker!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 07:44, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Erbertino1.jpg

edit
 
File:Erbertino1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:17, 28 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Herbert-Erbertino.jpg

edit
 
File:Herbert-Erbertino.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:02, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Bilder von Oberwesel

edit

The subject page is not an appropriate Commons gallery page -- it is entirely personal. Please do not revert my moving it again. Also, please do not load more images of yourself. As a user with very limited history here, you are not actually entitled to any images of yourself or other personal items. Commons is not Facebook. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:11, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:DC1PEA.jpg

edit
 
File:DC1PEA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:18, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Herbert-Erbertino.jpg
Herbert-Erbertino
Stahlecker (talk) 18:24, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Nicht löschen, ich bin der Eigentümer von dem Bild.: DC1PEA Stahlecker Stahlecker (talk) 18:27, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
The message above was created by a bot, so ordinarily no one will see your reply. You should reply to Deletion Requests at the DR,as instructed in the second snetence of the message above.
You may own the image, but the club logo shown twice is copyrighted and cannot be kept on Commons without a free license from an authorized official of the club viaVRT. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:08, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Ich habe DC1PEA mit einem anderen Foto ersetzt! Stahlecker Stahlecker (talk) 21:50, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply


Warning

edit

Removing {{Delete}} tags as you did at File:Erbertino1.jpg is a serious violation of Commons rules. If you continue to break the rules, you will be blocked from editing on Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:16, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Erbertino1 ist Stahlecker. also bin ich auch der Eigentümer von dem Bild. Stahlecker (talk) 22:13, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply



I have blocked you from editing here for one week. Please use that time to consider whether you want to be a useful contributor to Commons or continue to be a nuisance. You have broken our rules three ways:

  1. Removing the {{Delete}} tag from File:Erbertino1.jpg a second time after being warned that that was against the rules.
  2. Creating a personal gallery in main gallery space, and after it was moved to your User space, putting it back in main space
  3. Repeatedly claiming that you were the actual photographer of images when that was not true.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:51, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Gedenktafel für Johann Kirchgässer.png

edit
 
File:Gedenktafel für Johann Kirchgässer.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:00, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Der Schifferverein Oberwesel am Schiffermast. (Ehrenstunde für Johann Kirchgässer).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:00, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Johann Kirchgässer.png

edit
 
File:Johann Kirchgässer.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:07, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply