Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Yuraily Lic!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:14, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Gundam StuffEdit

I'd like to point out that the uploads regarding them were done and no editors warned me about it. You're the only one who pointed it out after you flagged four of them for potential violations yesterday. Ominae (talk) 05:04, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Why is the heading "Gundam Stuff"? Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:43, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

CopyrightEdit

Excuse me, but I don't understand why I risk to be blocked! It's clear I make mistakes with files copyright. But as you can see I upload many pics. A part a possibility to make mistake, I add Gundam images because I have seen other pics already there so I was thinking no problems with copyright. The second the same, in my evaluation was good but wasn't ok and I accept the cancellation. What I consider exagerate is the risk to be blocked. You have to block people who upload with negative intentions, not a casual mistake. I hope you understand my point of view. --Davide Mauro (talk) 23:27, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.--Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:25, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
You've been here two weeks and have made 2,000 edits, all deletion requests. You have contributed nothing of your own. Nor are your deletion requests showing much understanding of complex situations. I am rather disturbed to see that you are now "warning" other editors and threatening blocks! Andy Dingley (talk) 09:28, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously. Deletion requests are contributions to Wikimedia Commons. And it ’s the administrators who make the final decisions about them. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:39, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
How long have you been on Commons? You're not an admin yet! Andy Dingley (talk) 09:43, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Copyrights violationsEdit

Why I risk my account to be blocked? The files you put for deletion were uploaded on flickr with the cc-by-2.0, which is accepted here in commons. I did it very simple :) --Manami (talk) 00:10, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.--Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:24, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Yes, but the license was right, so what the problem? --Manami (talk) 00:26, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
The license of files by flickr users are often wrong. When you upload files, you need to judge them.--Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
@Yuraily Lic: do not threaten other users like that, you do not know how to do, you are too young on commons. --Cody escadron delta (d) 06:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Cody escadron delta, thank you for your advice. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:33, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Nominating filesEdit

I think you have to slow down in nominating files for deletion. And you need to familiarize yourself with COM:DR, COM:COPYRIGHT, COM:FOP, COM:FAIRUSE, and other Commons policies. Kind Regards! -- CptViraj (📧) 10:15, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

  • Also, if you're bulk deleting files for the same reason (such as copyright issues with toys of Thomas the Tank Engine), please consder making bulk deletions and listing them together. Otherwise it looks as if you're simply trying to use volume to overwhelm other editors' ability to reply. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:19, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Andy Dingley, thank you for your advice. For the same reason, I have listed them. For example, Com:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mechagodzilla. However, sometimes, the files of DR is found later. When a similar DR was found later, I decided to add it. (Com:Deletion requests/File:Kariya city Museum of History lecture room ac (1).jpg) Thank you. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:52, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

FoP in JapanEdit

Of course Japan has FoP, you are even linking to our page on the topic. It's not a particularly free access to such content and rarely of use at Commons, but that is not the same as making a false statement that there is, "No FoP in Japan".

Please do not continue to create huge numbers of deletion requests based on an obviously false statement. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:30, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

“No FoP in Japan” is a term used in DRs. For example, Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Statue_of_Masatoshi_Maeda.JPG. No problem. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:01, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

COM:AN/UEdit

বাংলা | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Português | Русский | Sicilianu | Svenska | +/−


 
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

【お伺い】二次作品における削除の線引きについてEdit

こんにちは。Rebirth10と申します。

私の投稿した画像について削除依頼や警告文に係る内容を弊トーク内にお知らせいただきましたが、画像の削除のボーダーラインについてお伺いいたします。

[このような]二次作品のICカードであっても長らく削除はされていませんが、私が過去に投稿したナルスカードにおいては二次作品として削除が行われたようです。(全文英語のため直訳できていませんが)

この点について、どのラインから削除の対象になるのかご教示いただけませんでしょうか。

そちら様はまだWikimediaに参加されて間もないようですが、ご回答いただきますようにお願い申し上げます。--Rebirth10 (talk) 18:00, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:コこちらの画像ではユニバーサルのキャラクターが写っていますが、これにおいては削除の対象とはならないのでしょうか?そちら様はキャラクターの写っているものを多数削除依頼されているようですので、ご質問差し上げます。--Rebirth10 (talk) 04:21, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Rebirth10. I'm one of the users. I'm not in a position to determine the borderline for deletion. About the borderline for deletion, please ask the admins or ask at Com:Village pump. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:59, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

せっかくご回答いただいたのに申し訳ないのですが、再度お聞きします。そちら様が言うように"線引きを決める立場ではない"というのであれば、何を基準にして削除依頼を出されたのでしょうか。この二次作品は良いけどあの二次作品はダメとか、そういうわかりやすい理由でも構わないのですが、弊トークページにはかなりキツめの警告文も記されており、そちら様がどういう基準で削除依頼の対処をされたのか疑問に思っております。ライセンスの問題でしょうか。であればその点についてご解説頂きたく存じます。--Rebirth10 (talk) 16:52, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Please read Commons:二次的著作物 about derivative works. Thank you. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:30, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
  Comment User:Yuraily_Licを拝見すると、en-1とのこと。
そうであれば、わざわざ英語ではなく、Rebirth10さんへ、日本語で回答されてもいいんじゃないですかね。失礼しました。--Benzoyl (talk) 06:31, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

説明文の写った写真の削除依頼についてEdit

失礼します。TR15336300101というものです。日本語の問いかけにも回答されているようですので、日本語で書かせていただきます。 歴史スポットの説明板が写った写真について削除依頼を多数出されていますCommons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Historical information signs in Japan。議論のページに書かせていただきましたが、回答がありませんでしたので、こちらに来ました。 Commons:二次的著作物 も読みましたが、以下の理由から、著作権上、問題はないと考えています。説明板の内容は、歴史事実の説明であり、特段独創性があるとは言えませんし、著作の自治体が明記されています。また、説明自体がこれらのスポットをよく知ってもらう啓発と観光を目的としていますので、何ら問題はないのではないでしょうか。真摯なご回答をお願いいたします。--TR15336300101 (talk) 13:46, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

[Google auto-translate for the benefit of those, like me, who can't read Japanese Andy Dingley (talk) 14:30, 21 August 2019 (UTC)]
About requesting deletion of photos with explanatory text
Excuse me. It is called TR15336300101. It seems that the Japanese questions are answered, so I will write in Japanese. A number of requests for deletion have been made for photos with an explanation board of historical spots Commons: Deletion requests / Files in Category: Historical information signs in Japan. I wrote it on the discussion page, but there was no answer, so I came here. I also read Commons: Secondary Works, but for the following reasons, I don't think there is a problem with copyright. The contents of the explanation board are explanations of historical facts, which cannot be said to be particularly original, and the local government of the work is clearly stated. Also, the explanation itself is aimed at enlightenment and tourism so that you can get to know these spots well, so there should be no problem. Please give a sincere answer.

Hello, TR15336300101. I found what is written about them. Please read this page. Thank you. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:18, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

In addition, deletion requests for explanation boards and guide maps are accepted as copyright violations. For example, Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Kireinakokoro. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:55, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. I am very surprised there is a copyright in one sentence. Is it written in the American copyright law that "A single sentence has copyright"? . I believe that you do not have an expanded interpretation of the law. Is it better for the local government to declare public domain for highly public information? There are other photos that I have updated that have an explanatory board, so you can delete them all.Wikimediaファイル一覧 It's very disappointing as a personal feeling. I've lost much of my motivation to upload to Wikimedia commons.--TR15336300101 (talk) 12:34, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Just to confirm, Is it OK to replace "a photo with an explanation board" by "a photo without it"?? For example like this [[1]]--TR15336300101 (talk) 13:05, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Overwriting existing file with different file is not a good way. Please read Commons:Overwriting existing files. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:27, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Goodbye, Wikipedia Commons and a guardian of the law. Unfortunately, I will never upload photos to the Wikipedia Commons again. Thank you.--TR15336300101 (talk) 23:13, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Are you another sockpuppet account of User:G I Chandor?Edit

You created your account only 2 month ago, but you looks like you understands lot of rules and process of Wikimedia Commons like a veteran Wikimedian user. So, I guess you're just another sockpuppet account of G I Chandor, who performing mass deletation requests of Japanese panorama pictures. Is correct or what? --110.165.187.149 15:49, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

AutopatrollerEdit

Hi, Yuraily Lic. You have made a lot of good work and your edits do not need patrolling anymore, so I just made you autopatroller. Thank you for your good work! Taivo (talk) 14:46, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Taivo, thank you! --Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:51, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Yuraily Lic".