User talk:XRay/Archive/2022

Latest comment: 1 year ago by QICbot in topic Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Francisco (California, USA), Ferry Building, Gate B -- 2012 -- 4250.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:48, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Francisco (California, USA), Alcatraz -- 2012 -- 4524.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:48, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

2022

All the best for 2022 !'
Bonne année XRay !
Je vous souhaite de nombreux plaisirs gratuits,
de belles collaborations et des découvertes fortuites !
Au plaisir de se recroiser,
Cordialement,
—  Pierre André (talk) 11:52, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Thanks so much! I wish you a happy new year too! --XRay 💬 14:36, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Themen

Snow

@XRay: Vielleicht kannst du deinen Bot anpassen, damit er Bilder in NRW (Dülmen und Co.) sucht bezüglich Category:Objects in snow in Germany und Category:Structures in snow in Germany. Dir frohe Weihnachten und einen guten Rutsch ins neue Jahre. Gruß Triplec85 (talk) 09:58, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Erst einmal wünsche ich ebenso frohe Feiertage und einen guten Rutsch in neue Jahr 2022. -- Mein Bot sucht eigentlich nur nach meinen eigenen Bildern. Andere Aktionen sind Einmalaktionen. Abfragen mache ich mit der ganz normalen Suche und Cat-a-lot oder VisualFileChange.js. Das sind dann Abfragen/Suche wie incategory:"Objects in snow in Germany" insource:/(Nordrhein-Westfalen|North Rhine-Westphalia)/. Wenn du da Unterstützung benötigst, um derartige Suchen zu realisieren, helfe ich gerne. Das geht immer alles über reguläre Ausdrücke. Die helfen auch ungemein bei Ersetzungen. Das kleine Problem: sie sind nicht immer ganz einfach. --XRay 💬 10:05, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Seasons

@XRay: Schau dir mal die Unterkategorien in Category:Categories of Germany by season an. Vielleicht kannst du ein paar entsprechende Bilder aus NRW beitragen. Triplec85 (talk) 14:38, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

In den Untiefen dieser Kategorie sind etliche NRW-Kategorien - u. a. mit meinen Bildern. Ich schaue mal, ob sich für meinen Bot das automatische Kategorisieren lohnt oder ob das lieber manuell mache. --XRay 💬 14:43, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

New Year

Die Category:New Year in Germany und entsprechende Unterkategorien sind mittlerweile auch nach Bundesländern gegliedert. Neujahrsgrüße Triplec85 (talk) 14:38, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Danke für die Info. Auch von meiner Seite ein frohes neues Jahr (und immer das passende Licht für schöne Fotos). --XRay 💬 14:43, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord -- 2020 -- 7824-6.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Amtsgericht, Kellerfenster -- 2022 -- 0840.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:45, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Dernekamp, Baum -- 2021 -- 9413 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality, maybe more --Michielverbeek 06:23, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 Question I agree. Is the plant species also known? Or would we have to place it into Category:Unidentified trees in Germany, from a botanical point of view? -- Martinus KE 16:09, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
I've added the image to the proposed category. --XRay 07:30, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Dernekamp, Bäume -- 2021 -- 9397.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Dernekamp, Bäume -- 2021 -- 9397.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Amtsgericht, Kellerfenster -- 2022 -- 0842.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 04:38, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Amtsgericht, Kellerfenster -- 2022 -- 0838.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Your most memorable shot of 2021

Happy New Year! As always at the beginning of the new year, I'm inviting you to share your most memorable shot of the past year. Which of your photos stood out in 2021? Which image created special memories that you'd like to share with others? On behalf of the Commons Photographers User Group I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best for 2022. Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Dernekamp, Wald (bei Haus Visbeck) -- 2022 -- 9495-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 12:33, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Dernekamp, Wald (bei Haus Visbeck) -- 2022 -- 9467.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 12:33, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Dortmund-Ems-Kanal (Alte Fahrt) -- 2022 -- 9465.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 12:33, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Tiberstraße, Weihnachtsbeleuchtung -- 2022 -- 9520.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 21:09, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Tiberstraße, Passage -- 2022 -- 9523.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:00, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Königsplatz, Weihnachtsbeleuchtung -- 2022 -- 9527.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:01, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Königsplatz, Weihnachtsschmuck -- 2022 -- 9531.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 19:04, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Dortmund-Ems-Kanal (Alte Fahrt) -- 2022 -- 9464.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

01:22, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Marktstraße, Kriegerehrenmal 1914-18 -- 2022 -- 9534.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:49, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Tiberstraße, Passage -- 2022 -- 9526.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 16:14, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Dank für Deine Hilfe im "Neuen Jahr 2022"!!

Lieber XRay; Freue mich über Deine Nachricht! - Du hast ein gutes Auge! Du hast Recht!! -- Bitte mache das gerne!! - "Tolle Hilfe von Dir!!" - Habe 1000 Dank für deine Mühen und Nachricht an mich! - "Das ist eine wirklich tolle Hilfestellung zum Jahresanfang von Dir. - "Verdammte Tippfehler!! Man kann wie du es sagst Dinge tausendmal lesen .. man liest immer das, was man lesen will!) - Bekommst von mir den XRay-Orden der Fotografie! Schenke Dir heute mein Bild dazu!!

X-Ray Imaging glass plate 24 x 30 cm - probably World War I - Chest torso of a military hospital - Nurse from Germany

Von Herzen 1000 Dank für Deine Mühen!! - Der ... --Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 15:15, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Von Herzen Dank für Deine schnelle Hilfe! - Nach vor ewiger Zeit - "Umbenennungsantrag" - meiner Bilderkategorie gestellt wurde ....- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Pictures_Lupus_in_Saxonia - passiert hier auch bei Wiki Commons gar nichts! - Kannst du diese auch in die neue Kategorie verschieben?? Damit hier endlich - "Ruhe" - ist ... und wir Fotografen Zeit und Musse finden bei Wiki Commons sich unser bestimmten Aufgabe als Fotografen zu widmen! Das wäre wirklich sehr Hilfreich und meinem - "Seelenfrieden" - dienlich. Hab Dank ... nur ...wenn es geht!?? - In verbundener - "Fotografenfreundschaft" - Der --Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 20:52, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Umbenennen darf ich, mache ich auch gerne. Aber ich verstehe nicht ganz, was du umbenannt haben möchtest. Soll das Category:Pictures_by_User:Lupus_in_Saxonia werden? Oder Category:Pictures_by_Lupus_in_Saxonia? Das Template {{User category}} müsste auch gesetzt werden/sein. --XRay 💬 21:10, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Lieber XRay;
Inhalt der "Umbenennungsdiskussion" ist im Kern: "Es sei nicht erkennbar, dass Kategorie Pictures Lupus in Saxonia eine Benutzerkategorie ist". Das Template User Categorie ist und war gesetzt. - (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Pictures_Lupus_in_Saxonia) Verstehe daher diese Commons Diskussion nicht:- ff...."It seems to me very much as a user category (that's why I have already added the user category tag), therefore it should be properly named. I suggest moving to Category:Pictures by User:Lupus in Saxonia" - (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Categories_for_discussion/2021/08/Category:Pictures_Lupus_in_Saxonia)- Was meinst Du dazu? (Wichtig ist mir nur, dass eine "Umleitung" bei Umbenennung dann auch mit allen meinen Bildern funktioniert. Den Grund des Antrages eines "USERS" zur Umbenennung verstehe ich aber trotzdem im Kern nicht.Problematisch ist ferner, dass Metadaten in der Bildbeschreibung ggf. auch zu ändern wären ...oder man lebt mit einer "Umleitung" ohne Bildmetadatenlinkveränderung ... da dieser auch durch die "Umleitung" zum Ziel führt??!! - Hab Dank für Deine Hilfestellung und Antwort. Der - Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 00:49, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Wenn man mal einen Blick in Category:User Categories wirft, stellt man fest, dass es da eine Vielzahl von verschiedenen Namensschemata gibt. Es gibt keine Regel, wie eine User-Kategorie zu benennen ist. Wichtig ist die Verwendung des Templates {{User category}}. Das ist aber erfolgt. Möglicherweise dreht sich die Diskussion bzw. die Intention darum, das Wörtchen "by" zu ergänzen. Das ist bei vielen der User-Kategorien auch so. So gesehen würde ich die Kategorie in Category:Pictures_by_Lupus_in_Saxonia umbenennen. Ich denke, dass die Diskussion dann auch ein Ende hat. (Es gibt hier bei Commons eine Reihe von Leuten, die versuchen, ihre teilweise völlig unterschiedlichen Ansichten durchzusetzen. Es kommt daher immer mal wieder vor, dass sich da jemand entsprechend äußert. Manchmal kann ich so etwas nachvollziehen, man ist ja selbst auch nicht perfekt. Manchmal schüttele ich leise mit dem Kopf.) --XRay 💬 05:28, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
.
Photographic-Transcendence and Illumination - Transmental Art Project Studies of Street Photographers in Germany
Ich Danke Dir für Deine Hilfe in der Diskuss, und auch hier oben mit Deiner wertvollen Sichtweise zur "Sachlage" mit konkreter, verbundener Hilfestellung. Auch ich schüttel immer mehr ...anfangs leicht ...später deutlich und heftiger meinen Kopf. Ich habe aufgehört mich zu ärgern ... und doch ärgere ich mich immer wieder. Wir beide sind Mensch der "Kreativprozesse"! - Wir "Erschaffen" - .... - "Wir packen eine Sache an" - ....und zerreden Dinge nicht in den - "Sphären der Unendlichkeit des Wiki Commons Weltraumes"! Selbst mein sehr geschätzter langjähriger mich immer noch beschützender Mentor gab auf. Ihm war es nach XXXX hoch (2) "Angriffen" nicht mehr möglich - zu wirken. Auch ich habe schon viel durchgemacht. Sogar Löschanträge auf meine komplette Wikipedia Benutzerseite. Zum Glück setzten sich viele liebe Menschen für mich ein; auch ein verständnisvoller Administrator half.

Fotografen sind "Kreativ" und manchmal in ihrem Werk auch "unverstanden" von der Zeit. Das ist wie in der Kunst, und da Fotografie Kunst ist, gelten auch hier die gleichen Gesetze. Man muss sein "Handwerk" verstehen und eine "Vision" haben, die einem zum erschaffen von "Neuem" treibt. Unwichtig muss und kann im Wirken "Globale Gefälligkeit" sein, auch wenn es natürch für den "Künstler" selbst "gefälliger" und angenehmer ist! "Reduktion" ist genau wie die "Provokation" ein Stilelement. Persönliche Gespräche mit Avedon, Gunther Blum, Lagerfeld und vielen anderen Fotografen bereicherten meine fotografische Sichtweise im Leben. Im muss nicht machen was andere machen, aber ich muss auch das "Andere" mir verschlossene zulassen können. Dein Vorschlag zur Umbenennung ist gut und "Zielführend" um Frieden zu schaffen, die Diskuss zu beenden. Category:Pictures_by_Lupus_in_Saxonia ist aus meiner Sicht in Ordnung und der Sachlage dienlich! Kannst du das für mich so machen?? Das wäre noch eine zweite tolle Hilfestellung zum "Neuen Jahr"! Sonst sehen alle Aufnahmen vor Fotografentränen in der Zukunft von mir immer so aus! (Spaß! :-) --- Lass uns in der Zukunft in Verbindung bleiben! Du bist ein Mensch der die Fotografie wirklich "versteht" und lebt! Das ist wichtig, dass sich diese Menschen bei Wiki Commons "zusammenfinden" und sich helfen ...so wie Du es bei mir tatest! Hab von Herzen Dank dafür. Liebe Grüße vom - --Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 14:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Da ich noch am Rechner sitze, mache ich deine Umbenennung gleich. Bei Wikimedia Commons (und auch Wikipedia) lernt man eines: Kompromisse. In den letzten Jahren habe ich auch so manchen Konflikt ausgetragen. Gut war auf jeden Fall immer, erst einmal die Argumente zu bedenken und dann eine Lösung zu finden. Das ist auch im Leben hilfreich. Ich habe auch manche Leute aus der Wikipedia-Welt persönlich kennengelernt und diese arbeiten auch im wirklichen Leben auf so, vor allem argumentbasiert. (Gut, gerade bei Wikipedia habe ich auch stürmische Leute kennengelernt, die Argumenten nicht zugänglich waren und ihren Kopf durchsetzen wollten. Das ist nie gut gegangen.) Gerne können wir in Kontakt bleiben. Austausch belebt. --XRay 💬 14:20, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Wahrscheinlich ist deine Beobachtungsliste nun mehr als voll. Aber das ließ sich nicht vermeiden. Bei der Diskussion habe ich einen Vermerk gemacht. Schauen wir mal, was jetzt passiert. --XRay 💬 14:36, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
XRay ... du bist wirklich ein Mensch mit Tatkraft! Danke für Deine Mühen ....Dein Tun um eine gute Sache für die Fotografie! Wir warten mal ab ....ob "Ruhe" einkehrt??! - Ich wünsch mir das sehr! Ich will meinen "Lebensfrieden" .... und einfach nur die Welt mit meinen Bildern bereichern, .... die wie ich hoffe ... auch manchmal zum Nachdenken anregen. Meine Hasselblad 500CM mit dem 40mm steht im Schrank.Machmal streichel ich sie so liebevoll wie meine Frau. Vorbei sind für mich die Zeiten "Dienen" zu müssen ...."Gefällig zu sein". Ich sehe den goldenen Ring im Wasserglas, und möchte meine verbleibende Lebenszeit nur ohne "Streit" mit schönen Dingen und Menschen verbringen, mit den man sich in Sachlage bereichernd austauschen kann. Du gehörst zu diesen Menschen mit denen man sich austauschen kann! Hab Dank für dein "Wirken und Sein" bei Wiki Commons! -

Limerick

Wir tuen warten bis der Garten

ist voller Blumen, die mit Freude

pflücken da, so viele Leute.

Nur der Fotograf, der hat Respekte "brav".

Er belichtet Bilde ohne "Schwarz und Schilde". Quelle: Eigen Werk

Verbundene Grüße vom ---Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 17:10, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Hallo miteinander, da ich auf der Cfd-Seite angesprochen wurde ganz kurz hier ein paar Worte von mir: Erstens DANKE für das Umsetzen der Präzisierung im Kategorie-Namen! Ich wollte das damals nicht "einfach machen", vor allem nicht unabgestimmt. Deswegen hatte ich die Diskussion angestoßen. Dass daraus so eine ewige Hängepartie für Lupus wurde, hatte ich weder erwartet noch gewünscht. Das tut mir leid. Warum ich damals die Diskussion angestoßen hatte, offenbart die Versionsgeschichte: Das Template {{User category}} war eben damals leider nicht drin, es ging leider mehrfach rein und raus. Warum auch immer. Ich hatte daher die klarstellende Präzisierung des Kategorienamens als User-Kategorie angestoßen, idealerweise mit "by User:", aber die jetzige Variante nur mit "by" ist auch okay. Ein Template verschwindet halt leider leichter (wenn auch versehentlich) als dass sich ein Kategoriename ändert. Nur darum ging es mir, nicht um Regelhuberei oder was auch immer. Klarstellen, aber nicht unabgestimmt. Beides haben wir jetzt erreicht. Ich bin zufrieden und Lupus in Saxonia offenbar auch. Danke nochmal und viele Grüße, --Kleeblatt187 (talk) 18:11, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Wenn sich alles so leicht machen ließe ... Unser Kategoriesystem gleicht an einigen Stellen einem Dschungel, ebenso unser Regelsystem. Und dann sind dann noch die teils widersprüchlichen Einzelinteressen. Aber in diesem Fall war die Lösung leicht und wenn alle Beteiligten zufrieden sind, ist es gut. --XRay 💬 18:46, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Hej sometimes you just need nuts. - For all those who have backs - we have furniture.

Meine noch junge Frau und ich haben gestern viel über "Geschehnisse in der Welt" nachgedacht. Das machen wir immer zum Tagesende. Wir reflektieren "Die und unsere Welt" - und auch gesellschaftliche Prosesse sind Teil unserer "Tagesreflexionen". Auch die Dinge von hier bei Wiki Commons gehörteten zu unserrem Gespräch. Arm im Arm schlafen wir zusammen ein, immer in der Hoffnung auf - "Weltfrieden" - . Wir beide verachten den "Krieg", auch wenn wir beide - "Wirkliche Krieger" sind - bzw. waren. Nur Menschen die einen "Wirklichen Krieg" erlebt haben, können verstehen was der Mensch sich auf dieser Welt antut! Nur das "Elend" und Untergang folgt: Das ist unser beider Sichtweise. Wir müssen lernen näher und Schneller und Respektvoller miteinander zu reden! Wie es sich auch hier gezeigt hat, wäre wohl der - "Kleine Beamtendienstweg" - eine vermutlich - "Bessere Lösung" - gewesen!!°?" Was ich mir zusammen mit meiner geliebten Frau für das kommende Jahr 2022 wünsche??!! - "Betrachten wir die Welt auch von der anderen Seite"! - "Unterstelle der anderen Seite nie das "Böse"! - "Rede mir den Menschen; spreche diese direkt an"! - "Vermeide das - §-Herumgefummelne-§- bei Wiki Commons und Wikipedia! - "Gehe in Dich" - bevor du schreibst; schlafe eine Nacht darüber!" - Nein!! - "Das ist kein dummes Geschwätz mit erhobenen Zeigefinger! - "Meine Frau und ich haben "Gott und Jesus" gesehen" - "- "Jesus kam zu unserer Geburtstagsfeier und überreichte uns den Friedhofschlüssel"!XRay- ich halte dich für einen Menschen der von seinem "Fotografischen Können und Deiner Wesensart" - befähigt ist ... hier bei Wiki Commons die - "Rolle und Aufgabe" eines - "Administrators" einzunehen; (sofern du diese schon evt. nicht hast??) - ....und Dir dieses auch ggf.wünschst und gerne wahrnehmen würdest??! .... - "Meine Stimme hast Du sicher!! - " Wiki Commons braucht Menschen wie Dich!! -

Limerick

Reden ist ein - „Segen - “ wenn Worte da besonnen.

Menschen sollten kommen

mehr zusammen, um von dannen

zu schaffen "Gute Werke" und viel Bilder

nicht vergessend - §-Schilder-§ - (Konform mit Gesetzen der BRD)

Quelle:Eigenes Werk


Liebe und Dir von Herzen verbundene Grüße vom - --Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 14:20, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Alles gut. :-) Auch wenn ich die Welt vielleicht etwas nüchterner betrachte und nicht so sehr zu philosophischen Betrachtungen neige (eher argumentbasiert und auch kurz und knackig - das mag auch mit den Eigenheiten eines Mathematikers zusammenhängen), so findet sich doch oft ein Weg, mit dem alle leben können. Dein Mentor ist wohl aus der Wikipedia-Welt. Bei Wikimedia Commons ist manches anders. Nebenbei: Die Administratorrechte hatte ich mal beantragt, aber da war man doch sehr eigen und wollte mehr als ich einzusetzen bereit bin. Es ist letztendlich zu viel Aufwand. In erster Linie möchte ich fotografieren. Deine Bilder finde ich übrigens sehr interessant. Sie passen hier nicht unbedingt in die Linie, haben aber meiner Meinung nach einen künstlerischen Anspruch. Ich finde es immer spannend, wenn jemand fotografisch einen anderen Weg beschreitet. Das ist meiner Meinung nach eine Weiterentwicklung der fotografischen Fähigkeiten, auch wenn dies mitunter zu Diskussionen führt. Der künstlerische Aspekt kommt bei Wikimedia Commons einfach zu kurz. --XRay 💬 20:13, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Was du oben sagst trifft gut den "Kern" von vielen Dingen! Einige gute Fotografen die ich schon fragte ob sie sich vorstellen könnten bei Wiki Commons als Admin in der Zukunft tätig zu sein ... können sich das nicht vorstellen. (Aus genannten Gründen die du sagtest. Die fotografische Tätigkeit steht bei allen die die Fotografie von Herzen in aller Tiefe lieben "immer an erster Stelle". - (Das ist auch gut so aus meiner Sicht!)) Auch wie du ...würde ich an Deiner Stelle immer...immer ... immer so entscheiden!! Ich verstehe Dich zu gut. Es war ein "Versuch" hier bei Wiki Commons Menschen die von "Herzen auch Fotograf" sind für diese bestimmt sehr schwierige Aufgabe zu "gewinnen". - "Der künstlerische Aspekt kommt bei Wikimedia Commons einfach zu kurz."...das sehe ich genauso wie du und viele Diskussionen bei meinen Bildern gehen in diese Richtung: - Bei "Wiki" ungewollt! - "Unverstanden" - wie z.B. "Schiefstellung als künsterisches Element diese sei bei Wiki ungewollt!!" - (Vergebens habe ich nach einer Richtline gesucht die das genauso beschreibt!) - Auch das berühmte Bild von Man Ray auf Wikipedia und in Wikimedia ... da benutzte der Fotograf z.B.die "Bildschiefstellung" als "Kunstelement" der Fotografie. Auch Wiki Commons muss sich aus meiner Sichtweise "weiterentwickeln" und in seinem - "Bilderfundus" - Dinge zulassen - die auch eben nicht "konform" des jetzigen Zeitgeistes der nur sachlichen und dokumentatorischen Bilddarstellung ist. (Aber das verstehen wohl nur "Fotografen" die wirklich "tiefe Ahnung von der Fotografie" ... mit deren "Geschichte" sowie der Entwicklung in der Kunstszene unserer Zeit haben??!) Ich stelle mich schon seit längeren diesen Diskussionen ohne - "meinen Weg" - zu verlassen. "Beschimpft als "Knipser der "nichts" von Fotografie versteht" verbuche ich diese Aussagen auf dem Konto: "Meinungsfreiheit"! Zu mindestens saß ich mit einem der wohl bedeutesten Fotografen des 20. Jahrhunderts - Avedon - an einem Tisch; unsere Gedanken austauschend. Gelernt habe ich von vielen wirklichen "Meistern der Fotografie" das Folgende: "Wer glaubt gut zu sei, der hört auf in der Zukunft besser zu werden!" - Philosophisches aber sehr treffendes Gedankengut.Es grüßt Dich in verbundenen Gedanken die im Ursprung mehr - "philosophisch als mathematisch" - sind. Ich bin mir sicher du lässt das gelten im Prozess eines "Gedankenaustausch" um "Werte der Fotografe". Der - Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 01:09, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Es gibt die Ecken, hier zwei Beispiele: Category:Abstract photography und Category:Dutch angle. Die Kritik an Bildern dieser Art kommt übrigens oft von Leuten, die hauptsächlich in der Wikipedia-Welt aktiv sind. Da ist mehr Sachlichkeit gefragt. Wikimedia Commons wird hauptsächlich als Reservoir für die Wikipedia-Welt gesehen. Allerdings hat sich Wikimedia Commons längst als allgemeines Medienarchiv entwickelt. --XRay 💬 05:30, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Danke, dass Du mir oben diese tollen Ecken der "Kreativen Fotografie" gezeigt und zugänglich gemacht hast. Viele meiner Bilder sehe ich hier gut aufgehoben und aus meiner Sicht sinkt auch hier die "Gefahr" immer wieder Bildlöschanträge mit "ganz eigenartigen und sogar fragwürdigen" "USER"-Argumenten diskutieren zu müssen. Erstaunt habe ich auch schon feststellen müssen, dass es Admins gibt, die da hier den ganz einfachen "Löschweg" präferieren und auch so handeln. Auch genau wie du sagst kommen Anträge oft von "Usern der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia". In der englisch sprachigen Wikipedia- Welt ist man da schon ein wenig mutiger und gegenüber der - "Modernen Fotografie" - "aufgeschlossener". Mein Bild der EZB (ECB) in Frankfurt (Main) hält hier zur Zeit (noch) seinen Platz.Noch heute beginne ich viele meiner Bilder in die Kategorien einzusortieren die du mir zugänglich gemacht hast. Eine wertvolle Hilfestellung zu besprochenen Dingen. Danke für alle Deine "Guten Taten"! Liebe Grüße vom - --Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 10:04, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Dann will ich dir die anderen, die ich kenne, nicht vorenthalten: Category:Intentionally blurred images, Category:Intentional camera tilt (Category:Intentional camera tilt (left), Category:Intentional camera tilt (right)), Category:Intentional camera movement, Category:Surreal photographs. In den Untiefen des Kategoriesystems gibt es bestimmt noch mehr davon. --XRay 💬 11:58, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Art Project and Erotic Nude Photography - Solarization - Meike the wife of a street photographer stands nude model - Hands and feet with cigarette tip in the style of Art Deco

Bin wirklich sehr froh über Deine Linkhinweise! - Es ist für meine Bilder (Die auch oft nicht den "Normen" von Wikimedia entsprechen ..... nicht leicht ... eine "Geeignete Kategorie"" zu finden. Meine Frau Meike bat mich hier nun ganz schnell tätig zu werden. In einem "Aktworkshop" von einigen befreundenden Fototografen stand sie letztes Wochenende in Berlin (COVID-19 Konform!!) Modell. Ich und meine Frau hoffen sehr ..., dass die Welt bei Wiki Commons für auch viele weitere neue angelegte "Kategorien" "offen" ist!!??

Von Herzen kommen die liebsten Grüße von mir und meiner Frau Meike - vom ---Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Ein wenig - "Fassungslos" - bin ich ... obwohl auch "heier" - = (Hier) "Reaktioenen" zu erwarten waren. Ein Wikipedia "Admin" löschte mein Bild in "Rekordzeit von 5 Minuten" - aus der Wikipedia "Welt" - mit der "Begründung" -:- "Selbstdarstelung"! - "Ich bin einfach nur - "Fassungslos!!" - "Ist wie ist"! - "Das Bild obige ist gut!" ... und wird nun bis "Baku" - und "Usbekistan" bei Wikipedia von mir eingestellt werden! Ich hoffe sehr , dass ich für meinen Text hier .... werder von - "Wikipedia Administratoren" - .....noch von Mitarbeitern des - "Федеральная служба безопасности Российской Федерации Federalnaja sluschba besopasnosti Rossijskoi Federazii (ФСБ)" = (bedeutet „Föderaler Dienst für Sicherheit der Russischen Föderation“) in der Zukunft - "verfolgt und ..."Bestraft"" werde!!!??. Es grüßt Dich ...Der --Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 20:01, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
In der Wikipedia gelten durchaus andere Regeln. Aber sicherlich kann man auch dort einer solchen Aktion widersprechen. Gute Gründe muss man mitbringen. --XRay 💬 20:07, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
. "NEIN"! - Kein "Einspruch" wird von mir erfolgen! Bei meiner letzten "Rückstellung" gegen einen Wikipedia Admin erfolgte sofort eine "Sperre" von ... "§Drei Tagen"!§ - Obwohl er merhr als tief kausal dieses verursachte! Ich wehre mich anders. "Andere Länderer bei Wikipedia sollen meine "Bilder" beurteilen! - "Das ist "Sein und Wesenszoll" zur Sachlage!?? =(Klarstellung) - "Außerdem: "Die fotografische Bildgeschichte sowie die "Kunstgeschichte" wird es bezeugen ... ob "Bilder" ..."Gut" sind"! Selbst wenn von "Nichte" .... ist es mir und meiner Frau ..."Egal"! Wir beide küssen uns gerade innig und sagen .... "Dann hat weder Wikipedia .... oder ggf. Wiki Commons unsere Bilder ..."verdient"! - Liebe Grüße vom --Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 20:32, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Meine Frau Meike kam inzwischen aus der "Kasernene vom Dienst". Ich kochte ihr und für mich französische Zwiebelsuuppe mit frischem Toast und überbackenen Käse . Wir beide tauschten unsere "Tagesgedanken" aus. Auch sie war - "Fassungslos" - über das - "Tun" - eines Wikipedia Admin. Meine Frau Meike stand auf ..... ging in unser Arbeitszimmer. Zurück kehrte sie mit dem Titanhelm Сфера (Sfera) – Spezialtruppen Militär, Russland 1993 - GOST Schutzklasse 2 (Государственный Стандарт) - (ГОСТ) und setze mir diesen auf den Kopf. Sie sagte zu mir: " Mit diesem wird dir selbst - "Putin" nicht auf den Kopf hauen" ... "Glaube mir"! - Sie nahm eben meine Hand und legte diese auf ihre "Brust". "Komm mein Schatz sagte sie wir vergessen die "Wikipedia Welt"! ... und ... "Denke nur.... "Kein Wikipedia Admin ist mächtiger als $"Putin"& .... "Glaube mir"! ......"Ich verspürte die Sehnsucht nach Liebe zu meiner Frau" ... und "folge" ihr! ....Der Computer wird heruntergefahren! .... - "Ende". Liebe Grüße vom --Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 22:04, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LVM -- 2017 -- 6322.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:08, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Große Teichsmühle -- 2022 -- 9640.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 21:37, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Dernekamp, Baumgruppe -- 2022 -- 9544-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:25, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Dernekamp, Baumreihe -- 2022 -- 9581-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 16:30, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Bauerschaft Reckelsum, Sonnenaufgang -- 2022 -- 9550-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:45, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Dernekamp, Baum -- 2021 -- 9413.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Dernekamp, Baum -- 2021 -- 9413.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Bauerschaft Reckelsum, Sonnenaufgang -- 2022 -- 9556-60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Dernekamp, Baumreihe -- 2022 -- 9606-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Gras im Gegenlicht -- 2022 -- 9642.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Eiskristalle -- 2022 -- 9646.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2020 -- 3427.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Raureif -- 2022 -- 9687.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Moos und Blätter -- 2022 -- 9651.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Heubach -- 2022 -- 9675.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Bauerschaft Reckelsum, Sonnenaufgang -- 2022 -- 9561-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Dernekamp, Baumreihe -- 2022 -- 9621-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:20, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Brücke -- 2022 -- 9665.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:20, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Eiskristalle auf Blättern -- 2022 -- 9659.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

19:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Eiskristalle auf Blättern -- 2022 -- 9657.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:39, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Heubach -- 2022 -- 9673.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:39, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:41, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Baum -- 2022 -- 9677.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:40, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Moos und Blätter -- 2022 -- 9652.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:40, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Bild Kategorisierung

Servus! Ich weiß ja, das du irgendein Programm nutz, welches deine Bilder automatisch sortieren. Aber vielleicht schaust du dir diese beiden Bilder noch einmal an: 1 & 2 Ich denke, das es übertrieben ist, hier [[10]] Kategorie zu verwenden. Gerade beim zweiten Bild ist mir überhaupt nicht ersichtlich, was dieses Bild mit einer Kirche zu tun haben soll. Beim zweiten Bild sehe ich die Kirche, diese ist aber so minimal am Horozinz zu sehen, dass ich es für nicht sinnvoll erachte, das Bild in diese Kategorie einzufügen. Ich hoffe, dass du dir die beiden Bilder noch einmal ansiehst. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, --Geoprofi Lars (talk) 14:12, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Hallo! Bei dem einen Bild ist die Kategorie definitiv falsch. Den Fehler behebe ich. Danke für den Hinweis. Auf dem anderen ist die St.-Mauritius-Kirche zu sehen und kategorisiert, daher die Einordnung. Mein Bot (= "irgendein Programm") kann nicht am Inhalt und individuell entscheiden, sondern nimmt die Kategorien und andere Metadaten als Grundlage. Manche Dinge kontrolliere ich immer wieder und dabei fallen halt auch Fehler auf. Unter dem Strich entstehen allerdings deutlich weniger Fehler als wenn man es von Hand machen würde. Sorry. --XRay 💬 14:17, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Danke, die Berichtigung wäre prima! Und danke fürs richtige Formatieren, das ist doch manchmal echt noch etwas schwierig, auch nach so langer Zeit. 😅. Liebe Grüße Geoprofi Lars (talk) 14:33, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Ist schon korrigiert. Das kommt davon, wenn Kategorien halt nicht passen. Das ist diese manuelle Arbeit, die ich nannte. Und man sieht es erst, wenn man die Bilder sieht. --XRay 💬 14:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Ich mache am liebsten alles selbst, aber so viele Bilder wie du pro Tag hochlädst, würde ich auch verrückt werden 😉. Geoprofi Lars (talk) 16:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, gefrorener Tropfen -- 2022 -- 9648.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:02, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Raureif -- 2022 -- 9678.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:02, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Umflut -- 2022 -- 9667-71.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good qialty --Llez 07:13, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Herzliche Grüße ... ("Unser Auftrag“ … „Der Gedanke“ … „ Das und "unser" Werk“ als Fotograf" - !?!)

Form , Color and Function - Photography of Modernism in the Style of the New Objectivity of the Bauhaus - Image Impression of a Street Photographer - January 2022

Lieber XRay;

Deine Werke sind wirklich - „Sehr Gut … wie gar viele der auch "Meinigen". - Wir sollten anfangen - „Fotografisch interessierten Menschen“ – zu berichten … wie diese „Werke“ von uns als - „Fotografen“ - entstanden. Was meinst „Du“ dazu?? Hier auf „Wiki Commons User“ Seiten hätten wir aus meiner Sicht das - „Recht“ - dazu?? Mache mal den Anfang:

!“Eigendarstellung“! – würde hier ggf. auch ein Wikipedia - „User“ und "*****" sagen. …“Aber darum geht es im Kern den meisten Fotografen bei Wiki Commons nicht … nein gar nicht -nicht!“ ….(Und falls doch…; jeder - „USER“ - stellt sich doch hier in seinem „Wirken und Sein“ - auf seiner „User-Page“ – „Selbst dar = "Selbbstdarstellung"!!?? - Jeder "Editor und Künster" ist so dann im Kern ein - „Selbstdarsteller“! ?? – „oder Nichte??!!“ - (Meine Meinung … und die meiner Frau! - Lese Freud: „Das Ich und das Es“!)

Fange mal an von einen guten Werk von mir, die - „Entstehungsgeschichte“ - zu berichten: Promotion (Doktor) – Bild Hier:

Vor vielen Jahren bat mich meine heutige Frau Meike um einen persönlichen Gefallen. Als Freimaurerin - (und heute Logengroßmeisterin) … (Ja …“Zeit der Emanzipation … auch das gibt es in den Tiefen unseres Universums!“ ….“und das ist gut so!)“) … lernte ich viele Menschen kennen ….von denen ich nur - „lernen“ - konnte. Als Gast wurde ich eingelassen. Heute bin ich mehr….. „Ein treu verbunderner „Freund“ und - „Meister einer anderen "Loge"“. (Fraumaurer waren auch Präsidenten der USA)- Schau dir mal die Dollarnote genau an! "Das sehende Auge ... findest du auch dort!")

Für eine treue Studienfreundin erschuf ich als Fotograf das Werk eines „Meisters“ – in Gedanken der „Demut“ - „Ihres - „Tuns und Wirkens als Ärztin“! “. Es galt eine Doktorin der Medizin in ganz besonderer - „Art und Weise“ - zu - "Fotographisch" - ehren. Ein Professor richtete diese persönliche - „Bitte“ - an meine Frau. Lange überlegte ich… wie das - „Studienwerk einer Medizinerin – „Schwerpunkt Humane Genetik und Reproduktionsmedizin“ – im Bildwerk eines - „Künstlers“ – umzusetzen ist.

Ich reduzierte meinen Gedanken auf den inneren Kern. – „„Fortpflanzung“. Diese als galt es in meinem Bildwerk darzustellen; mit der inhaltlichen Promotion als Frau Dr… einer „Medizinerin und Frau.“ - Ein „Professor“ schüttelte mir die Hand; und sagte: „ Ich neige mein Haupt; gelungen!“ - Die heute Frau Dr. habil. - (venia legendi) - und … liebste Freundin meiner Frau – bat mich dieses - „Ihr Kunstwerk“ – als Diaposiiv auszubelichten. - Ein Ilfochrome Abzug - zwei mal * Sechs und nicht (Sex) Meter – hängt heute in ihrem Loft-Wohnzimmer; von allen Seiten LED beleuchtet. Gemeinsam hängten wir alle dieses Bild auf; inzischen mit Glaswand gegen UV-Licht geschützt. Ich bekam einen Kuss auf die Wange. - „Treffend und erotisch“ - … ich liebe dieses Bild, waren die Worte die ich liebevoll, als Fotograf in meinem Ohr wahrnahm". - Als weiters Danke erhielten meine Frau Meike und ich zum Geschenk: -Dissertationsschrift im handschriftlichen Orginal und eine der weitreichensten Gen-Entschlüssel unserer DNA. (Freundschaften fordern nicht! ....sie beschenkt Menschen mit inniger Freude!!) - Für Wiki Commons stelle ich mein Bild als - „Fotograf“ - nur in sehr reduzierter .JPEG Bilddateienform – aber noch in akzeptabler Auflösung Qualität: - als "Windows Handy Image" – zur Verfügung. Mein Werk soll - „Sichtbar“ – aber nicht - „Art Kunst - Reproduktion“ – ersetzbar sein!

"Gute Fotografen" - bei Wiki Commons müssen sich in der Zukunft einfach besser - "Verknüpfen" und "Wertschätzen" - lernen. Ich denke wir Beide sollte den - "Anfang für ein kleines Forum von - "Meistern" - machen ... mit "Menschen die auch denken wie wir"!!??

Von Herzen verbundene liebe Grüße vom - --Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 17:08, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Purple Rain
Sorry, manchmal benötige ich ein wenig für eine Antwort. Du hast also die Idee, dass es bei Wikimedia Commons eine Gruppe von Leuten gibt, die auch künstlerische Aspekte berücksichtigen. Es gibt schon eine Reihe von Leuten, die in dieser Art und Weise unterwegs sind. Mir fällt dabei immer das nebenstehende Bild einer Fotografin ein. Es ist eines der wenigen dieser Art, die es geschafft haben, den Status eines exzellenten Bilds zu erreichen. Die Fotografin hat ein sehr gutes Auge für schöne Motive und ein Händchen für die Umsetzung. In einer eher allgemeinen Gruppe bin ich gelegentlich aktiv: Commons Photographers User Group. Insgesamt das Fotografieren unter dem Aspekt "Kunst" hier bei Commons eher zäh. Das liegt auch am Wikipedia-Ursprung. Die dort sachliche Verwendung ist fern von künstlerischen Aspekten. Dieses Gedankengut ist noch weit verbreitet. Ich komme zwar auch aus der Richtung, habe mich aber lange schon davon gelöst. Dokumentarische Fotos mache ich zwar auch noch, schon aus meinem geschichtlichem Interesse heraus, aber ich merke auch, wie sich meine Art der Fotografie ändert. Meine Bilder haben heute einen etwas anderen Anspruch und den werde ich auch weiter ausbauen. Es macht einfach Spaß und das soll so auch sein. --XRay 💬 13:24, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wassertropfen -- 2021 -- 7987.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orange -- 2022 -- 9715.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orange -- 2022 -- 9713.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:51, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Dernekamp, Wirtschaftsweg -- 2021 -- 9407.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Dernekamp, Wirtschaftsweg -- 2021 -- 9407.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orange -- 2022 -- 9718.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Kriegerehrenmal 1870-71 -- 2022 -- 141732.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

21:36, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spiralbinderücken -- 2022 -- 9739.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:31, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schneebesen -- 2022 -- 9745.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:31, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 08:49, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Bäume -- 2022 -- 9636.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:01, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spiralbinderücken -- 2022 -- 9722.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schneebesen -- 2022 -- 9748.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Filzuntersetzer -- 2022 -- 9752.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:01, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gasbläschen -- 2022 -- 9759.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:10, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spiralbinderücken -- 2022 -- 9739 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schneebesen -- 2022 -- 9745 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 18:06, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

17:40, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Wassermühle -- 2022 -- 9768.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. @XRay: Please correct redlink "Haltern am See photographs taken on 2022-01-28" --Tagooty 09:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
My bot is working. It will be done in a few minutes. --XRay 09:40, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Wassermühle -- 2022 -- 9777.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 10:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Wassermühle -- 2022 -- 9771.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 10:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Wassermühle -- 2022 -- 9772.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 10:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Wassermühle -- 2022 -- 9774.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 10:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Wassermühle -- 2022 -- 9769.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 21:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Wassermühle -- 2022 -- 9786.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 21:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Wassermühle -- 2022 -- 9791.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:45, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 21:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2022 -- 9816.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:45, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Neat - a little work needed on overall composition for FP --Charlesjsharp 16:05, 30 January 2022 (UTC
 Support Good quality.)
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 21:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Sechskantschrauben -- 2020 -- 3985-8.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Wassermühle -- 2022 -- 9777 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Wassermühle -- 2022 -- 9788.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:56, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Wassermühle -- 2022 -- 9796.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:56, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Wassermühle -- 2022 -- 9794.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:11, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Wassermühle -- 2022 -- 9798.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Wassermühle -- 2022 -- 9769.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2022 -- 9827.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2022 -- 9824.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 Support Great shot!Represents the way some users work perfectly. Very good quality. --Steindy 10:22, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Adamant1 11:36, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glaskugel -- 2022 -- 9832.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Wassermühle -- 2022 -- 9769 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:02, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, ehemalige Bahnstrecke -- 2022 -- 9805.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:02, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Silbersee II -- 2022 -- 9808.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:02, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Silbersee II -- 2022 -- 9812.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Wassermühle -- 2022 -- 9772 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:13, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Silbersee II -- 2022 -- 9810.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:13, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, ehemalige Bahnstrecke -- 2022 -- 9807.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:13, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Silbersee II -- 2022 -- 9809.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:13, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glaskugel -- 2022 -- 9848.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:13, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Wassermühle -- 2022 -- 9774 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2022 -- 9828.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:16, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Wassermühle -- 2022 -- 9788 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:16, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glaskugel -- 2022 -- 9849.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

21:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glaskugel -- 2022 -- 9850.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:16, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
 Comment Striking, but I see a couple of dust spots on the lower right. -- Ikan Kekek 12:31, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Thank you. Sorry. It will be fixed within the next minutes. --XRay 06:35, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glaskugel -- 2022 -- 9836.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Glaskugel -- 2022 -- 9849.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Glaskugel -- 2022 -- 9849.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glaskugel -- 2022 -- 9840.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:16, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Parkleuchten

Hallo Dietmar! Vielen Dank für deinen Hinweis zu File:Gruga-Parkleuchten-2022-Bienen-01.jpg. Ich tendiere dazu das Foto zu löschen, da ich 1. keine Zeit habe Kontakt mit dem Künstler aufzunehmen und 2. (gewichtiger) ich das Foto auch nicht gut genug ist, dass es das wert wäre. Da du im Gegensatz zu mir viele Nacht- / Lichtaufnahmen gemacht hast stellt sich mir generell die Frage, was man davon ohne weitere Einwilligung online stellen darf. Ich persönlich hätte File:Gruga-Parkleuchten-2022-Bienen-01.jpg eher als Randfall eingeordnet, da weniger das Lichtkunstwerk sondern das Gesamtsetting (beleuchteter Park mit vielen interessierten Besuchern und interessanter Wolkenkonstellation im Vordergrund steht), zumal das auch eine Soundkomponente hat. Wie schätzt du denn die Urheberrechtsthematik bei den beiden anderen Parkleuchten-Bildern ein? Bei Gruga-Parkleuchten-2022-Wasserprojektion.jpg würde ein Closeup der Wasserprojektion sicher ein Problem darstellen, in meinem Foto ist das allerdings nur ein kleines Teilelement einer Gesamtkomposition die eben von mir kommt. Den farbig beleuchteten Bäumen (File:Gruga-Parkleuchten-2022-Baeume-rot-blau.jpg) würde ich eine Schöpfungshöhe absprechen. Ich finde die Diskussion insgesamt sehr schwierig, da der einzige Zweck der Parkleuchten darin besteht, dass man sich diese anschaut und fotografiert. Auch wenn ich auf Insta&Co allenfalls passiv unterwegs bin, würde ich unterstellen, dass dort etliche dieser Fotos zu finden sind. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:16, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Das ist insgesamt ein schwieriges Thema. Eines ist klar, denn unter die Panoramafreiheit fällt das Parkleuchten nicht. Der künstlerische Aspekt ist eine Sache. Auf den Webseiten des Parkleuchtens ist der Künstler klar benannt. Allerdings lässt man sich zum Fotografieren nicht aus. Zumindest gefunden habe ich nichts. Bei derartigen Aktionen habe ich schon alles Mögliche erlebt. Es reicht "ach, das ist doch nur Licht" bei nur bunter Beleuchtung oder einfachen Lichteffekten über von einem "ist uns eigentlich egal/gerne dürfen Sie die Bilder entsprechend nutzen" bei (gewissem) künstlerischem Anspruch (wie "Recklinghausen leuchtet") bis hin zu einer Ablehnung. LaPaDu ist so ein Thema für sich, denn im LaPaDu oder auch beim Schloss Nordkirchen benötigt man schon mal grundsätzlich eine Genehmigung (ist tatsächlich so, wird aber locker gesehen - bei Hochzeitsfotos oder gezielt gewerblichen Aufnahmen wird es enger gesehen), bei der effektvollen Beleuchtung im LaPaDu ist die Genehmigung erforderlich. Von manchen Aktionen habe ich Fotos, lade sie aber bewusst wegen der möglichen kommerziellen Verwendung bei Wikimedia Commons nicht hoch. Allerdings: Die positiven Erfahrungen überwiegen deutlich. Eine nette Mail mit der möglichen Verwendung und einer Erläuterung der Lizenz ggf. mit dem Angebot der freien Nutzung der gemachten Aufnahmen ist kein Aufwand und man wundert sich (in der Regel), wie nett darauf reagiert wird. Scheu sollte man also nicht haben. Mit mancher Pressestelle und mancher/m Künstler/in hatte ich schon einen netten Austausch. --XRay 💬 10:47, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Ich habe soeben einen Speedy-Deletion-Request gestellt - auch ein anderer User hat mich auf die Problematik hingewiesen. Die Bilder sind den Aufwand nicht wert. Ich hatte mal richtig gute Innenraumaufnahmen von einem Einkaufszentrum gemacht. Dort hatte ich versucht eine Freigabe für WP zu erhalten - auf meine Emails hat man nicht reagiert. Der Aufwand würde sich lohnen, wenn sich der Künstler eine generelle Freigabe für Fotos seiner Lichtinstallationen auf Commons erteilen könnte. Das letzte Mal als ich mich für ein anderes Bild um eine Freigabe gekümmert hat, hätte der Architekt höchstpersönlich für jedes einzelnes (!!) Bild eine Freigabeemail an eine WP-Adresse schicken müssen - so schreckt man leider schnell Fotograf und Rechteinhaber ab. Oder sind dir auch *-Freigabe bekannt? Was ist denn "LaPaDu" - sagt mir gerade nichts. --Tuxyso (talk) 17:11, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
LaPaDu ist der Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord. ;-) Und schau mal in die Kategorie Category:Custom license tags. Man kann auch Gruppen mit einer Genehmigung versehen. Die Dateien werden dann in einer Liste aufgeführt. Die Genehmigungen lasse ich immer an mich schicken, für viele ist das Prozedere hier ein Buch mit sieben Siegeln. Oft kommt erst die Genehmigung, vielleicht mit ein, zwei Bildern. Die restlichen Bilder trage ich dann nach Upload in die Liste ein. Bei Genehmigung pro Bild hätte ich längst aufgegeben. --XRay 💬 17:29, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

19:17, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Börnste, Baumgruppe -- 2022 -- 9870-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Lovely patterns. Flare well controlled while shooting into the sun. --Tagooty 11:54, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Börnste, Baumgruppe -- 2022 -- 9880-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:18, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Börnste, Bäume -- 2022 -- 9892-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:18, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Börnste, Neusträßer Graben -- 2022 -- 9891.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:18, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Eingangsportal -- 2021 -- 4504-10.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering, Wegweiser an der Zufahrt -- 2022 -- 9925.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:42, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering, Hauptburg, Fenster -- 2022 -- 9933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:42, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering, Wegweiser an der Zufahrt -- 2022 -- 9924.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:43, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering, Vorburg, Tor -- 2022 -- 9927.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:43, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering, Hauptburg, Fenster -- 2022 -- 9931.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:43, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering, Hauptburg -- 2022 -- 9934.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:43, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Börnste, Baumgruppe -- 2022 -- 9875-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Nice composition. Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:30, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glaskugel -- 2022 -- 9841.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:15, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering, Vorburg, Tor -- 2022 -- 9928.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:16, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering, Hauptburg -- 2022 -- 9936.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:16, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering, Vorburg, Tor -- 2022 -- 9930.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering, Vorburg -- 2022 -- 9957.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering, Hauptburg -- 2022 -- 9963.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering, Vorburg -- 2022 -- 9965.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:03, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Wäldchen "Am Linnert" -- 2022 -- 9989-93.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:03, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering, Hauptburg -- 2022 -- 9955.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering, Vorburg -- 2022 -- 9959.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:11, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering, Hauptburg -- 2022 -- 9960.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering, Georgskapelle -- 2022 -- 9970.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering, Hauptburg, Fenster -- 2022 -- 9932.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, XRay 💬 13:43, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering, Hauptburg -- 2022 -- 9962.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:24, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering, Vorburg -- 2022 -- 9967.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:24, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering, St.-Nepomuk-Statue -- 2022 -- 9969.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:24, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering, Hauptburg -- 2022 -- 9936 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:25, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schachfiguren, Bauern -- 2022 -- 0022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:25, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

19:10, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering, Vorburg -- 2022 -- 9967 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:49, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schachfiguren, König -- 2022 -- 0019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:49, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schachfiguren, Bauern -- 2022 -- 0022 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:56, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Katholisches Pfarramt St. Viktor -- 2015 -- 6580.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 13:09, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schachfiguren -- 2022 -- 0038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:11, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Schachfiguren, Bauern -- 2022 -- 0022 (bw).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schachfiguren, Bauern -- 2022 -- 0022 (bw).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glaskugel -- 2022 -- 9846.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Domplatz, Brunnen -- 2022 -- 0042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Michaelisplatz, Na-Dann-Fahrrad -- 2022 -- 0046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:52, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, St.-Lamberti-Kirche, Käfige -- 2022 -- 0062.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

22:58, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Prinzipalmarkt, Fahrräder -- 2022 -- 0064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 08:09, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Domgasse, Skulptur "4 Tore" -- 2022 -- 0107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 08:09, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LWL-Museum für Kunst und Kultur, (ehemaliger) Eingang -- 2022 -- 0138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 08:09, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Lambertibrunnen -- 2022 -- 0073-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:42, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, St.-Lamberti-Kirche -- 2022 -- 0098-101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:42, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LWL-Museum für Kunst und Kultur -- 2022 -- 0133-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:14, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, St.-Lamberti-Kirche -- 2022 -- 0113-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:14, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Glaskugel -- 2022 -- 9846.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Glaskugel -- 2022 -- 9846.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Schmalo -- 2022 -- 0144-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:49, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Schmalo -- 2022 -- 0161.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:49, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Prinzipalmarkt, Fahrräder -- 2022 -- 0065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:14, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LWL-Museum für Kunst und Kultur, (ehemaliger) Eingang -- 2022 -- 0139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:14, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Bauerschaft Börnste -- 2021 -- 4406 (bw).jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, St.-Paulus-Dom, Paradiesportal -- 2022 -- 0183-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality Lmbuga 13:50, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, historisches Rathaus, Friedensdemonstration -- 2022 -- 0214.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:12, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Stadtweinhaus, Beflaggung Ukraine und EU -- 2022 -- 0216.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 15:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Schmalo -- 2022 -- 0153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:14, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Schmalo -- 2022 -- 0156.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:14, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Schmalo -- 2022 -- 0158.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:14, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Schmalo -- 2022 -- 0151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:14, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Stadtweinhaus, Beflaggung Ukraine und EU -- 2022 -- 0217.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:16, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, St.-Paulus-Dom, Paradiesportal -- 2022 -- 0179.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:16, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, St.-Lamberti-Kirche, EU-Beflaggung -- 2022 -- 0235.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:14, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Schmalo -- 2022 -- 0165.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Schmalo -- 2022 -- 0172.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Stadtweinhaus, Beflaggung Ukraine und EU -- 2022 -- 0219.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, St.-Lamberti-Kirche, EU-Beflaggung -- 2022 -- 0245.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

21:14, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Schmalo -- 2022 -- 0173.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:07, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Schmalo -- 2022 -- 0178.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:07, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, historisches Rathaus und Stadtweinhaus, Beflaggung Ukraine und EU -- 2022 -- 0225.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:07, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, St.-Lamberti-Kirche, EU-Beflaggung -- 2022 -- 0247.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:09, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Domplatz, Friedensrose -- 2022 -- 0195.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:09, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Börnste, Neusträßer Graben -- 2022 -- 9891.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Börnste, Neusträßer Graben -- 2022 -- 9891.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Prinzipalmarkt 48 -- 2022 -- 0242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:18, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Michaelisplatz, Stadtmodell -- 2022 -- 0211.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:18, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Prinzipalmarkt 13 -- 2022 -- 0229.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:16, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, historisches Rathaus, Statue "Bischof Lambertus" -- 2022 -- 0259.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:16, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Prinzipalmarkt 22, Nasenschild -- 2022 -- 0254.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:16, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Prinzipalmarkt 48 -- 2022 -- 0244.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:00, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Stadthausturm -- 2022 -- 0232.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Prinzipalmarkt 21-27 -- 2022 -- 0233.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Stadthaus 1 -- 2022 -- 0262.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:00, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Clemenskirche, Türme -- 2022 -- 0275.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:00, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Erbdrostenhof, Umzäunung, Figur -- 2022 -- 0278.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schachfiguren -- 2022 -- 0292.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2022 -- 0294.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark, Solitärbaum -- 2022 -- 0303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2022 -- 0297.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Prinzipalmarkt, Arkaden -- 2022 -- 0250.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Prinzipalmarkt 13, Nasenschild -- 2022 -- 0256.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Erbdrostenhof, Tor -- 2022 -- 0280.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:15, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Erbdrostenhof, Umzäunung -- 2022 -- 0277.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:15, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 8-Damen-Problem -- 2022 -- 0288.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:15, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

22:05, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark, Baum am Herzteich -- 2022 -- 0338-40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2022 -- 0314-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Mahnmal für die Opfer des Nationalsozialismus -- 2013 -- 2173.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:56, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Hörster Friedhof, Grabstätte "Bernhard Schlüter" -- 2022 -- 0369.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:56, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Kugel-Fisch-Brunnen -- 2022 -- 0428.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:56, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2022 -- 0300.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:54, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2022 -- 0305.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:54, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark, Solitärbaum -- 2022 -- 0304.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:55, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schachfiguren -- 2022 -- 0292 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:55, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Mahnmal für die Opfer des Nationalsozialismus -- 2013 -- 2175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:55, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Dülmen, Merfeld, Feldweg am Mühlenbach -- 2021 -- 4347-51.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Mahnmal für die Opfer des Nationalsozialismus -- 2022 -- 171601.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Hörster Friedhof, Schneeglöcken -- 2022 -- 0386.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Aaseitenweg -- 2022 -- 0411.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:39, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Turm der ehemaligen Sternwarte -- 2022 -- 0403.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:39, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, St.-Petri-Kirche, Tür -- 2022 -- 0404.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:39, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Mahnmal für die Opfer des Nationalsozialismus -- 2012 -- 3491.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:11, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Hörster Friedhof, Grabstätte "Caspar Offenberg" -- 2022 -- 0390.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:15, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Skulptur "Verkürzter Himmel" -- 2022 -- 0410.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:11, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Turm der ehemaligen Sternwarte -- 2022 -- 0402.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:15, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, St.-Petri-Kirche, Portal -- 2022 -- 0400.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:15, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Mahnmal für die Opfer des Nationalsozialismus -- 2012 -- 3477.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Hörster Friedhof, Grabstätte "Bernhard Schlüter" -- 2022 -- 0370.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Gänseplastik am Humborgweg -- 2022 -- 0420.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality but background should be more blurred --Charlesjsharp 11:55, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Turm der ehemaligen Sternwarte -- 2022 -- 0396.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0491.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:31, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

15:59, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Spiralbinderücken -- 2022 -- 9739 (bw).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spiralbinderücken -- 2022 -- 9739 (bw).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Spiekerhof 44, Nasenschild -- 2022 -- 0422.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:42, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Überwasserkirche, Portal -- 2022 -- 0419.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:02, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Stadtmodell -- 2022 -- 0417.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:02, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0493.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:02, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Hörster Friedhof, Grabstätte "Bernhard Schlüter" -- 2022 -- 0369 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Der bunte Vogel -- 2022 -- 0424.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Turm der ehemaligen Sternwarte -- 2022 -- 0402 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0435-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0559.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Mahnmal für die Opfer des Nationalsozialismus -- 2011 -- 1879.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Soft overall. Can be sharpened? --Tagooty 08:39, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done I'm wondering. This old photograph sharpened with a modern software tool. It's better. Yes. Thank you. --XRay 06:51, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
 Support Much improved  Thank you. --Tagooty 03:11, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Kugel-Fisch-Brunnen -- 2022 -- 0426.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Gänseplastik am Humborgweg -- 2022 -- 0420 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, St.-Petri-Kirche, Portal -- 2022 -- 0407.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:05, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:05, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0441-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:05, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0457-61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:57, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0484-8 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:57, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0604.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Coesfelder Straße 123 -- 2022 -- 0638.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Manual der Orgel -- 2022 -- 0662.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Aaseitenweg -- 2022 -- 0413.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:07, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0565.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:07, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0558.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:07, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0432-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:05, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Rosette -- 2022 -- 0669 (crop, kreativ).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Rosette -- 2022 -- 0669 (crop, kreativ).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0494-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:52, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0561.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:52, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0605.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:52, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Coesfelder Straße 123 -- 2022 -- 0641.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:53, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Kontrabassflöte -- 2022 -- 0664.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:53, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seifenblasen -- 2020 -- 9932.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:05, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --GRDN711 23:40, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0593.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0524-8 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0569-73.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Coesfelder Straße 123 -- 2022 -- 0643.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Rosette -- 2022 -- 0665.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

19:53, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0624.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Coesfelder Straße 123 -- 2022 -- 0648.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:23, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Havixbeck, Hohenholte, ehem. Spritzenhaus -- 2022 -- 0750.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:23, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0509-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0609.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:32, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Coesfelder Straße 123 -- 2022 -- 0646.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:32, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Music for a Whale (E-MEX) -- 2022 -- 0703.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:32, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0579-83.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:23, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0605 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:23, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Rosette -- 2022 -- 0669.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Wassermühle, Mühlstein -- 2022 -- 0845.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Wassermühle, Mühlstein -- 2022 -- 0864.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Wassermühle, Geländer -- 2022 -- 0848.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Wassermühle -- 2022 -- 0850.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Schloss Sythen, Eingangsschild -- 2022 -- 0851.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Dülmen, Hausdülmen, eisbedeckter Strauch -- 2021 -- 5033-7.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Schloss Sythen -- 2022 -- 0852.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Schloss Sythen, Gedenkstein "Otto Graf von Westerholt und Gysenberg" -- 2022 -- 0855.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Wassermühle -- 2022 -- 0857.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Wassermühle, Wehr -- 2022 -- 0858.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Wassermühle, Mühlstein -- 2022 -- 0863.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Rosette -- 2022 -- 0669 (crop, kreativ).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Lüdinghauser Tor -- 2014 -- 3340.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:31, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchspiel, Rödder, St.-Michael-Kapelle -- 2012 -- 4165.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:31, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchspiel, Rödder, Mäusescheune -- 2013 -- 9806.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:31, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

20:59, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, St.-Jakobus-Kirche -- 2015 -- 5533.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:47, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Westdeutsche Lotterie, Flaggen -- 2022 -- 0780.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:47, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Westdeutsche Lotterie, Flaggen -- 2022 -- 0768.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:08, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Westdeutsche Lotterie, Flaggen -- 2022 -- 0758.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Wohnmobilstellplatz am Heubach -- 2011 -- 1787.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Feuerwehr, Eingang -- 2013 -- 00082.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Straßenschild -- 2014 -- 3178.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Friedhof, Skulptur -- 2015 -- 7347.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hiddingsel, St.-Johannes-Nepomuk-Kapelle -- 2013 -- 9824.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hiddingsel, St.-Georg-Grundschule -- 2013 -- 0945.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hiddingsel, St.-Johannes-Nepomuk-Kapelle, Innen -- 2013 -- 9977.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hiddingsel, St.-Johannes-Nepomuk-Kapelle -- 2013 -- 9822.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hiddingsel, St.-Johannes-Nepomuk-Kapelle -- 2013 -- 9823.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 03:47, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hiddingsel, Brennerei Hellmann -- 2013 -- 9815.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 03:47, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hiddingsel, Bildstock (Schützenstraße) -- 2012 -- 7541.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 03:47, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rorup, St.-Agatha-Kirche -- 2013 -- 9878.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 03:47, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-15

19:42, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, St.-Antonius-Kirche -- 2012 -- 7525.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, St.-Antonius-Kirche -- 2012 -- 7526.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2020 -- 6115.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Welte, Windräder -- 2010 -- 3513.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Welte, Windräder -- 2010 -- 3509.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:04, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Dülmen, Hiddingsel, St.-Johannes-Nepomuk-Kapelle -- 2012 -- 7105.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Hiddingsel, St.-Johannes-Nepomuk-Kapelle -- 2012 -- 7105.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Welte, Windräder -- 2010 -- 3514.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Welte, Windräder -- 2010 -- 3519.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Spinnerei Bendix, Lagerhaus -- 2010 -- 2905.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:24, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Gewerbegebiet Telgenkamp, Erko Classics -- 2011 -- 1965.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Marienplatz, Lüdinghauser Tor aus Blumen -- 2011 -- 2111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Alte Schule Dernekamp -- 2011 -- 2141.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:28, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Münsterstraße, Kreisel Auf dem Quellberg -- 2011 -- 2599.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:32, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Kinderwohnheim -- 2012 -- 3364.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:32, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Annette-von-Droste-Hülshoff-Gymnasium (Spinnerei Bendix) -- 2012 -- 3373.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Marstall -- 2022 -- 0792.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Jüdischer Friedhof, Bendix-Mausoleum -- 2011 -- 2124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Jüdischer Friedhof, Tor -- 2011 -- 2127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:29, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Gewerbegebiet Dernekamp, Krematorium -- 2011 -- 2132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:54, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Annette-von-Droste-Hülshoff-Gymnasium (Spinnerei Bendix) -- 2012 -- 3370.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:57, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-16

23:09, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Annette-von-Droste-Hülshoff-Gymnasium (Spinnerei Bendix) -- 2012 -- 3375.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Sportwagenmanufaktur Wiesmann (Gewerbegebiet "An der Lehmkuhle") -- 2012 -- 3377.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Sportwagenmanufaktur Wiesmann (Gewerbegebiet "An der Lehmkuhle") -- 2012 -- 3387.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Marstall -- 2022 -- 0794.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Schlossplatz, Laternen -- 2022 -- 0786.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2022 - Deutschland

Hallo XRay,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2022 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist bereits zum neunten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Seit dem vergangenen Jahr ist der Wettbewerb zweigeteilt, das heißt wir unterscheiden zwischen den beiden Bereichen Landschaft und Detail/Makro. Zu Landschaft zählen auch geschützte Einzelbäume. Im Bereich Detail/Makro werden Pflanzen, Tiere und Pilze bewertet.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen - zum Beispiel in Bayern Liste der Naturdenkmäler im Landkreis Würzburg oder in Sachsen Liste der Naturdenkmale in Stollberg/Erzgeb.

Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2022 – Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung.

In diesem Jahr feiert die FFH-Richtlinie ihren 30. Geburtstag. Aus diesem Grund vergeben wir fünf Sonderpreise für die Fotografen, die die meisten FFH-Gebiete fotografieren.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2022 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 12:10, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Südflügel -- 2022 -- 0791.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Marstall -- 2022 -- 0796.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Fahrrad am Marstall -- 2022 -- 0798.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss -- 2022 -- 0801.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III, Solaranlage -- 2022 -- 0818-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Fahrrad am Marstall -- 2022 -- 0799.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Would like to see more context, but nevertheless good quality. --MB-one 05:38, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Schlossplatz, Laternen -- 2022 -- 0788.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:21, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Marstall -- 2022 -- 0789.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:21, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Fahnen -- 2022 -- 0790.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:24, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III, Solaranlage -- 2022 -- 0830.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:20, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss -- 2022 -- 0804.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:49, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Fahrrad am Marstall -- 2022 -- 0797.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Mariensäule -- 2022 -- 0807.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:49, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III, Solaranlage -- 2022 -- 0810-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Clemens-Brentano-Gymnasium -- 2012 -- 3165.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Marstall -- 2022 -- 0792 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Marstall -- 2022 -- 0794 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III, Solaranlage -- 2022 -- 0827.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Cinema-Center -- 2012 -- 3392.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche -- 2012 -- 3404.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss, Fahrrad am Marstall -- 2022 -- 0799 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:28, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III, Solaranlage -- 2022 -- 0809.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hermann-Leeser-Schule -- 2012 -- 3485.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Clemens-Brentano-Gymnasium -- 2012 -- 3170.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:28, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Cinema-Center -- 2012 -- 3398.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-17

22:53, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche -- 2012 -- 3412.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:48, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hermann-Leeser-Schule -- 2012 -- 3468.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:48, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Spiekerhof, Kiepenkerl -- 2022 -- 0855.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Schulstraße, Kirschblüte -- 2022 -- 0835.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Gaststätte "Blaues Haus" -- 2022 -- 0848.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Kriegerehrenmal 1870-71 -- 2012 -- 3439.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Skulptur "Die Widerspenstige" (Borkener Straße) -- 2012 -- 3437.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Liudgerhaus und Diözesanbibliothek -- 2022 -- 0851.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Schulstraße, Kirschblüte -- 2022 -- 0836.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Spiekerhof, Kiepenkerl -- 2022 -- 0857.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Kriegerehrenmal 1870-71 -- 2012 -- 3443.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Kriegerdenkmal Weltkriege (Ludwig-Wiesmann-Straße) -- 2012 -- 3474.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Schulstraße, Kirschblüte -- 2022 -- 0838.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Gebäude Ecke Salzstraße-Heinrich-Brüning-Straße -- 2022 -- 0876.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Hohe Mark, Fernmeldeturm -- 2022 -- 0899.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hermann-Leeser-Schule, Eingang -- 2012 -- 3490.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Turnhalle der Hermann-Leeser-Schule -- 2012 -- 3912.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Spiekerhof, Gaststätte "Kleiner Kiepenkerl" -- 2022 -- 0860.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Julius-Voos-Gasse, Konventsgebäude -- 2022 -- 0880.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Naturpark Hohe Mark -- 2022 -- 0912.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Franz-Hospital -- 2012 -- 3908.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, ehem. Textilfabrik Ketteler-Specht -- 2012 -- 3915.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Schulstraße, Kirschblüte -- 2022 -- 0839.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Dominikanerkirche -- 2022 -- 0881.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Turnhalle der Hermann-Leeser-Schule -- 2022 -- 0965.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Naturpark Hohe Mark -- 2022 -- 0915.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality and btw. a great artwork! -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Servatiikirchplatz, Baumreihe -- 2022 -- 0882.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:10, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Skulptur "Partnerschaft" (Charleville-Mézières-Platz) -- 2012 -- 3905.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:10, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hermann-Leeser-Schule -- 2012 -- 3907.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Domplatz, Sparschwein -- 2022 -- 0863.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:10, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality: Piggy of the day! -- Terragio67 16:37, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-18

19:31, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Halterner Straße, Willkommensschild -- 2012 -- 3876.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Kutscherhaus (Lüdinghauser Straße) -- 2012 -- 3832.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, St.-Lamberti-Kirche -- 2022 -- 0865.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:03, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Naturpark Hohe Mark -- 2022 -- 0917.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Turnhalle der Hermann-Leeser-Schule -- 2022 -- 0966.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, ehem. Textilfabrik Ketteler-Specht -- 2012 -- 3496.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:15, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hermann-Leeser-Schule -- 2012 -- 3900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Schulstraße, Kirschblüte -- 2022 -- 0841.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Servatiikirchplatz, Gebäude -- 2022 -- 0883.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:15, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Hohe Mark, Fernmeldeturm -- 2022 -- 0901.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:15, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering -- 2021 -- 5233.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Annette-von-Droste-Hülshoff-Gymnasium (Spinnerei Bendix) -- 2012 -- 3929.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Marienplatz -- 2012 -- 3936.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Schulstraße, Fahrräder -- 2022 -- 0846.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Naturpark Hohe Mark, Hexenbuchen -- 2022 -- 0887.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2021 -- 4698.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2021 -- 4714-8.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2021 -- 4714-8.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Annette-von-Droste-Hülshoff-Gymnasium (Spinnerei Bendix) -- 2012 -- 3931.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Stadtbücherei -- 2022 -- 0873 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:09, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Dülmener Pferde im Merfelder Bruch -- 2022 -- 1002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:09, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Dülmener Pferde im Merfelder Bruch -- 2022 -- 1149.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:09, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Annette-von-Droste-Hülshoff-Gymnasium (Spinnerei Bendix) -- 2012 -- 3934.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Lüdinghauser Straße -- 2012 -- 3998.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Dülmener Pferde im Merfelder Bruch -- 2022 -- 1267.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Hohe Mark, Naturschutzgebiet "Hohemarkenbusch" -- 2021 -- 6541.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Naturpark Hohe Mark, Hexenbuchen -- 2022 -- 0890.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Bahnhof, Vorplatz -- 2012 -- 3970.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:04, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2021 -- 4685.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Dülmener Pferde im Merfelder Bruch -- 2022 -- 1011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Dülmener Pferde im Merfelder Bruch -- 2022 -- 1159.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-19

15:20, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Turnhalle der Hermann-Leeser-Schule -- 2022 -- 0967.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Naturpark Hohe Mark -- 2022 -- 0957.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Dülmener Pferde im Merfelder Bruch -- 2022 -- 1276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Hohe Mark, Naturschutzgebiet "Hohemarkenbusch" -- 2021 -- 6553.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:04, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Naturpark Hohe Mark, Hexenbuchen -- 2022 -- 0892.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:04, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Naturpark Hohe Mark -- 2022 -- 0928.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 Comment FP for me. -- Ikan Kekek 09:23, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2013 -- 00465.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Caritas -- 2013 -- 0645.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olfen, Stever an der Füchtelner Mühle -- 2021 -- 8966.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Dülmener Pferde im Merfelder Bruch -- 2022 -- 1060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Dülmener Pferde im Merfelder Bruch -- 2022 -- 1174.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Lüdinghauser Tor -- 2013 -- 0076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:07, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:10, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, ehem. Textilfabrik Ketteler-Specht -- 2013 -- 0002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:07, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:10, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2021 -- 4714-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:07, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Naturpark Hohe Mark, Hexenbuchen -- 2022 -- 0893.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:10, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Dülmener Pferde im Merfelder Bruch -- 2022 -- 1176.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:11, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Würfel, gemischt -- 2021 -- 5577.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-20

18:56, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Maria-Königin-Kirche -- 2012 -- 9385.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:03, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Overbergschule -- 2012 -- 9129.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:51, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Dülmener Pferde im Merfelder Bruch -- 2022 -- 1290.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:50, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
We can never have too many Dülmen horse QIs!! Charlesjsharp 09:00, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Hohe Mark, Naturschutzgebiet "Hohemarkenbusch" -- 2022 -- 0902.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:30, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Naturpark Hohe Mark, Hexenbuchen -- 2022 -- 0895.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:30, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, ehem. Textilfabrik Ketteler-Specht -- 2013 -- 0008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Kapelle des Franz-Hospitals -- 2012 -- 8117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Dülmener Pferde im Merfelder Bruch -- 2022 -- 1291.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Hohe Mark, Naturschutzgebiet "Hohemarkenbusch" -- 2022 -- 0906.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:09, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2021 -- 4761.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:09, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Vorpark -- 2012 -- 9115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 12:37, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Mariensäule -- 2012 -- 8225.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 09:33, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2021 -- 4758.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 12:37, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Dülmener Pferde im Merfelder Bruch -- 2022 -- 1076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:09, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Dülmener Pferde im Merfelder Bruch -- 2022 -- 1200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:09, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Evangelischer Friedhof -- 2012 -- 8085.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Richard-von-Weizsäcker-Berufskolleg -- 2013 -- 0649.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Senden, Venner Moor -- 2022 -- 1358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Dülmener Pferde im Merfelder Bruch -- 2022 -- 1230.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Dülmener Pferde im Merfelder Bruch -- 2022 -- 1294.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Baumreihe -- 2022 -- 0969.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:10, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Hohe Mark, Naturschutzgebiet "Hohemarkenbusch" -- 2022 -- 0907.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:10, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Senden, Venner Moor, Bohlenweg -- 2022 -- 1354.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Dülmener Pferde im Merfelder Bruch -- 2022 -- 1238.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Dülmener Pferde im Merfelder Bruch -- 2022 -- 1299.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:11, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Baumreihe -- 2022 -- 0970.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Hohe Mark, Naturschutzgebiet "Hohemarkenbusch" -- 2022 -- 0909.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:48, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, St.-Lamberti-Kirche, Portal "Wurzel Jesse", Glaskunstwerk "L’Or" -- 2022 -- 1380.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Stadtmodell am Michaelisplatz -- 2022 -- 1386.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Baumreihe -- 2022 -- 0973.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Brücke über den Heubach -- 2022 -- 1396 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Dernekamp, Löwenzahn -- 2022 -- 1338.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:20, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Friedenstaube an einem Wohnhaus -- 2022 -- 1450 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:20, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Senden, Venner Moor, Bank -- 2022 -- 1374.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:20, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-21

00:18, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Baumreihe -- 2022 -- 0978.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:45, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-22

20:26, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

Template:POTDpromotion //EatchaBot ([[User talk:EatchaBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:00, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Sydney Harbour Bridge

The name of the bridge is the Sydney Harbour Bridge. It is NOT called "Harbour Bridge". Kindly accept this from an elderly Austrlian historian who lived in the shadow of the Sydney Harbour Bridge for many years, and has crossed it, by train, car and of foot a great number of times. Please revert to the correct name. If you want to be really precise, you will rename the file as well. Sydney (Au) Harbour Bridge does not go down well. Amandajm ([[User talk:Amandajm|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:05, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Template:Ping The description is modified, the structured data (label) will be modified by my bot. I think about renaming the file, but first I have to modify my local image data, then upload the file with new meta data and new file name. For me it is important to have same file name local and in Commons. Next the file name is part of the license. In printed media the link will be the old name. BTW: I reverted your edit because of the language prefix (:de:/:en:) visible in the text. If you have a look to the file now, you'll see that the link in the description is fixed with your proposed name at all of my images of the Sydney Harbour Bridge. IMO, Sydney (AU), Sydney Harbour Bridge isn't a good filename, but it would be only a minor problem. And there are still a lot of files with only Harbour Bridge in the filename. Harbour Bridge is an often used term and not wrong, but not the official name. --XRay 💬 17:20, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-23

02:44, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Save the date: Commons Photographers meeting next week

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

Please save the date: on Saturday, June 19th, our next virtual Zoom meeting is going to take place. As you know, one goal of these meetings is to share knowledge about different types of photography. This time, we've lined up the following presentations:

  • Photography in Nigeria
  • Photographing vehicles
  • I started printing my images – here’s what I've learned so far…

If you'd like to participate in this event, please consider signing up on this page. Also, if you'd like to present at one of the next meetings, please send me a quick note. Sharing your experiences and learnings with others can make a huge difference!

I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best! Hope to see you on the 19th.

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg ([[User talk:Frank Schulenburg|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-24

16:57, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

Template:POTDpromotion //EatchaBot ([[User talk:EatchaBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:00, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

This Sunday!

Hi, this is just a quick reminder: the next virtual meeting of our user group is scheduled for Sunday, June 19, 16:00 UTC. Topics are: “Photography in Nigeria”, “Photographing Vehicles”, “Wildlife photography and citizen science”, and “I started printing my images – here’s what I've learned so far…”. I'm thrilled about this great agenda and I'm looking forward to connecting with you again. Stay safe and all the best, --Frank Schulenburg ([[User talk:Frank Schulenburg|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-25

20:16, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-26

20:00, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

Template:POTDpromotion //EatchaBot ([[User talk:EatchaBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:05, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-27

19:30, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Comment placement

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Pacific_Science_Center&diff=672428779&oldid=628707654 : why? In my experience this change is likely in future edits to get the comment separated from the category it refers to. I know you are a very experienced editor, so I don't want to revert you without understanding why you think this other way of doing this is better. - Jmabel ! talk 14:47, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

IMO opinion a comment shouldn't be within a link (or category). It is not a good programming style, even if it works. However, I do not really understand the meaning of the comment. In my opinion, this should actually be solved quite differently. For example, the architect is missing in the info box. --XRay 💬 15:50, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
BTW: I had read the category via bot and the API reported an error with this construction when writing. This is also an indication of not ideal programming style. --XRay 💬 16:46, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Thanks. Weird that the API objects to Wikisyntax that works fine, but so it is. - Jmabel ! talk 17:16, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
BTW: I've searched for similar syntax with Category: insource:/\[\[Category:[^\|\[\]]*\<!--/i … and found only a few categories! I think it this is surprising, that I found one! --XRay 💬 18:24, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-28

19:22, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:00, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-29

22:58, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotedUploader /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:01, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-30

19:25, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Helferlein für Textschreibe in Kategorien

Hallo Template:Ping Einst hattest du mich auf das Helferlein VisualFileChange aufmerksam gemacht. Gibt es auch so ein ähnliches Helferlein, damit man in alle Unterkategorien einer Kategorie einen Text einfügen kann? Cat sind ja keine Dateien. Tozina ([[User talk:Tozina|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:07, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Hallo! So ein Tool kenne ich leider nicht. Meistens schreibe ich mir in derartigen Fällen ein Skript (Bot), welches die Aufgabe erledigt. Allerdings habe ich es auch schon mal mit VisualFileChange soweit geschafft, dass die Kategorien angezeigt werden. Dazu benötigt man eine Suchabfrage wie "Category: Cantilever signs in Germany". Eingeben kann man so etwas nur in der Commons-Suche. Wichtig ist das Leerzeichen hinter "Category:". --XRay 💬 04:32, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
ich hab es leider nicht geschafft. Dennoch VIELEN DANK für die schnelle Antwort Tozina ([[User talk:Tozina|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:37, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-31

21:19, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

Template:POTDpromotion //EatchaBot ([[User talk:EatchaBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:00, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:00, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:00, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-32

19:47, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Template:VICpromoted --VICBot2 ([[User talk:VICBot2|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-33

21:06, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#July_29,_2022

Hi, sorry for missing your reviews until now, and thanks for adding them! I've had another go at the verticals, could you have another look and see what you think? Thanks. Mike Peel ([[User talk:Mike Peel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:20, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

A short view and only with the restrictions of a mobile phone: File:Zadar 2011 11.jpg is better, but please look at the windows of the modern building at the left. They are still leaning in. At old buildings it is much more difficult to find verticals. File:Zadar 2011 06.jpg looks like tilted CW - with a look to the modern buildings in the background. Both is easy to fix, for example using tools like Adobe Lightroom. Good Open Source existing too. --XRay 💬 18:17, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

Template:POTDpromotion //EatchaBot ([[User talk:EatchaBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:00, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Quick update on behalf of the Commons Photographers User Group

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I hope you're well and enjoy taking photos for Wikimedia Commons. Here are a couple of quick updates on behalf of our group:

  • Our next virtual meeting will take place on Saturday, August 27. At this point we have two presentations lined up:
  • Suitable! Unsuitable! How to choose photos for a Wikipedia for children, “Klexikon (Ziko)
  • The aperture and its (less known) effects (XRay)
You can sign up for the event on this page: Virtual Meeting on August 27, 2022. – Given that we can accommodate more speakers, I'll invite you to get in touch with me in case you'd like to present on the 27th. You can reach me any time on my talk page or by sending a quick email.
  • Also, we now have a page for local events organized by members of our user group: Local events 2022. Please check it out and consider organizing an event yourself!
  • And finally, we're planning on offering a Post-processing Workshop on October 8. Please save the date; an events page with more information will go up later.

Thanks for being a member of our group and for sharing your works under a free license. Have fun taking pictures!

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg ([[User talk:Frank Schulenburg|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:23, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-34

00:09, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022

Template:Clear Hallo XRay,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2022 findet zum zwölften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Sieger 2021 – Schloss Langenburg

Vergangenes Jahr hat Matthias Süßen mit einer Drohnenaufnahme von Schloss Langenburg im Morgennebel gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf wird dieses Jahr sein Nachfolger?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Cloppenburg oder in Oldenburg.

Wir haben dieses Jahr unter dem Motto „Klein aber Oho“ drei Sonderpreise für Kleindenkmale ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die die unterschätzten Kleindenkmale wie Grenzsteine oder Bildstöcke zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2022 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 06:12, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:01, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

The aperture and its (less known) effects

Hallo Dietmar, leider konnte ich nicht am Samstag nicht am Online-Treffen der Commons Photographers User Group teilnehmen. Dein Vortrag The aperture and its (less known) effects hätte mich aber sehr interessiert. Hast Du zufällig Folien oder eine Stichwortliste oder so etwas, die ich mir ansehen könnte? Das wäre toll! Auf jeden Fall herzliche Grüße,

Roman / --Aristeas (talk) 07:32, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Folien habe ich, aber da sind Bilder drin, die nicht frei zugänglich sind. Ich mache dir eine Stichwortliste. --XRay 💬 07:53, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Template:Ping Die wichtigsten Punkte aus dem Vortrag:
Erfahrung aus dem Vortrag (abgesehen von meinen geringen Englischkenntnissen): Die 15 Minuten waren viel zu kurz. Ich hätte eher 30 Minuten benötigt.
--XRay 💬 08:25, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Wow, vielen Dank, Dietmar! Das ist eine schöne Zusammenstellung. Im Moment bin ich mit Umzugsvorbereitungen voll beschäftigt, aber sobald im neuen Heim der Internetzugang funktioniert, werde ich mich durch die Links klicken und lesen, was ich noch nicht kenne. – Ja, die Zeit vergeht bei solchen Vorträgen enorm schnell, gerade beim Vortragen in Fremdsprachen. Ich habe einige Seminare zu Fachvorträgen mitgemacht und der Zeitfaktor war am Ende oft der springende Punkt. Herzlichen Dank und viele Grüße, Roman / --Aristeas (talk) 07:24, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-35

23:02, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello

Why do you keep reverting my edits? Kwameghana ([[User talk:Kwameghana|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:31, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Template:Ping It's very simple. You delete qualifiers (well, that's a bug in the ISA tool) and set unnecessary properties. Please read Commons:Depicts. --XRay 💬 04:31, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Please read especially Commons:Depicts#Generic_items. --XRay 💬 04:33, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
You need samples? Template:Diff, but Template:Q already set. --XRay 💬 04:37, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
With the campaign, very many descriptions/depicts were destroyed. Every day there was unnecessary work with it. The control was so costly that I just reset the changes after a short control. There were maybe 2 (!) reasonable additions during the campaign, which I took over. The rest were redundant or deleted existing qualifiers unnecessarily. --XRay 💬 04:44, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Ok! Maybe we can have a zoom or google meet so that you can teach me on what to add and not what to add. Thanks Kwameghana ([[User talk:Kwameghana|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:20, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Sorry, please forgive me if I don't want to do an individual meeting via Zoom or Google Meet. It's the same like phone calls that I don't like to make. The time commitment is too great, even though it would definitely be a nice conversation. I recommend you look at the Commons:Structured data pages. There are procedures there. In particular, please look at Commons:Depicts. The ISA tool has several disadvantages. This does not only mean the bug that qualifiers are deleted when you change from "normal" to "preferred". You can't see what is set and what would be superfluous. So please have a closer look to the images and descriptions before you modify SDC with the ISA tool. --XRay 💬 08:54, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

Template:POTDpromotion //EatchaBot ([[User talk:EatchaBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:00, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-36

23:19, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:01, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-37

01:47, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Type of locomotive

Template:Re I think it is fireles steam locomotive, not a Compressed-air locomotive. I think it depends on the details of the locomotive construction. MIGORMCZ ([[User talk:MIGORMCZ|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:17, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Compressed air isn't steam. But yes, it's fireless. And why do you ask here? Please delete this talk page and ask/comment on my user talk page. --XRay 💬 11:31, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
I think the File talk namespace is suitable for file discussions. MIGORMCZ ([[User talk:MIGORMCZ|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:01, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
So I should answer at several pages? IMO not a good idea. For a discussion with a user I discuss at user talk pages. Otherwise all the discussions are distributed over several pages. The discussion about special things like this one is not interesting for other people. You've commented with a ping for me, so please use user talk pages. --XRay 💬 12:05, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Template:Ping FYI: This compressed air locomotive from 1901 wasn’t from the Bankhead coal mine, but rather from the nearby Old Canmore Mine. --XRay 💬 11:38, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Ok, the design doesn't seem to me to be originally intended for propulsion by compressed air, but by steam from an external source. MIGORMCZ ([[User talk:MIGORMCZ|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:00, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

Template:POTDpromotion //EatchaBot ([[User talk:EatchaBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:00, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:01, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-38

MediaWiki message delivery 22:13, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

You're invited to provide input…

Dear fellow member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

At our last meeting end of August, we talked about getting in touch with the Wikimedia Foundation and offering our help for improving Wikimedia Commons. Today, I invite you to provide your input on a draft open letter to the Foundation. Over the course of the next ten days, we'll further improve the text together, before inviting people to sign it. If you're interested in providing input, please engage in the discussion on the talk page of the draft.

In the meanwhile, I hope you're well and have a great time taking photos! All the best, --Frank Schulenburg ([[User talk:Frank Schulenburg|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:42, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-39

MediaWiki message delivery 00:27, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

Template:POTDpromotion //EatchaBot ([[User talk:EatchaBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:00, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-40

MediaWiki message delivery 00:21, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Online workshop this weekend

Dear Commons Photographers User Group member,

This coming Saturday, October 8, we'll host an online post processing workshop. On behalf of our events coordinator Shreya I invite you to sign up for the event using this Google form.

I hope you're well. All the best, --Frank Schulenburg ([[User talk:Frank Schulenburg|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:50, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

  • Thank you. IMO your photographs are very good. :-) They show that you are familiar with the techniques of development. I won't have much new to tell you. --XRay 💬 05:42, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your presentation

Expert presenter
Thank you for your time and dedication in making the presentation about Lightroom, I learned how to upload photos from Lightroom to Commons and it will save me a lot of time. Thank you and I hope you accept this humble gift Wilfredor ([[User talk:Wilfredor|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:30, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you very much. 90 minutes may be an introduction. I've started using Lightroom years ago with less knowledge, but I've learned a much over the years. Today I think, there is so much more and I continue learning. I would love to use the knowledge I have gained and also the new functionalities of Lightroom to re-edit my older images as well, but there is not enough time for that. In individual cases, however, I do that. You know your way around and I wish you many more great pictures. --XRay 💬 16:41, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Sortierschlüssel

Schönen Sonntag XRay,

die Forumsdiskussion ist schon so lang: wo finde ich den Sortierschlüssel / wie geht das?

Danke noch für Deinen Hinweis zur Benennung eines Bildes vs Kategorie. Habe das für meine Änderungen stichprobenartig geprüft, war noch alles gut, was auch daran liegen mag, dass die Bilder höchstens in zwei Kategorien auftauchten.

Viele Grüße, Wikisympathisant ([[User talk:Wikisympathisant|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:09, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Ich bin sicherlich jemand, der recht viele Kategorien setzt. Da ich vieles (nicht alles) per Bot mache, ist das zumindest für die eher trivialen Kategorien kein Problem. Sortierschlüssel nutze ich bei allen Datumskategorien, damit dort die Chronologie erhalten bleibt. Mehr dazu findest du zum Beispiel unter [119]. (Ich vermute aber, dass dir das gar nicht so unbekannt ist.) Es steht zwar drin, aber ich erwähne es doch lieber noch einmal: Nationale Sonderzeichen wie Ä, Ö, Ü und Ligaturen wie ß kommen nicht unbedingt zwischen A und Z. Daher wird zum Beispiel der Schlüssel meiner Heimatstadt Dülmen nicht mit Umlaut geschrieben. Beispiel: [[Categorie:Irgendeine Kategorie|Dulmen]]. Manche verwenden auch Leerzeichen oder andere Zeichen, um bestimmte Gruppierungen vorzunehmen. Das hast du bestimmt schon bei den Unterkategorien gesehen. Im Gegensatz zum Dateinamen hat man so die Möglichkeit, für jede Kategorie eine andere, individuelle Sortierfolge anzugeben. Viele Grüße und noch einen schönen Sonntag! --XRay 💬 13:21, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Doch, war mir tatsächlich unbekannt. Danke für die Beschreibung und auch noch einen schönen Sonntag, Wikisympathisant ([[User talk:Wikisympathisant|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:28, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-41

14:06, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Kleiner blauer Himmel

Guten Tag, XRay. Entschuldigen Sie mein schrecklich Deutsch.

Ich habe die Kategorien "blauer Himmel" von einigen Fotos entfernt, weil sie nicht sehr viel Himmel enthielten. Ich glaube beschreibende Kategorien sollten bemerkenswerte Teile der Fotografien sein.

Viele dank! — hike395 (talk) 03:59, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Template:Ping Thank you for the information. I saw that and thought it was an oversight. Nothing is said in the rules about the necessary size and therefore the images are correct in the category. In the other corresponding categories it is handled the same way. --XRay 💬 04:06, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
OK, vielleicht können wir uns nicht einigen. Beachten Sie, dass eines der Bilder nicht in California war. — hike395 (talk) 04:10, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
I've seen your changes. Thank you! --XRay 💬 04:12, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

Template:POTDpromotion //EatchaBot ([[User talk:EatchaBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:00, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:01, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-42

MediaWiki message delivery 21:43, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:00, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Congratulations

Congratulations on your grand tour of the western U.S. and Canada. Yellowstone is one of my favorite places in the world. I'm sorry your visit coincided with the floods - the northeast corner of the park is quite different from the areas with thermal features, and well worth seeing on its own. I first went there in 1973 when I was 14, with my parents, and my wife and I have been back five times, with loops as far as Banff and Salt Lake City, or just driving from the East Coast. For your next trip I would highly recommend southern Utah. Thank you for your pictures, and I look forward to more. Acroterion ([[User talk:Acroterion|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:37, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! The national parks are really amazing. There are some national parks along our way, but we couldn't visit them all. (We've visited Banff National Park (rainy day), Yellowstone National Park and Yosemite National Park (second time, first 2012) - and a lot of other wonderful places). Utah was my favorite too. We've been in Salt Lake City for an afternoon, but we couldn't visit a lot. At the afternoon and evening there were a demonstrations belonging to the abortion decision of the Supreme Court. The northeast of Yellowstone National Park was still closed at June 22nd. But we were happy to visit the geysers and hot springs in the west. Let's see where the next path takes us. --XRay 💬 12:50, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-43

MediaWiki message delivery 21:20, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:00, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

October 28, 2022

Hello! On October 28, 2022, I posted 4 files. You have marked only 2. Why? Matsievsky ([[User talk:Matsievsky|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:00, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Simple rule, 5 nominations, 5 reviews. Often I made more than 5, sometimes less. On October 28th I made 8 reviews. It's the reviewers choice which images were reviewed. --XRay 💬 09:52, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

JPEG and PNG formats

Hello! JPEG and PNG formats have difference functions. See: Discussion about JPEG and PNG format files in Russian. Discussion about JPEG and PNG format files in English. --Matsievsky ([[User talk:Matsievsky|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:46, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

And the JPEG format quality is better, the PNG formats is vague IN WIKI. --Matsievsky ([[User talk:Matsievsky|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:56, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Yes, but not different images. It's the same development. If you like to discuss, discuss it on QI discussion page. --XRay 💬 03:58, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-44

MediaWiki message delivery 21:13, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

Template:POTDpromotion //EatchaBot ([[User talk:EatchaBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:01, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:00, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-45

MediaWiki message delivery 00:29, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-46

MediaWiki message delivery 21:52, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

Template:POTDpromotion //EatchaBot ([[User talk:EatchaBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Cat-a-lot

Moin, auf MediaWiki talk:Gadget-Cat-a-lot.js#Cat-a-lot not working on Chrome/Android schreibst Du von einer modifizierten Version die funktioniert. Kannst du dafür einen link angeben oder mir sagen was ich tun kann damit cat-a-lot auf meinem Samsung Tab wieder läuft? GeorgHHtalk   14:12, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Der Zugang war nur vorübergehend und nur zum Test. Ich nutze die normale Version, habe aber noch immer zwei Dinge ausgeblendet. Hier kannst du es sehen: User:XRay/common.js. --XRay 💬 18:52, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Hab es bei mir auch so geändert - funktioniert. Danke für die Hilfe. GeorgHHtalk   20:41, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-47

MediaWiki message delivery 23:19, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Template:VICpromoted --VICBot2 ([[User talk:VICBot2|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:19, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Template:VICpromoted --VICBot2 ([[User talk:VICBot2|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:19, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

About Category:Overcast in the Netherlands

@XRay, According to w:en:Overcast: Overcast ..., as defined by the World Meteorological Organization, is the meteorological condition of clouds obscuring at least 95% of the sky. I see clouds and a lot of blue sky on this photo, perhaps about 50-50. So I think clouds are obscuring far less than 95% of the sky, and the Category:Overcast in the Netherlands is not appropriate here; therefor I removed it. Why did you reverse this edit? Do you see more than 94% clouds? JopkeB ([[User talk:JopkeB|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:22, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Template:Ping First: If you like to ask or discuss anything, please use the user discussion pages. I can't check thousands of file discussion pages. I've transferred your comment. I've read the 95% rule too. So I added the overcast category to some of my images with 95% or more clouds. And I moved some photographs with more blue sky to "Clouds and blue sky ...". And I reversed your edit at one (!) (this one: File:Zaanse Schans, Windmühlen -- 2015 -- 7271.jpg) photographs, because there was nearly 100% clouds. --XRay 💬 07:21, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
  1. I pinged you in the file discussion page, so you would have get an alert, even when you would not have checked the file discussion page. I prefer to keep discussions closest to where they are about, and in this case it is the file discussion page.
  2. On File:Zaanse Schans, Windmühlen -- 2015 -- 7271.jpg I see sunny weather, with lots of shadows and lots of blue sky. In my opinion that is not overcast weather. That is why I removed it. Appearently we see different photos.
JopkeB ([[User talk:JopkeB|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:44, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
First (again): Mail notifications are possible at user talk pages, not at file talk pages. I never answer at file talk pages. File talk pages should only contain information that is of interest to third parties, for example sources for the use of the image. The other problem (File:Zaanse Schans, Windmühlen -- 2015 -- 7271.jpg): Yes, there are shadows. That's the reason why I thought for a long time whether the picture fits to overcast categories. I only see different shades of gray, but no blue sky. --XRay 💬 08:38, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
I conclude that we disagree about a lot:
  • Mail notifications: I think that by pinging a user, mail notifications are possible for all kind of discussion pages, including file talk pages. You think they only are possible on user talk pages.
  • The purpose of talk pages: I think file talk pages can serve many purposes, including containing information that is of interest to third parties AND for discussions. You think file talk pages are only for the first purpose. Can you point out for me where the Commons rule is that says that Talk pages of files (it is in the name!) are not for discussions? I see only: "standard talk pages are used to discuss a Commons page or File" on Commons:Talk page guidelines.
  • Where a discussion about a file should be held. I think a file discussions should be held in the Talk page of the file because then later others can easily find a discussion about the file. You only want to discuss them on your own user talk page.
  • What we see on this photo: I see clouds, a lot of blue sky, sunny weather and shadows. You do not see any blue sky at all.
How to go on? JopkeB ([[User talk:JopkeB|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:56, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
In my opinion, a discussion here is pointless. Discussions about an file by an file are superfluous, at the latest when they are concluded. There isn't an archiving job like user talks that you can or should set up. The comments confuse third parties. A communication between two users should be made on a user talk page. It is usual and also that one answers there as well. So far in many years I have never discussed with anyone on a file talk page. It just never occurred to anyone. Last point: Blue sky? I can't see any blue sky. Dark and light gray clouds, yes. Sorry. Please have a look to File:Zaanse Schans, Windmühlen -- 2015 -- 7270.jpg and File:Zaanse Schans, Windmühlen -- 2015 -- 7271.jpg. If you think it's wrong, put "Category:Clouds and blue sky in the Netherlands". --XRay 💬 13:55, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
BTW: standard talk pages are used to discuss a Commons page or File, while user talk pages are used to communicate with other users or leave them messages --XRay 💬 04:02, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-48

MediaWiki message delivery 20:00, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Template:VICpromoted --VICBot2 ([[User talk:VICBot2|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:20, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Template:VICpromoted Template:VICpromoted --VICBot2 ([[User talk:VICBot2|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:19, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-49

MediaWiki message delivery 00:39, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi, kannst du noch etwas zu der Skulptur sagen bzw. in die Beschreibung setzen. Autor? Alter? Sind die Bedingungen für FoP erfüllt? --Túrelio ([[User talk:Túrelio|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:22, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Ja, vielleicht. Dokumentationen zu den Skulpturen am Schloss Nordkirchen gibt es, wenn auch nicht für alles. Ich schaue mal. --XRay 💬 11:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Ich habe einen eher weichen Hinweis gefunden, so zwischen 1798 und 1801. Ich habe da jetzt als Info "um 1800" ergänzt. Mehr war nicht aufzutreiben. --XRay 💬 13:18, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Ok. Dann spielt das eventuelle Urheberrecht des Bildhauers jedenfalls keine Rolle mehr. --Túrelio ([[User talk:Túrelio|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:58, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
War ehrlich gesagt auch nicht zu erwarten. Das Schloss ist aus dem 18. Jahrhundert. Moderne Dinge (FoP) stehen dort nicht. --XRay 💬 14:02, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
So spontan wirkte diese Skulptur auf mich nicht so alt (in der hiesigen Umgebung). Liegt vielleicht an guter Pflege. ;-) --Túrelio ([[User talk:Túrelio|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:37, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Soll ich mal Werbung für das Münsterland machen? ;-) Das Schloss ist gut gepflegt. Es beherbergt die Finanzhochschule des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen. Garten und Gebäude sind immer gut gepflegt. Man nennt es auch das Versailles des Münsterlands oder Westfälisches Versailles. Es ist eines der schönsten Schlösser des Münsterlands. --XRay 💬 14:52, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Question from the CPUG Board

Dear user group member,

I'm writing you to today on behalf of the board of the Commons Photographers User Group. The past year has been a busy one for us. In 2022, we've had more activities than ever before in the history of our group and you'll find an overview on our group's page.

With that being said, 2022 was also a year of learning for the current board members. Most of us hadn't been involved in running the Photographers User Group and we spent quite some time on getting used to our new roles. We all feel it was a steep learning curve.

That's why, at our last board meeting, we decided to ask our members whether they'd be ok with us serving for another year. Extending our board duties to the end of 2023 would allow us to continue the work we've started this year, and to benefit from the knowledge we've built over the past twelve months.

However, in the end, it's up to you and the other members of our group to decide whether such an extension of our board term should be granted. I invite you to voice your opinion on this page:

Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2022

We'll gather feedback until December 27, and we'll keep you in the loop about the outcomes of this process.

Thanks so much for your ongoing support of our group. I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best.

--Ailura ([[User talk:Ailura|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:32, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-50

MediaWiki message delivery 23:32, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

Template:POTDpromotion //EatchaBot ([[User talk:EatchaBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:01, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Ein paar Commons-Anregungen für den "Dezember"

Template:Ping Ich wünsche dir einen schönen und gesegneten 3. Advent und möchte dir ein paar Commons-Anregungen für den "Dezember" in deiner Umgebung geben. Mögliche Bilder im Dezember ...

~Zeit vor Weihnachten; speziell die drei Sonntage im Dezember vor Weihnachten = 2., 3., und 4. Advent
1. - 21./22. Dezember
21./22. - 31. Dezember (20./21. März)
24.-26. Dezember; Weihnachten; und teilweise schon die "Weihnachtszeit" davor im Dezember
31. Dezember

Persönlich finde ich vor allem die zum Teil sehr aufwendigen Weihnachtskrippen (Category:Nativity scenes of North Rhine-Westphalia) in Kirchengebäuden interessant.

P.S. Die rot leuchtenden Kategorien bestehen in Nordrhein-Westfalen noch nicht, jedoch in anderen Bundesländern. Vielleicht kannst du sie mit geeigneten bestehenden oder neuen Bildern anlegen. Viele Grüße -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 13:38, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Einige der Kategorien nutze ich bereits. Allerdings lege ich selten Kategorien nur für eine einzelne Datei an. Und die Krippen sind sicherlich interessant, allerdings würde ich diese nicht ohne ausdrückliche Genehmigung. Sie sind in den Kirchen und da gilt das Hausrecht. Abgesehen davon sind sie im Januar erst vollständig bestückt. Für die anderen Kategorien mit Monat oder Land/Bundesland überlege ich, wie so etwas halbwegs automatisiert (per Skript) erkennen kann. Den Bedarf hätte ich wohl - und ich bin kein Fan von manuellen Tätigkeiten. Ich wünsche dir noch eine schöne Vorweihnachtszeit! --XRay 💬 14:22, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Nachtrag: Bei den aktuellen Temperaturen (-12/13° C):
Gruß -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 08:40, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Ich habe da mal hineingeschaut. In den Kategorien sind meine Bilder bis auf einen Fall bereits vertreten. Bei der Sucherei nach Kategorien findet man im Laufe der Jahre einige. --XRay 💬 08:50, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate --SHB2000 ([[User talk:SHB2000|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:56, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your information. :-) --XRay 💬 04:18, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-51

MediaWiki message delivery 23:57, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

eine Frage

Hallo XRay, viele Grüße erst mal!

Ich bin gerade die Category:Globes of the Moon am aufräumen, schreibe an einem Artikel zum Thema. In der Kategorie sind mir drei Bilder mit eher künsterlischen Objekten aufgefallen, z.B: dies. Der Ersteller des Fotos, Benutzer:Sergio Fabris, scheint auch der Schöpfer des Kunstwerkes zu sein. Wenn ich mir dessen Beiträge auf Commons anschaue, scheint er viele weitere derartige Objekte geschaffen und eingestellt zu haben. Das ist aber nicht so ganz der Sinn der Sache? Wie würdest du das einordnen?

Wünsche dir schon mal schöne Weihnachtstage! Coyote III ([[User talk:Coyote III|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:27, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

das hier ist wahrscheinlich die Webseite des Künstlers. --Coyote III ([[User talk:Coyote III|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:34, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Deinen Vermutungen würde ich durchaus folgen. Die Bilder sind hier aber eher schwierig, weil ihnen die Genehmigung fehlt. Er geht das Risiko ein, dass die Bilder gelöscht werden. Mindestens ein VTRS-Ticket mit Genehmigung sollte es geben. Ich bin mir nicht ganz sicher, aber er könnte sich auch als Urheberaccount zertifizieren lassen. Ich meine, so etwas mal gesehen zu haben. Die Kunstwerke werden oft erst einmal unter dem Künstlernamen kategorisiert - zum Beispiel Category:Jürgen Ebert. Das wäre hier wichtig. Danach kommt den passende Kategorien darunter: Category:Sculptures by Jürgen Ebert. Das ist zumindest der erste Schritt. Danach kommen dann die Wikidata-Einträge etc. Aber wie gesagt: Solange nichts belegt ist, dass der Urheber eine explizite Zustimmung gegeben hat, kommt irgendwann jemand und löscht die Bilder. --XRay 💬 09:45, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi, danke für deine Antwort. Meine Frage zielte auf was anderes ab: ich habe den Eindruck, dass der Künstler selber die Kunstwerke eingestellt hat. Kann das den jeder der meint, er habe Kunst geschaffen, auf Commons machen? Viele Grüße, --Coyote III ([[User talk:Coyote III|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:23, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Template:Ping Das ist eine andere Frage, stimmt. Wenn wir uns mal von dem Gedanken lösen, es sei eine Künstlerin oder ein Künstler: Jede:r kann Fotos von allen Dingen einstellen - im Grunde. Es gilt auf jeden Fall, den hier definierten Projektumfang einzuhalten: COM:SCOPE. Der Begriff "edukativ", der darin auftaucht, führt immer mal wieder zu Diskussionen. Manche sehen es viel zu eng, glauben aber, ganz fix mal einen Löschantrag stellen zu müssen. Tatsächlich ist der Begriff eher weiter zu fassen, sonst hätten wir Kategorien wie Category:Photo art nicht. Was definitiv unerwünscht ist, sind die Flut von Selbstdarstellungen und Partybildern, die man in den sozialen Medien findet. Für eigene Zwecke (User-Page) darf in geringem Umfang auch ein Selbstporträt hochgeladen werden. Und es gibt noch einen zweiten Aspekt: Das Foto muss legal entstanden sein. Dies bedingt, dass man sich u. U. schon mal eine Erlaubnis einholen muss (Stichwort: Urheberrecht der Künstlerin/des Künstlers und nicht vorhandene Panoramafreiheit - ein langwieriges Thema). Diese Erlaubnis wird dann hinterlegt (COM:VRTS) und auch beim Bild angegeben. Wenn wir dies alles wissen, kann ich deine Frage mit einem schlichten "ja" beantworten. Was Kunst ist und was nicht, ist ja ein ganz anderes und durchaus heikles Thema. Wenn das Bild dann augenscheinlich den Projektumfang nicht erfüllt und auch das VRTS-Ticket fehlt, wird's halt gelöscht - ggf. nach Diskussion. Da kann die Künstlerin/der Künstler mit Bildern eigener Kunstwerke auch schon mal ein Nachsehen haben. Falls irgendjemand in den abgebildeten Objekten auch ein Kunstwerk sieht und das VRTS-Ticket fehlt, dann kommt auch schon mal ein Löschantrag. --XRay 💬 09:19, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
OK, super, vielen Dank! Das hilft mir schon weiter. Grüße, --Coyote III ([[User talk:Coyote III|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:51, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays

Happy New Year!

Happy Holidays and Happy New Year, XRay!

The other day, I was having a conversation with someone about holiday cards and social media. It occurred to me that, in the years since I left Facebook, the site I use most to communicate with people I like isn't actually a social media site at all. If you're receiving this, it's pretty likely I've talked with you more recently than I have my distant relatives and college friends on FB, at very least, and we may have even collaborated on something useful. So here's a holiday "card", Wikimedia friend. :) Hope the next couple weeks bring some fun and/or rest. — Rhododendrites talk19:53, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Many, many thanks. All the best from me too. Let's all hope that the next year will be good and peaceful. --XRay 💬 06:12, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2022/2023!

  * Happy Holidays 2022/2023, BASEPAGENAME! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 00:46, 23 December 2022 (UTC)  

Template:-

Many, many thanks. All the best from me too. Fingers crossed that the next year will be better than the last, especially in your homeland. I am still at a loss for words because of all the injustice and suffering in the past year. I wish you and your family all the best. --XRay 💬 06:19, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2022/2023!

  * Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Dietmar! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohe Weihnachten! Glückliches Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- Johann Jaritz talk 10:00, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Vielen, lieben Dank. Auch von mir alles Gute! --XRay 💬 06:21, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Frohes Weihnachten!

  * Happy Holidays 2022/2023! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
  • Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku!

   -- Tournasol7 ([[User talk:Tournasol7|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:15, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Many, many thanks. All the best from me too. Let's look to the future with optimism. --XRay 💬 06:22, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Holidays 2022/2023!

User:Aristeas/Cards/Holidays 2022-2023

Vielen, lieben Dank! Auch dir alles Gute! Hoffen wir, dass das neue Jahr viel Gutes bringt. Es gibt genug Anlass, dies zu wünschen. --XRay 💬 06:25, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Holidays 2022/2023!

  * Happy Holidays 2022/2023, BASEPAGENAME! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

Happy Holidays and best wishes for 2023. Pierre André (talk) 11:31, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup, merci beaucoup. Je vous souhaite également bonne chance. Regardons l'avenir avec optimisme. (Malheureusement, je ne parle pas français, mais il y a une aide numérique sympathique). --XRay 💬 06:27, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

User:SHB2000/CC

Thank you very much. All the best from me too. Many greetings to the (from a European point of view) wintry warm Australia. It is always unusual to see Christmas pictures in the Australian summer. --XRay 💬 06:31, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
It does snow during December in places like Mount Kosciuszko, but yeah, a lot of people from the Northern Hemisphere always ask me what an Australian Christmas is like. Stay warm in North Rhine-Westphalia! SHB2000 ([[User talk:SHB2000|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:47, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

Template:POTDpromotion //EatchaBot ([[User talk:EatchaBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:01, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:00, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:11, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:11, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:00, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "XRay/Archive/2022".