Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Lamberto99!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:51, 14 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Stellantis-blue.svg edit

Copyright status: File:Stellantis-blue.svg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Stellantis-blue.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:05, 30 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Corone edit

Ciao, non puoi sovrascrivere i file già esistenti con un'immagine diversa. Devi procedere facendo l'upload di file nuovi con nome nuovo, senza sovrascrivere il lavoro degli altri. --RiccardoP1983 (talk) 11:45, 28 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

San Vito stemma edit

Ciao, ho visto che hai caricato File:Stemma-SanVito.svg. Ci sono alcune cosette da sistemare secondo me ed è bene che tu le conosca se vuoi continuare a creare stemmi in SVG su Commons per it.wiki.

  • Vanno aggiunte le categorie specifiche all'araldica (vedi ad esempio quelle che ho aggiunto io)
  • Andrebbero indicati i file SVG che hai utilizzato per realizzare lo stemma (per non essere accusato di copyviol)
  • Le convenzioni dello stemma dicono che il nome deve essere <Comune-Stemma.svg> altrimenti diventa complesso l'inserimento automatico dello stemma (guarda i nomi dei file in SVG coats of arms of municipalities of Italy ad esempio)
  • Poi andrebbe usato il template {{COAInformation}}, se vuoi fare le cose per bene (e magari altri template di avviso sulla blasonatura, ma è secondario)

Se sei interessato, ti invito a riferirti ad un file di esempio con le cose messe in ordine, come Albignasego-Stemma.svg. Ciao e buona continuazione! --Ruthven (msg) 14:05, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Disegno99.svg edit

 
File:Disegno99.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Grasso Luigi (talk) 15:47, 14 November 2022 (UTC)Reply