Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ca moriniBR!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:14, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Watermarks

edit

Hi Ca moriniBR, please respect Commons:Watermarks and do NOT watermark your images. You only force other users to remove the watermarks. -- Ies (talk) 13:37, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Project scope

edit

Hi Ca moriniBR, please respect that Commons has a project scope and that contributed images must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Therefore please give useful descriptions and useful categories to your images so that they no longer remain data trash but actually can be used for an educational purpose! -- Ies (talk) 13:41, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply


Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

edit

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:My love! Mellanny.jpg, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Wdwd (talk) 19:12, 1 September 2014 (UTC)Reply