Open main menu

Wikimedia Commons β

User talk:Ruslik0

Image:Uranium rings scheme.pngEdit

Should be "Uranian", not Uranium... AnonMoos 16:52, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Portrait of Jupiter from Cassini.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Portrait of Jupiter from Cassini.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

--Simonizer (talk) 09:33, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

FP promotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Mercury in color - Prockter07 centered.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Mercury in color - Prockter07 centered.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

--Simonizer (talk) 16:50, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Patroller and/or Rollbacker ?Edit

Hi Ruslik0,

I've seen some of your edits and see that you are also active in Undo'ing bad edits. If you are interested, I would like you to request the Patroller right and/or the Rollback right. By then marking the edits you have undone as [patrolled], you save us 1 additional edit to check. Since you're a trusted user on English Wikipedia you can simply leave a message here and it will be taken care of shortly. –Krinkletalk 12:02, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, I will probably apply. Ruslik (talk) 13:09, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Redirected categoryEdit

Why? - dcljr (talk) 10:46, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

It contained only one article as I remember, so I decided to redirect it. You can reinstate the category if you want. Ruslik (talk) 16:43, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
The one file you saw was just because there's only one NGC object in the range 1 to 100 that's classified as a planetary nebula, and that's as far as I've gotten working on "fully" describing and categorizing (example) the NGC objects by number, location and type. (Obviously most of the work will require a bot; I haven't figured out exactly how I'm going to do it, though, as the vast majority of the NGC objects don't actually have any files here.) Trust me, there will be more going into all of the by-type subcategories. The category has been resurrected. Thanks for the explanation. - dcljr (talk) 00:55, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Why the dupes in that direction?Edit

There has been a number of star photos, where you have favoured the duplication in the favour of the new photo over the long existing photo with all the links. I am not sure why you are favouring that direction? Especially not understanding that thought in lieu of the extra work involved.  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:30, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

New photos are often have better names and descriptions. Ruslik (talk) 13:01, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

{{Bian}}Edit

Hi Ruslik. I hope you don't mind me asking more about this here, but I'd rather sound like a dummy on a talkpage than VP. ;) Where do I put {{subst:CURRENTMONTH}} and {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}? In the bian template? INeverCry 18:18, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

You should replace the month and year, respectively, with them in the template. And then use {{subst:bain}} when you want to put this template on a talk page. Ruslik (talk) 06:51, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
I did this, but I get this red-link category? INeverCry 17:58, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
In this case use January. Ruslik (talk) 07:32, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

file deletionEdit

Dear Ruslik0,

I noticed a mistake in your's uploaded file (image:Voyager 2 picture of Oberon mod.jpg) and made a correct version (image:Oberon-NASA names en.png). So, I nominated the first file for deletion. Stas000D (talk) 00:15, 9 April 2013 (UTC)


File:Voyager 2 picture of Oberon mod.jpgEdit

  File:Voyager 2 picture of Oberon mod.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stas000D (talk) 00:15, 9 April 2013 (UTC)


  Hello, Ruslik0. You have new messages at Hedwig in Washington's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Notification about possible deletionEdit

  Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:46, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

???????Edit

[1], just why? -- RTA 20:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Because it was floating over your text hiding it. Ruslik (talk) 20:20, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
In it browser? -- RTA 20:30, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
In Chrome. Ruslik (talk) 20:00, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

thanksEdit

thanks for helping me with the pageanalysis tool :) Rebecaluvsbirds (talk) 05:18, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Rebecaluvsbirds

No machine-readable source providedEdit

Hi Ruslik. Thank you for your help at COm:VP/C#File:Therese.delisieux.jpg and File:Marthe.robin.jpg. I've got another question about two similar files. File:Miss Univers 2001.JPG and File:Denise Quinones.png were both uploaded as {{self}}, but they also appear to be scans and list the source and author as "No machine-readable source provided". Do you think these should be tagged with {{No permission since}}? -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:41, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I think so. Ruslik (talk) 16:07, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for checking. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:22, 26 November 2016 (UTC)


Raul E Escribano photosEdit

Hi Ruslik. You helped me out at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/11#File:Raul E Escribano.jpg‎, so I am wondering what (if anything) should be done about File:Escribano flag casing.jpg , File:Escribano CoC.jpg and File:LTC Raul Escribano.jpg. Same uploader whose claiming them as "own work". There's no EXIF data for any of the files, and I can't find them online. Do you think these are OK as is? -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:13, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

They are not obvious scans but may qualify under {{PD-USGov-Military}}. Ruslik (talk) 17:17, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for checking. I will post something on the uploader's user talk and ask them to clarify. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:18, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi again Ruslik. I posted something on the uploader's talk page and they responded. Would you mind taking a look at User talk:Marchjuly#Raul Escribano Image when you have some time? Thanks. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:05, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

File:BIO.pngEdit

Hi Ruslik0,

sorry for removing the categories. I had to figure out the exact topic of the file, which is endosymbiosis. "Bacteria" and "Symbiosis" was just a tagging. Greetings, Sascha GPD (talk) 21:48, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

SaturnEdit

Why did you delete my changes? You have a problem with the multilingual? --77.132.127.102 18:52, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

I do not have a problem multilingual (What is it?) but I have problems with misleading edit summaries. Ruslik (talk) 19:30, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Phylloscopus trochilusEdit

Hi, I'm sorry, but It is Phylloscopus BONELLI ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kookaburra 81 (talk • contribs) 16:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

VirusesEdit

Hello Ruslik0
I have seen you do some changes in Category:Bunyavirales
Maybee I can help you with those.
Which source do you want to follow ?
Best regards Liné1 (talk) 06:38, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

@Liné1: I do not understand why you reinstated Bunyaviridae category? The family does not exist any more (more precisely it was renamed to Peribunyaviridae). Ruslik (talk) 18:59, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Sadly, nothing is as simple.
Renaming a taxon is done by a taxonomist and has to be accepted by the community.
Some sources/authors still recognize Bunyaviridae (See Bunyaviridae wikidata links).
That is the reason of my previous question "Which source do you want to follow ?"
I don't mind following any source if we can provide it {{Taxa}}, {{Genera}} ...
I will even enforce this source for you.
Best regards 11:57, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
I am not sure that any sources "recognize Bunyaviridae". They are simply too slow to update. The only authoritative source is ictv. Ruslik (talk) 20:11, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Ruslik0".