User talk:C messier/Archive 5

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nieuwe Kerk, Amsterdam - view from Dam square.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 15:52, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centraal Apotheek 1639.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be better with f/8. --XRay 04:54, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fries Museum 1603.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be better with f/8. --XRay 04:54, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poeleplein, Groningen 1445.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tiny bit of CA on several chimneys and on the roof top right, otherwise in good order. Please fix. W.carter 19:13, 7 September 2016 (UTC)  Done --C messier 16:29, 9 September 2016 (UTC) Thank you! :) Good quality. --W.carter 21:08, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leeuwarden 1597.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:41, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Bijenkorf, Amsterdam 1975.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 11:24, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fryske Akademy 1575.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you apply some NR in the sky, please? --Basotxerri 11:24, 10 September 2016 (UTC) Done --C messier 11:43, 10 September 2016 (UTC) Much better, thank you! --Basotxerri 11:38, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oude Boteringestraat 1496.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:14, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Fortuin windmill, Noordhorn 1535.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 22:20, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groningen Provinciehuis 1140.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:14, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aakerk tower 1101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:43, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leeuwarden 1594.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:04, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oldehove 1584.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The house is straight but the tower is leaning. Why is that? W.carter 22:20, 10 September 2016 (UTC) See description above :) --C messier 10:32, 11 September 2016 (UTC) Doh! I completely missed the key word in that sentence. Too concentrated on the picture. :-P Good quality. W.carter 12:48, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Het Vliet, Leeuwarden 1559.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen 1155.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Μητρόπολη Αθηνών 3321.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Yes !--Jebulon 21:43, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen 1153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:07, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Help by a native Greek speaker needed

Hello, C Messier, in Commons:Help desk#Ελληνικα a Greek user asks for help obviously not understanding English. It would be nice, if you could help. Apparently the problem is, that he uploaded a poem as image (actually 3 times by the way, cf. File uploads list) and got a deletion request for it (one of them). I would love to point to Commons:Project scope/el, but this needs a lot of translation. Once again: It would be very kind of you, if you’d help Vangelis. — Speravir_Talk – 15:45, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montelbaanstoren 1791.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:01, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeylsgasthuis 1480.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:44, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spilsluizen, Groningen 1170.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:13, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maagdenbrug, Groningen 1151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 08:44, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Φράγμα Στενού Σερίφου 1975.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 21:43, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Χώρα Σερίφου 9423.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:33, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Χώρα Σερίφου 9467.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The sky is a bit noisy but still QI to me --Poco a poco 21:33, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scheepvaartmuseum 1947.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 09:32, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Abraham van der Hulst 1730.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for QI, I think. The composition is good; the contrast could perhaps be a little stronger. --Peulle 12:12, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Λιμνοδεξαμενή Σερίφου 1970.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 05:13, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Χώρα Σερίφου 9417.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 09:55, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oude Ebbingestraat 39 1182.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 10:49, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsterdam Royal Palace 1699.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:09, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spire of Sint-Bonifatiuskerk, Leeuwarden 1643.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Χώρα Σερίφου 9422.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --ArildV 19:25, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κωνικά ρυτά από την Ευαγγελιστρία Ναυπλίου 8000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support How wonderful and moving objects! I know how such museum pictures are difficult to take, and often ignored by reviewers... Congrats.--Jebulon 21:48, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koningssloep 1914.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:28, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Φετιχιέ Τζαμί, Αθήνα 4250.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo--ArildV 19:32, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Αστεροσκοπείο Αθηνών 6212.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:19, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Μετόχι Αγίων Αναργύρων Πλάκα 4167.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI. Dmitry Ivanov 20:35, 29 September 2016 (UTC).

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Χάλκινο κάτοπτρο από την Επίδαυρο, ΑΜ Ναυπλίου 8114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support--Jebulon 17:17, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Αρχοντικό Μπενιζέλου 4180.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:20, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Λειψανοθήκη Αγίας Φιλοθέης 4199.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:41, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rokin 2352.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 20:20, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stopera 2063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 20:20, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Τάφος στο Μπερμπάτι 8049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 08:59, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stopera 2068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:02, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Μετόχι Αγίων Αναργύρων Πλάκα 4168.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:05, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Παλιά κρήνη Τυλίσσου 4442.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:03, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Παιχνίδια με βάρκες στο κανάλι 1476.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and fun shot, but I think you got the description wrong...:) Check it please. It could also fit into more categories. W.carter 20:25, 30 September 2016 (UTC)  Done --C messier 08:15, 30 September 2016 (UTC) Thanks! As for categories, you missed two of the most obvious so I added them. Take a look and you'll see for future shots. Good quality. --W.carter 09:42, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DoubleTree by Hilton Amsterdam Centraal Station 2975.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 17:00, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Άγιος Γεώργιος και Αγία Τριάδα, Κορφές Μαλεβιζίου 4479.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:26, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Μέγαρο Β, Τύλισσος 4334.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:16, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Μέγαρο Α, Τύλισσος 4416.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:26, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Παναγιά Χρυσοκαστριώτισσα 4255.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 16:00, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Άγιος Κωνσταντίνος, Σέριφος 9441.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Άγιος Κωνσταντίνος, Σέριφος 9441.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Καβροχώρι 4487.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:41, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Οικία Κρασαδάκη, Πετροκέφαλο Ηρακλείου 4538.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 17:10, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Μέγαρο Γ, Τύλισσος 4381.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:27, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Μουσείο Ιστορίας Πανεπιστημίου Αθηνών 4262.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 13:52, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Λιμάνι Παντάνασας 0164.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 06:28, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Βόνη Ηρακλείου 4604.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 17:29, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Αχλάδα Ηρακλείου 4748.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:56, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Άνω Μούλια Ηρακλείου 4712.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Αγία Βαρβάρα Ηρακλείου 4716.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Παναγία Καρδιώτισσα, Άγιος Θωμάς Ηρακλείου 4726.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The building perhaps seems a bit bright but still OK for me. --Basotxerri 16:49, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ναός Αγίας Παρασκευής στον Άγιο Θωμά 4723.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:10, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Αστυράκι 4760.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:19, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Αηδονοχώρι Μαλεβιζίου 4769.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments perhaps could have been a little sharper, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 15:28, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Πρεβελιανά 4725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:05, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Νικολάου, Τύλισσος 4459.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:49, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Μύρωνα, Ηράκλειο 4513.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 19:34, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κουναβοί 4629.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 19:22, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Είσοδος Μεγάρου Α στην Τύλισσο 4388.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support See note, but good quality. --Lmbuga 19:26, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ελληνικό Ιερό Τυλίσσου 4435.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:45, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moco Museum Amsterdam 2159.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Ikan Kekek 22:40, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Van Gogh Museum 2537.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1. Only ISO200 has made the image a bit noisy --Michielverbeek 22:53, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coster Diamonds Museum 2533.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 22:49, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ναός Αρχαγγέλου Μιχαήλ, Αρκαλοχώρι 4616.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:30, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Άγιος Γεώργιος Μάλες 5086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:24, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Χριστός Λασιθίου 5084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:08, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Άγιος Βασίλειος Βιάννου 5144.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:06, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ανατολή Λασιθίου 5071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:08, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Λουτρά Μαλών 5089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:07, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Γδόχια 4987.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 14:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Γέφυρα Μύρτου Λασιθίου 5131.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 14:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volkswagen e-up in Amsterdam 2962.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:34, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ναός Αρχαγγέλου Μιχαήλ, Αρκαλοχώρι 4615.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Combino tram, Damrak 1971.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI. Dmitry Ivanov 18:09, 8 November 2016 (UTC).

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Kop van Oost toren 1 1076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Roofline into the air could have been a little sharper, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:15, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volvo L60F 1126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 15:58, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Παναγιά Γοργοεπήκοος 4187.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:59, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Παναγιά Σερίφου 1929.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:02, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Μέγαρο Α, Τύλισσος 4421.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:18, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue Horizon 5327.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, overall. -- Ikan Kekek 15:15, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festos Palace 5416.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice composition and adequate quality. -- Ikan Kekek 15:10, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boerenwetering 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could have been a little sharper, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:11, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Icebar Amsterdam 2066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:53, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ναός Ευαγγελισμού, Άγιος Θωμάς Ηρακλείου 8926.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 21:49, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Πατέλλα Πρινιά 8838.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ναός Παναγίας, Επισκοπή Ηρακλείου 5704.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:30, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Γαλίφα 5738.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, though somewhat dull lighting. --Smial 14:58, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Γάλυπε 5744.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:30, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ναός Κοίμησης της Θεοτόκου, Βούτες 5666.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:08, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Θωμά Ηρακλείου 8940.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 06:57, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Μεταμόρφωση Σωτήρος, Τύλισος 4454.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 06:57, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Άμστελ 2049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments No part of the pic is really sharp, sorry. --W.carter 07:05, 17 November 2016 (UTC)  Comment Uploaded sharper version. Please discuss. --C messier 09:01, 17 November 2016 (UTC) No need to discuss since this version is indeed sharper. :) QI. W.carter 15:49, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ναός Αγίων Πάντων και Φανερωμένης, Επισκοπή Ηρακλείου 5709.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is pretty good. -- Ikan Kekek 00:10, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Νικολάου, Επισκοπή Ηρακλείου 5717.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:55, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ναός Κοίμησης της Θεοτόκου, Βούτες 5670.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are arguably some distracting things on either side of the church, but they really don't sap my enjoyment of this photo too much. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 00:07, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Ιωάννη, Επισκοπή Ηρακλείου 5694.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:01, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Οικία Τριγύρη 5659.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It seems to me that the fine blue shadow on the pole on the right is a CA, could you check that, please? --Basotxerri 19:15, 17 November 2016 (UTC)  Done --C messier 09:19, 17 November 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:45, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Τύλισσος 4467.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pic slightly tilted to the right (see door and fence) and there is a strong CA on the wall and shadow to the right. Think you could fix that? W.carter 06:57, 17 November 2016 (UTC)  Done --C messier 09:27, 17 November 2016 (UTC) Almost there, still some CA on the shadow, see note. W.carter 15:46, 17 November 2016 (UTC)  Done --C messier 09:18, 17 November 2016 (UTC) Thank you. Good quality. --W.carter 09:01, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Πατέλλα Πρινιά 8844.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 18:32, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κάτω Βάθεια 2208.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit soft, but I think this is good enough for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 00:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Πάνω Βάθεια 2211.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Προδρόμου, Σμάρι 2263.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Λουτράκι Μαλεβιζίου 2198.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer

Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 21:12, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Καινούργιο Χωριό Κρήτης 2212.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:53, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κάτω Λουτράκι Μαλεβιζίου 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:56, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Πύργος του Φώσκολου 2218.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Παναγιά Δεικτιανή, Καινούριο Χωριό 2227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:54, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κεραμούτσι 2204.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:43, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Καινούργιο Χωριό Κρήτης 2222.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 21:55, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κερά Τσομπάνεμα 5697.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 03:10, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Λιμένας Χερσονήσου 8635.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speedrunner IV in Serifos 2066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 22:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Χώρα Σερίφου 2041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Καμάρες Σίφνου 2162.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Καινούργιο Χωριό, Κρήτη 5753.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A lot of objects in one shot. Quality is high enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 22:12, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Θωμά Ηρακλείου 8935.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ναός Παναγίας, Επισκοπή Ηρακλείου 5707.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:53, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Καμπαναριό Πετροκεφάλι 5761.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. A week pro. Denoising the blue channel might be an easy way to get rid of the noise in the sky. --Ermell 21:27, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Αμπελούζος 2352.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:27, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Festos Palace 5416.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Festos Palace 5416.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ωδείο Γόρτυνας 2344.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:56, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Άγιοι Δέκα 5865.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 20:40, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Απεσωκάρι, Κοίμηση της Θεοτόκου 5886.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:31, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Βασιλική Ηρακλείου 5909.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:20, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Πόμπια 5770.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd consider the suggested crop, though --Daniel Case 03:58, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κουσές 2452.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Contrasts could be better handled (some of the houses are blown) but overall a nice contrast between warm and cool colors --Daniel Case 03:58, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Άγιοι Δέκα 2303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not optimum, a bit unsharp on the right and a pity for the shade in front. Weak  Support. --Basotxerri 21:08, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Καινούργιο Χωριό Κρήτης 2216.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:03, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Σμάρι 2268.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:02, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Επισκοπή Πεδιάδος 5719.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 14:09, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Φλαθιάκες 5890.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:02, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Γεωργίου, Πλάτανος Ηρακλείου 5877.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Στόλοι 5937.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Πλώρα 5885.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nikhilb239 23:31, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Πλάτανος Ηρακλείου - Ναός Αγίου Χαραλάμπου 5880.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not totally gone, but acceptable IMHO --Poco a poco 14:44, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for review

Many thanks for reviewing my picture File:Southampton medieval walls Western Esplanade.jpg. I greatly appreciate your advice, but I have to confess I don't have the technical know-how to correct the problem you identify. I am new to Wikimedia Commons and still trying to find my way around (that is why I am contacting you via your user page). Could I ask you to reject the picture on the grounds you mention. Kind regards Michael Coppins (talk) 18:48, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Dear Michael Coppins, you can withdraw your nomination, by changing the /Nomination to /Withdrawn and also add {{withdrawn}} ( I withdraw my nomination) with your signature. --C messier (talk) 21:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Πενταμόδι 5973.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 15:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Παναγιά Λιμνιώτισσα, Επισκοπή Πεδιάδας 6091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:48, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ναός Αγίας Παρασκευής και Παντελεήμονα, Γαλίφα Ηρακλείου 2244.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κρήνη στον Άγιο Μύρωνα Ηρακλείου 5938.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly underexposed IMO but good quality. --Ermell 22:04, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Σμάρι 2259.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ναός Μεταμόρφωσης του Σωτήρος και Αγίου Χαραλάμπου, Άγιος Μύρων Κρήτης 5988.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 15:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κύμη 8400-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:00, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Χανιά 8308-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 15:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Καμπαναριό αγίου Αθανασίου, Σέριφος 2035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Στέρνες Ηρακλείου 5933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks like it needs sharpening and NR combination IMHO.--Nikhilb239 02:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC) Done --C messier 15:19, 8 December 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Nikhilb239 14:28, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Μάραθος Ηρακλείου 6221.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:32, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Χώνος Μυλοποτάμου 6225.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice color for the conditions --Daniel Case 05:19, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Πυργού Ηρακλείου 2638.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:45, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Βασιλειές Ηρακλείου 2779.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:45, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Άγιος Σύλλας, Ηράκλειο 2762.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:45, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Νικολάου, Χουδέτσι 6494.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 23:06, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Μπαδιά 6587.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 21:50, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Γαρίπα 6578.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:50, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Δεμάτι 6563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:50, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Πύργος Καλού Χωριού 6410.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 07:49, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Λαγούτα 6560.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:58, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Καλαμαύκα 6419.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:51, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Καμπαναριό Αγίου Γεωργίου, Άνω Καλέσια 2797.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:51, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Μονή Σπηλιώτισας, Άγιος Βασίλειος Πεδιάδας 6480.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe better to cut right off the branches, but still okay for me.--Famberhorst 16:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Χουμεριάκος 6400.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:52, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Folkingestraatm Groningen 1091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:45, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Πρίνα Λασιθίου 6416.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:26, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ναός Παναγίας, Αρχάνες 2589.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:04, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Αναποδιάρης 6572.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:04, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singel, Amsterdam 2088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oude Ebbingestraat 1177.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:23, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Athens movie theatre

Hi, thanks a lot for your help, used this pic in nl:Griekse staatsschuldencrisis. Kind regards, MartinD (talk) 12:27, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leiden Centraal Station 6838.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:00, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beestenmarkt, Leiden 6858.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:47, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ζίντα 6590.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:00, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oude Vest canal, Leiden 6869.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I would crop away the dark object at the right, but OK4QI. --A.Savin 16:59, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Αρκαλοχώρι 6550.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:28, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Άγιος Γεώργιος, Βασιλειές Ηρακλείου 2776.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI. Dmitry Ivanov 17:49, 13 February 2017 (UTC).

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Διδασκαλείο Αρχανών 2599.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Eaves hat been a little sharper, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:32, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Πρινιάς 2669.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Extraordinary and very good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:48, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leiden 7036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Reasonably good cloudy-day scene --Daniel Case 21:51, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Οδός Σερβίλη, Ηράκλειο 7515.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bob Collowân 18:52, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Επιπρομαχώνας Sciavo ή Lando 7718.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bob Collowân 18:57, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Σκρα και Παλμέτη 4, Ηράκλειο 7513.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:41, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Χαμάμ οδού Κατρέ, Χανιά 7712.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:06, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Πύλη Σαμπιονάρα, Χανιά 7618.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 16:46, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Παναγία Μεσοχωρήτισσα, Θραψανό 7976.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:28, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Αγίες Παρασκιές 7970.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 10:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Μητροπολιτικός ναός Χανίων 7554.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:28, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κρήνη Πρίουλι 7532.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:40, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Γυαλί Τζαμί Χανιά 7575.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Πανόραμα Ηρακλείου 8577.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 21:16, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Πατσίδερος 8567.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Καταλαγάρι 7942.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:10, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Καταλαγάρι 7943.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:12, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ενετικά Νεώρια Χανίων 7610.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:14, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Βυζαντινά τείχη Χανίων 7708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pity the deep shade, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:19, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Βυζαντινά τείχη Χανίων 7829.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:42, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Αλάγνι 8547.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:42, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Δημοτική Αγορά Χανίων 7730.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 00:18, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Θραψανό 7989.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bob Collowân 21:21, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Προμαχώνας Σαν Σαλβατόρε 7700.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 18:54, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Αρχάνες 7928.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 07:34, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Θραψανό 7978.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:22, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Μεσκηνόβρυση 8036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Βυζαντινά τείχη Χανίων 7831 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just avoids being overexposed --Daniel Case 02:54, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Μικρό Σεράι, Ηράκλειο 6114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very low noise level for a night photo! Good quality. --W.carter 11:08, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Προμαχώνας Lando ή Schiavo 7764.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:06, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Άγιος Φραγκίσκος, Ρέθυμνο 8023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:19, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Τοπανάς 7687.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:49, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Δημοτική Αγορά Χανίων 7552.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, especially for a night shot --A.Savin 21:18, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Σάρχος 8645.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:43, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Νερατζέ τζαμί, Ρέθυμνο 8022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Probably could have better exposed, but you didn't lose anything --Daniel Case 17:49, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Οδός Κλειδή, Ρέθυμνο 7998.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wish it hadn't been cloudy, but still well done --Daniel Case 17:49, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 12 March 2017 (UTC)