Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, ITZQing!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 09:35, 21 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Odesa renames

edit

Thanks for your hard work in identifying these files to be renamed! --DannyS712 (talk) 06:12, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

@DannyS712 and ITZQing: Well, but Odessa is not wrong spelling, it is alternative spelling. If you open en:Odesa, you can read: Odesa (also spelled Odessa), so it is not obvious error and it does not fall under FR p.3, but falls under COM:FRNOT, p.1,2. So it should NOT be renamed.--Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 13:14, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hello, I checked and it doesn't meet criteria to decline the rename. The source I gave explains why it should be renamed. And thank you for reminding me that this is an issue that should be discussed. ITZQing (talk) 14:34, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
"Odessa" is a historical name spelling. After the Ukrainian government revise the city's English name, it should be slowly replaced, such as Vilnius' historical spelling "Vilna (Вильна)". However, due to the influence of the former Soviet Union and the increase in the number of non-Ukrainian cities with the same spelling at that time (also an influence of the former Soviet Union), this revision has been very slowly carried into modern times. I think this is an issue we should all pay attention to. ITZQing (talk) 14:49, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
No, it should not. Commons is multilingual project. We should not name only in Ukrainian. It may be any language.--Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 14:59, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
If you know Russian and Ukrainian, you should know that the transliteration is not like this (for example, the Russian transliteration of Odesa Oblast is Odesskaya oblast' and the Ukrainian transliteration is "Odeska oblast". We are talking about English spelling, as for other languages, we should not interfere. ITZQing (talk) 15:08, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
For example, if this example is true, then a file named "Odesa qizhi of the East-West Museum of Odesa Oblast.svg" can also be true.You can state that qizhi (lit.: flag) is Chinese. This can cause great confusion, and we should be careful about language distinctions. ITZQing (talk) 15:23, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Other language is not reason for renaming, see COM:FRNOT, p.2.--Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 17:40, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yes, because this file is named in English, the English spelling is important. ITZQing (talk) 17:52, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
there's no reason to favor English over other languages.--Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 17:53, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
I think you misunderstood. What I meant to say is that the file name I applied to change is basically spelled in English. If it is not in English, then I will not edit it (unless there are other obvious errors). ITZQing (talk) 17:59, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
But in English it is not obvious error. It is a bit better - COM:FRNOT, p.1.--Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 18:00, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
As I said, many places in modern times are called "Odessa", but Odesa, Ukraine is only spelled this way in English for historical reasons. I think changing to Odesa is also consistent with com:FNC"Only information is the location (broad)". ITZQing (talk) 18:14, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
And regarding how to identify "obvious error", in a city, if the government announces modern spellings, then the modern spellings are correct, and the historical spellings are "obvious error", such as Beijing and Peking. This is especially true if the "brand" follows suit. (Leave it as is without following). And the part about history, a historical object, using words to describe things in the present, should use modern spelling, like "We should not Old English spelling into the text of modern published 'Shakespeare Collected Works', even if it is Original spelling". ITZQing (talk) 18:32, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
This "also spelled Odessa" is to help those who do not know the new spelling (such as most intellectuals in the former Soviet Union) find the correct location, and to prevent other cities such as "Odessa, Texas" and "Odessa, Delaware" from being mistaken for Odesa, Ukraine. . I think it should exist because it's "knowledge", but that doesn't excuse the old spelling from being the main spelling. ITZQing (talk) 15:03, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Name of image should not be disambiguate. It is also not reason for renaming.--Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 17:40, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

Copyright status: File:Chechen Alphabet (Italic) From Children's Book.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Chechen Alphabet (Italic) From Children's Book.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 14:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply