Adiel lo~commonswiki

Welcome to the Commons, Adiel lo!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 13:09, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Adiel lo~commonswiki!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Neuen Universität Heidelberg.JPG is uncategorized since 8 March 2009. BotMultichillT 05:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Stadhuis Leuven.JPG was uncategorized on 13 September 2009.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Sepulchre cross.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good light and composition, sharp --Ianare 14:06, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwinger gardens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hazbani.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Meets the requirements. --High Contrast 08:33, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mamila area by night.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castello di Miramare.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks a bit tilted and geolocation ist helpful at photographs of buildings. --Berthold Werner 13:35, 9 July 2009  Comment Hmm.. The horizon looks straight to me. I added a geocode. Adiel lo 18:39, 9 July 2009 (UTC) The walls on the left side are tilted cw, needs perspective correction, otherwise good --Mbdortmund 00:56, 10 July 2009 (UTC) Perspective corrected. Would someone now promote? --Berthold Werner 15:25, 12 July 2009 (UTC) Looks good now. --Iotatau 17:32, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sha'ar hagai armored vehicle1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Unfortunate drastic loss of sharpness in the background, but lighting and the educational value let me forgive this. -- H005 19:55, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Belfort HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Maedin 06:53, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bled Overview.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice location and composition. -- JovanCormac 07:02, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lake Bled.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope should be changed to "Lake Bled". A separate category should also be created. "Bled" alone is a municipality, and this picture is not appriopriate for the municipality. Yann (talk) 15:52, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
  • You are right. I changed the category and the scope. Adiel lo (talk) 16:09, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
    •  Support OK now. Best match for this scope. Yann (talk) 00:27, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - good. התמונה הכי טובה לדעתי ;-) --Rastaman3000 (talk) 15:08, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 09:55, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lupinus pilosus adl1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wonderful colours. --99of9 06:13, 10 February 2010

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lupinus pilosus adl2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good colors and depth of field. --MathKnight 16:19, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lupinus pilosus adl2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good colors and depth of field. --MathKnight 16:19, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metula and Hermon.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment An attractive view. Unfortunately there is considerable chromatic aberration at full resolution. Do you have a RAW version? Canon DPP might get rid of the CA. --Iotatau 16:42, 18 February 2010 (UTC)  Comment Sorry, the image was shot in Jpeg. Adiel lo 15:46, 22 February 2010 (UTC) I have changed my mind, the CA is tolerable. (Let's see if my promotion is challenged...) Adding the geocode would be helpful. --Iotatau 21:57, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lupinus pilosus adl3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition. Front flower spike is sharp enough IMO. -- Avenue 23:42, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Fonske.JPG

And also:

• File:Fonske2.JPG

Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 09:04, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Adiel lo. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Adiel lo~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

19:41, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

01:38, 21 April 2015 (UTC)