User talk:DenesFeri/Archív05

Not Sedum spurium?

Hi Bff,

If this is not Sedum spurium, than do you have an idea, that what could it be? It isn't a cultivars? This picture is from a garden.

File:Saxifragales - Sedum spurium - 3.jpg

Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 08:09, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

• It's probably Sedum kamtschaticum ([1], [2]) but I'm not sure about this. --Bff (talk) 13:01, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

OK! Thanks! DenesFeri (talk) 08:18, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Unknown Iris cultivar with yellow to orange colour gradient.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Unknown Iris cultivar with yellow to orange colour gradient.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Speravir 17:24, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

See also Commons:OTRS. — Speravir – 17:27, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

(File:Unknown Iris cultivar with yellow to orange colour gradient.jpg)

Hi Speravir,

Have you or the Commons received the permission from my sister? DenesFeri (talk) 08:26, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

She send it. DenesFeri (talk) 08:27, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Please answer as soon as posible. DenesFeri (talk) 09:05, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

No, I haven’t. But I am not a member of the OTRS team, so it doesn’t matter, whether I’ve got one or not.

Also, it would have been better to discuss on your own talk page in the existing section for this file.

— Speravir – 00:24, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

@Speravir: Where should I write then? On Commons:OTRS? DenesFeri (talk) 08:46, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

OTRS tag

You can now tag the images by Emőke Dénes with {{Emőke Dénes}} or {{Emoke Denes}}. I've applied this to the images already uploaded, so you don't need to go back through all of them. They will be categorized into Category:Photographs by Emőke Dénes. Guanaco (talk) 10:06, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi @Guanaco: ,

OK, thank you very much! For everything! And this will apply on the future uploads to? Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 10:14, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Yes, as long as Emőke is the creator and you're the uploader, you can place {{Emőke Dénes}} in the permission section for files new and old. Guanaco (talk) 10:17, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

OAU!!! That's cool!!! DenesFeri (talk) 10:19, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Rodrigues solitaire photos

Thanks for those great photos[3], I have long waited for a photo of those exact skeletons! If you upload a photo of unique specimens, don't hesitate to add them to Wikipedia articles, I was "shocked" that the photos had been here since May, I would never have known, haha... FunkMonk (talk) 08:54, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi @FunkMonk: ,

I'm glad that you like it. And thanks for putting it on the enwiki article about this bird. Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 08:47, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Richmond Park butterflies

Hi DenesFeri, FYI this and this are actually Lycaena phlaeas. Kind regards --LamBoet (talk) 19:03, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi @LamBoet: , OK, thanks for the right identification. Cheers. DenesFeri (talk) 09:03, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Nelumbo nucifera - 20140912 - Madurai.jpg

File:Nelumbo nucifera - 20140912 - Madurai.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 12:44, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Iz - Danaus chrysippus - 5.jpg

Hi DenesFeri, this butterfly is not Danaus chrysippus, but Danaus genutia :-) Kind regards --LamBoet (talk) 20:11, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi @LamBoet: , OK, thank you for the identification! Cheers. DenesFeri (talk) 06:44, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Mit szerkesztettem

https://hu.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speci%C3%A1lis:MobileDiff/21420108 Csaballa (talk) 19:56, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Lepidoptera identifications

Hi DenesFeri, I noticed a few mistakes in the moth pictures you uploaded: these [ 1, 2, 3, 4] ara actually Idaea aversata; this is actually some species of Mythimna, and this [ 1, 2] is an Agriphila. Could you please be a little more cautious with these identifications, perhaps have them checked before uploading the pictures? Thanks! --LamBoet (talk) 16:51, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi @LamBoet: ,

Thank you for the corrections! I'm not a Lepidoptera expert; I searched on Google and on Commons for the best resembling moths, and I found those. Do you have any idea that what could this be File:1 Lepidoptera sp. - 20120828.jpg .jpg? And I have several other unidentified butterflies on my user page; could you look at them? Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 09:47, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi DenesFeri, sorry, I don't know the species of this Noctuidae, or of the butterflies of your user page. Perhaps you get help from internet forums, such as the Lepiforum? --LamBoet (talk) 19:45, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi @LamBoet: , OK; thanks. DenesFeri (talk) 07:48, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Allosaurus?

Hi Gretarsson,

You don't agree that this skull belongs to a Megalosaurus, File:Dino - Megalosaurus - 1.jpg. But I think that on the label in the museum they wrote Megalosaurus. Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 08:29, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Skull reconstruction of Megalosaurus; unknown bones are rendered in dark grey

Allosaurus skull reconstruction…

…and another one…

…and yet another one.

All three look as if they were identical to the alleged “Megalosaurus” skull reconstruction (which is because all four are probably replicas of the same Allosaurus fragilis skull reconstruction, based on the work of Madsen, 1976)

Hi DenesFeri,

then there are three possibilities:

1) The labelling was plain wrong, which would be a really severe lapsus, and I can hardly imagine that.

2) You confused the label with that of a nearby exhibit of Megalosaurus.

3) Your memory is incorrect.

Anyhow, the skull reconstruction on your picture is extremely similar to the skull reconstruction of Allosaurus fragilis as published by Madsen (1976, Plate 1). Furthermore, there are only a few skull bones known from Megalosaurus (cf. drawing in the upper image to the right). For instance, the lacrimal is not known. So reconstructing the skull of Megalosaurus with a prominent lacrimal “horn” would be quite speculative since most Megalosaurids from which the lacrimal is known do not have a pronounced lacrimal “horn” (e.g. Torvosaurus, Dubreuillosaurus, Eustreptospondylus). Also, the skulls of megalosaurids are generally rather low and elongated, accompanied by a dorsal/nasal process of the maxilla that is directed posteriorly rather than dorsally. So the skull of Megalosaurus may have resembled that of Torvosaurus rather than that of Allosaurus… --Gretarsson (talk) 11:53, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi Gretarsson, I'm not an expert in dinosaurs, so I believe you. And thank you for the correction! Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 08:29, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

File:1 Anthozoa sp. Kew 4.jpg

File:1 Anthozoa sp. Kew 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 11:52, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Túrelio: , I requested the deletion of this file/picture, and I have told my reason for it. DenesFeri (talk) 07:43, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of your uploads

Hi, DenesFeri. You nominated a lot of images for speedy deletion. Mostly I deleted them. But in the future please do not blank the files before nominating them for deletion. It is time-consuming to search from file history previous versions before blanking. Thank you. Taivo (talk) 20:13, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Taivo: , Thank you for the deletions! I didn't knew that I wasn't supposed to blank them. Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 07:53, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Iz - Lepidoptera - GMZ.jpg

File:Iz - Lepidoptera - GMZ.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Majora (talk) 14:58, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Docoglossa2.jpg

File:Docoglossa2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Majora (talk) 14:58, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

File:1 Bryophyte sp. 4 - Putney Heath Common 2011.08.02.jpg

File:1 Bryophyte sp. 4 - Putney Heath Common 2011.08.02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Majora (talk) 14:58, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Caryophyllales - Portulaca grandiflora - 6.jpg

Are you sure it's Portulaca grandiflora? I don't think so, it seems to me like Carpobrotus. Salicyna (talk) 18:09, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Salicyna: , Probably you have right; it might not be a Portulaca grandiflora. DenesFeri (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Kulin György mellszobra Nagyszalontán - 1.jpg

Szia! Ezt a képet töltsd fel, kérlek, a huwikire, mert innen törölni kell sajnos. Romániában nem fényképezhetők szabadon a szobrok, ha a szobrász még él vagy 70 évnél nem halt meg régebben. --Regasterios (talk) 20:08, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Szia @Regasterios: ! Hát ez milyen dolog? Az a szobor a parkban közszemlére van téve. Akárki lefényképezheti; nem volt tiltótábla mellette. Üdv. DenesFeri (talk) 08:36, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Magyarországon így van, de Romániában nem, erről ott törvény rendelkezik, nem kell hozzá külön tiltótábla (nálunk is törvény rendelkezik arról, hogy szabad). Lefényképezni persze lefényképezheted, de csak a számítógépednek. Nem teheted azonban közzé a képet, főleg nem szabad licenc alatt, hiába te készítetted. Romániában nincs panorámaszabadság, mint nálunk. A kiskapu az, hogy a huwikire feltöltheted a képet, de ide a Commonsba nem. Az ilyen fotókat ott fel is sablonozzuk, mint például ezt: hu:Fájl:Gábor Áron szobra Kézdivásárhelyen.jpg. --Regasterios (talk) 09:06, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

@Regasterios: OK. Akkor ezt tegyem meg minden romániai szoborral? Még Mátyás királlyal is? DenesFeri (talk) 09:12, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Nem mindegyikkel. Ha szobrász 70 éve már nem élt, akkor ide is feltölthető. Fadrusz János pedig ugye már 1903-ban meghalt. Ha a saját fotóid között van ilyen, érdemes áttölteni, utána meg törlésre jelölni az itteni változatot. Ha utóbbit nem tudod, hogyan kell, majd segítek. --Regasterios (talk) 09:15, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

@Regasterios: OK. Akkor légyszi nézd meg itt, melyik szobrok a tilosak és szóljál nekem róluk [4]. DenesFeri (talk) 09:20, 11 November 2019 (UTC) Továbbá, ha senki sem veszi észre, akkor szerintem ne erőltessük a törlést. DenesFeri (talk) 09:22, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Oké, majd átnézem őket. Kossuth nagyszalontai szobra például rendben van, az maradhat. A törlés viszont nem elkerülhető sajnos azon képek esetében, amelyeknek a szerzője 70 éve még élt. Ha viszont ilyet találok, én törlésre jelölöm, csak nem szerettem volna, ha hidegzuhanyként ér a dolog, ezért írtam először erről csak általánosságban neked. --Regasterios (talk) 09:54, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

@Regasterios: Na jól van; köszönöm, hogy előre szóltál! DenesFeri (talk) 09:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Törlésre jelöltem akkor, a törlési kérés itt található: Commons:Deletion requests/Bust of György Kulin (Salonta). --Regasterios (talk) 10:21, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fotód: File:Bocskai István szobra Nagyszalontán - 1.jpg. --Regasterios (talk) 10:02, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Szia @Regasterios: ! Kösz, hogy szóltál. Már lementettem a huwikire. DenesFeri (talk) 10:09, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 20:59, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Heliconius erato cyrbia 2.jpg

Hi DenesFeri, this one is not an Heliconius, but a Papilionidae, although I am not sure which species. Kind regards --LamBoet (talk) 18:09, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi @LamBoet: , Could it be Parides montezuma like this one; File:Parides montezuma - 1.jpg? Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 10:46, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi DenesFeri, I agree that it looks like a Parides, but not Parides montezuma. A few Parides species have pink marks at the hindwing and white ones at the forewing; I don't know which one it is.

About the other picture, actually, I don't think it is Parides montezuma either: it has two rows of black marks, so it looks more like Parides photinus. Kind regards --LamBoet (talk) 17:37, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi @LamBoet: , OK, thank you. Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 09:02, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Michaelmas-daisies

Hi Emőke - sorry, but your photos (like the overwhelming majority of cultivated Michaelmas-daisies) are not Aster amellus, which is actually very rare in cultivation. Most garden Michaelmas-daisies are Symphyotrichum species or hybrids (primarily S. lanceolatum, S. novae-angliae, S. novi-belgii, and their hybrids S. × salignum, S. × versicolor), but other genera and species are involved as well. Hope this helps! - MPF (talk) 09:53, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi @MPF: , OK. Thanks for this information. I,m not Emőke, I am Feri, her brother. Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 09:58, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Ooops, my apologies! I fear I made an assumption from the name on the photo files! - MPF (talk) 10:04, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

@MPF: That's ok. She makes the photoes, and I upload them and also take care of them. DenesFeri (talk) 10:08, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! I just looked a bit more, and think File:1 Növény L77.jpg and File:1 Növény L78.jpg may perhaps be Erigeron species or hybrids, from leaf shape and the flowerheads with broad discs and short ray florets. - MPF (talk) 10:18, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Dodo models

Hi, just a heads up, I removed the category Threskiornis solitarius from some photos you had uploaded of models in London; though they are supposed to depict a supposed white dodo of Réunion, they are based on old dodo paintings that are now known to have no connection with Réunion, and therefore they simply depict dodos. I know it may seem confusing! FunkMonk (talk) 00:09, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi @FunkMonk: , That's ok, thank you. I want my pictures as correct as possible. Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 09:36, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

• Hi, I reverted your edit, because Plesiosaurus macrocephalus has not received a new genus name yet! Anningasaura was given to a specimen which was once assigned to Plesiosaurus macrocephalus, but the original Plesiosaurus macrocephalus still needs a new genus. FunkMonk (talk) 09:19, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi @FunkMonk: , OK, than. Thanks. I thought that Plesiosaurus macrocephalus became the synonym of the Anningasaura lymense. Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 09:29, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

No (macrocephalus is the oldest of the two names, so would have priority over lymense), they will probably end up as two different genera, which is also pretty cool! FunkMonk (talk) 09:56, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

@FunkMonk: OK. DenesFeri (talk) 10:01, 28 September 2020 (UTC)