This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Benoit_Soubeyran.

This is the user talk page of Benoit Soubeyran, where you can send messages and comments to Benoit Soubeyran.

  • Be polite.
  • Be friendly.
  • Assume good faith.
  • No personal attacks.
  • Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
  • Put new text under old text.
  • New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
  • Click here to start a new topic.

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2018-09-30 Studium Theologicum Salesianum by Benoit Soubeyran (43268207400).jpg edit

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
 
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2018-09-30 Studium Theologicum Salesianum by Benoit Soubeyran (43268207400).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jonteemil (talk) 15:59, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Kalevi Kull edit

Hi, Mazuritz. You moved Category:Kalevi Kull from Wikipedians of Estonia to Wikimedians of Estonia, but did he stop being a Wikipedian (if he ever was one) and where is his User page on Commons or rather: how do you know Kull is a Wikimedian? Greetings, Eissink (talk) 17:09, 24 March 2020 (UTC).Reply

Hi Eissink
This category Wikimedians of Estonia by name doesn't aim to exclude the Wikipedians of Estonia. On the contrary, it aims to include all contributors to Wikimedia projects. Its seems better to use Wikipedians in Estonia as a user category and Wikimedians of Estonia by name with categories of people. Best wishes, Mazuritz (talk) 18:56, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
A Wikimedian to me (and I guess that is also what the Category is for) is someone who actively participates on Wikimedia Commons, not someone whose picture is stored on Wikimedia Commons. Are you saying that Kalevi Kull is an active contributor to Wikimedia Commons, or not? If not, he should not be in that Category. Best wishes to you too, Eissink (talk) 19:03, 25 March 2020 (UTC).Reply
For me, Wikipedians are included in Wikimedians. But I can change for Category:Kalevi Kull if you prefer. --Mazuritz (talk) 20:18, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
To me, and to many others I think, it is not the same Category. There are many people on Wikipedia who have never contributed to Wikimedia Commons. It's not one and the same. Only question I have now, is whether Kull indeed participated on Wikipedia, but I know that someone else made that categorization. Thanks, Eissink (talk) 20:23, 25 March 2020 (UTC).Reply

Copyright status: File:Logo DUMAS.jpg edit

Copyright status: File:Logo DUMAS.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Logo DUMAS.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 09:41, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi JuTa,
Thanks for this information. I contacted the administator of the open repository DUMAS. The license of this logo is correcty Creative Commons. We are sending this information to the OTRS team. Best wishes, --Mazuritz (talk) 16:09, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Coriandre 2015.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Coriandre 2015.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Coriandre 2015.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ytoyoda (talk) 13:49, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Ikumi nakamura by mantisshrimpp dd91ltc-200h.jpg edit

 
File:Ikumi nakamura by mantisshrimpp dd91ltc-200h.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : TarkusAB.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 17:40, 12 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Ikumi nakamura by mantisshrimpp dd91ltc-200h.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ikumi nakamura by mantisshrimpp dd91ltc-200h.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ikumi nakamura by mantisshrimpp dd91ltc-200h.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

King of ♥ 01:03, 13 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Julie Lemieux et Julie Lemieux edit

Bonjour, Julie Lemieux, journaliste, responsable de la culture et conseillère municipale de 2009 à 2017 de Québec, capitale nationale et ville d'un demi-million de personnes, directrice régionale de Radio-Canada, et Julie Lemieux, ébéniste et mairesse depuis 2017 de Très-Saint-Rédempteur, municipalité de 1000 personnes en Montérégie, sont deux personnes différentes bien qu'ayant des noms identiques. La première est plus connue mais n'a pas d'article sur Wikipédia. La seconde a un article sur Wikipédia. Toutes les photos que vous avez groupées dans la catégorie «Category:Julie Lemieux» sur Commons sont des photos de Julie Lemieux de Québec. J'ai donc ajusté la page de cette catégorie en conséquence. Il faudrait toutefois aussi enlever les éditions qui confondent ces deux personnes sur Wikidata, Wikipédia ou ailleurs. Je ne sais pas exactement les endroits où vous en avez ajouté, donc ce serait apprécié si vous vous pouviez vous charger de les révoquer. Merci d'avance. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:44, 9 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour Asclepias, merci pour ce signalement, j'ai créé l'élément wikidata Q115154310 pour Julie Lemieux (journaliste), créé la page d'homonymie sur Commons Category:Julie Lemieux, et fait diverses mises à jour mineures pour éviter la confusion entre les différentes Julie Lemieux, Bien à vous Benoit Soubeyran (talk) 10:49, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Social_and_solidarity_economy edit

 

Social and solidarity economy has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


JopkeB (talk) 10:47, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply