User talk:Frank C. Müller

Auf die Idee einerEdit

Category:Blue sky bin ich - warum auch immer - nicht gekommen. Danke fürs Umräumen. Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 12:07, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Danke für das Danke. Du bist aber auch ein fleißiger Hochlader! gruß, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 12:28, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Please give images better namesEdit

العربية | Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Sicilianu | Українська | +/−


I noticed you've uploaded File:HD-SC-98-07558_Ausschnitt_fcm.jpg and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error.

Please give uploaded images meaningful names. Otherwise they are difficult to track and it is hard to tell what the image is about without actually looking at it. I suggest you rename your image with an intuitive name that describes the image itself. Thanks, and happy editing!

This is just an information. New name might be File:Samuel Kanyon Doe - Liberian.jpg. Renaming will be carried out by a filemover. No action at your side is required. Thank you. RE rillke questions? 13:40, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Bierdeckel_Fischer_fcm.jpgEdit

  File:Bierdeckel_Fischer_fcm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leyo 18:43, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Eppelborn 09 fcm.jpgEdit

  File:Eppelborn 09 fcm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 21:44, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Category:Economy_by_cityEdit

Mjrmtg (talk) 14:53, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

closeupEdit

Guten Abend, File:Bombylius major - Burgenland.jpg, File:Episyrphus balteatus - botanischer Garten Schönbrunn 2.jpg und einige andere sind definitiv keine Closeups, diese Kategorie wurde, seitdem sie mit Makroaufnahmen vereinigt wurde, sinnbefreit. LG., --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 22:57, 26 December 2013 (UTC)


Hallo Spacebirdy!

  • Wie definierst Du denn Close-ups?
  • Meinst Du mit "Makroaufnahmen " die Kategorie "Macro photographs", die der Kategorie "Close-ups" untergeordnet ist?
  • Was meinst Du mit "sinnbefreit"?

gruß, fcm, --Frank C. Müller (talk) 10:38, 28 December 2013 (UTC) (ich hatte die Unterschrift vergessen!)

Nicht ich definiere das. Es gibt eine Definition, was Makroaufnahmen sind, und diese fallen sicher darunter (bzw. ersteres schon Mikrofotografie)... einfach alles mit Nahaufnahmen (Closeups) zusammenzuwuerfeln ist komplett unsinnig, da Makros (wie z.B. das zweite) nicht notwendigerweise Nahaufnahmen sind! Das zweite zeigt das komplette Tier, das ist also keine Nahaufnahme. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:30, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Hallo tototl!

Ich höre aus Deinen Äußerungen zwei Kritiken heraus:

  • Aufnahmen des ganzen Objekts sind keine Close-Ups, die fangen erst da an, wo nur noch Teile des Objektes (ab etwa der Hälfte) zu sehen sind.
Dem kann ich mich anpassen, kein Problem!
  • Macro photographs sind keine Close-ups. Makrophotographie ist eine technische Dimension (es geht um den Abbildungsmaßstab); beim Closeup geht es darum, was man auf der Aufnahme sieht: Sieht man auf dem Bild nur einen Pferdekopf, ist das ein Closeup, aber kein Makro; sieht man auf dem Bild nur ein ganzes Insekt, ist das (wahrscheinlich) ein Makro, aber kein Closeup.
Wenn das Deine Meinung wiedergibt, kann ich Dir nur zustimmen. Wie Du aber leicht nachprüfen kannst, habe nicht ich die Makros den Closeups zugeordnet, sondern die User Pierpao und Foroa; User ComputerHotline hat das auch schon einmal versucht, rückgängig zu machen. Wenn Du einverstanden bist, kann ich versuchen, die Zuordnung noch einmal rückgängig zu machen und das auf der Diskussionsseite der Kategorie erläutern.

gruß, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 15:15, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Das waere fein. Der Kritikpunkt die Kategorie Closeup in Makroaufnahmen einzufuegen bleibt jedoch bestehen ;o) LG., --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:45, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

So, ich hab die Macro photographs wieder aus den Close-ups rausgenommen und das auch in der Diskussion begründet.

--Frank C. Müller (talk) 18:17, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Interrobang fcm.pngEdit

  File:Interrobang fcm.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mahir256 (talk) 23:58, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Kaiserin-Augusta-Denkmal in Baden-Baden 01 (fcm).jpgEdit

  File:Kaiserin-Augusta-Denkmal in Baden-Baden 01 (fcm).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Josve05a (talk) 22:21, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Overcat?Edit

These two categories you added are COM:OVERCAT:

Don’t you agree? -- Tuválkin 13:35, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello Tuválkin! I apologize, but "Men at work in Portugal" is not a parent-category of "Milkmen in Portugal", and I think moreover, that it also should not be one, because "Men at work" shows actually working men and "Milkmen" more shows men with a specific profession. If you don't agree, you are free to add a "parenting" bridge between the two categories. And what's about "Black and white photographs", that's special! I quote: "The use of this category in addition to topical sub-categories of Category: Black and white photography remains a subject of contention." So if you are in the mood, then you may delete this extra categorization, but nobody must do this. saudação, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 14:07, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Category:Crown_corksEdit

BrightRaven (talk) 14:48, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Rueckseite-Notgeld-Eppelborn-Dirmingen-1921-10-Pfennig-Bergarbeiter-vor-Bergwerk-Kaisereiche-zu-Eppelborn.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rueckseite-Notgeld-Eppelborn-Dirmingen-1921-10-Pfennig-Bergarbeiter-vor-Bergwerk-Kaisereiche-zu-Eppelborn.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 11:52, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Rueckseite-Notgeld-Eppelborn-Dirmingen-1921-25-Pfennig-Bergarbeiter-vor-Bergwerk-Kaisereiche-zu-Eppelborn.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rueckseite-Notgeld-Eppelborn-Dirmingen-1921-25-Pfennig-Bergarbeiter-vor-Bergwerk-Kaisereiche-zu-Eppelborn.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 11:52, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

taken on...Edit

Hello Frank As there an lot of images of these screwdriver bits I created a category called "Category:Photographs taken of Screwdriver bits on 2016-11-02" within the "Category:Photographs taken on 2016-11-02" which made the use of {{taken on| an unnecessary duplicate category for your files. If you object to this I will not continue with this transfer. Regards Kolforn (talk) 08:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi Kolforn!
Thanks for this explanation. For me it's ok!
regards, fcm. --13:51, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Kolforn!
Now, where your new Category:Photographs taken of Screwdriver bits on 2016-11-02 was characterized as vandalism and deleted, could you please restore all that "taken ons" in my files?
regards, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 10:29, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello Frank

I have left a message on the page of User:Achim55 asking him to do as your request and asking him for an explaination of his action over this matter. Regards Kolforn (talk) 10:46, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello Frank

Your screwdriver bit files have now been restored to the original day date category. Regards Kolforn (talk) 07:33, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi Kolforn! Thanks! gruß, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 12:16, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Ringsgwandl 01 fcm.jpgEdit

  File:Ringsgwandl 01 fcm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hiddenhauser (talk) 12:00, 13 December 2016 (UTC)


DankeEdit

Da man dem Danken keinen Text anfügen kann, möchte ich mich hier für deine Korrekturen meiner Fehler und für die geschichtlich korrekte Schreibweise der Kategorien bedanken --2003:72:8F66:B500:65AA:7B74:46BC:281E 22:04, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Not logged in

p.s. was war das mit dem Bild obendrüber --Jörgens.Mi Talk 22:05, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Jörgens.Mi!
Vielen Dank für den Dank!
Und dann hätte ich da noch ne Frage an Dich: Du hast doch ganz viele Aufnahmen gemacht von drei Äpfeln im Korb mit Namenszettel davor. Sieht für mich nach einer Ausstellung aus. Ich würde mir sowas auch mal gerne in natura anschauen. Kannst Du mir sagen, wo und bei welcher Gelegenheit das war?
Das Ringsgwandl-Bild von obendrüber war ein Porträt-Foto, nur das Gesicht mit der großen Nase und einem Hut. Es war ganz unscharf, ohne Details; wer Ringsgwandl nicht kennt, sieht nur ein verschwommenes Foto von einem Männerkopf; kennt man ihn aber, kann man ihn auf dem Foto sofort wiedererkennen, weil das für ihn Charakteristische trotz der Unschärfe immer noch da ist. Das Foto hat das Spezifische betont, indem es die Details weggelassen hat. Aber es ist sicher auch kein großer Verlust für die Menschheit, wenn das Bild hier auf Commons nicht verewigt wird.
gruß, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 12:46, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi fcm, das war hier loakl eine Ausstellung bei einem Obstbauern in Staufen der alte Sorten (http://obstparadies-staufen.de/) sammelt. An der Zahl drei in nicht ich shuld sondern der Obstbauer, er hat es so präsentiert. Ob das mit den Sorten jetzt ein einmaliges Ereignis oder alle Jahre wieder kommt, weis ich noch nicht, kann ich aber gerne in Erfahrung bringen. Ich würde gerne mal im Frühjahr bei ihm die Obtsbäume begehen und photographieren und im Herbst zwei Äpfel längs und quer geschnitten leicht gesäuert, damit sie nicht braun sind und dann formatfüllend den Schnitt. Man müsste auch mal rauskriegen was er sonst noch so hat. Gruß --Jörgens.Mi Talk 16:32, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Joergens.mi! Danke für die Info und weiterhin viel Freude beim Fotografieren von Äpfeln und anderem! gruß, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 12:45, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Hallo fcm, die Äpfel waren ein Zufallstreffer, ich stehe eigentlich mehr auf Kirchen und Konzerte - Aber so was nimmt man gerne mit 2 große Tischreihen mit Obst, wann kommt man an so eine Auswahl. Mir tat anschließend der Auslösefinger weh :). Alles ohne Stativ, freihand und mitten im Besucherandrang - Muss mal schauen ob ich noch ne Übersichtsaufnahme im Archiv habe.

Frohes Fest.

--Jörgens.Mi Talk 14:01, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion requestsEdit

Hi, if you do this, then the file will appear in Category:Other speedy deletions, not the redirect. Please make sure you break the redirect while adding such a nomination. Jcb (talk) 15:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello Jcb. Thanks for the info. I corrected the files in this sense. regards, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 15:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyEdit

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Apple categorizationEdit

I just wanted to thank you and ‎Hilohello for all your work with categorizing Category:Apples. You've both put in a lot of work with great results, and it hasn't gone unnoticed. - Themightyquill (talk) 14:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your esteem! gruß, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 14:15, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia surveyEdit

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Return to the user page of "Frank C. Müller".