Urmelbeauftragter

Steam locomotives of Germany and / or Borsig locomotives edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

@ Urmel…, Borsig hat nicht nur deutsche Gesellschaften belliefert, sondern z.B. auch die de:Warschau-Wiener Eisenbahn in de:Kongresspolen. Daher ist Category:Borsig locomotives keine Teilmenge von Category:Steam locomotives of Germany., Gruß, Ulamm (talk) 16:15, 22 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

@Ulamm: OK, zugegeben, in der Kategorie sind z. B. auch Lokomotiven aus Südafrika enthalten. Allerdings gehören die Lokomotiven, die vorher in der Kategorie "Borsig (locomotive)" waren da auch nicht hin, da sie einer anderen Baureihe angehören. Warum eine finnische Dampfspeicherlokomotive, die von Borsig gefertigt wurde direkt in der Kategorie "Steam locomotives of Germany" einsortiert war, erschließt sich mir auch nicht so ganz. Urmelbeauftragter 17:27, 22 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Mir ging es darum, dass Borsiglokomotiven international verbreitet waren und darum die Borsiglokomotiven deutscher Bahngesellschaften nicht nur unter Category:Borsig locomotives, sondern zusätzlich unter Category:Steam locomotives of Germany einzuordnen sind, anstatt Category:Borsig locomotives als Unterkategorie von Category:Steam locomotives of Germany aufzufassen und einzuordnen.--Ulamm (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Bitte information-template nicht "zuspammen" edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo Urmelbeauftragter, bei vielen Bildern setzt Du in das information-template in den Urheber-Abschnitt ein User-Template mit der Anzahl deiner persönlichen Bilderuploads. Diese Angabe hat dort eigentlich nichts verloren und behindert nur Tools bei der Auswertung der Urheber(-rechts)angaben. Wäre schön wenn du auf solchen "Firlefanz" verzichten könntest. --Arch2all (talk)

Zuspammen? Ich hatte dies in der Vergangenheit von anderen Usern gesehen und fand dies eine interessante Ergänzung. Wen oder was behindern denn diese Angaben und warum? Dazu hätte ich schon gerne nähere Informationen. Urmelbeauftragter 20:39, 19 Oktober 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, wenn ich einen etwas rauhen Tonfall angeschlagen habe. Das information-template wurde aber erstellt, um eine möglichst strukturierte Form von Zusatzinformationen zu Bilddateien zu bekommen (soweit dies in einem Wiki-System überhaupt möglich ist). In einem Feld author sollte dann aber eben (nur!) der Autorname rein. Die Angabe deiner beachtlichen Uploadzahl ist dagegen auf deiner Userpage gut aufgehoben. Ist doch nachvollziehbar, oder? --Arch2all (talk) 10:29, 20 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:96 023 Arnold Spur N 01082010.JPG edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:96 023 Arnold Spur N 01082010.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ju Ta 10:57, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

{{Rename}} statt {{Delete}} edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo Urmelbeauftragter, Du hast auf die von Dir mit falschem Namen hochgeladenen Bilder File:Nikolai-Kirche Caldern 10062012.JPG, File:Nikolai-Kirche Caldern Mauer Klostergelaende 10062012.JPG, File:Nikolai-Kirche Caldern Konventbau 10062012.JPG und File:Nikolai-Kirche Caldern Kirchenfenster 10062012.JPG Löschanträge gestellt, nachdem Du sie mit richtigem Namen neu hochgeladen hast.
Man kann auch auf Commons Dateien umbenennen, in dem man sie verschiebt (allerdings hat nicht jede_r automatisch das Recht dazu). Bitte stelle das nächste Mal einen Antrag auf Verschiebung mit der Vorlage {{Rename}}. Freundliche Grüße, --Emha (talk) 13:16, 4 July 2012 (UTC) PS: Auf die o.g. Dateien habe ich Schnell-Löschanträge gestellt.Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Heilig Kreuz Weihnachtskrippe 25122011.JPG

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 17:43, 14 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Keep file:Heilig Kreuz Weihnachtskrippe 25122011.JPG, The owners of the figurines agree with using the photo in Wikipedia. --Urmelbeauftragter (talk) 16:17, 16 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Image Consent for AFAR Travel Guide edit

Hello,

I work for AFAR Media, a travel media company whose mission is to inspire and enable travelers to have richer, deeper and more authentic travel experiences around the world. We publish AFAR Magazine, which has twice been named America's best travel magazine, and AFAR.com, an online travel guide that has been recognized by the New York Times, Time magazine and many others as breaking new ground in inspiring and enabling great travel experiences (see www.afar.com/).

I’m creating content to recommend that travelers visit Frankfurt, Germany, and would like to use the image in the following link. I would like to request your authorization and approval to do so.

http://www.afar.com/highlights/hop-on-and-off-the-ebbelwei-express?context=wanderlist&context_id=23765

AFAR also provides destination guides for partners, such as Westin Finds from AFAR, in which AFAR recommends places for Westin Hotel guests to visit. (See westinfinds.com/) We would also like to include your image in these recommendations.

If this is acceptable to you, I need you to reply to me that you are in agreement with the following provision, have the rights to the image and are authorized to provide this consent:

CONSENT AND AGREEMENT

AFAR Media is hereby granted royalty-free authorization and license to publish, display and use the image in AFAR Magazine, on AFAR,com, on WestinFinds.com, mobile variations thereof, and in such other electronic, digital, and print channels as AFAR and its partners shall determine, including in social media and collateral marketing materials. It is understood that you retain copyright ownership over the image, and this is a license only.

We will share our recommendation with you after it is complete. Thank you very much for your consideration.

All the best, Lara community@afar.com

Copyright status: File:03-05-15TurmH3a.jpg edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:03-05-15TurmH3a.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 17:30, 20 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:St-Michael Trauerzentrum-Kapelle-Meistermann-Fenster 09092014.JPG edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:St-Michael Trauerzentrum-Kapelle-Meistermann-Fenster 09092014.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:St-Michael Trauerzentrum-Kapelle-Meistermann-Fenster 09092014.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin Sg. (talk) 10:59, 6 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Die Panoramafreiheit gilt ausdrücklich auch für Fotos von Kunstwerken in Kirchenräumen. Siehe Artikel Panoramafreiheit. Wegen fehlender Relevanz habe ich den Hinweis wegen angeblich fehlender Rechte entfernt. Urmelbeauftragter (talk) 15:59, 6. December 2015 (UTC)

Mir ist noch zu diesem konkreten Fall eingefallen, dass ich die ausdrückliche Zustimmung des Hausherren hatte Fotos zu machen, die in Wikipedia veröffentlicht werden können. Mit der Witwe von Herrn Meistermann (dem Künsler, der die Fenster ursprünglich gestaltet hat) konnte ich allerdings nicht sprechen. --Urmelbeauftragter (talk) 21:47, 4 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Doppeldeckerbus in Bornheim edit

	Hello, Urmelbeauftragter. You have new messages at De728631's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Panorama-Freiheit in Kirchen edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Urmelbeauftragter,
ich habe gerade Deinen Hinweis beim Benutzer:Martin Sg. gesehen. Ich denke, ich herrscht ein Missverständnis: Kunstwerke innerhalb von Kirchen oder Museen unterliegen NICHT der Panoramafreiheit; es ist auf jeden Fall eine Genehmigung des Künstlers (bzw. seiner Erben) notwendig, wenn der Künstler noch keine 71 Jahre tot ist. --DaB. (talk) 19:56, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Worauf beruht diese Regelung? Ist es auch unerheblich, wenn der Eigentümer bzw. dessen Vertreter die Genehmigung zur Veröffentlichung des Bildes auf Wikipedia erteilt? Im konkreten Fall wurde ich sogar dazu eingeladen dieses Foto zu machen. --Urmelbeauftragter (talk) 19:47, 7 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:St-Michael Trauerzentrum-Kapelle-Meistermann-Fenster 09092014.JPG edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:St-Michael Trauerzentrum-Kapelle-Meistermann-Fenster 09092014.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

178.202.154.134 16:59, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Gibt es dafür einen Beleg? / Is there a proof for it?--Urmelbeauftragter (talk) 21:01, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Lokschuppen+Drehscheibe RAW Nied 1939.jpg edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Lokschuppen+Drehscheibe RAW Nied 1939.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Gdietridwag (talk) 16:37, 7 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Maus Gotisches Haus Bad Homburg 23092017.JPG edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Urmelbeauftragter, ist die Stelle, von der aus du dieses Foto aufgenommen hast, öffentliches, jederzeit frei zugängliches Gelände? Könntest du noch den Namen des Bildhauers zur Beschreibung hinzufügen. --Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 24 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ja, es gilt das gleiche, wie für alle anderen Skulpturen in dem Skulpturengarten des Gotischen Hauses in Bad Homburg.--Urmelbeauftragter (talk) 10:47, 24 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Prima. Ich sehe, du hast inzwischen selbst den FoP-Baustein gesetzt. Ich wollte mich halt nur vergewissern bevor ich das tue. --Túrelio (talk) 12:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Deine Nachricht kam schon, während ich mit der Bearbeitung noch nicht fertig war ... ;-) --Urmelbeauftragter (talk) 20:54, 24 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:St Josef-Frankfurt Logo .PNG edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:St Josef-Frankfurt Logo .PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

— Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 01:26, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:St. Josef-Frankfurt Pfarrei Logo+Text.jpg edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:St. Josef-Frankfurt Pfarrei Logo+Text.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

— Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 01:31, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Reminder edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Urmelbeauftragter. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template, please remember to follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion, otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 01:32, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

You did it again in this edit. One more time, and I will be forced to report your actions. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 11:36, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I coundn't not find the right instructions to delete a wrong category. It is not so easy to find. The category Category:Frankfurt tram type l makes no sense. It was empty. "l" stands for a small "L", this would be wrong because in small letter it would be a tram trailer which should be in category Category:Frankfurt tram trailers.--Urmelbeauftragter (talk) 12:04, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright status edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 11:36, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Tram line Ebbelwei-Expreß (Frankfurt am Main) edit

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Category:Tram line Ebbelwei-Expreß (Frankfurt am Main) is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD C2 (unuseful empty category)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Prototyperspective (talk) 17:44, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic