Brookford

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Brookford!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 02:50, 1 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Redirects for deletion

Latest comment: 4 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Hello!

As I said in one of the categories for discussion, please tag category redirects with {{SD|G2}} if you want them deleted. Since CSD G2 is a speedy deletion criteria there is no need for such a process. Happy editing!Jonteemil (talk) 03:48, 19 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello Jonteemil, thanks for letting me know ! --Brookford (talk) 10:34, 19 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

No worries :).Jonteemil (talk) 11:28, 19 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Files that you have uploaded within 7 days also don't need a deletion request. {{SD|G7}} is enough :).Jonteemil (talk) 11:53, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Good to know, thanks ! --Brookford (talk) 11:54, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:VAN DIEVOET arm(e)s.png

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:VAN DIEVOET arm(e)s.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 20:32, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Van.Dievoet.Arm(e)s.png

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Van.Dievoet.Arm(e)s.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 20:33, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

please explain Category:Burgher arms

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

See here: Category talk:Burgher arms.--Carolus (talk) 16:54, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Coat of arms of Metzger family.svg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Coat of arms of Metzger family.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

GerritR (talk) 20:27, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Armes de la famille de Serhuyghs

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bonjour Brookford,
Je découvre quelques mois après votre modification des armes que j'avais dessinées. Je n'ai rien contre les corrections (même si changer les meubles ne me semble pas être une amélioration, c'est une considération esthétique et les goûts et les couleurs, vous savez, tout ça, tout ça...), mais là, la correction introduit un conflit avec le blasonnement indiqué dans la description.
Le blasonnement indique que les fleurs de lis sont coupées. Donc, sans pied. Ce qui n'est pas le cas de votre modification. Je rappelle que c'est à votre demande que j'avais fait ces armes au pied coupé.
Si vous avez une bonne raison de modifier l'image (les erreurs, ça arrive à tout le monde) alors adaptez la description en conséquence et les éventuelles catégories posées.
Bonne journée. Jpgibert (talk) 11:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour Brookford,

Étant tombé par hasard sur l'image, je reprends cette conversation, initiée par Jpgibert que je notifie par la même occasion.

Si en effet, lorsqu'on modifie un blason il va de soi qu'une mise à jour de la description et des catégories s'impose naturellement, il est également à considérer qu'une intervention est nécessaire sur les pages qui, éventuellement, utilisent ladite image.

Dans le cas présent on peut constater que deux articles du wiki italien, pour illustrer un pied nourri ou coupé, utilisent (depuis janvier 2023) ce blason (page 1, page 2), et que là non plus, après plus de 6 mois aucune action n'a été entreprise pour compenser les erreurs induites par la modification de l'image.

La situation est identique concernant les fichiers dérivés "Blasons des sept Lignages de Bruxelles" (liens :

) (à noter que le premier des ce deux fichiers est utilisé par deux articles).

Ensuite, après les vérifications d'usage, il apparaît que l'Armorial de Rietstap donne pour la famille « Serhuygs, l'une des sept familles patricienne de Bruxelles », de gueules à trois fleurs-de-lis d'argent (lire en ligne) ; ce qui m'amène, en vue d'orienter les futures corrections dans la bonne direction, à vous poser la question suivante : quelles sont exactement les références utilisées pour la version d'azur à trois fleurs ?

Cordialement, --Kontributor 2K (talk) 14:19, 29 november 2023 (UTC)

File:Michel Polak Architect.jpg

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Michel Polak Architect.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Goesseln (talk) 21:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic