Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Madfly2!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:31, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Elizabeth II & Philip after coronation (Elizabeth II sitting).webp has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Not a government work, not appears in the Royal Collection with a clearly claim that this specific photograph was commissioned by the Royal Family (which would made it eligible to be PD-UK-Gov), but instead, a copy of the same photo appears in the National Portrait Gallery with a copyright notice to V&A Images, the Victoria & Albert Museum). Also there is no evidence in the original source that corroborates that this specific photo is PD-UK-Gov. Unless evidence is provided, this file may be considered a copyvio and deleted according with the precautionary principle. However, this file could be undeleted in 2051, when 70 years from Beaton's death had been passed.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

81.41.172.147 12:25, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

The image is clearly an official portrait, with the National Portait Gallery page describing it as a "coronation sitting". Beaton was an official photographer for the coronation, as noted here. Therefore, it was commissioned by the royal family (i.e. the Crown), so the copyright belonged to them. As per COM:CROWN, Crown copyright photopgraphs created prior to 1957 became public domain after 50 years, which was in 2003 for this image. The Canadian Government identifies an almost identical image as copyright expired. Please see this discussion on a similar portrait by the same photographer. Madfly2 (talk) 14:00, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
File:Elizabeth II & Philip after coronation (Elizabeth II sitting).webp has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

King of ♥ 23:40, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply