Frank C. Müller

Look also at

• User:Frank C. Müller/Discussion 2008
• User:Frank C. Müller/Discussion 2009
• User:Frank C. Müller/Discussion 2010
• User:Frank C. Müller/Discussion 2011
• User:Frank C. Müller/Discussion 2013
• User:Frank C. Müller/Discussion 2014
• User:Frank C. Müller/Discussion 2015
• User:Frank C. Müller/Discussion 2016
• User:Frank C. Müller/Discussion 2017
• User:Frank C. Müller/Discussion 2018

---

File:Santa Cruz Maske vor dem Teatro Guimera fcm.jpg

Hi Frank, I removed your photograph from the category of Sculptures in Tenerife because it is already included in the category Per Adriano by Igor Mitoraj, which is a subcategory of Sculptures in Santa Cruz de Tenerife, which is itself a subcategory of the aforementioned Sculptures in Tenerife.

My understanding is that categories on this site work in a hierarchical structure, and that redundant categories should be avoided; it was pointed out to me when I first started editing years ago that only the smallest location is required to categorize a photo. Indeed, having multiple redundant categories is one reason why the category of Santa Cruz de Tenerife (and other categories within Tenerife) is the mess that it is, which is what I have been trying to clean up.

If you believe that I have acted in error, could you please point out to me the relevant policy page which states that having redundant categories is, in fact, encouraged? Best regards, StellarD (talk) 08:35, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi StellarD! You're right! Sorry, I didn't detect the multi-level hierarchy in the categories and so I also didn't check the overcategorization caused by me. I'll correct my error. gruß, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 13:42, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Aussprachedateien

Hallo Frank C. Müller, die Audioaufnahmen sind bisher nur in Category:Lingua Libre pronunciation-deu aufgenommen. Es gibt jedoch auch einen thematisch besser eingebundenen Kategoriezweig, der ebenfalls verwendet werden sollte, siehe Unterkategorien von Category:German pronunciation by grammar. Dort finden sich auch bereits vorhandene Dateien, die nicht unbedingt gedoppelt werden müssen. Eine Einbindung als Audiodatei halte ich ansonsten zunächst im Wiktionary für sinnvoll, dann in Artikeln fremdsprachiger Wikis zu deutschen Begriffen bzw. Namen. In der de.wp würde ich persönlich Aussprachedateien nur in Zweifelsfällen einbauen, wo du die Aussprache z. B. eines Ortsnamens besser kennst als der Durchschnittsleser. de:Neckarsulm wäre vielleicht so ein Fall. Gruß, --Sitacuisses (talk) 15:23, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Sitacuisses!

Danke für die Anregungen!

Die zusätzlichen Kategorien in Commons sind mir bekannt. Danke! Derzeit warte ich zuerst mal darauf, dass die mit Lingua Libre gewonnenen Dateien passend einsortiert werden (DEFAULTSORT); siehe Lingua Libre Chat room.

Einige Einträge in den deutschsprachigen Wiktionary habe ich schon zu Fuß ausprobiert; das Gros sollte aber demnächst per Lingua-Libre-Bot automatisch eingetragen werden; in der Testphase läuft das aber zuerst mal nur im frankophonen Wiktionary.

Die Einträge in die Wikipedia mache ich nicht nur in Zweifelsfällen für geübte deutschsprachige Nutzer, sondern vor allem auch im Hinblick Leser, die des Deutschen nicht so mächtig sind. Ich selbst bin z. B., wenn ich in für mich fremdsprachigen Wikipedien etwas nachschlage, umgekehrt oft auch dankbar, wenn ich dort Aussprachehinweise erhalte.

gruß, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 15:55, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Beim letzten Punkt gehe nicht ganz konform, denn für andersprachige Leser gibt es ja in der Wikiwelt die anderssprachigen Wikis, die sich alle jeweils an Leser der eigenen Sprache richten, und für sprachliche Fragen alleine gibt es das Wiktionary. Aber das sollte man grundsätzlich in einem größerem Rahmen besprechen. --Sitacuisses (talk) 16:40, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Piassavabesen 5 fcm.jpg

File:Piassavabesen 5 fcm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Christian Ude (talk) 21:56, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Frank C. Müller,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Frank C. Müller,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Frank C. Müller,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:07, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Question about Nahwikt

Hi Frank, I came across an extremely large deletion backlog on nahwiktionary, mainly due to one user mass tagging templates for deletion. I do not understand nah language but I was wondering if you know why this is and whether or not it is valid? It seems rather disruptive given it would cause the deletion of almost 3000 pages. Thanks! Praxidicae (talk) 14:33, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi Praxidicae! I know the problem roughly, but I don't really know, what to do. I know the user, he is a bit special, but I don't understand his concept of making a nahuatl-wiktionary. ‎Marrovi is only one person, and so there is no mechanism of mutual control. I am helpless! gruß, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 14:45, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Well I've asked on their talk page why they are continuing to mass tag templates and pages, it appears a lot of others have too and it has resulted in 6 indefinite blocks on other projects. I think an indefinite block would be appropriate until they respond to three questions: 1.) why are they tagging so many templates for deletion 2.) why are they tagging so many articles for deletion without any explanation and 3.) what they are trying to accomplish. I can do this or it can be a partial indefinite block from namespace and template space.

I am also concerned because with nearly 3000 pages up for deletion, that is almost half of the entire project and I cannot imagine a situation in which this wouldn't require broader community input or would be appropriate. Praxidicae (talk) 14:53, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Therefore I decided for me, not to delete anything, until the situation is clearer. gruß, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 14:59, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Schraubenkopfantriebe

Hallo Frank C. Müller,

für Diesen Artikel habe ich nahezu alle Grafiken auf das gewünschte Format angepasst beziehungsweise neu erstellt. Ausgabedatei ist jeweils eine .jpg Datei mit 900*900 Pixeln. Auf meinem Lokalen Verzeichnis werden alle Farben korrekt dargestellt. Im Vergleich mit der Beispieldatei der Schlitzschraube zu den von mir erstellten Dateien stimmen die Farbwerte miteinander überein. Jedoch nach dem Upload einer Datei verwandelt sich "weiß" (R255 G255 B255 / #FFFFFF ) in einen Grauton um - Suboptimal.

Würde gern wissen, ob das Problem bei Ihnen auch aufgetreten ist und ob es dafür einen bewährten Lösungsweg gibt.

Vielen Dank & Gruß — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chillimind12 (talk • contribs) 13:37, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Chillimind12!

Welches ist "das gewünschte Format"? Ich habe mir die von die erstellte Grafik File:Phillips Screwhead.jpg angeschaut und sehe keine Besonderheiten. Kannst Du mir ein konkretes Beispiel benennen, bei dem der Fehler auftritt?

gruß, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 15:51, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Simon Höneß 01 (fcm).jpg

File:Simon Höneß 01 (fcm).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2003:F6:2707:2C00:DD55:76B5:2F6E:368E 21:40, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Leo Nebelsiek.jpg

Copyright status: File:Leo Nebelsiek.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Leo Nebelsiek.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Tonaufnahmen Hilfe

Guten Abend Sind sie möglicherweise in der Lage, mir zu erklären, wie sie Tonaufnahmen auf Wikimedia Commons hochladen. Ich weiß es selbst nämlich nicht. Besten Dank im Voraus. --Geoprofi Lars (talk) 18:23, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Geoprofi Lars! Ich benutze die Seite Special:Upload und lade die Audios als Dateien hoch, ganz ähnlich wie Fotos. gruß, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 12:13, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Danke :)--Geoprofi Lars (talk) 12:40, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Corinna Danzer (fcm).jpg

File:Corinna Danzer (fcm).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:908:1C0:5900:D5FA:91AB:7494:53F 20:58, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Nominating redirects for speedy deletion

Hi, Frank! If you nominate redirects for speedy deletion, then please add speedy template before redirect, not after. When the template is situated after redirect, then wiki software shows, like you want to delete whole file. Experience is needed to understand, that only redirect must be deleted. Taivo (talk) 12:05, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi Taivo! Thanks for the hint. I hope, next time I'll still remember it! ;-) gruß, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 12:18, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Santa Cruz Auditorio mit Baum fcm.jpg

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 03:58, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Santa Cruz Statue der Sophia Vari vorm Auditorio fcm.jpg

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 04:14, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Oberhofenkirche 39 (fcm).jpg

File:Oberhofenkirche 39 (fcm).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 17:09, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

---

Hi Frank C. Müller, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Raymond (talk) 17:40, 23 April 2024 (UTC)