User talk:MGA73/Archive 39

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Leoboudv in topic Unfree images

Copyright status: File:Caledonian Canal.JPG

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Caledonian Canal.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Cwbm (commons) (talk) 14:18, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Soap bubbles 2.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Soap bubbles 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Cwbm (commons) (talk) 14:25, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Soap bubbles1.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Soap bubbles1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Cwbm (commons) (talk) 14:25, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:The World of Scotch Whisky.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Cwbm (commons) (talk) 14:27, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Ecija längster Balkon 28-2-2007 079.verkl.jpg

 
File:Ecija längster Balkon 28-2-2007 079.verkl.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tine (talk) 07:12, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

 
File:Ruine der Hammershus Festung, bei Sandvig, Bornholm, DK.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tine (talk) 11:16, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Exponat in der Ausstellung Gold.jpg

 
File:Exponat in der Ausstellung Gold.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tine (talk) 17:45, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Frauenfeld Schloss.jpg

 
File:Frauenfeld Schloss.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tine (talk) 17:59, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Frauenfeld Baliere.jpg

 
File:Frauenfeld Baliere.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tine (talk) 18:01, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

 
File:Canal Albert tête de garde amont entrée vers le canal au fond à droite le barrage Monsin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BrightRaven (talk) 12:59, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Books of Bismil.jpg

 
File:Books of Bismil.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MGA73 (talk) 08:15, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

HAY MGA73! I have added my question here as Kindly see the Summery of File:Books of Bismil.jpg once again. In the column of Description it has been clearly mentioned by me

"An image of a collage of 8 books of Bismil taken by Kodak camera (only front cover with low resolution)". Date is given as 1 August 2011 (original upload date). And in the column of Permission (Reusing this file) I have written at the very first undertaking as "I hereby assert that I am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the work [Only Front Cover of the books of Bismil whose auther is I myself]." Even then if some body is questioning about my honesty, what else can be done? Kindly see it and do as you wish. Thanks, Krantmlverma (talk) 06:44, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Serbia.jpg

 
File:Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Serbia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vanjagenije (talk) 09:59, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

OTRS [Ticket#2013071410004487]

Hi Michael, long time... Sorry to bother you, but I don't think I know any other scandinavian OTRS-members active at Commons. I've got a problem with getting permission for some images recognised by OTRS, see User_talk:Cindamuse#OTRS_.5BTicket.232013071410004487.5D - and I can't figure out what the problem really is. The volunteer at OTRS I've been in touch with is just sending me long templated texts. There may be a language problem here somewhere, could you take a look? Finn Rindahl (talk) 14:13, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Never mind, taken care of :) Finn Rindahl (talk) 20:10, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

File:YosriTembikaiSusu.jpg

 
File:YosriTembikaiSusu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Tuválkin 08:55, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 11:52, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Old Dover City Hall.jpg

 
File:Old Dover City Hall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Deanlaw (talk) 13:19, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

File:USS Orca (AVP-49).jpg

 
File:USS Orca (AVP-49).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Deanlaw (talk) 13:22, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Rådhuspladsen - Vesterport memorial.jpg

Since this pillar is in your country, perhaps you might know if its old enough to avoid FOP issues in Denmark which has FOP only for buildings. I passed it as a courtesy. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:28, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Good to hear from you.
Well I do not know how old it is. It's a memorial for something that has been gone for centuries. The text is PD-ineligible and the "pictures" on the stone are PD-old so I think we could keep it at least until we find out if it is a recent work of art. --MGA73 (talk) 06:11, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
The zero kilometer stone at the former gate Vesterport was created by en:Peder Vilhelm Jensen-Klint (1853-1930) in 1925. He also created the three other stones at the former gates Nørreport, Østerport and Amagerport in the years before. There is a little about the stone at Vesterport in Danish here. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 13:00, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Nbs seal.jpg

 
File:Nbs seal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vanjagenije (talk) 19:46, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Eastnor.jpg

 
File:Eastnor.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:28, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Rotatebot

Very Strange. The Rotatebot has not functioned since July 16 and the category of images needing rotation keeps growing here It seems the bot's operator is away from Commons. (I replied to your comments on that Danish image above). Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:13, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Help needed

Hi MGA73! Could you please have a look here and see if you can help out? Thanks a bunch! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:01, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Problem solved itself. :-) Thanks! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:57, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Lazard Logo 1.svg

 
File:Lazard Logo 1.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lazard IT (talk) 15:38, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lazard_Logo_1.svg

Hi,

Could you please remove this old Lazard logo. The company has since rebranded and the font style in this thumbnail is no longer correct

   * Would it be possible to remove the image all together?

Hi. I see the file was nominated for deletion and kept. It is marked "old logo" so it should be fine to keep. --MGA73 (talk) 09:05, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

File:RedCross.png

 
File:RedCross.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ricordisamoa 20:03, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 19:12, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft.jpg

 
File:Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Codename Lisa (talk) 12:47, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Moving WT-en & wts-old Category:Files uploaded by MrkStvns

Would you mind moving all photos to Commons from wt-en and wts-old by MrkStvns [1][2]. He was a reliable user, they seem clearly to be his own work, and they are properly licensed and are free of FoP issues (all from Mexico). Thanks! --Peter Talk 20:40, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. My bot have not been working for some time but today it worked fine so I moved them all :-) --MGA73 (talk) 09:03, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks! --Peter Talk 17:46, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Bosnia and Herzegovina Regions map.svg

 
File:Bosnia and Herzegovina Regions map.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vanja / Вања (talk) 21:45, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

File:MysorePalace 2010.JPG

 
File:MysorePalace 2010.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

കുമാര്‍ വൈക്കം (talk) 10:45, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Mcb pendleton.JPG

 
File:Mcb pendleton.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 07:08, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 12:21, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

File:VAE-Dubai-adress-downtown-dubai.JPG

 
File:VAE-Dubai-adress-downtown-dubai.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 12:16, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:424ABS.gif

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:424ABS.gif, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:424ABS.gif]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:24, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

File:424ABS.gif

 
File:424ABS.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MGA73 (talk) 08:01, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Vejlby_Kirke

 

Vejlby Kirke has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Beethoven9 (talk) 20:36, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Route659.gif

 
File:Route659.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alkari (?), 5 September 2013, 07:15 UTC 07:15, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

File:SWCC insignia.png

 
File:SWCC insignia.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 18:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Forest walk in Tsitsikammasmall.jpg

 
File:Forest walk in Tsitsikammasmall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

File:ZA-MP-Ehlanzeni Wappen.jpg

 
File:ZA-MP-Ehlanzeni Wappen.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Underlying lk (talk) 15:58, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 17:09, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Karte Wahrendorff (01).jpg

 
File:Karte Wahrendorff (01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pyfisch (talk) 10:36, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Landungsbruecken Hamburg 718-20a fL55h.jpg

 
File:Landungsbruecken Hamburg 718-20a fL55h.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pedelecs (talk) 11:20, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Kingston-zentrum.JPG

 
File:Kingston-zentrum.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pyfisch (talk) 12:13, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Marktplatz Bad Gandersheim 284-85-h.jpg

 
File:Marktplatz Bad Gandersheim 284-85-h.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pedelecs (talk) 13:13, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Kingston-groß.JPG

 
File:Kingston-groß.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pyfisch (talk) 17:34, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Rüdeshem Historienweg 582-84kh.jpg

 
File:Rüdeshem Historienweg 582-84kh.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pedelecs (talk) 21:22, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Weißenburg Rathaus 10545-h.jpg

 
File:Weißenburg Rathaus 10545-h.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pedelecs (talk) 22:57, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Las Medulas Karte.jpg

 
File:Las Medulas Karte.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pyfisch (talk) 06:50, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

File:P1020116-hnzh.jpg

 
File:P1020116-hnzh.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pedelecs (talk) 08:24, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

 
File:Bremer Rathaus - links im Vordergrund ist der Roland zu sehen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pedelecs (talk) 09:05, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Schloss Vollrads 43-v.jpg

 
File:Schloss Vollrads 43-v.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pedelecs (talk) 09:46, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

 
File:Theodor-Heuss-Brücke und das Kurfürstliche Schloss bei Nacht.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pedelecs (talk) 10:07, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 12:32, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Rotes Dreieck-1.jpg

 
File:Rotes Dreieck-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tine (talk) 16:23, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Karte Wahrendorff (01).jpg

 
File:Karte Wahrendorff (01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pyfisch (talk) 10:36, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Landungsbruecken Hamburg 718-20a fL55h.jpg

 
File:Landungsbruecken Hamburg 718-20a fL55h.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pedelecs (talk) 11:20, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Kingston-zentrum.JPG

 
File:Kingston-zentrum.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pyfisch (talk) 12:13, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Marktplatz Bad Gandersheim 284-85-h.jpg

 
File:Marktplatz Bad Gandersheim 284-85-h.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pedelecs (talk) 13:13, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Kingston-groß.JPG

 
File:Kingston-groß.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pyfisch (talk) 17:34, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Rüdeshem Historienweg 582-84kh.jpg

 
File:Rüdeshem Historienweg 582-84kh.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pedelecs (talk) 21:22, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Weißenburg Rathaus 10545-h.jpg

 
File:Weißenburg Rathaus 10545-h.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pedelecs (talk) 22:57, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Las Medulas Karte.jpg

#invoke:Autotranslate Pyfisch (talk) 06:50, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

File:P1020116-hnzh.jpg

Template:Idw/layout Pedelecs (talk) 08:24, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Pedelecs (talk) 09:05, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Schloss Vollrads 43-v.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Pedelecs (talk) 09:46, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Pedelecs (talk) 10:07, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 12:32, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Rotes Dreieck-1.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Tine (talk) 16:23, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 15:32, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

File:New Orleans districts map.png

Template:Autotranslate 2601:0:B00:398:E9EB:1C18:E44C:B92E 20:27, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

File:User Jsf1974.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Gbawden (talk) 10:34, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

File:External fragmentation.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Wizardman 16:45, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 09:33, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

File:My Zeil 2009.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Pedelecs (talk) 20:26, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

File:ICE-T Ffm-Flughafen 123-kzh.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Pedelecs (talk) 20:28, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 19:40, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

File:NA-cape-cross-diego-cao.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 08:02, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

File:NA-cape-cross-stein-engl.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 08:13, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

File:NA-cape-cross-stein-3spr.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 08:15, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Nagarghadi-raipur.jpg

Template:Autotranslate ukexpat (talk) 15:47, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Thixa caobang.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Dschwen (talk) 16:15, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 19:43, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Map of Pakistan.png

Template:Autotranslate Saqib (talk) 16:28, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Bled Toplice.JPG

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 12:00, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 08:38, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikivoyage

Hello MGA73, I have 628 fichiers to Wikitravel in french and my page ; User:FrankyLeRoutier/Brouillon is you capacity to import for bot. Thank you very much FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 20:49, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

I can't import from Wikitravel but I can copy from Wikivoyage. I did a few test uploads that you can find in Category:Files moved from fr.oldwikivoyage to Commons requiring review to see if it worked.
Have you checked that uploader is photographer / copyright holder or that there is a permission if not? --MGA73 (talk) 21:51, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
The authors inclus to exemple the models ; Template:T, Template:T, Template:T, Template:T, Template:T, Template:T, or inclus in the texte ; « Domaine publique, Libre de droits » and by default is Template:T. You bot work for import the fr.oldWikivoyage is very good. Thank. FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 07:24, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Okay. I'll tell the bot to copy all the files it can. It needs a license tag to work. Then we can see what is left when it is done. It would be a great help if you could help check the files when they are copied. Correct author etc. if needed.
If some are not okay just add a speedy deletion tag so we can get them deleted. --MGA73 (talk) 17:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Trieste bersagliere.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 00:27, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Moronic acid.png

Template:Autotranslate DMacks (talk) 19:31, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Bled Toplice.JPG

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 10:43, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

File:43 -pienennys-.JPG

Template:Autotranslate Rudko (talk) 06:57, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Bruxelles Musee des intruments de musique.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Agramonte48 (talk) 16:39, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it. If you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:09, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 17:51, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Sunset over the Assateague wetlands.jpg

Template:Autotranslate JuTa 12:28, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Meteora Monasteries.jpg

Template:Autotranslate INeverCry 20:23, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Pelion.jpg

Template:Autotranslate INeverCry 20:26, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Mozambique200Metical.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 21:58, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:UpsideDown-China Flag.png

Template:Autotranslate Sven Manguard Wha? 18:54, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Disneyworld overview map.png

And also:

Hi MGA73. Some of your files are listed in Category:Pages using Information template with incorrect parameter. Could you please have a look and try to fix the syntax errors? Thank you. Leyo 09:53, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Yep :-) --MGA73 (talk) 16:42, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

Yours sincerely, BaseSat (talk) 14:07, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Unfree images

Dear Michael,

I don't know but I think all these images from Instagram are unfree and should be deleted. If you agreed, please file a speedy delete on them. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:23, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

  • Secondly, feel free to make a comment in this DR if you wish. I believe the metadata personally...but of course I could be wrong and the image could be a US government work and be PD. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:16, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your input. Dennis made a response and the image on the balance of probability I think will likely not be kept without OTRS permission. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 17:50, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "MGA73/Archive 39".