User talk:Coyau/3

Welcome to commons Coyau. What better way than starting off with a Quality Image promotion could there be? :-) --QICbot (talk) 12:17, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bassin des Morts gelé, 2012-02-11, mouette rieuse 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments rather sharp, QI and useful --Herzi Pinki 13:15, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Théâtre de la Renaissance

Salut Coyau,
Une de tes images va certainement remporter le label VI pour le scope "Théâtre de la Renaissance" - je suis verte, j'enrage ! Je plaisante, je t'écris juste pour t'inviter à retailler cette photo, comme cela a été suggéré durant la revue... @+, --Myrabella (talk) 19:46, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Provins

Je suis très intéressée par aller à Provins le 24, merci de l'info et de l'invit' ! --Myrabella (talk) 20:51, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Over corrected ?

Oui tu as raison, ça n'allait pas. J'ai importé une nouvelle version. Peux-tu me dire si ça convient désormais ? Merci.--Jebulon (talk) 22:01, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

J'avais un problème avec les verticales vers les bords en haut. J'ai appris ça à la dure : on voit beaucoup mieux les parallèles que les perpendiculaires, et les bords de la photo sont terriblement droits. les parallèles. Les gouttières et les pilastres avaient l'air de s'écarter en montant, mais c'est bon maintenant. Je vais de ce pas promote cette photo. --Coyau (talk) 22:19, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Merci ! C'est vrai que les verticales étaient dures à gérer, surtout que tout le façade est incurvée, et que j'ai trouvé la correction difficile à faire. C'est d'ailleurs une autre prise qui a servi, je n'ai pas réussi à recorriger entièrement la première. Celà dit, l'intérieur de cette église, c'est de la folie baroque à l'état pur ! à voir absolument (photos sans trépied impossibles, j'ai essayé un peu la chaire, en appui sur un banc, mais c'était difficile...)--Jebulon (talk) 10:41, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Gare de Belfort-Montbéliard TGV.jpg

Bonjour bonjour

Il semblerait que ce fichier risque de passer à la trappe assez vite (tag de suppression rapide, et en effet niveau COM:FOP en France ça coince vu comment la gare a été prise bien de face). Je me demandais s'il était possible de transférer l'image sur WP-FR à l'aide de ton super bot, du moins si toutefois l'image est éligible, en tant qu'oeuvre architecturale récente? Si cela est possible ce serait super^^ dans tous les cas merci beaucoup! Bonne soirée et bon week end! Jeriby (talk) 19:43, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

C'est fait. Bon week-end à toi aussi. --Coyau (talk) 06:39, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup pour ton intervention Jeriby (talk) 19:59, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Bojour, je travaille la pluspart du temps sur le wikipedia allemande, j´ai crée aussi l´article sur la gare de Belfort-Montbéliard TGV. Est-ce-qu´il serait possible d´utiliser ce fichier sur la WP allemande?? Comme je suis plutôt nouveau, je sais pas si c´est possible. Merci d´avance et bien à vous. --Hoff1980 (talk) 12:34, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour,
Je ne connais pas les règles de Wikipédia en allemand, il faudrait se renseigner là-bas. Et puis je n'ai les droits que pour faire les transferts vers Wikipédia en français.
Cordialement, --Coyau (talk) 12:45, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 8 - Pierre-Jules Cavelier 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice composition.--Jebulon 22:59, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 8 - Pierre-Jules Cavelier 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 19:39, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 8 - Pierre-Jules Cavelier 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality ~Pyb 20:35, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

/* Valued Image Promotion */

Bonjour Coyau,
Merci à toi ! Je reconnais bien volontiers ma défaite :-) 17:55, 16 March 2012 (UTC)~

★ An image you created has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Théâtre de la Renaissance, Paris (exterior).

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:47, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Idem. Thanks both to Myrabella (la classe !) and Coyau.--Jebulon (talk) 17:24, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Support This is what I was talking about.--MrPanyGoff 17:33, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Support cmadler (talk) 19:27, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Paris theatre de la Renaissance.jpg: +0
2. Théâtre de la Renaissance et théâtre de la Porte-Saint-Martin.jpg: +0
3. Théâtre de la Renaissance.jpg: +4 
=>
File:Paris theatre de la Renaissance.jpg: Declined.
File:Théâtre de la Renaissance et théâtre de la Porte-Saint-Martin.jpg: Declined.
File:Théâtre de la Renaissance.jpg: Promoted.

--MrPanyGoff 00:27, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 4 - Dantan 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 09:18, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 4 - Dantan 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit creepy but very good. --Saffron Blaze 01:15, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 4 - Dantan 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 05:59, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 4 - Beauvisage 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great quality. --Selbymay 06:24, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Galezowski Tamberlick 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, good quality --~Pyb 22:00, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Galezowski Tamberlick 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality. ---~Pyb 22:00, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Pierre de Lucy Fossarieu 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:11, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Gourlot 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:11, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 10 - Dominique Vivant Denon 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 15:42, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Gourlot 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:11, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Père-Lachaise - Division 4 - Dantan 04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Père-Lachaise - Division 4 - Dantan 04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:08, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Vincenzo Bellini 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Jebulon 16:51, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Cherubini 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good detail--Jebulon 16:47, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Thury & Poubelle 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 16:25, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de Turenne (Paris), numéro 64, porte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I would crop off the window and the two outer poles. Otherwise very nice!Saffron Blaze 19:31, 28 March 2012 (UTC) But… I liked that dying pole. Mercilessly done. --Coyau 20:01, 28 March 2012 (UTC) Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 20:32, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 8 - Étienne-Gaspard Robert 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine with me. --Iifar 16:23, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Galezowski Tamberlick 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Small overexposed parts, but imo still QI. --Iifar 18:46, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue des Tournelles (Paris), numéro 18, porte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good--Jebulon 18:05, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris, caserne Château-Landon 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:25, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris, caserne Château-Landon 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 16:38, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris, caserne Château-Landon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, very good--Lmbuga 16:34, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris, caserne Château-Landon 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 15:05, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Tugnot de la Noye 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 07:23, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris, caserne Château-Landon 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMHO, this image would be great if you only show the wall, the pipe and the street plate, without windows and traffic light shadow. --Kadellar 15:11, 2 April 2012 (UTC)  Done Better? --Coyau 15:30, 2 April 2012 (UTC) For me, it is. I like it a lot. Can't promote it twice. --Kadellar 15:49, 2 April 2012 (UTC)  Support Excellent crop choice idea. Great pic. Saffron Blaze 18:07, 2 April 2012 (UTC)  Support Useless, but I join the party (great file description too, BtW)--Jebulon 08:27, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Tu fais ta chochotte ! Une photo n'est pas "nécessaire", mais celle-là, elle a fait "tilt", c'est comme ça ! Félicitations!--Jebulon (talk) 14:06, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontaine Dejean 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, maybe a bit too dark. --CLI 09:33, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Pistes cyclables

Bonjour Coyau. Quelle hiérarchisation adopter entre Category:Bikeways in France, Category:Cycling infrastructure in France, et Category:Rail trails in France ? La Category:Ligne Bordeaux-Bénauge - La Sauvetat-du-Dropt est déjà dans Bikeways in France. Je te laisse mettre de l'ordre, j'avoue que je suis un peu perdu... Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 17:10, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

A mon avis, les anciennes voies ferrées converties en pistes cyclables sont des Rail trails et des Bikeways (et des Voies Vertes), les Bikeways devant être dans Cycling infrastructure. Jack ma (talk) 17:13, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Bien vu. À chaque fois que je veux ranger une photo je passe un quart d'heure à chercher des catégories qui n'existent pas. Du coup, je m'énerve et je mets n'importe quoi (enfin, presque).

J'ai mis un peu d'ordre : tout est dans cycling infrastructure, j'ai fait des trucs pas département et par ville. À partir de là, en fonction de ce qu'on a par département/ville, on peut diviser en bandes/pistes cyclables, garage à vélo, signalisation, etc. j'ai essayé de mettre un mot compréhensible en français (repris de wp) en haut des catégories … in France quand il me semblait qu'il y avait une confusion possible (le truc qui devrait m'éviter de piquer une crise la prochaine fois).
Au-dessus, il y a cycling, avec les mecs sur des vélos, courses, les marchands de vélo, les musées du vélo, les vendeurs de glace en vélo, et que sais-je.

Pour les voies vertes, ça semble rentrer dans la définition de cycling route‎, et comme ça ressemble furieusement à Rail trails in France, je fusionne les deux catégories. (revert possible si mon initiative n'est pas pertinente)
Comme rail trails est en-dessous de cycling infrastructure, ce n'est peut-être pas la peine de catégoriser en double ?

Ça te semble raisonnable dans l'ensemble ? --Coyau (talk) 18:40, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Oui on marche comme ça, merci d'avance. Il reste un petit hic (copie discussion Pline ci-dessous). Il faut aussi noter que Category:Voie Verte a ses articles spécifiques sur wiki:fr et wiki:en, d'où sans doute la nécessité de ne pas supprimer cette catégorie. Jack ma (talk) 06:57, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour Pline. Merci pour ton travail de catégorisation des voies vertes. Il reste cepedant une petite incertitude à régler aussi avec Coyau: la redirection de Category:Voie Verte. La question est: une voie verte est-elle dans 100% des cas une ancienne voie ferrée ? Si oui, la redirection est justifiée, sinon, il faut inclure la 1ère dans la 2ème. Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 06:57, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Voie verte

Bonjour Pline. Merci pour ton travail de catégorisation des voies vertes. Il reste cepedant une petite incertitude à régler aussi avec Coyau: la redirection de Category:Voie Verte. La question est: une voie verte est-elle dans 100% des cas une ancienne voie ferrée ? Si oui, la redirection est justifiée, sinon, il faut inclure la 1ère dans la 2ème. Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 06:57, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Tout ce qui suit ne concerne que le territoire français. Une voie verte est un aménagement cyclable qui répond à un cahier des charges défini par des instances françaises. Une ancienne voie ferrée lorsqu'elle est aménagée donne souvent lieu à l'aménagement d'une voie cyclable mais peut faire place à chemin interdit aux vélos. Si c'est une voie cyclable, elle peut répondre au cahier des charges des voies vertes (le plus souvent) ou non. Le fait que le terme voie verte ne figure pas dans l'intitulé de la piste cyclable ne veut pas dire que la piste en question n'est pas une Voie verte. Site de référence malheureusement pas toujours à jour Pline (talk) 10:10, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Pour compléter :

• l'infrastructure d'origine d'un aménagement cyclable (dont les voies vertes) peut être une ancienne voie ferrée, un chemin de halage,...
• il existe la notion de véloroute, qui est un itinéraire moyenne ou longue distance, qui emprunte des voies vertes, de petites voies routières,... avec un cahier des charges en ce qui concerne le type de route empruntée, la déclivité maximale,... Il existe des véloroutes européennes (l'EuroVelo 6 emprunte en France La "Loire à vélo") et nationales (Tour de Bourgogne,...). La véloroute nationale est une notion pas très pérenne dans la mesure où il est facile de rabouter des départementales pour l'allonger ou la modifier pour répondre à des considérations touristiques/de prestige/électorales. La région met souvent en avant la véloroute qui comprend quelques voies vertes et beaucoup de départementales Pline (talk) 10:33, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

OK, donc les voies vertes, ça n'est pas des cycling routes. Je mets les voies vertes en sous-catégorie. Ça marche comme ça ? --Coyau (talk) 14:46, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

AMHA la catégorie "Voie verte" se rattache à "cycle infrastructure type" tandis que la catégorie "Bikeways in France" se rattache à "cycle infrastructure". --Pline (talk) 15:28, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caserne Verines - Place de la Republique 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 17:55, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boulevard du Temple (Paris), numéro 42, portail 06 grille en fonte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes.--Jebulon 09:40, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Kazakhstan

Je me suis planté dans la géoloc ?--Jebulon (talk) 15:16, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Catégoriser en lot des fichiers récemment importés par un utilisateur

Bonjour Coyau, Puis-je te demander un conseil technique ? Sais-tu comment catégoriser en un seul coup les imports récents d'un utilisateur ? Je sais faire avec Cat-a-lot, en utilisant la recherche sur le nom d'utilisateur, mais les fichiers importés aujourd'hui ne sont pas encore indexés dans la base et je préférerai ne pas le faire à la main. Je suis preneuse d'un conseil pratique. La galerie de cet utilisateur est là : Special:ListFiles/Allot_rené, la catégorie où les envoyer est Category:Ateliers Allot Frères (après, on affinera). Merci par avance ! --Myrabella (talk) 21:04, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

 Done J'ai récupéré le journal d'import et je l'ai mis dans le robot (puis j'ai décatégorisé le mégalithe). --Coyau (talk) 22:39, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Super, merci. And good night ! --Myrabella (talk) 23:06, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Scarron (Paris), côté nord, détail 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maintenons les Mascarons rue Scarron ! capillotracté, mais historiquement subtil, quand même.--Jebulon 16:19, 16 April 2012 (UTC) J'aime bien :) --Coyau 07:26, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Marcel-Gromaire (Paris), côté nord, détail 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes.--Jebulon 16:22, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boulevard Beaumarchais (Paris), plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Kadellar 09:33, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de la République (Paris), réaménagement, 2012-04-05 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lacks an english file description for QI, IMO. Please add. --NorbertNagel 18:05, 24 April 2012 (UTC)  Done --Coyau 09:34, 25 April 2012 (UTC) Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:18, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de la République (Paris), réaménagement, 2012-04-05 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add an english file description to the french one. --NorbertNagel 18:13, 24 April 2012 (UTC)  Done --Coyau 09:34, 25 April 2012 (UTC) Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:18, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de la République (Paris), réaménagement, 2012-04-05 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add an english file description to the french one. --NorbertNagel 18:13, 24 April 2012 (UTC)  Done --Coyau 09:34, 25 April 2012 (UTC) QI IMO.ArildV 07:41, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

A Quality Image Barnstar for you

		The Quality Image Barnstar
		For your more than 200 Quality Images and your sense of nice detail. Congratulations, dear Coyau ! --Myrabella (talk) 08:06, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Panoramics

Hi! I think the category panoramics only for truly panorama picrures. For Commons' visitors, some pictures like this one or this one aren't panoramas.--Paris 16 (talk) 13:20, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

OK. That solution is better. I agree with you.--Paris 16 (talk) 13:41, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Viaduc disparu

Bonjour. En passant ce matin sur la page QI candidates, je constate que votre image "Viaduc de la rue de l'Aqueduc" n'apparaît pas : seule la légende est visible. Même chose sur la page du fichier lui-même (File:Viaduc de la rue de l'Aqueduc (Paris) 02.jpg). Peut-être y a-t-il eu un problème au moment du téléversement ? -- Bien cordialement. JLPC (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Tout s'est bien passé, le fichier a l'air de fonctionner c'est juste MediaWiki qui ne génère pas d'aperçu. Je n'y peux rien. --Coyau (talk) 11:29, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Viaduc en QI

Ton viaduc ne s'affiche pas c'est moi qui ai un problème ou ta photo? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:50, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

En fait j'ai la réponse sur le Message précédent :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:50, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

C'est pas la première fois que MediaWiki refuse d'afficher correctement une image. C'est dommage, parce que dans l'absolu on sait afficher des images depuis des décennies. --Coyau (talk) 14:42, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Viaduc de la rue de l'Aqueduc (Paris) 02.jpg

Bonjour,

Il semble qu'il y a un probleme avec cette image. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 07:02, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Ouais. J'abandonne, d'ailleurs. --Coyau (talk) 14:37, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

via que duc ?

Si je n'avais pas lu les trois messages précédents, je dirais bien que... Mais bon, j'ai lu les messages précédents.

Et si tu essayais un photo d'un aqueduc, rue du Viaduc ?...

ok, je sors....--Jebulon (talk) 16:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Bonne idée, ça. :D --Coyau (talk) 16:32, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viaduc de la rue de l'Aqueduc (Paris) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The composition is really great and the quality good (maybe increase the contrast and saturation?)--ArildV 22:42, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Est, aiguillage 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iste Praetor 11:45, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Est, caddie sur un quai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iste Praetor 11:45, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Est, isolateurs 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality & nice image composition. . --NorbertNagel 20:07, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boulevard Richard-Lenoir (Paris), poubelle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. JLPC 20:14, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris, averse 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sad mood but good quality. --Selbymay 06:55, 10 July 2012 (UTC) I'm just happy I didn't get the camera wet. ;) --Coyau 07:05, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camion-nacelle place Saint-Michel (Paris) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Poco a poco 20:44, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boulevard Saint-Martin (Paris), arceaux à vélo 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some CA visible (far left and right). --NorbertNagel 14:02, 9 July 2012 (UTC) Fixed. --Coyau 03:16, 10 July 2012 (UTC) Good quality. --NorbertNagel 12:05, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de la République (Paris), réaménagement, 2012-06-19 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality, but I have no idea what you mean by "Restructuration" --AzaToth 22:40, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Est, signalisation 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 11:50, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Est, signalisation 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 11:50, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Est, signalisation 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 11:50, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place T10 (Paris), pignon école.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me (but isn'it possible to upload it in a lower resolution ?) -- JLPC 20:43, 18 July 2012 (UTC) (Seriously? You don't like counting bricks? --Coyau 20:54, 18 July 2012 (UTC))

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Provins - église Sainte-Croix - portail occidental, vaisseau central 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 08:22, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place des Vosges, Paris, porte du n° 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 21:25, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Provins - Hôtel-Dieu 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI Poco a poco 19:21, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 27 - Théodore Joseph Napoléon Jacques 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It works pretty well. QI for me. -- JLPC 16:48, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 27 - Théodore Joseph Napoléon Jacques 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:50, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 19 - Louis Mazet 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 16:56, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 27 - Théodore Joseph Napoléon Jacques 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 05:56, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Product images

I saw your recent FP lens nomination. Well it might not be an FP but I don't think the "boring product photos" criticism is fair. As an educational resource, WP needs photos of "things". It is hard to get the "wow" vote for them but they are useful nonetheless. I got my photo of an File:Electric steam iron.jpg to FP on en.wp but don't know if it is "wow" enough for Commons. What I do know is that Category:Electric irons is dire. If Commons was overloaded with fantastic images of irons or lenses or other everyday objects, then I could see that FP might get bored of them. So I encourage you to keep taking and uploading high quality pictures of everyday things. Colin (talk) 21:15, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Don't worry, I'm not leaving Commons and I'm not quitting taking photos of things and stuffs. --Coyau (talk) 22:01, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Armand Joseph Bruat 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 20:54, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Error in file "Place T10 (Paris), pignon école.jpg"

On my computer and on my web browser (Firefox 14.0.1), the file Place T10 (Paris), pignon école.jpg "cannot be displayed because it contains errors". Please don't remove the template {{Broken file}} I put in it just because it can be displayed on your computer. It doesn't work on my computer so there is clearly something wrong with it or something that prevents it from working properly. It doesn't matter if it is the file that causes the error or if it is my system that is incompatible with it; the two are equally bad and people who want to use the image on any Wikimedia site should be aware of that fact that not all web browsers can display it. I have restored the template again and please let it be there. —Kri (talk) 17:48, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

The problem is obviously on your computer and you should fix it, not blame a file which by the way is correctly displayed by Firefox 14.0.1. --Coyau (talk) 22:02, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF-S 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 II 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:21, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanley dynagrip 5 m × 19 mm 33-684 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:19, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magnusson ruban 8 m 25 mm 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Kreuzschnabel 20:17, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 27 - Théodore Joseph Napoléon Jacques 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF-S 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 II 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 06:29, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF-S 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 II 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 06:29, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF-S 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 II 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 06:29, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 36 - Lavalette 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 06:39, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 65 - Auguste Burdeau 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 06:34, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 18 - Joseph Fourier 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:06, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Cafetière et soliflore

Bonjour Coyau. Deux problèmes, pour ce qui me concerne, au sujet de tes deux dernières photos. a/ La cafetière : je n'arrivais pas, hier soir, à voir si elle est totalement nette ou non (ni à me décider sur une sorte de reflet, très léger, qu'on aperçoit sur la facette la plus proche du bec verseur). Mêmes impressions ce matin, malgré ton utilisation de f:22. b/ Le soliflore : me semble plus net mais quelques poussières apparaissent sur le fond et un trait noir sur le bord supérieur de la photo. J'ai mis des notes sur le fichier. -- Tout cela en toute modestie : je suis incapable de mettre en œuvre un éclairage tel que le tien et tu peux juger, au jour le jour, de la bonne ou mauvaise qualité de mes productions... -- Pour ce qui est des deux objets dont tu as déposé les photos depuis hier, je ne sais pas quelle technique tu utilises. Je te livre une suggestion (que m'a transmise Archaodontausaurus) : le logiciel (gratuit) Combine ZP, qui fonctionne sous Windows seulement, et qui permet de résoudre certains problèmes de macro ou de photo rapprochée. Le principe est théoriquement simple : prendre (avec un pied) trois vues successives du même objet avec trois mises au point différentes (premier plan, deuxième puis arrière-plan). Le logiciel "empile" ensuite les trois et te livre une photo entièrement nette. -- J'ai commencé les essais, obtenu quelques résultats partiels mais encore nettement insuffisants. Je te signale l'existence du procédé, pour le cas où cela pourrait t'aider car tu as l'air beaucoup plus à l'aise que moi dans le domaine de la photo de type studio. -- Bien cordialement. --JLPC (talk) 08:10, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour,

Déjà, merci pour les commentaires. J'ai enlevé les poussières sur le soliflore. Pour la cafetière, je la trouve nette, mais le principe des QI c'est de s'en remettre au jugement des autres, donc tu as raison de t'interroger, et j'ai peut-être tort (tiens, un mauvais argument : ici, à f/22, je ne trouve pas de problème flagrant de profondeur de champs — c'est un mauvais argument) ; le problème que j'y vois c'est qu'elle est blanc sur blanc, donc les passages ne sont pas contrastés du coup on ne voit pas tout ce qu'on aurait pu voir si le fond avait été noir.

Pour le côté technique, j'ai utilisé le mini studio photo que Wikimédia France vient d'acheter, c'est une boîte blanche avec plein de lumière à l'intérieur (là on voit les reflets des lampes sur les émaux) dans laquelle on met les trucs qu'on photographie par un trou (dont on voit le reflet dans la cafetière sur la facette la plus proche du bec verseur). J'en suis encore à l'essayer, donc c'est utile d'avoir des retours. Je post-traite la première série conséquente que j'ai fait avec (encore quelques cafetières, et d'autres trucs éclectiques). Je note Combine ZP, peut-être pour la prochaine série.

Bien cordialement. --Coyau (talk) 14:01, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 66 - Alphand 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:46, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 39 - Murat 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:13, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Père-Lachaise - Division 58 - Sépulture de famille 03.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 58 - Sépulture de famille 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Kadellar 19:48, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soliflore en émail de Longwy 268.2 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 13:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Versailles, cour de marbre, buste d'empereur romain, Vdse 110 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:46, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osselets métalliques 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 06:22, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 65 - Auguste Burdeau 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments wonderful composition. Good quality. --Herzi Pinki 09:16, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cafetière à percolation en faïence crème 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Oui. Un fond noir, peut-être, pour voir ?--Jebulon 14:56, 21 August 2012 (UTC) Prochaine fois, j'essaye. --Coyau 16:22, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Couperet à débiter les lapins 08.jpg

Pourquoi que les lapins ? Pov' bêtes !

Si j'ai envie de débiter des côtelettes avec, moi ?

Je crois que c'est ça, qu'on appelle une "feuille" de boucher. (si j'en crois Google images).--Jebulon (talk) 16:24, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

J'ai toujours vu ce truc à un clou du mur de la cuisine, il paraît que ça servait à débiter les lapins (quand on avait encore des lapins, ça veut dire que ça commence à dater un peu), et c'est bon, le lapin.
Sur le fond, j'en sais rien, fr:Feuille de boucher ressemble pas mal à fr:Couperet (ustensile) (visiblement ça sert à quelqu'un à écraser de l'ail), si tu veux changer la description ne te gène pas. --Coyau (talk) 16:42, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Non non, moi aussi j'aime bien le lapin. Aux pruneaux, notamment. J'ai su faire.--Jebulon (talk) 23:44, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Au fait, on fait comment pour utiliser le mini studio ? ça m'intéresse, ça !--Jebulon (talk) 23:45, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

J'imagine ! Je vais le rapporter en début de semaine aux locaux de Wikimédia France, après il faut voir avec eux (il m'a semblé comprendre que pas mal de monde était intéressé), mais c'est pas compliqué (convention de prêt). Il y a ici un tableau qui dit où est le studio. --Coyau (talk) 00:08, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Je sais où sont les locaux de WM France et compte tenu de la situation, des lieux, et de mon standing personnel, j'estime que j'ai bien du mérite ! ;))) Je leur ai prêté récemment une caméra et mon trépied, suite à un appel de User:Serein sur le mail de l'association, d'où deux expéditions ethnographiques vers le fameux Lawomatic. Mais je ne savais pas qu'ils avaient fait cette acquisition, je l'ai découvert grâce aux bandeaux de tes photos. D'ailleurs, je ne savais même pas que ce genre de trucs existait, ça me parait particulièrement pas con, comme objet à avoir pour un groupe de gens qui font des photos. Dommage que ça ne soit dispo qu'à Paris, je connais quelques Toulousains qui ne cracheraient pas dessus...--Jebulon (talk) 08:59, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cafetière Mignon 2 tazze 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:45, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cafetière Mignon 2 tazze 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:54, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bialetti moka mini express 1 tazza 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 23:37, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cafetière Mignon 2 tazze 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 23:18, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cafetière Mignon 2 tazze 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:04, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Couperet à débiter les lapins 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK--Jebulon 16:33, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osselets métalliques 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bad composition(especially the two touching at the top). A more uniform composition would be better but otherwise the quality is excellent. Need another opinion--Gauravjuvekar 17:55, 22 August 2012 (UTC)  Comment the game is to throw them randomly and then pick them up. I don't see the point in regular spacing. --Coyau 17:34, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cafetière Presto 2 tasses 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cafetière Presto 2 tasses 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cafetière Presto 2 tasses 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cafetière Nova Express Export 4 tasses 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cafetière Nova Express Export 4 tasses 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments !QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 12:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cafetière Nova Express Export 4 tasses 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pourrait faire un excellent set en VISC, surtout constitué de 3 QI, à mon avis...--Jebulon 15:01, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cafetière Presto 2 tasses 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 23:00, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cafetière Presto 2 tasses 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 23:00, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cafetière Vesuviana 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:19, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ortie blanche 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jkadavoor 10:12, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mortier et pilon en fonte 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments quite alright --Vamps 07:59, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taartschep Gero Zilmeta 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:05, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pince à plats chromée 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, supposing that the short DOF is intentional here.. --Cayambe 08:48, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Père-Lachaise

Bonsoir Coyau!
Je sais que tu connais assez bien le cimetière du Père-Lachaise et je veux te faire une question. Je voudrais savoir le nom de la tombe de cette image; est-ce que tu pourrais m'aider? Merci beaucoup!! --Kadellar (talk) 17:46, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Bonsoir Kadellar,
Ça ne me dit rien comme ça, mais le cimetière est grand. Je transmets la question à ~Pyb, qui connaît mieux que moi. --Coyau (talk) 19:00, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Je vais regarder dans la semaine. J'ai commencé à affiner la catégorisation hier soir. Malheureusement, je vais devoir supprimer certaines photos. La France ne dispose pas de la liberté de panorama. ~Pyb (talk) 19:06, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 10 - Dominique Vivant Denon 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 08:32, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 10 - Dominique Vivant Denon 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good, + excellent caption.--Jebulon 10:11, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apsco Vacuhold pencil sharpener 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Impressive. --Selbymay 17:57, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aurora electronic calculator DT210 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:47, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anti-monte-lait en inox 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:09, 13 October 2012 (UTC)  Support Good idea ! --JLPC 08:48, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aurora electronic calculator DT210 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not bad - A.Savin 19:06, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boulevard du Temple (Paris), numéro 42, portail 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 05:46, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boulevard du Temple (Paris), numéro 42, portail 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 03:00, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anti-monte-lait en inox 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Selbymay 18:36, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Quelle i d !

Bonjour, Coyau. -- Quelques mots au sujet de ta remarque sur mes roses trémières. Je n'ai pas mis l'id de la plante car elle n'est pas le sujet principal de la photo. Mon but était de montrer en partie un spectacle fréquent à BouRcefranc (!), à savoir les roses trémières devant les cabanes de pêcheur. Ce type de fleurs est depuis longtemps, caractéristique de la côte charentaise... même si la rose trémière gagne, ces temps-ci, l'intérieur des terres ! -- Bravo pour tes anti-monte-lait : ils m'ont rappelé mon enfance. -- Quant à ta calculatrice d'hier soir, je ne vois pas ce qui peut lui être reproché question qualité : je voterai pour en discussion. -- Bien cordialement. --JLPC (talk) 09:28, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aurora electronic calculator DT210 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:24, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aurora electronic calculator DT210 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:24, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aurora electronic calculator DT210 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:24, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aurora electronic calculator DT210 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:24, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pot à lait en tôle émaillée 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi for me. --JLPC 21:05, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aurora electronic calculator DT210 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place des Vosges, Paris, porte du n° 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 10:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de la République (Paris), réaménagement, 2012-04-05 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, imho.--V-wolf 13:33, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place des Vosges, Paris, porte du n° 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:58, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place des Vosges, Paris, porte du n° 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:25, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delphine, Madame de Staël, Paris, 1803 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. - A.Savin 11:33, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lactaire des épicéas vert 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 08:41, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolet roux 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Holleday 22:00, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolet roux 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit dark, but still very nice! --Ximeg 17:15, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolet roux 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wonderful! --Ximeg 17:15, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 66 - Henri Cernuschi 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:59, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 60 - Tetaz Fiorentini 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 11:16, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 66 - Alphand 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me - A.Savin 11:13, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 66 - Alphand 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 08:39, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Help: no-FoP Italy

Hi. When you have a moment, could you do me a favor. I decided to occupy my time to list the no-FoP files in Italy. It has been a long and difficult work that needs to be reviewed by administrators. Please, could you check if everything is correct on User:Raoli/Deletion requests/FoP Italy? Thanks! Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:23, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 66 - Floquet 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me - A.Savin 12:11, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 66 - Anatole de la Forge 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some CA on the hand at the right. - A.Savin 12:09, 29 November 2012 (UTC) Fixed. --Coyau 12:47, 29 November 2012 (UTC) QI. - A.Savin 13:10, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 59 - sépulture Derocher 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Jebulon 18:51, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Transfert vers fr. (FoP)

Les 5 photos suivantes sont utilisées sur fr. et devraient y être transférées :

• File:Centre commercial de la Toison d'Or - Dijon (13-05-2012) - img1.JPG
• File:Centre commercial de la Toison d'Or - Dijon (13-05-2012) - img3.JPG
• File:Centre commercial de la Toison d'Or - Dijon (13-05-2012) - img2.JPG
• File:Centre commercial de la Toison d'Or - Dijon (13-05-2012) - img4.JPG
• File:Centre commercial de la Toison d'Or - Dijon (13-05-2012) - img5.JPG

Tu peux t'en charger ? --Dereckson (talk) 17:43, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

 Done fait. --Coyau (talk) 18:08, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Sépulture de famille 02.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Sépulture de famille 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:28, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 71 - Cléray 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:28, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 71 - Cléray 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:03, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 72 - Minal et Durif 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Moonik 16:29, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 72 - Minal et Durif 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:54, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Armand Joseph Bruat 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -Kadellar 13:59, 5 December 2012 (UTC)