Open main menu

Contents

Welcome!Edit

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Skyllfully!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:00, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 October 2015Edit

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

File:It's Monday.jpgEdit

 
File:It's Monday.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

4ing (talk) 21:56, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

File:KeithSequeira.jpgEdit

Hi, FYI Images from Bollywood Hungama are usually OK. See Category:Files from Bollywood Hungama. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:20, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Your DRsEdit

Hi, Please select carefully files before nominating them for deletion. There is no reason to delete these below. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:30, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

re@Yann: Thanks for the notice! Please remember to change the FOP cases category (if needed), e.g., see my diff here. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 22:41, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

your messages on my user siteEdit

Hi, I recieved 252 fotos by the author/photographer to upload them with CC by-sa licence on Commons. You informed me that something is probably wrong. The assistent link you posted only allows ONE photo per mail. I won't do this 252 times. Where can I tell somebody in charge that all the photos I uploaded by this author ARE under CC by-sa licence? --Jensbest (talk) 00:10, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Hey there, thanks for informing me of this. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 00:13, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Please remember to tell them all the images you want to confirm, and when you've sent the message, please add {{subst:OP}} to each image you're confirming. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 00:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
That is a totally laborious way which I will not do. I have 252 photos and I will not copy-paste each filename individually into an email. I have the permission by the photographer to upload the photos under CC by-sa 3.0 - where or with which tool can I do this in an efficient way? Thanks for your help. --Jensbest (talk) 00:22, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Bitte senden Sie die Erlaubnis für alle Dateien, können Sie Haufen sie alle in der Liste in einer E-Mail. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 00:24, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Okay, little bit complicated procedure, but I'll do it that way. Thanks. --Jensbest (talk) 00:39, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Marshall Aerospace - Smallmalogo.jpgEdit

 
File:Marshall Aerospace - Smallmalogo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:23, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!Edit

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Skyllfully,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

(c) TaggingEdit

Aloha! Just noticed a few of your tags. E.g. File:Learn.png is a lousy logo, yes. Still, it is text only, without any color gradients or grafix. Have a peek @ Commons:Licensing#Simple_design. You can change the license of a file like that to pd-textlogo and add trademark if you think it might be trademarked. In general, the trademark tag doesn't hurt if it is added. Enuf barking! Cheers,   --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:00, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know! I was concerned that, since the user claimed it was their own work, it wouldn't work like that; I'll remember this in the future. I also couldn't find the logo's origin apart from the page where I had linked in the copyvio. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 05:07, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
99.999% if mobile logo uploads claim own work. When it seems obvious to you, just correct the wrong entry and license. When in doubt, throw a speedy dr out.   --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:48, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Skyllfully".