User talk:NickK/Archive/2018
(2017 | current | archives | 2019)
File:Kremenets Shevchenko.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
editHello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.
Thank you!
Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
editEvery response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.
If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
editHello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.
Hello there! Please check your mail and reply to a letter with a topic WLE international (rules). We need to finalize them before the contests starts. Thank you! --アンタナナ 18:37, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
- Done, answered, thanks — NickK (talk) 18:55, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jarash (talk) 12:04, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Torez vs. Chystiakove and Krasnodon vs. Sorokyne has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Вікі любить пам'ятки 2018 в Україні
editВітаємо!
1 вересня вже традиційно стартувала українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! До 30 вересня включно Ви можете подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Цього року є трохи змін у правилах конкурсу:
- фотографії пам'яток, для яких на момент початку конкурсу (відповідно до відомої Організаційному комітету інформації) не було жодної ілюстрації на Вікісховищі або у Вікіпедії, отримують коефіцієнт рівний 7 (для кожної пам'ятки);
- фотографії автоматично вантажаться у категорію, яка бере учать у номінації за найбільшу кількість сфотографованих об'єктів, для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації за найкраще фото потрібно вибрати необхідні налаштування у завантажувачі.
Також у конкурсі є спецномінація банерів для статей у Вікімандрах, детальніше за посиланням.
Приєднуйтеся! Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться у блозі конкурсу. Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlm wikimedia.org.ua – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» 22:33, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, B dash (talk) 10:11, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Ще 4 дні до завершення «Вікі любить пам'ятки»
editПривіт!
Наш цьогорічний конкурс добігає свого кінця — залишилося ще 4 дні. Проміжні підсумки конкурсу опубліковано на сайті. У нас зараз понад 13500 світлин, і це значить, що Україна посідає четверте місце, поступаючись Росії (23 тисячі), Німеччині (21 тисяча) та Італії (19 тисяч). Загалом, понад 200 учасників цього року уже. Дякуємо, що вантажили фото у попередні роки, якщо б Вам захотілося ще взяти участь цього року, то може бути корисно переглянути цей пост із покроковою інструкцією як вантажити світлини: «Як подати свою роботу на конкурс». Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Цього року у конкурсі також є ще одна спеціальні номінація — «Єврейська спадщина». Детальніше про неї можна прочитати за посиланням.
Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться у блозі конкурсу. Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlm wikimedia.org.ua – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки».21:07, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Crimean status referendum Ballot boxes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File tagging File:Ruslan Koshulynskyi.jpg
editThis media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Ruslan Koshulynskyi.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:54, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
- I agree Ruslan should be kept, but generally speaking you should know that reviewing your own uploads is quite heavily frowned upon. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:59, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Is it written somewhere? I thought that as a license reviewer I am reducing workload for others, as they will not have to review each and every my upload. Doesn't it work this way? — NickK (talk) 11:00, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not sure, but it may not be written anywhere. I do recall Majora recently calling it a terrible sin, or something along those lines. Review the licenses for files from others and let them review yours.. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:10, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- My bad, it is written: Please note that as of 21 February 2012, image-reviewers may not review their own uploads unless the account is an approved bot. This ensures that at least two individuals, or one individual and a bot, have checked that the license choice is correct. Reviews by image-reviewers on their own uploads will be considered invalid.
- What else have you self-reviewed? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:17, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Oops, did not know that. I received these rights long ago (2011 I think), and I was never informed of this change. I think I self-reviewed thousands of files... — NickK (talk) 11:37, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Are you going to put VFC to work or will you wait for me to do it? (I'd rather you do it.. I'm busy enough as it is) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:40, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: To be very honest, I don't think this will work. Most of my self-reviews are Picasa or Panoramio (both dead, new review nearly impossible), some are YouTube screenshots (some videos are deleted but many are still alive, will take a lot of time but in most cases feasible), and almost none are Flickr where a bot can do it. I am very surprised nobody informed me so far, I have literally done this for years without anyone telling me I was wrong, thus I was completely sure I was doing the right thing! I will do some quick analysis and will probably write on the Village pump or somewhere to ask on what to do, perhaps this evening or early next week — NickK (talk) 11:46, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Works for me. Somehow a lot of reviewers seem to be unaware of this. A VP thread will also help to increase awareness. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:51, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: OK, wrote at Commons:Village pump, thanks — NickK (talk) 16:42, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Works for me. Somehow a lot of reviewers seem to be unaware of this. A VP thread will also help to increase awareness. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:51, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: To be very honest, I don't think this will work. Most of my self-reviews are Picasa or Panoramio (both dead, new review nearly impossible), some are YouTube screenshots (some videos are deleted but many are still alive, will take a lot of time but in most cases feasible), and almost none are Flickr where a bot can do it. I am very surprised nobody informed me so far, I have literally done this for years without anyone telling me I was wrong, thus I was completely sure I was doing the right thing! I will do some quick analysis and will probably write on the Village pump or somewhere to ask on what to do, perhaps this evening or early next week — NickK (talk) 11:46, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Are you going to put VFC to work or will you wait for me to do it? (I'd rather you do it.. I'm busy enough as it is) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:40, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Oops, did not know that. I received these rights long ago (2011 I think), and I was never informed of this change. I think I self-reviewed thousands of files... — NickK (talk) 11:37, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Is it written somewhere? I thought that as a license reviewer I am reducing workload for others, as they will not have to review each and every my upload. Doesn't it work this way? — NickK (talk) 11:00, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Flag of Zabolottia (Liuboml).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Kutuzov2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
File:Kostyantyn Morozov.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|