Welcome to the Commons, Cmelak770!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Yann 19:19, 29 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:18, 17 April 2010 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

File:Lokomotywa SM42-2296.jpg edit

Ta lokomotywa nie jest w Porcie w Świnoujściu. Zwiadowca 21 17:13, 30 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ale jest własnością portu Świnoujście. --Cmelak770 (talk) 20:09, 30 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Je léto, tedy zimní video, já pořád žiju a pracuju edit

Biedronka CZ je prostě nejlepší, byť toho času bloknutá :-D

Teď se budu soustředit pouze na videa, protože vůbec žádná nemáme až je to trapné. --Daniel Holý (talk) 10:37, 1 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2TE116-964 TO Tapa - Lehtse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 17:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Głuszyca station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 16:28, 16 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 60-0412 RO-TFG Valea lui Mihai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok --Cccefalon 19:22, 16 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 471 083 CZ-CD Jistebnik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:02, 17 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 363 039 CD Lipnik nad Becvou - Drahotuse R735.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:02, 17 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elektrárna Vítkovice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:03, 19 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Úvalno stop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit dark, but ok --Poco a poco 11:17, 19 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20150415 Zelený most Ostrava báňské nádraží.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:16, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 797 705 CZ-ELZEL Cesky Tesin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:48, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 740 711 SK-LTESK Petrovice u Karvine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Villy Fink Isaksen 10:05, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 122 053 CDC Ostrava hlavni nadrazi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:48, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loket station.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:57, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strzelce Kujawskie station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boguszów Gorce Wschód.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Knihy edit

 
Ten plánek jsem nedělal celou věčnost, cca 4 hodiny během půl roku

V knihovnách se najde téměř všechno. Lidé prostě nečtou a proto mi pak nerozumí. Přitom ty knihy si může vypůjčit každý v rámci meziknihovní výpůčky, Studijní a vědecká knihovna v Hradci králové není pro VIP členy, je to univerzální knihovna, stejně jako městská. Proto už na Wikipedii nepůsobím, nemá smysl se pořád dokola s někým hádat o nesmyslech, Hradec mi stačil. Parní lokomotivy řady 399.0 - https://aleph.svkhk.cz/F?func=direct&doc_number=000626212&local_base=katalog&format=999 Sergeje : motorové lokomotivy řady 781 (T 679.1 a T 679.5) - https://aleph.svkhk.cz/F?func=direct&doc_number=000627747&local_base=katalog&format=999 Fenomén ČME 3 - https://aleph.svkhk.cz/F?func=direct&doc_number=000771629&local_base=katalog&format=999 Parní lokomotivy 475.0, 476.1 a 477.0 - https://aleph.svkhk.cz/F?func=direct&doc_number=000729774&local_base=katalog&format=999 Brejlovci - https://aleph.svkhk.cz/F?func=direct&doc_number=000524470&local_base=katalog&format=999 Elektrické lokomotivy E 499.0 - https://aleph.svkhk.cz/F?func=direct&doc_number=000365540&local_base=katalog&format=999 Haswellovy lokomotivy StEG s vnějším rámem - https://aleph.svkhk.cz/F?func=direct&doc_number=000246625&local_base=katalog&format=999 Kesslerovy nákladní lokomotivy soustavy Engerth o uspořádání pojezdu C 2’ dráhy MIDI (Francie) a StEG - https://aleph.svkhk.cz/F?func=direct&doc_number=000234240&local_base=katalog&format=999 . --Daniel Holý (talk) 14:32, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 794 001 CZ-CZL Bratislava-Lamac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:38, 24 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proto jsou atlasy k ničemu edit

Proto jsou atlasy k ničemu, v nejednom infoboxu nalezneš zhovadilosti. Uvadí tam délku s tendrem, ale už nepíšou s jakým tendrem. Nikdo se v tom nevyzná, ani já. Česká Wikipedie je starej dobrej WWW, bohužel. --Daniel Holý (talk) 13:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)Reply


Category:Rolling stock of Metrans edit

Pkbwcgs (talk) 14:06, 2 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 207E-001 PL-RAILP TRAKO Gdansk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good sharp photo, but it would have been better without those people at the right side --Michielverbeek 21:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Přihlaste své fotky do Czech Wiki Photo 2020! edit

 
Czech Wiki Photo

Milí fotografové a editoři projektů Wikimedia,

každý rok společně nahrajete na Commons tisíce svobodných fotografií. Chceme vám všem poděkovat a také vás ocenit. Vyberte ty nejlepší z vašich fotek a přihlaste je do 30. 10. 2020 do soutěže Czech Wiki Photo 2020! Soutěž je otevřená i úplným nováčkům. Autoři tří nejlepších fotek si odnesou vouchery do Foto Škoda a speciální wiki-odznaky. Přihlášené fotky bude hodnotit i Honza Rybář, držitel Czech Press Photo.

Baví vás focení pro Commons i mimo soutěže? Staňte se fotografem Wikimedie, půjčujeme fototechniku a proplácíme cesty - více na Fotíme Česko.

Těšíme se na vaše snímky!
Za spolek Wikimedia Česká republika
Jakub Holzer
jakub.holzer@wikimedia.cz -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Photo edit

Hello. Can you make a photo like this one File:Ostrava, výhled z věže radnice, 2015 (06).jpg but without fog? Blast furnaces must to be seen bether. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 19:50, 7 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, now I have only these two photos: https://screenshot.cz/UXINR/ and https://screenshot.cz/G98PF/ --Cmelak770 (talk) 12:53, 9 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
These photos are good but unsuitable. The first one is not for this category because there are no city elements in the foreground and on the second one there are fog there. As I guess fog is a constant problem in this part of the city. If someday you will be in this place and you will have the possibility and desire then try again to take a photo from this place like the second one but without fog. By the way there are the third blast furnace is almost unvisible on the first photo. If the third blast furnace is visible the photo is much bether as for me. Thank you. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 15:36, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
Yet one more. Which plant is shown on you photo File:Ostrava, výhled z věže radnice, 2015 (06).jpg, is it Liberty Ostrava or Vítkovické železárny? I guess it is Vítkovické železárny but not Liberty Ostrava. If I am right then category ArcelorMittal Ostrava must be delated from its description. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 17:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
I fined this photo File:Ostrava, pohled z věže Nové radnice.jpg. If you will be not able to make a bether one because of fog then do not bother yourself.
Wiki commons needs photos of blast furnaces of Liberty Ostrava. There are 4 blast furnaces at this steel works and there are no photos of them at Wiki commons. These photos are nesessery for the List of European Blast Furnaces in particular. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 17:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
File:Ostrava, výhled z věže radnice, 2015 (06).jpg is Vítkovické železárny, not Liberty. I can take a better pictures from the Nová radnice tower later, because now it's closed due to covid-measurements. But in this period of year there is probably impossible to make pictures without fog. It's hard to make pictures of Liberty Ostrava blast furnaces, because these furnaces are in the middle of the factory and it's a restricted area, of course. Maybe I have some old picture taken by non-digital camera. --Cmelak770 (talk) 17:33, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
So, I found this photo of Liberty Ostrava blast furnaces: https://screenshot.cz/Y2QAZ/. I t was taken 18 years ago by my old camera, unfortunatelly I don!t have a better scaner. --Cmelak770 (talk) 17:51, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
Aha, so I guessed about Vítkovické železárny. It was not difficult. I am sorry but the photo of blast furnace of the Liberty Ostrava you offered rihgt now is not very suitable for educational purposes of the Wikipedia. It may be interesting to me, I can see something here, but a person from the outside will not understand anything here.
About Vítkovické železárny. Yes, it would be nice to get good photos of blast furnaces of the Vítkovické železárny in a manner like of your second abovementioned photo with the city in foreground and in good weather.
If you some time will be able to take photos of blast furnaces of the Liberty Ostrava from outside the factory then it will be good. I hope this is not prohibited. Thank you. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 18:24, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
I'm sorry for disturbing but I found another photo File:Cathedral of the Divine Saviour, Vítkovice.jpg. And one more File:Pohled na ostravu z radnicni veze - 31.7.2007.jpg. I think these photos not bad but they do not close this theme for a variety of reasons. So, if you will be able to make more quality photos and it will be not heavy for you then do it some time. Thank you. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 19:13, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 361 128 SK-ZSSK Vsetin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 6001 NL-NS Alstom Konstal Chorzow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. In the next time add your nominations above; at the beginning, please. --Tournasol7 21:00, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 19 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 181 150 CZ-CDC Ostrava-Kuncice - Ostrava-Vitkovice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:49, 24 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Miroslav Cerny.jpg edit

 
File:Miroslav Cerny.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stang 08:17, 17 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 742 200 Skovice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Very good quality! --Augustgeyler 10:32, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 06:55, 21 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 705 913 CZ-CD Bohusov.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:02, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horní Kamenice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:04, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kostelec nad Labem station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --AStiasny 18:47, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praha-Bubny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:59, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mlýny budova.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bělá pod Bezdězem nádraží.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praha-Satalice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --V.Boldychev 11:51, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 131 010+009 SK-BTS Letanovce - Spisske Tomasovce.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:46, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 383 212 SK-SPAP Ostrava hlavni nadrazi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:04, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chuchelná.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:04, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 913 202 CZ-KZC Praha-Satalice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:10, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horní Lipova.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 15:58, 21 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hluboká nad Vltavou-Zámostí.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:10, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chalupki 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:10, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skrochovice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:10, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 914 156 CZ-CD Nucice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:54, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jeneč předvěst.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Odbočka Jeneček.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zdislava station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support A bit soft but good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bezděz nádraží.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 07:09, 25 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mýtna stop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 07:04, 26 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alesd 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 16:53, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sajonemeti 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:38, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vadu Crisului 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:38, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Česká Kamenice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 07:04, 27 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Podkriváň 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 20:28, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Săcuieni Bihor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:42, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mestecko Trnavka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rozhovice nadrazi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 17:35, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kostel Kyjovice.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 17:35, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 193 393 D-DB T448p-034 PL-DBCCZ Ostrava prave nadrazi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:39, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 07:01, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sebes Alba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Dust spot in the sky should be removed IMO --Ermell 15:52, 25 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
  Comment Thanks, I removed it. --Cmelak770 21:16, 25 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:16, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

tram & rail transport in Prague and Czechia by month and by year edit

Ahoj @Cmelak770: I have started new categories for tram and rail transport in Praha by month and by year, see: Category:April 2013 in tram transport in Prague. Btw I have modernized some categories by adding the template Regions of the Czech Republic --anro (talk) 21:10, 1 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the information. I try to categorize especially rail transport pictures. --Cmelak770 (talk) 22:10, 1 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mb 4015 S-GC Ostrava.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:42, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 363 098 SK-ZSSKC Horni Lidec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Hillopo2018 09:07, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EP09-022 PL-PKPIC Gdynia Orlowo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:56, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 471 081 CZ-CD Ostrava hlavni nadrazi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:56, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1216 210 A-OBB Chalupki - Bohumin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 07:05, 2 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sveti Petar u Šumi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:16, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 843 010 CZ-CD Novy Bor - Skalice u Ceske Lipy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:07, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 951 006 SK-ZSSK Bratislava-Vinohrady - Bratislava hlavna stanica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:07, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 752 051 SK-ZSSKC Gemerska Horka zastavka - Hucin 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:07, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 388 202 CZ-RJ Ostrava-Svinov - Polanka nad Odrou vyhybna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:07, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 130 008 CZ-CDC Suchdol nad Odrou - Hladke Zivotice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:07, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lotru.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Needs perspective correction (also, IMHO, a bit overexposed) --C messier 15:43, 1 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
  Done Perspective corrected. --Cmelak770 20:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
  Support OK. --C messier 19:43, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 06:59, 5 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 315 0517 PL-SZDS Ostrava-Svinov.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:29, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Komenského sady Ostrava 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --C messier 21:23, 6 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 07:10, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 365 006 CZ-CZL Ostrava-Svinov - Polanka nad Odrou vyhybna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:21, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 163 014 CDC Ostrava hlavni nadrazi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:21, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 07:12, 15 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

To je zajímavá kategorie edit

 

Vypadá to, že schválně pořizuješ fotografie řídících vozů ze předu, aby tam nebyla vidět lokomotiva. Můžeš mi vysvětlit, co je to řídící vůz bez lokomotivy v zadu. Vy padá to, že v názvu kategorií nehodláš zohledňovat vozíčkáře, přestože se údajně jedná o nízkopodlažní vozy, které jsou určeny zejména vozíčkářům, čili hendikepovaným lidem. Hendikepovaní lidé mohou pořídit vlastní fotografie vozů, v níž cestují a nepotřebují na to čas, jak řekl jeden zdejší přispěvatel. Ty kategorie jsou vadné úplně všechny, některé jsou napůl česky, jiné napůl anglicky a obsah tématu v nich nenalezneme. Co je to Škoda 13Ev bez lokomotivy v zadu? Normálního člověka zajímá, zdali tato lokomotiva může být zapřažena za jakýmkoliv vozem, to znemná, za jakýmkoliv řídícím vozem a ne pouze za Škodou 13Ev. Už sem tady jeden takový řídící vůz řešil a je tam vidět lokomotiva. Kategorie ČD Class Bfhpvee a s ní související kategorie Multiple units, motor coaches and railcars of the Czech Republic je stejně vadná, když tam nehodláš ukazovat lokomotivu, no. Vypadá to, že za tebou přišel Bůh ze studijní a vědecké knihovny v Hradci králové, aby ti řekl. Oni to tady dělají všichni stejně na ulozto.cz a jiných pofiderních webech. Příště se neangažuj v projektu koleje, když tam nechseš mít koleje. Ty kategorie, které se týkají železničních tratí jsou stejně vadné, když odkazují na dnes již neexistující jízdní řady s různými čísly. Najdi starý jízdní řád, týkající se Jana Pernera a pak ty kategorie a články přepracuj podle tohoto jízdního řádu z 18. století. A budeš mít klid, protože takhle tady stvoříš aktualitu bez kolejí.

--Edwin Tangen (talk) 12:11, 1 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Rád bych reagoval, ale text nemá hlavu ani patu, takže jsem jej vůbec nepochopil... --Cmelak770 (talk) 21:44, 3 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Já ti rád poradím přes Itálii. Vy se tady všichni tváříte, že skrze tyto řídící vozy stvoříte vozy hnací, už tam máš jedno video File:ČD Class Bfhpvee.webm. To je zajímavá myšlenka, proč tedy nepovíš lidem, jak je to s Itálií a s vlaky Eurostar City Italia. Všichni se tváříte, že se jedná o lak, to znamená, že mluvíte o řídícím vozu, kdy vzniká dojem, že by se do budoucna mohl stát vozem hnacím přes Convogli a composizione bloccata a MDVC. Není zřejmé, zdali tento řídící vůz může jezdit s jinou lokomotivou, to znamená, s jakoukoliv lokomotivou. Proč? Jak by asi tak mohlo mít německé ICE dva samostatné hnací vozy, když jejich motory musí běžet současně. Jak by první hnací vůz mohl na motorou zaznamenat jinou rychlost než hnací vůz druhý. Vypadá to nelogicky, ale opravdu takto jezdí německé ICE nebo vykazuje vady jako francouzské TGV. A co tedy dělá Škoda 13Ev a Bfhpvee? Je to nelogické, ale všechny hnací vozy vysokorychlostních souprav museli vznikat přes Convogli a composizione bloccata a MDVC a ne jinak. Jenže se o tom vůbec nemluví a většina lidí má tak velice pokroucený obraz o západu jako o demokracii, když toto oranžové kolečko Xmenů a Johnyho Ingliše vzešlo skrze demokraci. Jak je to možné, když Itálie byla západem v dobách bývalého Československa? A opravdu se toho věhlasného kolečka doposud nezbavila? Jak mají tedy lidé vnímat Itálii coby lídra Evropské unie, když vykazují takové defekty, že je rovnou napodobují češi. Jak to, že to nevidí češi? Opravdu si myslíš, že se jedná o upřímné kolečko Italů skrze papeže, nebo je to zesmešňování výrobce těchto hnacích vozů? Já jsem ta kolečka nikdy neviděl, přitom se Itálie tváří, že vlastní vysokorychlostní železnici. Proč se tady o tom nemluví a všechno se tady tváří jako File:CZ Class 943 of ČD in Najbrt livery.webm , prostě jako Najbrt livery, prostě jako livery, když je to Švejk Českých drah. Údajně je italské pojetí Eurostar City Itália livery, to znamená Najbrt livery. Bohužel, to se tady bavíte o laku na kolejích a proto vám všem vadí Karel, který řeší koleje skrze lokomotivu. Jsou tam vidět návěsti, výměny, vyhýbky a to proto, aby tam byl vidět celek. A k čemu to je, když Karla neumíte nahradit a poukazát na kvality kamery, když už nejste kameramani, ale amatéři. Tak se podívej sem https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Combination_of_DVD_Player_and_Video_Cassette_Recorder_LG_V_280_(VCR),_television_Sony_Bravia,_movie_(original_title)_Death_Warrant,_satellite_receiver_DIGI_TV_(left),_2009.webm . Je tam vidět Jean-Claude Van Damme a je to vtipné video o češích. Jenže to video je celek. --Edwin Tangen (talk) 14:53, 8 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Příště o těch vědeckých nesmyslech nepiš a bude ti lépe. Proto chodím do Studijní a vědecké v Hradci Králové, abych tam našel vědu ve jménu počůraného zachodu. Co si myslíš, že tady mají za počítače a server? Odpověď nalezneš víše. V těch knihách jsou hromady nesmyslů, tak jako ve vašich hlavách. Ty knížky napsal idiot a je úplně jedno, zdali si náhodou říká pan profesor a Bůh ví, co. Příště se k těmto blbcům nehlas a bude ti líp. Nevěříš, tak zajdi na Noc vědců, tam uvidíš modláře, tak jako na noci kostelů s Vodafonem ve věži. Vodafone vlastní stejné servery jako ta Studijní a vědecká v Hradci Králové, Policie ČR, Armáda ČR a to platí i o výrobním závodě Škoda v Plzni. Víš, ona ta tvoje lokomotiva nežere a nepije vodu, je to zvíře jménem SIEMENS. Věř, že tahle trapná německá firma je vyřízená. Osobně jsem jim to zařídil v zapadním německu s Polizei za zády. Už jsi viděl německý Axien, Werben a další vyhlášená německá města a obce. Ten fašistický západní bordel. Víš, já to prošel pěšky a tak jsem nechal ukrást motorku jezdci, aby se Česká republika ztrapnila. A co bude dál? Pád. Bude následovat pád, abych ho mohl sledovat. V německu mají špatnou elektřinu, proto zvíře SIEMENSU nežere a nepije vodu a pozdravuje tě modrý jezevec, který obchází trakční vedení a chodí se dívat na tu špinavou ESU 11. Opravdu komické zařízení s mrtvými klacky. Víš, já to vím, v Pardubicích vypadne vlak z kolejí, aby tam němec zaznamenal body za průjezd. Budou to moje Pardubice hlavní nádraží bez mrtvol a to si piš, že ten tvůj obilňák rozseká celé nastupiště. Bohužel, někteří lidé s ŽDC skončí u soudu i s Českými dráhami dohromady a zpovídat u soudu se bude i firma SIEMENS a západní Polizei. Nechtěj vědět, co je to za dobytky se sekuriťáky za zády. Přeci se nebojíš SIEMENSU? Oni dělají opravdu první vědu, ale takovým podivným způsobem přes prvního vědce, to znamená, že jsou druzí, západní němci, ne první. A ten první vědec, ten dřímá někde v Americe, ale už teď se třese až najdu druhého vědce SIEMENSU přes modrého jezevce. On se mu modrý jezevec podívá na ten jeho tančík Angely Markelové a prostě ho spálí jako tu ESU 11. Co si počneš s tou německou špínou pak? Půjdeš do Itálie, Francie, Velké Británie? Asi těžko, on si tě najde i tam, neboť i tam mají zvíře, které nežere a nepije vodu. A to platí i o USA. Nemůžeš uniknou, ale moje videa ti nedávají možnost uniknot, jsou o kumunikaci, která ve skutečnosti neexistuje. Říkám tomu NeBůh. Tak bež a můžeš se kamarádit s elektřinou toho trapného Boha Velkého Vládce Hospodina, s modrým jezevcem. On se s nim už nebaví, ani s vámi, neboť je to fašista celosvětový. Tak se těš na budoucnost, která už teď neexistuje a čti na mé User Page MADE IN CZECH REPUBLIC. Zařiď si nový život bez teplého Boha jménem SIEMENS. Na západu žadný západ není a poznáš to, když tam přijdeš pěšky, jedině tak poznáš modrého jezevce a ne idota, jezdce. Co víc chceš slyšet, prý jsem byl nachytán a tak jsem vás nachytal a zlikvidoval. Tenhle projekt je mrtvý a majitel tohoto serveru trvá na tom, že se z něho stane YouTube. Víš jaké svinstvo je vidět na dlouhých videích, které se týkají železniční dráhy. Majitel toho serveru, američan, udá sám sebe za USA a zbytek světa. A bude vidět němce, já tam s nima jezdím pravidelně, aby ten jejich bordel byl vidět vědecky a majitel tohoto serveru tak začal krást po celém světě. Nic jiného nedělá, pořídil si zvíře SIEMENSU bez vody a bez žrádla a říká tomu Kristus, jenže to byl obyčejný udavač, kterého nemá modrý jezevec rád a nechal ho shnít. --Edwin Tangen (talk) 14:46, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Práce doma nebo v zaměstnání edit

Karel nebyl tak dobrý, ale opravdu chceš vidět můj video a foto styl. Mám starý telefon Samsung, opravdu starý chytrý telefon a točím s ním videa a také fotografuji na Pardubickém hlavním nádraží. Vědecky, můžeš ukázat svoji techniku, co máš na monitoru telefonu, počítače a to buď doma nebo v práci, pokud ovšem práce pro Wikimedia Commons souvisí s tvým zaměstnáním. Vznikne tak tvá user:Page, otestuješ svoje zaměstnání a především pochopíš, na jaké příčně sedíš. Prostě jakou používáš techniku a kde udělal Karel chybu. A co já? Můžu natočit video na svém telefonu Samsung v knihovně vědecké v Hradci Králové. Budu malovat v programu malování podle knihy a mohu tak lidem ukázat monitor počítače v knihovně a i knihu najednou. Kolik toho vlastně vznikne? Opravdu je můj telefon tak starý? Opravdu lidé v knihovně pracují? Čtenáři a čtenářky. Edwin Tangen (talk) 14:34, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:0Z1A9858.jpg edit

Zde bych volil spíše šabonu Template:No permission since {{subst:npd}}. Gampe (talk) 17:16, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Aha, děkuji za vysvětlení. Lze to ještě změnit? Cmelak770 (talk) 18:15, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 189 064 D-DB Zamrsk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 19:53, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

CFR edit

Ahoj, máš pravdu. Možná by tam teda chtělo doplnit do hlavičky něco o nástupnických organizacích. A nutno podotknout, že většina obsahu z Căile Ferate Române patří tedy do CFR Calatori... — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:45, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ano, to patří, ale to by byla fuška to předělat. Ona byla i dost fuška přesvědčit (aspoň některé) lidi na en.wiki, že žádné Căile Ferate Române už dávno neexistuje. Na Commons to nebude o moc lepší. Cmelak770 (talk) 14:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply