User talk:Hannes 24/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Deine Streichorgie
Hallo Hannes 24! Ich weiß nicht, was Deine einseitige (sonst ja nicht) Streichorgie bedeuten soll. Es gibt keinen Grund, warum Du partiell in meinen Bildeingaben, aber sehr zahlreich, bei Wappen gestrichen hast. Auch wenn es einen für mich unerfindlichen Grund geben sollte, hättest Du vorher eine Information bzw. ein Gespräch suchen sollen. So, muss ich sagen, hast Du gewütet wie in der Pampa. Reiner Vandalismus! Da ich weiß, dass Du mir mal geholfen hast, sehe ich von Streitereien ab. Ich ersuche Dich jedoch, von dieser Form des Vorgehens abzusehen. Gruß! --Sacha47 (Diskussion) 22:10, 29. April 2013 (CEST)
- Hallo Sascha47, es gibt einen guten Grund dafür, ich wollte die Übersichtlichkeit dieser Seite erhöhen: Category:Coats_of_arms_of_Austrian_nobility. Durch die Erstellung von Unterkategorien, wird diese Seite übersichtlicher. mfg Hannes_24
- Wie ich gerade sehe, hast du (Sascha47) alle Kategorien wiederhergestellt. Es tut mir leid, für diese Mehrarbeit. Werde es nicht mehr machen. --Hannes 24 (talk) 13:44, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
J_Reiner-Attentat...
Die blöde Vorschau hat das alte Bild (File:J.Reiner - Attentat auf Kaiser Franz Joseph.jpg) gezeigt, und ich dachte ich hab mich vertan. Dabei war es eh richtig. Dann hab ich das selbe Bild nochmals hochgeladen. Eine Vorschaufunktion wär halt super ;-) --Hannes 24 (talk) 10:47, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 05:31, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Carl Thomas Mozart framed 2.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Carl Thomas Mozart framed 2.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:27, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
- Ich habe nur eine bestehende Datei (sogar genannt) bearbeitet. Bei den REchten kenn ich mich nicht wirklich gut aus;-) --Hannes 24 (talk) 17:53, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:BSB Ci 313 50v Reichlin A.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:BSB Ci 313 50v Reichlin A.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Copyright status: File:Andrea Franchi.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Andrea Franchi.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 17:37, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- Frust, wozu tut man sich die Arbeit an? --Hannes 24 (talk) 16:43, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:COA Bakalarz Zakos.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:COA Bakalarz Zakos.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Hilfen
Category redirect|neuername
{de|name (weiterenamen), Augsburger Patriziergeschlecht.}}
Category:Coats of arms of families of Germany - L|Lauinger Category:Coats of arms from Augsburg|Lauinger
(edited by Hannes_24)
Copyright status: File:COA Locatelli - Tyroff AT.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:COA Locatelli - Tyroff AT.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:18, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
Wonderful holidays
Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! --Tremonist (talk) 16:14, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:COA Trautson.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:COA Trautson.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:12, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Yesterday I was kicked out of the system/lost the connection several times, therefore I couldn´t finish the work. bw --Hannes 24 (talk) 18:45, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Welcome, Dear Filemover!
Hi Hannes 24, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:
- Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
- Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
- Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.
Image without license
File:COA Harrucker.png
This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 19:06, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- aus meiner Sicht erledigt. Now CC-BY-SA 3.0 (same as original). --Hannes 24 (talk) 19:14, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Image without license
File:Amb 279.2 fol 67 r Landauer I.png
This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 10:33, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:COA Knappitsch kl.png
Copyright status: File:COA Knappitsch kl.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:COA Knappitsch kl.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Copyright status: File:COA Knappitsch.png
Copyright status: File:COA Knappitsch.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:COA Knappitsch.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Important message for file movers
A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect
user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect
user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:COA Randegg Lichteneck Neidlingen.jpg
Copyright status: File:COA Randegg Lichteneck Neidlingen.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:COA Randegg Lichteneck Neidlingen.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
File:COA Büllich sw.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Bakoori.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 18:35, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Hilfe
Hallo bester Hannes!
Auf Commons habe ich in den letzten Jahren einiges im Bereich der Kategorien gemacht. Das wird hier völlig anders gehandhabt, als es in de üblich ist. Bei Bildern bzw. Medien bieten sich fast immer Mehrfachzuordnungen an; es gibt auf Commons eher wenige Kategorien die "sortenrein" sind. Worauf allerdings hier geachtet werden sollte, ist die Einbindung und Angleichung mit bereits bestehenden Strukturen auch höherer Ebenen. Ein Kategorieprojekt wie bei de: gibt es hier nicht, die meisten die hier an Kats werkeln sind eh alte Hasen was das angeht. Einige Besonderheiten finden sich mit den ziemlich raffinierten Infobox-Verknüpfungen der Kategorien, die es so in de: (leider) nicht gibt. Der "Super-Experte" bin ich allerdings auch nicht dazu. Meist schaue ich mir Beispiele an, die so sind wie ich es gut finde, prüfe auf Parallelstrukturen und beginne dann etwas zu machen. Viel zu tun gibt es hier auf jeden Fall, weil etliche Schätze in den Dateien mangels sinnvoller Zuordnungen einfach nicht auffindbar sind. Das kann aber auch zum Lebenswerk ausarten, daher beschränke ich mich hier auf gelegentliche Ad-hoc-Aktionen. Vielleicht können wir uns bei Gelegenheit gegenseitig helfen? Grüße --Tom (talk) 09:26, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Ich hab zu commons noch eine grü0ere Distanz als zu de:wp; dort bin ich draussen. De facto hier auch, ich spende jetzt meine (Frei)zeit anderen Projekten. Viel Glück --Hannes 24 (talk) 19:09, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Grabstein Hadmar von Laaber 1412.png
Copyright status: File:Grabstein Hadmar von Laaber 1412.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Grabstein Hadmar von Laaber 1412.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Reminder
Hi Hannes 24. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request, omitting transclusion and the subpage. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy or the "By hand" portion of COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 20:43, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I did not want to delete that, i want to hold it. Could you solve this and delete the delete request. The file was uploaded from someone, i transformed it only. The rights are the same as the original. (Sorry for my brocken English) Thank you, --Hannes 24 (talk) 08:43, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- I don't know what file you are referring to, but I removed the deletion request from Category:Koelnpoeck family in this edit. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 21:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- sorry, i was talking about File:Grabstein Hadmar von Laaber 1412.png and the license of that.
- the Koelnpoeck had different kind of writting see Category:Köllnbach family. I changed the Category and all files, therefore imho the old Category:Koelnpoeck family could be deleted? --Hannes 24 (talk) 10:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- I don't know what file you are referring to, but I removed the deletion request from Category:Koelnpoeck family in this edit. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 21:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Coats of arms of Berg (Kattentack) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |