User talk:Florstein/Archive/2018-20

Happy holidays! 2018! ;)

			* Happy Holidays 2018, Florstein/Archive! *
			Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:39, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! State Institute of Technology SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and good quality, Tournasol7 16:34, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolshoy Obukhovsky Bridge SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 18:16, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuybysheva Street 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:09, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace Bridge SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:40, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace Bridge SPB (img2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:56, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace Bridge SPB (img3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 18:59, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace Bridge Panorama (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:39, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace Bridge Panorama (img2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 19:49, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annunciation Bridge SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:48, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trinity Bridge SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 02:26, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trinity Bridge SPB (img2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:05, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trinity Bridge SPB (img3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:48, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trinity Bridge SPB (img4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 00:47, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trinity Bridge Panorama (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 22:36, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liteyny Bridge SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:37, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liteyny Bridge SPB (img2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Cool bridge! Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:56, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kutuzov Embankment SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:46, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sampsonievsky Bridge SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:37, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kunstkamera Tower SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:50, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Admiralteysky Canal Embankment 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 20:32, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Admiralteysky Canal Embankment 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 21:35, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument to Catherine II SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me --Cvmontuy 03:08, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Holland SPB The Bottle (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Rain pipe on the far left a bit strange. But otherwise the photo has good quality for me.--Famberhorst 17:51, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Holland SPB The Bottle (img2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:52, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Holland SPB The Bottle (img3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:17, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Holland SPB The Bottle (img4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 20:03, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Holland SPB The Bottle (img5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:57, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Holland SPB The Bottle (img11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 19:00, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Holland SPB The Bottle (img8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 13:29, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Holland SPB Commandant House.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:03, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Holland SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:03, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Holland SPB (img2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:20, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Holland SPB (img3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:20, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Holland SPB (img4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:22, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Holland SPB The Bottle (img12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please add some noise reduction. --Halavar 22:51, 1 March 2018 (UTC)  Done --Florstein 18:59, 2 March 2018 (UTC)  Support OK, good now. QI for me --Halavar 15:51, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Holland SPB (img7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:31, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Holland SPB (img5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:59, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Holland SPB (img6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:59, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Holland SPB (img8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:59, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Holland SPB (img9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:31, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Holland SPB The Bottle (img6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:51, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Holland SPB The Bottle (img10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better now. --Ermell 22:51, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Winter Palace Panorama 4.jpg

Could you update Russian and English descriptions? As GPS data and the photo itself show, this is not "вид с Дворцовой набережной". --jdx ^Re: 17:53, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your notice. I've updated the descriptions. Sorry for inconvenience. :) --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:49, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2019! ;)

			* Happy Holidays 2019, Florstein/Archive! *
			Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:52, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected file:Afanasiy Nikitin Monument in Tver.jpg Taivo (talk) 09:36, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:SPB Collage 2014-5.png

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:SPB Collage 2014-5.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:57, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:SPB Collage 2014-4.png

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:SPB Collage 2014-4.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:58, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020!

		* Happy Holidays 2020, Florstein/Archive! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:00, 23 December 2019 (UTC)