User talk:Bgag/Archives 2014-1

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Churchgate railway station sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 17:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMC building winged lion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:42, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prince of Wales Museum (exterior), Mumbai.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 21:58, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 20:42, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Takhteshwar Temple 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit of noise in the sky, but ok --Poco a poco 18:26, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gateway of India - turret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It's leaning to the left.--XRay 15:36, 10 January 2014 (UTC)  Done --Bgag 16:40, 10 January 2014 (UTC)  Support Good quality (now). --XRay 09:54, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shri Swaminarayan Mandir, Bhavnagar 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 19:55, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shri Swaminarayan Mandir, Bhavnagar 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:23, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shri Swaminarayan Mandir, Bhavnagar 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 15:37, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shri Swaminarayan Mandir gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:56, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shri Swaminarayan Mandir, Bhavnagar 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:22, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shri Swaminarayan Mandir, Bhavnagar (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope.--Tonto II. (talk) 21:45, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Agree, best in scope. Halavar (talk) 23:08, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Samovsaran Mandir Palitana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:18, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shri Swaminarayan Mandir, Bhavnagar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:16, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Padmavati Mandir, Palitana 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:35, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Samovsaran Mandir Palitana (exterior), view from South.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : Nice picture, Bgag, but could you add "SW (or NE...) view", as we usually do here, please ? - Friendly. --JLPC (talk) 17:57, 16 January 2014 (UTC)  Done --Bgag (talk) 18:55, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks : oK now (sorry for the delay). --JLPC (talk) 22:16, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:54, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Padmavati Mandir, Palitana 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:43, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Thé baozhong wulong à Pinglin

Après tant de félicitations, je suis un peu gêné pour vous demander un petit renseignement. Je prépare un article sur le thé (pour WP fr) baozhong (fait à Pinglin, Taiwan) et j'aimerais utiliser votre photo d'un atelier File:Tea factory, Pinglin.jpg. Pourriez-vous m'indiquer si la machine au fond à droite est un dessiccateur. Vous indiquez "Drying the tea" : est-ce la dernière opération de déshydratation (après le four) ou est-ce une opération de séchage avant la mise au four? Merci. Pancrat (talk) 14:12, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• C'est un dessiccateur (voir le site: http://www.aarkay.net/fre/driers.html). D'après ce que je comprends c'est pour la déshydratation et il n'y a pas de mise au four après, mais je ne suis pas certain. --Bgag (talk) 15:24, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palitana temples 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:41, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palitana temples 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:41, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Padmavati Mandir, Palitana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not 100% sure but better --Poco a poco 21:11, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shri Swaminarayan Mandir, Bhavnagar 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palitana temples 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could be nice see lion face, But maybe it is imposible. Well done --The Photographer 16:25, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Chaumukhji Tonk 02.jpg

Bonjour Bernard, n'étant toujours pas pleinenment satisfait de tes corrections je me suis permis de corriger ton image (tilt + sharp), qu'en penses-tu? --Christian Ferrer 18:17, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

C'est très bien. Merci. --Bgag (talk) 20:58, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palitana temples 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:55, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chaumukhji Tonk 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:54, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palitana temples 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:23, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palitana temples 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A wonderful photo and I am ready to promote it. Can you get it rectilinear? The upper verticals are leaning slightly inwards ... --Cccefalon 17:03, 24 January 2014 (UTC)~  Done --Bgag 18:29, 24 January 2014 (UTC)  Support --Cccefalon 10:41, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chaumukhji Tonk 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asiatic lion 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:13, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nilgai in Gir Forest National Park 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:32, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asiatic lion 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:21, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Adi Kadi Vav 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Buddhist caves, Uperkot - plaque.jpg
• File:Map of Uperkot Fort.jpg
• File:Gir Forest National Park.jpg
• File:Map of Palitana temples.jpg

Yours sincerely Эlcobbola _talk 19:09, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Mago National Park 02.jpg

And also:

• File:Mago National Park 01.jpg
• File:Simien Mountains National Park Office.jpg
• File:Gouder Red Wine.jpg
• File:Coffee shop sign in Mek'ele.jpg

Yours sincerely Эlcobbola _talk 19:13, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mugger crocodile in Gir Forest National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:03, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chaumukhji Tonk 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok but it is tilted on the right --Christian Ferrer 16:40, 23 January 2014 (UTC) Done --Bgag 19:41, 23 January 2014 (UTC) Sorry but now I see the right is leaning out, it need a little perspective correction --Christian Ferrer 07:10, 25 January 2014 (UTC) Is it better now? --Bgag 15:52, 25 January 2014 (UTC)  Info New version by me, another opinion is needeed please --Christian Ferrer 11:38, 29 January 2014 (UTC) Seems ok to me. Mattbuck 21:32, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Women at work, Gujarat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Cccefalon 16:04, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woman at work, Gujarat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:14, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Common Myna, Junagadh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:23, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cannon at Uperkot Fort 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good Quality. --Sebbe xy 00:46, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Junagadh, India.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 04:33, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jama Masjid, Uperkot 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:39, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculpture of elephant, Palitana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'm not quite sure about the image quality, especially at the bottom. The detail seems a bit blocky. Mattbuck 10:45, 26 January 2014 (UTC)  Support QI IMO. --P e z i 21:19, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gate of Junagadh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:40, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Bahar-ud-din Bhar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for QI. Ah, l'Inde mystérieuse...--Jebulon 16:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tombs in the Mahabat Maqbara,.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:56, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Bahar-ud-din Bhar 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Left crop is improvable, but good overall --Poco a poco 21:12, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naulakha Palace 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:21, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naulakha Palace 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 17:17, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jama Masjid, Uperkot (interior), Junagadh, India.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope, nice picture. Yann (talk) 04:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Bahar-ud-din Bhar (exterior), Junagadh, India.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope imo. --JLPC (talk) 17:30, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Mahabat Khan (exterior), Junagadh, India.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:31, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jama Masjid, Uperkot (interior), Junagadh, India.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope, nice picture. Yann (talk) 04:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Bahar-ud-din Bhar 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:32, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jama Masjid, Uperkot (interior), Junagadh, India.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope, nice picture. Yann (talk) 04:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jama Masjid, Uperkot (interior), Junagadh, India.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope, nice picture. Yann (talk) 04:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naulakha Palace 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 15:52, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jama Masjid, Uperkot (interior), Junagadh, India.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope, nice picture. Yann (talk) 04:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jama Masjid, Uperkot (interior), Junagadh, India.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope, nice picture. Yann (talk) 04:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rani Rupavati's Mosque 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lothal - ancient well.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jama Masjid, Uperkot (interior), Junagadh, India.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope, nice picture. Yann (talk) 04:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Utelia Palace (exterior), Utelia, India (view from W).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 01:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jama Masjid, Uperkot (exterior), Junagadh, India (view from SO).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 01:06, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rani Rupavati's Mosque (exterior), Ahmedabad, India (view from NE).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 16:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:33, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auto rickshaw in Ahmedabad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:56, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rani Rupavati's Mosque 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done. --Bgag 17:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC)  Support now. --JLPC 19:03, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clock tower, Ahmedabad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JOAQUIND 17:23, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jama Masjid, Ahmedabad 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 17:12, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naulakha Palace 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 23:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jama Masjid, Ahmedabad 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:53, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jama Masjid, Ahmedabad (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 useful and best in scope. -- Sputniktilt (talk) 11:02, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jama Masjid, Ahmedabad 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:24, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jama Masjid, Ahmedabad 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jali at Sidi Saiyyed Mosque 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 16:12, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jali at Sidi Saiyyed Mosque 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:41, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jama Masjid, Ahmedabad 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good for QI --Cccefalon 17:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sacred cow in Ahmedabad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The right side is leaning inwards. I proposed a tighter crop, see annotation. --Cccefalon 08:58, 15 February 2014 (UTC)  Done --Bgag 15:42, 15 February 2014 (UTC) Sorry, I still have to insist. While the new crop becomes to the photo, the perspective correction is not yet done. I made annotations for your assistance. --Cccefalon 16:58, 16 February 2014 (UTC)  Done Should be better now. --Bgag 15:38, 17 February 2014 (UTC)  Support Good now! --Cccefalon 19:46, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Swaminarayan Temple, Ahmedabad 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:06, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Gandhi at Sabarmati Ashram.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:30, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jama Masjid, Ahmedabad 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auto rickshaws in Ahmedabad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:46, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jama Masjid, Uperkot - Mihrab 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sun Temple, Modhera 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:50, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sun Temple, Modhera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bicycle in Ahmedabad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 15:48, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rani Rupavati's Mosque 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes --Mattbuck 20:11, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sun Temple, Modhera - Hindu people.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:35, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sun Temple, Modhera - pillars 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:13, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sun Temple, Modhera - Nandi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:15, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sun Temple, Modhera - Guda Mandap 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sun Temple, Modhera - Guda Mandap 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:41, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sun Temple, Modhera 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Looks OK now. --DAJF 16:56, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sabha Mandap, Modhera Sun Temple, India (view from E).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 01:28, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 01:13, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Guda Mandap, Modhera Sun Temple, India (view from SW).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. Halavar (talk) 01:28, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 01:13, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sun Temple, Modhera - pillars 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:31, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sun Temple, Modhera - Guda Mandap 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:53, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sun Temple, Modhera - Sabha Mandap 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me. -Barras 15:27, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bats at the Sun Temple, Modhera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting --Poco a poco 19:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Surya Kund 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:31, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sun Temple, Modhera - sanctuary 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 16:03, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sun Temple, Modhera - Sabha Mandap 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:24, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Surya Kund 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:24, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sun Temple, Modhera - Guda Mandap 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 16:29, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sun Temple, Modhera - Sabha Mandap 0.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 16:29, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sun Temple, Modhera - Guda Mandap 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 16:13, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gopuram Madurai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 15:38, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculptures in Rani ki vav 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 17:02, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaslamp Quarter 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:02, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculptures in Rani ki vav 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:23, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cattle in Patan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 15:47, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculpture in Rani ki vav.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:44, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Diego Museum of Man 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 15:58, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Diego Museum of Art 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:47, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joshua Tree, California 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 14:45, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Jolla Fire Station Engine Company 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:25, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mission San Diego de Alcalá - church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Cccefalon 15:03, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balboa Park Botanical Building 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:01, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cattle in Adalaj.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:59, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ancient Greek theatre (Lindos).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:32, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Omkareshwar Temple 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:31, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Omkareshwar Mahadev Temple (exterior), India, view from South.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 12:23, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Omkareshwar Palace (exterior), India, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Omkareshwar Temple 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:34, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Omkareshwar Palace 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Interesante --Ivan2010 14:46, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculptures in Rani ki vav 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gomukh ghat, Omkareshwar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:06, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Omkareshwar 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:06, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Omkareshwar 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:14, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mamleshwar Temple 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:05, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mamleshwar Temple 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:46, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Carcès01.jpg

File:Carcès01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Aga (d) 07:37, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mamleshwar Temple - Nandi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:41, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mamleshwar Temple - Vishnu and Lakshmi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:04, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mamleshwar Temple - Shiva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:33, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Omkareshwar - Sindoor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:27, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Omkareshwar Temple - Sculpture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:18, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Royal Palace of Maheshwar (exterior), Madhya Pradesh, India, view from South.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. I added "Madhya Pradesh" in the scope. Yann (talk) 04:08, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chhatri of Vithoji, Maheshwar, Madhya Pradesh, India, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. I added "Madhya Pradesh" in the scope. Yann (talk) 04:05, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Nev1 (talk) 12:42, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chhatri of Vithoji 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:25, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Music band vehicle in Maheshwar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice :-) --Ralf Roletschek 14:53, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Omkareshwar Temple 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --DXR 21:01, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Omkareshwar Palace 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:22, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sun Temple, Modhera - Sabha Mandap 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sun Temple, Modhera - Sabha Mandap 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chhatri of Vithoji 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --J.-H. Janßen 18:44, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chhatri of Vithoji 08 - Elephants.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice elephants. --J.-H. Janßen 16:20, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maheshwar Fort 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:39, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ahilyeshwar Shivalaya 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:44, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maheshwar Fort - Exterior 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:25, 4 April 2014 (UTC) Please, correct the perspective issues Poco a poco 18:22, 4 April 2014 (UTC)  Done --Bgag 22:39, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maheshwar Fort - Jharokha 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:51, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chhatri of Vithoji 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:05, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chhatri of Vithoji 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:38, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chhatri of Vithoji 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:48, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Road sign in Madhya Pradesh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:43, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maheshwar Fort - Jharokha 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Malchen53 19:41, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maheshwar Fort - Sculpture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:50, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ghats of Maheshwar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 03:31, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maheshwar Fort - Exterior 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:44, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laxmi Bai kii Chhatri 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Malchen53 15:39, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maheshwar Fort 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:31, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ghats of Maheshwar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 08:26, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ghats of Maheshwar 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:49, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musician in Mandu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:09, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baz Bahadur's Palace 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 15:22, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baz Bahadur's Palace - plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:04, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baz Bahadur's Palace 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:44, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Shri Swaminarayan Mandir, Bhavnagar 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Shri Swaminarayan Mandir, Bhavnagar 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/Jee 07:35, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baz Bahadur's Palace 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 14:38, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baz Bahadur's Palace 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 14:19, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maheshwar Fort - Exterior 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:44, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Baz Bahadur's Palace, Mandu (exterior), SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 16:13, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baz Bahadur's Palace 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 16:29, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baz Bahadur's Palace 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:27, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jama Masjid, Mandu (exterior), East view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:05, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb near Baz Bahadur's Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Malchen53 18:29, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baz Bahadur's Palace 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:17, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baz Bahadur's Palace 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:49, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rewa Kund, Mandu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Cccefalon 15:47, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mausoleum of Hoshang Shah, Mandu (exterior), SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 22:30, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:18, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jami Masjid, Mandu 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:07, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baz Bahadur's Palace 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:06, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joshua Tree National Park Visitor Center.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:06, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jami Masjid, Mandu 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 00:11, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jami Masjid, Mandu 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 00:11, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jami Masjid, Mandu 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:44, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porch of Hoshang Shah's Tomb 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 14:05, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoshang Shah's Tomb 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 16:32, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoshang Shah's Tomb 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 13:53, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoshang Shah's Tomb 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 14:09, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jami Masjid, Mandu 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:29, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porch of Hoshang Shah's Tomb 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:29, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jami Masjid, Mandu - dome 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:05, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porch of Hoshang Shah's Tomb 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:00, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower of Victory 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:04, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mahmud Khilji's Tomb 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --A.Savin 14:26, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower of Victory 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:23, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ashrafi Mahal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, detail level not the best, though --Poco a poco 18:07, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapoor Talao 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:35, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Champa Baodi, Mandu (exterior), SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good choice imo. --JLPC (talk) 19:03, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jal Mahal, Mandu (exterior), SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good choice too. --JLPC (talk) 19:05, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapoor Talao 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:08, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapoor Talao 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:48, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapoor Talao 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:40, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Taveli Mahal, Mandu (exterior), NW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope IMO --Christian Ferrer 05:26, 27 april 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:57, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kapoor Talao, Mandu, West view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:57, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jahaz Mahal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 16:44, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tower of Victory, Mandu, SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope imo. --JLPC (talk) 16:26, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jahaz Mahal plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:18, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jahaz Mahal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:17, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jahaz Mahal 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:34, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jahaz Mahal 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 04:50,2 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jahaz Mahal 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Minor CA but overall QI to me --Poco a poco 15:34, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hindola Mahal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 23:08, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hindola Mahal 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 23:08, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jahaz Mahal 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:32, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jahaz Mahal 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:04, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hindola Mahal - jharokha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 14:34, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Champa Baodi 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Left side not rectilinear (see annotation) --Cccefalon 16:00, 3 May 2014 (UTC)  Done --Bgag 16:33, 3 May 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:28, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hammam, Mandu 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:32, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dilawar Khan's Mosque 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 22:00, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dilawar Khan's Mosque 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:50, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dilawar Khan's Mosque 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:32, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dilawar Khan's Mosque 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:28, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hammam, Mandu (exterior), South view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:12, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:36, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jahaz Mahal 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not as sharp as the other one but OK. --JLPC 16:55, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jahaz Mahal 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 15:55, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapoor Talao 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:39, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient Hindu Baodi, Mandu - plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Heuschrecke 18:33, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shri Ram Ghat 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:20, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shri Ram Ghat 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:01, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Harsiddhi Mata Temple, Ujjain (exterior), South view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 13:30, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:03, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jahaz Mahal 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:51, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapoor Talao 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:51, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vedh Shala, Ujjain, SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:21, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ram Ghat, Ujjain 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 14:54, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shri Ram Ghat 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Left side leaning outwards. --Cccefalon 04:44, 12 May 2014 (UTC)  Done --Bgag 18:25, 12 May 2014 (UTC) Good now. --Cccefalon 09:06, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Mamleshwar Temple - Vishnu and Lakshmi.jpg

Firstly, Beautiful quality images of India and Hindu temples. But, are you sure this image is Shiva and Parvati? the iconography resembles Lakshmi - Vishnu (Narayan) on Garuda IMO. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 06:22, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

I think you are right. I have changed the description. --Bgag (talk) 21:47, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street food in Indore.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:44, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vedh Shala, Ujjain 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 15:08, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vedh Shala, Ujjain 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:10, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krishnapura Chhatri - sculptures.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:21, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lakshmi Narayan Temple, Bhopal (exterior) SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 04:56, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vedh Shala, Ujjain 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lakshmi Narayan Temple 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:18, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lakshmi Narayan Temple 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Cccefalon 19:45, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vedh Shala, Ujjain 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:03, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lakshmi Narayan Temple 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 17:46, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chetiyagiri Vihar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 17:33, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chetiyagiri Vihar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments something happened on top of the cupola during postprocessing. can you please check? --Cccefalon 17:35, 20 June 2014 (UTC) I think it is a bird and some sprig (maybe a nest?) --Bgag 19:40, 20 June 2014 (UTC) Yes, your explanation makes sense. Good quality. --Cccefalon 20:02, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chetiyagiri Vihar, Sanchi (exterior), SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buddha Statue, Sanchi 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 03:55, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buddha Statue, Sanchi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:28, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buddha Statue, Sanchi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:26, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buddha Statue, Sanchi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:26, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stupa 3, Sanchi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bird-nest-free and QI :) --Cccefalon 16:10, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stupa 3, Sanchi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 16:10, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple 45, Sanchi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 15:30, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stupa 3, Sanchi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 15:30, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple 45, Sanchi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:23, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple 45, Sanchi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:50, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple 45, Sanchi 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo --Lewis Hulbert 18:31, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Temple 45, Sanchi, India NW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:34, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stupa 1, Sanchi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 20:32, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stupa 1, Sanchi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:55, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple 31, Sanchi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 08:58, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Temple 31, Sanchi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 08:26, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple 45, Sanchi 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to go --Poco a poco 17:21, 30 June 2014 (UTC)