XXLRay

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, XXLRay!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 08:48, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, XXLRay!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 22:45, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Profile-savonius.png was uncategorized on 17 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 22:45, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Profile-modis.png was uncategorized on 17 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 22:45, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Profile-benesh.png was uncategorized on 17 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 22:45, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Profile-rahai.png was uncategorized on 17 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 22:45, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Autogyro flettner patent.png was uncategorized on 14 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 04:59, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Rotating advertisement.jpg was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:55, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Those young birds

Hi XXLRay - my apologies for getting them wrong as Erithacus rubecula. However, they don't match for Muscicapa striata either, the bill on the chick is too stout. I see you also mention (File talk:Muscicapa striata young05.jpg) "Both were bigger than Erithacus rubecula"; how much larger? Muscicapa striata is the same size as Erithacus rubecula or slightly smaller (slimmer). The eggs and young in your photos are however consistent with Turdus philomelos, though the nest (no mud lining) does not fit that so well. But perhaps another Turdus species? Luscinia luscinia can safely be excluded as their eggs are plain green-brown (photos); also this species would only nest in dense vegetation, not in a wood-pile in a shed. Hope this helps! - MPF (talk) 19:39, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

No problem. Let's try to work it out. I can definitely exclude Turdus philomelos. The parents were only slightly larger than Erithacus rubecula and from my memories smaller than Turdus philomelos. The birds could (shortly) stand still in flight if that helps. If I furthermore compare the chick to the following image it looks very much alike:

--XXLRay (talk) 07:47, 9 November 2013 (UTC)