User talk:Gamemaster669

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Gamemaster669!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:59, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:SBB - Cafe bottom floor.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:SBB - Cafe bottom floor.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

odder (talk) 09:23, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

  • The picture seems to be released under the CC-BY-ND license, which is not acceptable on Commons. The only way forward that I can see now is to try to convince the Flickr uploader to change the license to one that allows creation of derivative works, such as CC-BY or CC-BY-SA. odder (talk) 09:26, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

File:SBB - Cafe bottom floor.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:SBB - Cafe bottom floor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 20:24, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

This File is Original taken from this Link: File on flickr and its tagged with (CC BY-ND 2.0). This was a misfortune and the file can be deleted immediately. Gamemaster669 (talk) 04:17, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Mountain station of the Plaine Morte.JPGEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mountain station of the Plaine Morte.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 05:32, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

KategorisierungenEdit

Hallo, du bist ja ziemlich aktiv bei der Kategorisierung. Ich bin allerdings nicht sicher, ob da alles verstehst was du tust. Hast du Commons:Categories bzw. Commons:Kategorien gelesen? Hast du dir Gedanken darüber gemacht, in welchem Verhältnis deine Category:Rhine Valley zur Category:Rhine stehen soll? Ist dir klar, wann eine Kategorie eine Unterkategorie einer anderen sein kann? Hast du dir Gedanken über richtige Namen und sytematische Einbindung bei neu angelegten Kategorien gemacht und das evtl. mit erfahreneren Benutzern abgestimmt? Ich finde auf Anhieb soviel Murks in deinen letzten Änderungen, dass ich es kaum alles aufzählen kann. Bitte mach etwas langsamer, lies dich ein und stimme Ergänzungen mit dem vorhandenen System ab. --Sitacuisses (talk) 15:59, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Hallo, habe ich gelesen. Und ja ich weiss nicht immer ganz genau was ich tue, wer weiss das schon ? Aber ich lerne schnell. Was ich noch nicht hundert Prozentig verstanden habe ist wie die Meta-Kategorien zusammenspielen. Ich werd bestimm noch herausfinden. einige der Kategorien die ich erstell habe, werde ich in der nächsten zeit mit einer SLA versehen, sie waren nur zum testen ob was funzt oder nicht. Gamemaster669 (talk) 04:52, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Du solltest zudem beachten, dass Kategorien auf Commons in der Regel in englischer Sprache verfasst werden. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 01:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Gamemaster669, das Bild Kaplaneyhus Berneck kann in der Category:Berneck bleiben, obwohl es über die Category:Katholische Kirche Unserer Lieben Frau (Berneck) bereits in dieser drinnen ist, da das Bild ein Haus in Berneck zeigt und nicht die Kirche (zu der es aber einen gewissen Bezug gibt). Hingegen macht es keinen Sinn, dass die Kategorie Katholische Kirche Unserer Lieben Frau (Berneck) auch in der Kategorie Berneck ist, weil sie sich über die Category:Cultural properties of regional significance in Berneck bereits in der Oberkategorie Berneck befindet > vgl. Kategoriestruktur Gruss --Schofför (talk) 19:11, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Schofför, da möchte ich doch widersprechen, obwohl das manchmal so gehandhabt wird wie du es beschreibst. Für Gebäude gibt es jedoch gewöhnlich eine Kategorie "Buildings in ..."
Category:Cultural properties of regional significance in Berneck ist eigentlich eine Unterkategorie von "Culture of ..." und bezieht sich nicht alleine auf Gebäude. Sie sollte daher parallel zur, in dem Fall noch einzurichtenden, üblichen Gebäude-Kategorie bestehen. Gruss, --Sitacuisses (talk) 20:07, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
So gesehen natürlich richtig und unterdessen auch erledigt. Gruss zurück --Schofför (talk) 23:50, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Haus zum Torggel Berneck.jpegEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Haus zum Torggel Berneck.jpeg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 18:34, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Littenbach zusammenfluss Fallbach Sulzbächli.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Littenbach zusammenfluss Fallbach Sulzbächli.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 18:07, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Category:Katholische_Pfarrkirche_Unserer_Lieben_Frau_(Berneck)Edit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Katholische_Pfarrkirche_Unserer_Lieben_Frau_(Berneck) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Schofför (talk) 23:38, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Katholische Kirche Berneck Ostansicht.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Katholische Kirche Berneck Ostansicht.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 10:05, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Gamemaster669".