Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Hurkonides!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:26, 14 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Piet Kramer - Oberman.jpg

edit
 
File:Piet Kramer - Oberman.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Velocitas (talk) 15:58, 28 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

Copyright status: File:VMF 016-0 038.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:VMF 016-0 038.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:06, 28 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please stop reuploading the same file without permission

edit

Hi, please stop reuploading the same file without permission (copyright violation). For details see the closing comment in the deletion request: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Piet Kramer - Oberman.jpg

Affected files:

--Wdwd (talk) 13:13, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

I reuploaded the file because there is no copyright violation. The picture is the property of the Verzetsmuseum in Leeuwarden, and the photographer is unknown. The same picture was used in my book without violating any copyright. so this is just nonsense what is happening here. Hurkonides (talk) 13:36, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:PietOberman02.jpg

edit
 
File:PietOberman02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Erik Wannee (talk) 13:51, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

I have explained this a thousand times and I am getting fed up. So one last time, Verzetsmuseum Leeuwarden has a collection of pictures which was taken in 1945 for a specific book and of which the photographer is unknown. I used them in my book in 2019 and these pictures have been used a thousand times. We are free to use them, but people here don't seem to understand. If this picture is taken away again, I will stop my work on Wikipedia. Hurkonides (talk) 14:00, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hi Hurkonides, sorry to disturb again about the photo. You wrote this picture was made in 1945 for a specific book. Can you show in which book this photo was published shortly after WWII? Could you please respond here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:PietOberman02.jpg. Thanks, Ellywa (talk) 21:44, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Oberman2.jpg

edit
 
File:Oberman2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:23, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Volie.jpg

edit
 
File:Volie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hoyanova (talk) 05:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply