Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Tokisaki Kurumi!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 03:16, 24 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:CRT扫描线下的工人与鞍钢宪法.png

edit

看到您加了一条描述,因此向您询问:可否确认这一图片的背景是在公有领域?或者说,如何得知这一图片公开发表的日期或是年份?({{PD-China}}里提到 "...Works of of legal persons or organizations without legal personality, or service works, or audiovisual works, enter the public domain 50 years after they were first published, or if unpublished 50 years from creation.")。非常感谢。 Stang 15:27, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Stang, 我还就几个事鸽子着,不过这个问题我应该可以较快解答:请参见User talk:赛里斯幻想工程师#About your recent upload / 关于您最近的上传ときさき くるみ not because they are easy, but because they are hard 15:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
非常感谢回复,咱应该没什么问题了。Stang 15:50, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

提删

edit

看到阁下对大量文件提请快速删除,理由为The website states "ALL RIGHTS RESERVED"。请注意网站申明“版权所有”并不代表该文件一定为该网站所有。以我上传的几张被阁下提删的图片为例:File:Portrait of Huang Chujiu.jpgFile:Portrait of Huang Chujiu 02.jpg 均为黃楚九的肖像照片,而该人物逝世于1931年,这些照片一定于逝世之前制作(拍摄),根据中国法律,这张照片已在中国进入公有领域,且也于美国进入公有领域,所以不应该删除。 源義信 (talk) 20:53, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

@源義信:
This is true. However as long as you have stated that you get the image from the website, then it's not permitted de jure. If you can, you may consider using the original link as the source.
是真的,但是如果你指明你是从这些网站获得的,那么程序上就是不允许的。你可以考虑使用原始链接作为来源。 ときさき くるみ not because they are easy, but because they are hard 21:01, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
请问阁下说的程序是哪一条Commons的规定,请赐教,最好能给出相关规定的链接以便我学习。另外,既然声称版权所有的网站实际上并非拥有这些文件的版权,那么何来侵犯版权一说,为何阁下要以侵犯版权为由提请删除,而不是指出这些文件违反了某个程序? 源義信 (talk) 21:05, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@源義信:
Commons:Deletion policy#Non-free licenses and fair use and Commons:Deletion policy#Other licensing/copyright issues.
Commons:Deletion policy/zh#非自由授權條款與合理使用Commons:Deletion_policy/zh#其他授權條款/著作權問題ときさき くるみ not because they are easy, but because they are hard 21:10, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
这些文件本身就是公有领域的文件的话,即使来源网站声称自己拥有这些文件的版权,也不会使得这些文件变成非自由内容啊。打个比方,我从网上获取了一张拍摄于清朝末年的照片,上传至我自己的微博,并且自称“版权所有”,这会使得这张老照片变成我的作品,而他人使用它侵犯我的版权吗?你发的链接也没有提到任何明示或者暗示“如果来源网站声称自己拥有某个处于公有领域的文件的版权,就应该将该文件从Commons上删除”。 源義信 (talk) 21:18, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
To be honest I'm not sure, but from what I understand this seems to be on the edge.
说实话我并不确定,但据我了解这似乎处于边缘。 ときさき くるみ not because they are easy, but because they are hard 21:24, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
另外请你阅读“Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion”的F1,“This does not apply whenever there is a reasonable possibility of discovering that the work is public domain through further research or a plausible argument that it is below the threshold of originality”,我觉得就我上传的两张照片而言,稍有常识就知道它们处于公有领域吧。 源義信 (talk) 21:21, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@源義信:
True. I apologize for going copyvio earlier, because I'm too often poisoned by content farms.
是的。我对刚才走copyvio感到抱歉,因为我太常被内容农场毒害了。 ときさき くるみ not because they are easy, but because they are hard 21:31, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
感谢阁下理解,我也认为从内容农场导入文件是非常不好的,但是有时候有些文件难以寻找到原始来源或是可靠网站发布的来源,故不得已只能从一些不太可靠的来源获取需要的文件。在这样的情况下,我会小心地检查文件,是否确实为来源所声称的内容(例如有无照片和人名弄混的情况),在确保无误后才会上传,并且会在有条件的时候将来源替换成可靠来源。 源義信 (talk) 21:39, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Also, can you help me identify which images may not be infringing so I can retract them? I've only just learned that this does not constitute copyright infringement because the site has no right to claim it is copyrighted, except to say that the situation in question has been so bad in the past that I'm keeping a high line of assessment.
还有,你能帮我识别一下哪些图片可能不构成侵权吗以便我撤回吗?我也是刚刚才了解到这一行为不构成侵权因为网站无权声称其具有版权,只能说是过去的相关情况太糟糕了让我保持了一个较高的评估线。 ときさき くるみ not because they are easy, but because they are hard 21:32, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Besides, I think this case might be useful for you. Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Sultan_Industrial_Road.JPG
此外,我认为这一案可能构成先例。Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Sultan_Industrial_Road.JPG ときさき くるみ not because they are easy, but because they are hard 21:12, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
An additional question

Hi 源義信, I just noticed a somehow new issue. In theory it should be an extension of the previous question, but since I do still have some doubts, here it is:

  • According to Article 9.4.c of Terms of Service, "Unless this website has written permission, you must not engage in any of the following behaviors: Use, rent, lend, copy, modify, link, reprint, compile, publish, publish, establish mirror sites, etc. of the intellectual property content of this website."
  • According to Article 10.1 of ToS, "The intellectual property rights of the content provided on this website (including but not limited to webpages, text, pictures, audio, video, graphics, computer software, etc.) belong to this website, and users use the services of this website."

I guess this could also get overrided by the PD, but I am not so sure about this and I think it's necessary to raise the doubt here. cc Pseudacorus and Ikan Kekek. ときさき くるみ not because they are easy, but because they are hard 14:05, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I believe the only issue is whether it's a faithful reproduction of a public-domain print. But mention it in the deletion thread for the consideration of the closing admin. Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:08, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply